The effect of administration method: A comparison of the Rapaport and Exner Rorschach systems

This study compared two Rorschach administration methods across a number of test variables. With a within‐subjects, counter‐balanced design, 20 female subjects randomly received either an initial Rapaport (Rapaport, Gill, & Schafer, 1968) or an Exner (Exner, 1974, 1986) Rorschach administration....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical psychology 1995-01, Vol.51 (1), p.100-107
Hauptverfasser: Blais, Mark A., Norman, Dennis K., Quintar, Bady, Herzog, David B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study compared two Rorschach administration methods across a number of test variables. With a within‐subjects, counter‐balanced design, 20 female subjects randomly received either an initial Rapaport (Rapaport, Gill, & Schafer, 1968) or an Exner (Exner, 1974, 1986) Rorschach administration. Results showed that the Exner administration produced significantly more Color (C), Shading (Shd), and Blend (B) responses than did the Rapaport administration. Intersystem differences were most prominent on the first presentation of the two administrations. The first Exner administration produced significantly more C, Shd, and Blend responses than did the first Rapaport administration. Findings are discussed in light of their clinical implications, limitations in the experimental design, and suggestions for improving future research.
ISSN:0021-9762
1097-4679
DOI:10.1002/1097-4679(199501)51:1<100::AID-JCLP2270510116>3.0.CO;2-A