Pseudophakic Retinal Detachments in the Presence of Various IOL Types
A series of 600 pseudophakic retinal detachments in 578 patients undergoing surgical repair between 1974 and 1984 was reviewed. Patients with previous retinal surgery of less than six months follow-up, were excluded. The series included 395 iris-fixated (IF) lenses, 130 anterior chamber (AC) lenses,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN) MN), 1986-09, Vol.93 (9), p.1198-1208 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1208 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1198 |
container_title | Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN) |
container_volume | 93 |
creator | Cousins, Scott Boniuk, Isaac Okun, Edward Johnston, Glen P. Arribas, Neva P. Escoffery, Richard F. Burgess, Dean B. Grand, M. Gilbert Olk, R. Joseph Schoch, Lawrence H. |
description | A series of 600 pseudophakic retinal detachments in 578 patients undergoing surgical repair between 1974 and 1984 was reviewed. Patients with previous retinal surgery of less than six months follow-up, were excluded. The series included 395 iris-fixated (IF) lenses, 130 anterior chamber (AC) lenses, and 75 posterior chamber (PC) lenses. The overall success rate for retinal detachment was 88% but was Significantly better in the PC lens group and significantly worse in the AC lens group. Forty-one percent of all cases achieved 20/40 visual acuity or better, although the AC lens group did worse (28%), while the PC lens group did significantly better (48%). Risk factors that were predictive of failure also were identified. Many of these factors occurred more frequently in the AC lens group and probably are related to the overall worse outcome in eyes with AC lens implants. The implications of these results for retinal and cataract surgeons are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0161-6420(86)33596-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77258762</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0161642086335966</els_id><sourcerecordid>77258762</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-de9e37949e424d4ca5e17fd2bdb3f13cdfa7188c850ee797a52eaf3bb555f6f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotVZ_QiEHET2sJpvNx55E_IaC4tc1ZJMJjW53a7IV-u_d2tKrl5nDPDPz8iA0puScEiouXvtCM1Hk5FSJM8Z4KTKxg4aUF2VWSMp20XCL7KODlD4JIUKwYoAGTBElGBmi2-cEC9fOp-YrWPwCXWhMjW-gM3Y6g6ZLODS4mwJ-jpCgsYBbjz9MDO0i4cenCX5bziEdoj1v6gRHmz5C73e3b9cP2eTp_vH6apJZpsouc1ACk2VRQpEXrrCGA5Xe5ZWrmKfMOm8kVcoqTgBkKQ3PwXhWVZxzL7xiI3SyvjuP7fcCUqdnIVmoa9NAH0hLmXMlRd6DfA3a2KYUwet5DDMTl5oSvdKn__TplRuthP7Tp0W_N948WFQzcNutja9-fryZm2RN7aNpbEhbTJZEKiJ77HKNQS_jJ0DUyYaVPRci2E67NvwT5BfXkovn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77258762</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pseudophakic Retinal Detachments in the Presence of Various IOL Types</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Cousins, Scott ; Boniuk, Isaac ; Okun, Edward ; Johnston, Glen P. ; Arribas, Neva P. ; Escoffery, Richard F. ; Burgess, Dean B. ; Grand, M. Gilbert ; Olk, R. Joseph ; Schoch, Lawrence H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cousins, Scott ; Boniuk, Isaac ; Okun, Edward ; Johnston, Glen P. ; Arribas, Neva P. ; Escoffery, Richard F. ; Burgess, Dean B. ; Grand, M. Gilbert ; Olk, R. Joseph ; Schoch, Lawrence H.</creatorcontrib><description>A series of 600 pseudophakic retinal detachments in 578 patients undergoing surgical repair between 1974 and 1984 was reviewed. Patients with previous retinal surgery of less than six months follow-up, were excluded. The series included 395 iris-fixated (IF) lenses, 130 anterior chamber (AC) lenses, and 75 posterior chamber (PC) lenses. The overall success rate for retinal detachment was 88% but was Significantly better in the PC lens group and significantly worse in the AC lens group. Forty-one percent of all cases achieved 20/40 visual acuity or better, although the AC lens group did worse (28%), while the PC lens group did significantly better (48%). Risk factors that were predictive of failure also were identified. Many of these factors occurred more frequently in the AC lens group and probably are related to the overall worse outcome in eyes with AC lens implants. The implications of these results for retinal and cataract surgeons are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-6420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-4713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(86)33596-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3808630</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OPHTDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; cataract surgery ; Humans ; intraocular lens implants ; Lenses, Intraocular - adverse effects ; Lenses, Intraocular - classification ; Medical sciences ; Ophthalmology ; Postoperative Complications ; pseudophakic retinal detachment ; Retinal Detachment - etiology ; Retinal Detachment - pathology ; Retinal Detachment - physiopathology ; Retinal Detachment - surgery ; Retinal Diseases - etiology ; Retinopathies ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk ; Vision, Ocular</subject><ispartof>Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN), 1986-09, Vol.93 (9), p.1198-1208</ispartof><rights>1986 American Academy of Ophthalmology, Inc</rights><rights>1987 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-de9e37949e424d4ca5e17fd2bdb3f13cdfa7188c850ee797a52eaf3bb555f6f83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-de9e37949e424d4ca5e17fd2bdb3f13cdfa7188c850ee797a52eaf3bb555f6f83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(86)33596-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=7907807$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3808630$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cousins, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boniuk, Isaac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okun, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Glen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arribas, Neva P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escoffery, Richard F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Dean B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grand, M. Gilbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olk, R. Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoch, Lawrence H.</creatorcontrib><title>Pseudophakic Retinal Detachments in the Presence of Various IOL Types</title><title>Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN)</title><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><description>A series of 600 pseudophakic retinal detachments in 578 patients undergoing surgical repair between 1974 and 1984 was reviewed. Patients with previous retinal surgery of less than six months follow-up, were excluded. The series included 395 iris-fixated (IF) lenses, 130 anterior chamber (AC) lenses, and 75 posterior chamber (PC) lenses. The overall success rate for retinal detachment was 88% but was Significantly better in the PC lens group and significantly worse in the AC lens group. Forty-one percent of all cases achieved 20/40 visual acuity or better, although the AC lens group did worse (28%), while the PC lens group did significantly better (48%). Risk factors that were predictive of failure also were identified. Many of these factors occurred more frequently in the AC lens group and probably are related to the overall worse outcome in eyes with AC lens implants. The implications of these results for retinal and cataract surgeons are discussed.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>cataract surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intraocular lens implants</subject><subject>Lenses, Intraocular - adverse effects</subject><subject>Lenses, Intraocular - classification</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>pseudophakic retinal detachment</subject><subject>Retinal Detachment - etiology</subject><subject>Retinal Detachment - pathology</subject><subject>Retinal Detachment - physiopathology</subject><subject>Retinal Detachment - surgery</subject><subject>Retinal Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Retinopathies</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Vision, Ocular</subject><issn>0161-6420</issn><issn>1549-4713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotVZ_QiEHET2sJpvNx55E_IaC4tc1ZJMJjW53a7IV-u_d2tKrl5nDPDPz8iA0puScEiouXvtCM1Hk5FSJM8Z4KTKxg4aUF2VWSMp20XCL7KODlD4JIUKwYoAGTBElGBmi2-cEC9fOp-YrWPwCXWhMjW-gM3Y6g6ZLODS4mwJ-jpCgsYBbjz9MDO0i4cenCX5bziEdoj1v6gRHmz5C73e3b9cP2eTp_vH6apJZpsouc1ACk2VRQpEXrrCGA5Xe5ZWrmKfMOm8kVcoqTgBkKQ3PwXhWVZxzL7xiI3SyvjuP7fcCUqdnIVmoa9NAH0hLmXMlRd6DfA3a2KYUwet5DDMTl5oSvdKn__TplRuthP7Tp0W_N948WFQzcNutja9-fryZm2RN7aNpbEhbTJZEKiJ77HKNQS_jJ0DUyYaVPRci2E67NvwT5BfXkovn</recordid><startdate>19860901</startdate><enddate>19860901</enddate><creator>Cousins, Scott</creator><creator>Boniuk, Isaac</creator><creator>Okun, Edward</creator><creator>Johnston, Glen P.</creator><creator>Arribas, Neva P.</creator><creator>Escoffery, Richard F.</creator><creator>Burgess, Dean B.</creator><creator>Grand, M. Gilbert</creator><creator>Olk, R. Joseph</creator><creator>Schoch, Lawrence H.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19860901</creationdate><title>Pseudophakic Retinal Detachments in the Presence of Various IOL Types</title><author>Cousins, Scott ; Boniuk, Isaac ; Okun, Edward ; Johnston, Glen P. ; Arribas, Neva P. ; Escoffery, Richard F. ; Burgess, Dean B. ; Grand, M. Gilbert ; Olk, R. Joseph ; Schoch, Lawrence H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-de9e37949e424d4ca5e17fd2bdb3f13cdfa7188c850ee797a52eaf3bb555f6f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>cataract surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intraocular lens implants</topic><topic>Lenses, Intraocular - adverse effects</topic><topic>Lenses, Intraocular - classification</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>pseudophakic retinal detachment</topic><topic>Retinal Detachment - etiology</topic><topic>Retinal Detachment - pathology</topic><topic>Retinal Detachment - physiopathology</topic><topic>Retinal Detachment - surgery</topic><topic>Retinal Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Retinopathies</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Vision, Ocular</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cousins, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boniuk, Isaac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okun, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Glen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arribas, Neva P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escoffery, Richard F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Dean B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grand, M. Gilbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olk, R. Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoch, Lawrence H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cousins, Scott</au><au>Boniuk, Isaac</au><au>Okun, Edward</au><au>Johnston, Glen P.</au><au>Arribas, Neva P.</au><au>Escoffery, Richard F.</au><au>Burgess, Dean B.</au><au>Grand, M. Gilbert</au><au>Olk, R. Joseph</au><au>Schoch, Lawrence H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pseudophakic Retinal Detachments in the Presence of Various IOL Types</atitle><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN)</jtitle><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><date>1986-09-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1198</spage><epage>1208</epage><pages>1198-1208</pages><issn>0161-6420</issn><eissn>1549-4713</eissn><coden>OPHTDG</coden><abstract>A series of 600 pseudophakic retinal detachments in 578 patients undergoing surgical repair between 1974 and 1984 was reviewed. Patients with previous retinal surgery of less than six months follow-up, were excluded. The series included 395 iris-fixated (IF) lenses, 130 anterior chamber (AC) lenses, and 75 posterior chamber (PC) lenses. The overall success rate for retinal detachment was 88% but was Significantly better in the PC lens group and significantly worse in the AC lens group. Forty-one percent of all cases achieved 20/40 visual acuity or better, although the AC lens group did worse (28%), while the PC lens group did significantly better (48%). Risk factors that were predictive of failure also were identified. Many of these factors occurred more frequently in the AC lens group and probably are related to the overall worse outcome in eyes with AC lens implants. The implications of these results for retinal and cataract surgeons are discussed.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>3808630</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0161-6420(86)33596-6</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0161-6420 |
ispartof | Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN), 1986-09, Vol.93 (9), p.1198-1208 |
issn | 0161-6420 1549-4713 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77258762 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences cataract surgery Humans intraocular lens implants Lenses, Intraocular - adverse effects Lenses, Intraocular - classification Medical sciences Ophthalmology Postoperative Complications pseudophakic retinal detachment Retinal Detachment - etiology Retinal Detachment - pathology Retinal Detachment - physiopathology Retinal Detachment - surgery Retinal Diseases - etiology Retinopathies Retrospective Studies Risk Vision, Ocular |
title | Pseudophakic Retinal Detachments in the Presence of Various IOL Types |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T06%3A52%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pseudophakic%20Retinal%20Detachments%20in%20the%20Presence%20of%20Various%20IOL%20Types&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology%20(Rochester,%20MN)&rft.au=Cousins,%20Scott&rft.date=1986-09-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1198&rft.epage=1208&rft.pages=1198-1208&rft.issn=0161-6420&rft.eissn=1549-4713&rft.coden=OPHTDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0161-6420(86)33596-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77258762%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77258762&rft_id=info:pmid/3808630&rft_els_id=S0161642086335966&rfr_iscdi=true |