Human eye movement response to z-axis linear acceleration : the effect of varying the phase relationships between visual and vestibular inputs
We investigated the effect of systematically varying the phase relationship between 0.5-Hz sinusoidal z-axis optokinetic (OKN) and linear acceleration stimuli upon the resulting vertical eye movement responses of five humans. Subjects lay supine on a linear sled which accelerated them sinusoidally a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental brain research 1995-03, Vol.103 (2), p.256-266 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 266 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 256 |
container_title | Experimental brain research |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | LATHAN, C. E WALL, C. III HARRIS, L. R |
description | We investigated the effect of systematically varying the phase relationship between 0.5-Hz sinusoidal z-axis optokinetic (OKN) and linear acceleration stimuli upon the resulting vertical eye movement responses of five humans. Subjects lay supine on a linear sled which accelerated them sinusoidally along their z-axis at 0.4 g peak acceleration (peak velocity 1.25 m/s). A high-contrast, striped z-axis OKN stimulus moving sinusoidally at 0.5 Hz, 70 degrees/s peak velocity was presented either concurrently or with the acceleration stimulus or alone. Subjects' vertical eye movements were recorded using scleral search coils. When stimuli were paired in the naturally occurring relationship (e.g., visual stripes moving upward paired with downward physical acceleration), the response was enhanced over the response to the visual stimulus presented alone. When the stimuli were opposed (e.g., visual stripes moving upward during upward physical acceleration, a combination that does not occur naturally), the response was not significantly different from the response to the visual stimulus presented alone. Enhancement was maximized when the velocities of the visual and motion stimuli were in their normal phase relationship, while the response took intermediate values for other phase relationships. The phase of the response depended upon the phase difference between the two inputs. We suggest that linear self-motion processing looks at agreement between the two stimuli-a sensory conflict model. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF00231712 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77346568</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16758010</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-8adddd845fe3af1c2f9b10b5dd136cd4f387ac33bce045706bf110435ee405e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFP3DAQhS1UBFvKpfdKPlQcKqW1M06c5QaolEpIvbTnyHHGXVeJEzzOUvgR_OYaWMGxc7HG7_PTeB5j76X4LIXQX84vhShBalnusZVUUBZSivoNWwkhVaEauT5kb4n-PLagxQE70LpZK4AVe7haRhM43iEfpy2OGBKPSPMUCHma-H1h_nrigw9oIjfW4oDRJD8FfsrTBjk6hzbxyfGtiXc-_H66nTcmv484PKG08TPxDtMtYuBbT4sZuAk93yIl3y1DtvZhXhK9Y_vODITHu_OI_br8-vPiqrj-8e37xdl1YUGVqWhMn6tRlUMwTtrSrTspuqrvJdS2Vw4abSxAZ1GoSou6c3kjCipEJSoEOGInz75znG6WPEU7esp_G0zAaaFWa1B1VTf_BWWtq0ZIkcFPz6CNE1FE187Rj3klrRTtY0rta0oZ_rBzXboR-xd0F0vWP-50Q9YMLppgPb1goLRoKgn_AIWem-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16758010</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human eye movement response to z-axis linear acceleration : the effect of varying the phase relationships between visual and vestibular inputs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>LATHAN, C. E ; WALL, C. III ; HARRIS, L. R</creator><creatorcontrib>LATHAN, C. E ; WALL, C. III ; HARRIS, L. R</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated the effect of systematically varying the phase relationship between 0.5-Hz sinusoidal z-axis optokinetic (OKN) and linear acceleration stimuli upon the resulting vertical eye movement responses of five humans. Subjects lay supine on a linear sled which accelerated them sinusoidally along their z-axis at 0.4 g peak acceleration (peak velocity 1.25 m/s). A high-contrast, striped z-axis OKN stimulus moving sinusoidally at 0.5 Hz, 70 degrees/s peak velocity was presented either concurrently or with the acceleration stimulus or alone. Subjects' vertical eye movements were recorded using scleral search coils. When stimuli were paired in the naturally occurring relationship (e.g., visual stripes moving upward paired with downward physical acceleration), the response was enhanced over the response to the visual stimulus presented alone. When the stimuli were opposed (e.g., visual stripes moving upward during upward physical acceleration, a combination that does not occur naturally), the response was not significantly different from the response to the visual stimulus presented alone. Enhancement was maximized when the velocities of the visual and motion stimuli were in their normal phase relationship, while the response took intermediate values for other phase relationships. The phase of the response depended upon the phase difference between the two inputs. We suggest that linear self-motion processing looks at agreement between the two stimuli-a sensory conflict model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4819</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00231712</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7789433</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EXBRAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Eye Movements ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration ; Nystagmus, Optokinetic ; Photic Stimulation ; Space life sciences ; Time Factors ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs ; Vestibule, Labyrinth - physiology ; Visual Pathways - physiology</subject><ispartof>Experimental brain research, 1995-03, Vol.103 (2), p.256-266</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-8adddd845fe3af1c2f9b10b5dd136cd4f387ac33bce045706bf110435ee405e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-8adddd845fe3af1c2f9b10b5dd136cd4f387ac33bce045706bf110435ee405e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3470851$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7789433$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LATHAN, C. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WALL, C. III</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARRIS, L. R</creatorcontrib><title>Human eye movement response to z-axis linear acceleration : the effect of varying the phase relationships between visual and vestibular inputs</title><title>Experimental brain research</title><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><description>We investigated the effect of systematically varying the phase relationship between 0.5-Hz sinusoidal z-axis optokinetic (OKN) and linear acceleration stimuli upon the resulting vertical eye movement responses of five humans. Subjects lay supine on a linear sled which accelerated them sinusoidally along their z-axis at 0.4 g peak acceleration (peak velocity 1.25 m/s). A high-contrast, striped z-axis OKN stimulus moving sinusoidally at 0.5 Hz, 70 degrees/s peak velocity was presented either concurrently or with the acceleration stimulus or alone. Subjects' vertical eye movements were recorded using scleral search coils. When stimuli were paired in the naturally occurring relationship (e.g., visual stripes moving upward paired with downward physical acceleration), the response was enhanced over the response to the visual stimulus presented alone. When the stimuli were opposed (e.g., visual stripes moving upward during upward physical acceleration, a combination that does not occur naturally), the response was not significantly different from the response to the visual stimulus presented alone. Enhancement was maximized when the velocities of the visual and motion stimuli were in their normal phase relationship, while the response took intermediate values for other phase relationships. The phase of the response depended upon the phase difference between the two inputs. We suggest that linear self-motion processing looks at agreement between the two stimuli-a sensory conflict model.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration</subject><subject>Nystagmus, Optokinetic</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><subject>Vestibule, Labyrinth - physiology</subject><subject>Visual Pathways - physiology</subject><issn>0014-4819</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFP3DAQhS1UBFvKpfdKPlQcKqW1M06c5QaolEpIvbTnyHHGXVeJEzzOUvgR_OYaWMGxc7HG7_PTeB5j76X4LIXQX84vhShBalnusZVUUBZSivoNWwkhVaEauT5kb4n-PLagxQE70LpZK4AVe7haRhM43iEfpy2OGBKPSPMUCHma-H1h_nrigw9oIjfW4oDRJD8FfsrTBjk6hzbxyfGtiXc-_H66nTcmv484PKG08TPxDtMtYuBbT4sZuAk93yIl3y1DtvZhXhK9Y_vODITHu_OI_br8-vPiqrj-8e37xdl1YUGVqWhMn6tRlUMwTtrSrTspuqrvJdS2Vw4abSxAZ1GoSou6c3kjCipEJSoEOGInz75znG6WPEU7esp_G0zAaaFWa1B1VTf_BWWtq0ZIkcFPz6CNE1FE187Rj3klrRTtY0rta0oZ_rBzXboR-xd0F0vWP-50Q9YMLppgPb1goLRoKgn_AIWem-Q</recordid><startdate>19950301</startdate><enddate>19950301</enddate><creator>LATHAN, C. E</creator><creator>WALL, C. III</creator><creator>HARRIS, L. R</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950301</creationdate><title>Human eye movement response to z-axis linear acceleration : the effect of varying the phase relationships between visual and vestibular inputs</title><author>LATHAN, C. E ; WALL, C. III ; HARRIS, L. R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-8adddd845fe3af1c2f9b10b5dd136cd4f387ac33bce045706bf110435ee405e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration</topic><topic>Nystagmus, Optokinetic</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><topic>Vestibule, Labyrinth - physiology</topic><topic>Visual Pathways - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LATHAN, C. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WALL, C. III</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARRIS, L. R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LATHAN, C. E</au><au>WALL, C. III</au><au>HARRIS, L. R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human eye movement response to z-axis linear acceleration : the effect of varying the phase relationships between visual and vestibular inputs</atitle><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><date>1995-03-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>256</spage><epage>266</epage><pages>256-266</pages><issn>0014-4819</issn><eissn>1432-1106</eissn><coden>EXBRAP</coden><abstract>We investigated the effect of systematically varying the phase relationship between 0.5-Hz sinusoidal z-axis optokinetic (OKN) and linear acceleration stimuli upon the resulting vertical eye movement responses of five humans. Subjects lay supine on a linear sled which accelerated them sinusoidally along their z-axis at 0.4 g peak acceleration (peak velocity 1.25 m/s). A high-contrast, striped z-axis OKN stimulus moving sinusoidally at 0.5 Hz, 70 degrees/s peak velocity was presented either concurrently or with the acceleration stimulus or alone. Subjects' vertical eye movements were recorded using scleral search coils. When stimuli were paired in the naturally occurring relationship (e.g., visual stripes moving upward paired with downward physical acceleration), the response was enhanced over the response to the visual stimulus presented alone. When the stimuli were opposed (e.g., visual stripes moving upward during upward physical acceleration, a combination that does not occur naturally), the response was not significantly different from the response to the visual stimulus presented alone. Enhancement was maximized when the velocities of the visual and motion stimuli were in their normal phase relationship, while the response took intermediate values for other phase relationships. The phase of the response depended upon the phase difference between the two inputs. We suggest that linear self-motion processing looks at agreement between the two stimuli-a sensory conflict model.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>7789433</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF00231712</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-4819 |
ispartof | Experimental brain research, 1995-03, Vol.103 (2), p.256-266 |
issn | 0014-4819 1432-1106 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77346568 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Eye Movements Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Male Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration Nystagmus, Optokinetic Photic Stimulation Space life sciences Time Factors Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs Vestibule, Labyrinth - physiology Visual Pathways - physiology |
title | Human eye movement response to z-axis linear acceleration : the effect of varying the phase relationships between visual and vestibular inputs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T14%3A35%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20eye%20movement%20response%20to%20z-axis%20linear%20acceleration%20:%20the%20effect%20of%20varying%20the%20phase%20relationships%20between%20visual%20and%20vestibular%20inputs&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20brain%20research&rft.au=LATHAN,%20C.%20E&rft.date=1995-03-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=256&rft.epage=266&rft.pages=256-266&rft.issn=0014-4819&rft.eissn=1432-1106&rft.coden=EXBRAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00231712&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16758010%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16758010&rft_id=info:pmid/7789433&rfr_iscdi=true |