Differential effects of two fluorescent probes on macrophage migration as assessed by manual and automated methods

Fluorescent probes have been utilized to label leukocytes for both in vivo and in vitro studies of cell migration; however, the effects of such probes on migration have not been determined. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of two commonly used fluorescent probes on leukocyte chemotax...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cytometry (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 1995-04, Vol.19 (4), p.366-369
Hauptverfasser: Denholm, Elizabeth M., Stankus, Gerald P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 369
container_issue 4
container_start_page 366
container_title Cytometry (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 19
creator Denholm, Elizabeth M.
Stankus, Gerald P.
description Fluorescent probes have been utilized to label leukocytes for both in vivo and in vitro studies of cell migration; however, the effects of such probes on migration have not been determined. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of two commonly used fluorescent probes on leukocyte chemotaxis. J774 macrophages were labeled with either calcein‐acetoxymethyl ester (calcein‐AM) or 2′,7′‐bis‐(2‐carboxyethyl)‐5‐(and‐6)‐carboxyfluorescein, acetomethyl ester (BCECF‐AM), then assayed for their ability to migrate to zymosan‐activated serum (ZAS). Cell migration was quantified by two methods: visual counting of cells and measuring cell fluorescence. Using the cell counts, commison of unlabeled and fluorescently labeled macrophages demonstrated that BCECF‐AM decreased the number of cells responding to ZAS, while cal‐n‐AM had essentially no effect. Neither probe significantly affected the number of cells migrating to medium alone. The inhibitory effects of BCECF‐AM on cell migration increased with probe concentration (0.1–1.0 μM) and cell fluorescence. Cell viability was unaffected by either probe. In contrast to the results obtained by visual counting, measuring fluorescence of migrated cells did not reveal a significant difference between the chemotactic response of macrophages labeled with BCECF‐AM and those labeled with calcein‐AM. These experiments indicated that fluorescent probes can affect the chemotactic response and that inhibitory activity of these probes may not be detected when chemotaxis is quantified solely by automated methods. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cyto.990190412
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77353360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77353360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2552-a7ead0e1d4bd69065f4595beeb9b4da653935471ae23ae0c319a99079296578e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1r3DAQxUVJSDdpr7kVdMrNm5FlSdWxbPMFgVzSQ09mbI8TB9vaSjJh__tO2CU5BgYk3nv6oXlCnCtYK4Dyst3lsPYelIdKlV_ESoF3BegSjsSKVVtUzuqv4jSlFwDwttIn4sQ5bx2UKxF_D31PkeY84CiJ721OMvQyvwbZj0uIlFp25TaGhtiZ5YRtDNtnfCI5DU8R88AiJp5EPJ1sdpyZF-bh3Elccpgwsz5Rfg5d-iaOexwTfT-cZ-LP9dXj5ra4f7i52_y6L9rSmLJAR9gBqa5qOuvBmr4y3jREjW-qDq3RXpvKKaRSI0GrlUfuwfnSW-N-kj4TF3suf_3fQinX08C7jCPOFJZUO6eN1hY4uN4Hea-UIvX1Ng4Txl2toH4ruX4ruX4vmR_8OJCXZqLuPX5olX2_91-HkXaf0OrN38eHD_Z_502LdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77353360</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential effects of two fluorescent probes on macrophage migration as assessed by manual and automated methods</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Denholm, Elizabeth M. ; Stankus, Gerald P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Denholm, Elizabeth M. ; Stankus, Gerald P.</creatorcontrib><description>Fluorescent probes have been utilized to label leukocytes for both in vivo and in vitro studies of cell migration; however, the effects of such probes on migration have not been determined. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of two commonly used fluorescent probes on leukocyte chemotaxis. J774 macrophages were labeled with either calcein‐acetoxymethyl ester (calcein‐AM) or 2′,7′‐bis‐(2‐carboxyethyl)‐5‐(and‐6)‐carboxyfluorescein, acetomethyl ester (BCECF‐AM), then assayed for their ability to migrate to zymosan‐activated serum (ZAS). Cell migration was quantified by two methods: visual counting of cells and measuring cell fluorescence. Using the cell counts, commison of unlabeled and fluorescently labeled macrophages demonstrated that BCECF‐AM decreased the number of cells responding to ZAS, while cal‐n‐AM had essentially no effect. Neither probe significantly affected the number of cells migrating to medium alone. The inhibitory effects of BCECF‐AM on cell migration increased with probe concentration (0.1–1.0 μM) and cell fluorescence. Cell viability was unaffected by either probe. In contrast to the results obtained by visual counting, measuring fluorescence of migrated cells did not reveal a significant difference between the chemotactic response of macrophages labeled with BCECF‐AM and those labeled with calcein‐AM. These experiments indicated that fluorescent probes can affect the chemotactic response and that inhibitory activity of these probes may not be detected when chemotaxis is quantified solely by automated methods. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-4763</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cyto.990190412</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7796702</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Animals ; assay ; BCECF‐AM ; calcein‐AM ; Cell Count - methods ; Cell Line ; Cell Movement ; chemotaxis ; Chemotaxis - drug effects ; Flow Cytometry - methods ; Fluoresceins - pharmacology ; J774 ; Macrophages - drug effects ; Macrophages - physiology ; methods ; Mice</subject><ispartof>Cytometry (New York, N.Y.), 1995-04, Vol.19 (4), p.366-369</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2552-a7ead0e1d4bd69065f4595beeb9b4da653935471ae23ae0c319a99079296578e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2552-a7ead0e1d4bd69065f4595beeb9b4da653935471ae23ae0c319a99079296578e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7796702$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Denholm, Elizabeth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stankus, Gerald P.</creatorcontrib><title>Differential effects of two fluorescent probes on macrophage migration as assessed by manual and automated methods</title><title>Cytometry (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Cytometry</addtitle><description>Fluorescent probes have been utilized to label leukocytes for both in vivo and in vitro studies of cell migration; however, the effects of such probes on migration have not been determined. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of two commonly used fluorescent probes on leukocyte chemotaxis. J774 macrophages were labeled with either calcein‐acetoxymethyl ester (calcein‐AM) or 2′,7′‐bis‐(2‐carboxyethyl)‐5‐(and‐6)‐carboxyfluorescein, acetomethyl ester (BCECF‐AM), then assayed for their ability to migrate to zymosan‐activated serum (ZAS). Cell migration was quantified by two methods: visual counting of cells and measuring cell fluorescence. Using the cell counts, commison of unlabeled and fluorescently labeled macrophages demonstrated that BCECF‐AM decreased the number of cells responding to ZAS, while cal‐n‐AM had essentially no effect. Neither probe significantly affected the number of cells migrating to medium alone. The inhibitory effects of BCECF‐AM on cell migration increased with probe concentration (0.1–1.0 μM) and cell fluorescence. Cell viability was unaffected by either probe. In contrast to the results obtained by visual counting, measuring fluorescence of migrated cells did not reveal a significant difference between the chemotactic response of macrophages labeled with BCECF‐AM and those labeled with calcein‐AM. These experiments indicated that fluorescent probes can affect the chemotactic response and that inhibitory activity of these probes may not be detected when chemotaxis is quantified solely by automated methods. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>assay</subject><subject>BCECF‐AM</subject><subject>calcein‐AM</subject><subject>Cell Count - methods</subject><subject>Cell Line</subject><subject>Cell Movement</subject><subject>chemotaxis</subject><subject>Chemotaxis - drug effects</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry - methods</subject><subject>Fluoresceins - pharmacology</subject><subject>J774</subject><subject>Macrophages - drug effects</subject><subject>Macrophages - physiology</subject><subject>methods</subject><subject>Mice</subject><issn>0196-4763</issn><issn>1097-0320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1r3DAQxUVJSDdpr7kVdMrNm5FlSdWxbPMFgVzSQ09mbI8TB9vaSjJh__tO2CU5BgYk3nv6oXlCnCtYK4Dyst3lsPYelIdKlV_ESoF3BegSjsSKVVtUzuqv4jSlFwDwttIn4sQ5bx2UKxF_D31PkeY84CiJ721OMvQyvwbZj0uIlFp25TaGhtiZ5YRtDNtnfCI5DU8R88AiJp5EPJ1sdpyZF-bh3Elccpgwsz5Rfg5d-iaOexwTfT-cZ-LP9dXj5ra4f7i52_y6L9rSmLJAR9gBqa5qOuvBmr4y3jREjW-qDq3RXpvKKaRSI0GrlUfuwfnSW-N-kj4TF3suf_3fQinX08C7jCPOFJZUO6eN1hY4uN4Hea-UIvX1Ng4Txl2toH4ruX4ruX4vmR_8OJCXZqLuPX5olX2_91-HkXaf0OrN38eHD_Z_502LdA</recordid><startdate>19950401</startdate><enddate>19950401</enddate><creator>Denholm, Elizabeth M.</creator><creator>Stankus, Gerald P.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950401</creationdate><title>Differential effects of two fluorescent probes on macrophage migration as assessed by manual and automated methods</title><author>Denholm, Elizabeth M. ; Stankus, Gerald P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2552-a7ead0e1d4bd69065f4595beeb9b4da653935471ae23ae0c319a99079296578e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>assay</topic><topic>BCECF‐AM</topic><topic>calcein‐AM</topic><topic>Cell Count - methods</topic><topic>Cell Line</topic><topic>Cell Movement</topic><topic>chemotaxis</topic><topic>Chemotaxis - drug effects</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry - methods</topic><topic>Fluoresceins - pharmacology</topic><topic>J774</topic><topic>Macrophages - drug effects</topic><topic>Macrophages - physiology</topic><topic>methods</topic><topic>Mice</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Denholm, Elizabeth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stankus, Gerald P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cytometry (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Denholm, Elizabeth M.</au><au>Stankus, Gerald P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential effects of two fluorescent probes on macrophage migration as assessed by manual and automated methods</atitle><jtitle>Cytometry (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Cytometry</addtitle><date>1995-04-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>366</spage><epage>369</epage><pages>366-369</pages><issn>0196-4763</issn><eissn>1097-0320</eissn><abstract>Fluorescent probes have been utilized to label leukocytes for both in vivo and in vitro studies of cell migration; however, the effects of such probes on migration have not been determined. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of two commonly used fluorescent probes on leukocyte chemotaxis. J774 macrophages were labeled with either calcein‐acetoxymethyl ester (calcein‐AM) or 2′,7′‐bis‐(2‐carboxyethyl)‐5‐(and‐6)‐carboxyfluorescein, acetomethyl ester (BCECF‐AM), then assayed for their ability to migrate to zymosan‐activated serum (ZAS). Cell migration was quantified by two methods: visual counting of cells and measuring cell fluorescence. Using the cell counts, commison of unlabeled and fluorescently labeled macrophages demonstrated that BCECF‐AM decreased the number of cells responding to ZAS, while cal‐n‐AM had essentially no effect. Neither probe significantly affected the number of cells migrating to medium alone. The inhibitory effects of BCECF‐AM on cell migration increased with probe concentration (0.1–1.0 μM) and cell fluorescence. Cell viability was unaffected by either probe. In contrast to the results obtained by visual counting, measuring fluorescence of migrated cells did not reveal a significant difference between the chemotactic response of macrophages labeled with BCECF‐AM and those labeled with calcein‐AM. These experiments indicated that fluorescent probes can affect the chemotactic response and that inhibitory activity of these probes may not be detected when chemotaxis is quantified solely by automated methods. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>7796702</pmid><doi>10.1002/cyto.990190412</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-4763
ispartof Cytometry (New York, N.Y.), 1995-04, Vol.19 (4), p.366-369
issn 0196-4763
1097-0320
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77353360
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
assay
BCECF‐AM
calcein‐AM
Cell Count - methods
Cell Line
Cell Movement
chemotaxis
Chemotaxis - drug effects
Flow Cytometry - methods
Fluoresceins - pharmacology
J774
Macrophages - drug effects
Macrophages - physiology
methods
Mice
title Differential effects of two fluorescent probes on macrophage migration as assessed by manual and automated methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T23%3A48%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20effects%20of%20two%20fluorescent%20probes%20on%20macrophage%20migration%20as%20assessed%20by%20manual%20and%20automated%20methods&rft.jtitle=Cytometry%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Denholm,%20Elizabeth%20M.&rft.date=1995-04-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=366&rft.epage=369&rft.pages=366-369&rft.issn=0196-4763&rft.eissn=1097-0320&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cyto.990190412&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77353360%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77353360&rft_id=info:pmid/7796702&rfr_iscdi=true