Long-term results of proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic disorders

We reviewed retrospectively 50 consecutive total hip arthroplasties with proximal femoral replacement prostheses in 49 patients. All the patients had massive bone loss. There were 31 women and 18 men who had undergone a mean of 3.1 hip operations. At the last review, 15 patients had died and two had...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume 1995-05, Vol.77 (3), p.351-356
Hauptverfasser: MALKANI, A. L, SETTECERRI, J. J, SIM, F. H, CHAO, E. Y. S, WALLRICHS, S. L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 356
container_issue 3
container_start_page 351
container_title Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume
container_volume 77
creator MALKANI, A. L
SETTECERRI, J. J
SIM, F. H
CHAO, E. Y. S
WALLRICHS, S. L
description We reviewed retrospectively 50 consecutive total hip arthroplasties with proximal femoral replacement prostheses in 49 patients. All the patients had massive bone loss. There were 31 women and 18 men who had undergone a mean of 3.1 hip operations. At the last review, 15 patients had died and two had been lost to follow-up, so that 32 patients (33 hips) were available for assessment. The mean age of the patients at the time of the operation was 60.6 years. The mean length of clinical follow-up was 11.1 +/- 4 years, and mean radiographic follow-up was 7.6 +/- 3.2 years. The average preoperative Harris hip score was 46 +/- 13 points, which improved to 80 +/- 10 points after one year and to 76 +/- 16 points at the latest follow-up. The most frequent complication was dislocation, which occurred in 11 hips. Four femoral components and seven acetabular prostheses were revised because of aseptic loosening. With revision at the end point, survivorship after total hip arthroplasty with a proximal femoral replacement prosthesis was predicted to be 64% at 12 years. Although our preliminary results of hip salvage with a proximal femoral replacement prosthesis were encouraging, a longer follow-up has shown a higher rate of failure.
doi_str_mv 10.1302/0301-620x.77b3.7744913
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77257713</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77257713</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3513-460966cedd479014befda3515ebbab6af8a32308dea99a02365b8b770055136c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkF1LwzAUhoMoc05_gtIL8a4z6Uma9VKHXzD0RsG7kKQnUmmbmXQw_70Zq3qTA3mf93y8hFwwOmdAi2sKlOVlQbdzKQ2kh_OKwQGZFpTzXICUh2T6C70fk5MYPymlXAiYkMmIT8nzyvcf-YChywLGTTvEzLtsHfy26XSbOex8SDXgutUWO-yHzPmQ9b7Pe_TpMw6Nzeom-lBjiKfkyOk24tlYZ-Tt_u51-ZivXh6eljer3IJgkPOSVmVpsa65rCjjBl2tkyLQGG1K7RYaCqCLGnVVaVpAKczCSEmpSPbSwoxc7fumTb82GAfVNdFi2-q01SYqKQshJYMElnvQBh9jQKfWIV0WvhWjahek2mWkdhkl0y2oMZlkPB8nbEyH9Z_tX78cdR2tbl3QvW3iHwYCRCE4_AA_RXvv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77257713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term results of proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic disorders</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>MALKANI, A. L ; SETTECERRI, J. J ; SIM, F. H ; CHAO, E. Y. S ; WALLRICHS, S. L</creator><creatorcontrib>MALKANI, A. L ; SETTECERRI, J. J ; SIM, F. H ; CHAO, E. Y. S ; WALLRICHS, S. L</creatorcontrib><description>We reviewed retrospectively 50 consecutive total hip arthroplasties with proximal femoral replacement prostheses in 49 patients. All the patients had massive bone loss. There were 31 women and 18 men who had undergone a mean of 3.1 hip operations. At the last review, 15 patients had died and two had been lost to follow-up, so that 32 patients (33 hips) were available for assessment. The mean age of the patients at the time of the operation was 60.6 years. The mean length of clinical follow-up was 11.1 +/- 4 years, and mean radiographic follow-up was 7.6 +/- 3.2 years. The average preoperative Harris hip score was 46 +/- 13 points, which improved to 80 +/- 10 points after one year and to 76 +/- 16 points at the latest follow-up. The most frequent complication was dislocation, which occurred in 11 hips. Four femoral components and seven acetabular prostheses were revised because of aseptic loosening. With revision at the end point, survivorship after total hip arthroplasty with a proximal femoral replacement prosthesis was predicted to be 64% at 12 years. Although our preliminary results of hip salvage with a proximal femoral replacement prosthesis were encouraging, a longer follow-up has shown a higher rate of failure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-620X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-5377</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.77b3.7744913</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7744913</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBSUAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Femur - surgery ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hip Prosthesis - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedic surgery ; Osteoarthritis - surgery ; Osteolysis - surgery ; Prosthesis Failure ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume, 1995-05, Vol.77 (3), p.351-356</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3513-460966cedd479014befda3515ebbab6af8a32308dea99a02365b8b770055136c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3535254$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7744913$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MALKANI, A. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SETTECERRI, J. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIM, F. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHAO, E. Y. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WALLRICHS, S. L</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term results of proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic disorders</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Br</addtitle><description>We reviewed retrospectively 50 consecutive total hip arthroplasties with proximal femoral replacement prostheses in 49 patients. All the patients had massive bone loss. There were 31 women and 18 men who had undergone a mean of 3.1 hip operations. At the last review, 15 patients had died and two had been lost to follow-up, so that 32 patients (33 hips) were available for assessment. The mean age of the patients at the time of the operation was 60.6 years. The mean length of clinical follow-up was 11.1 +/- 4 years, and mean radiographic follow-up was 7.6 +/- 3.2 years. The average preoperative Harris hip score was 46 +/- 13 points, which improved to 80 +/- 10 points after one year and to 76 +/- 16 points at the latest follow-up. The most frequent complication was dislocation, which occurred in 11 hips. Four femoral components and seven acetabular prostheses were revised because of aseptic loosening. With revision at the end point, survivorship after total hip arthroplasty with a proximal femoral replacement prosthesis was predicted to be 64% at 12 years. Although our preliminary results of hip salvage with a proximal femoral replacement prosthesis were encouraging, a longer follow-up has shown a higher rate of failure.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis - surgery</subject><subject>Osteolysis - surgery</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0301-620X</issn><issn>2044-5377</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkF1LwzAUhoMoc05_gtIL8a4z6Uma9VKHXzD0RsG7kKQnUmmbmXQw_70Zq3qTA3mf93y8hFwwOmdAi2sKlOVlQbdzKQ2kh_OKwQGZFpTzXICUh2T6C70fk5MYPymlXAiYkMmIT8nzyvcf-YChywLGTTvEzLtsHfy26XSbOex8SDXgutUWO-yHzPmQ9b7Pe_TpMw6Nzeom-lBjiKfkyOk24tlYZ-Tt_u51-ZivXh6eljer3IJgkPOSVmVpsa65rCjjBl2tkyLQGG1K7RYaCqCLGnVVaVpAKczCSEmpSPbSwoxc7fumTb82GAfVNdFi2-q01SYqKQshJYMElnvQBh9jQKfWIV0WvhWjahek2mWkdhkl0y2oMZlkPB8nbEyH9Z_tX78cdR2tbl3QvW3iHwYCRCE4_AA_RXvv</recordid><startdate>199505</startdate><enddate>199505</enddate><creator>MALKANI, A. L</creator><creator>SETTECERRI, J. J</creator><creator>SIM, F. H</creator><creator>CHAO, E. Y. S</creator><creator>WALLRICHS, S. L</creator><general>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199505</creationdate><title>Long-term results of proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic disorders</title><author>MALKANI, A. L ; SETTECERRI, J. J ; SIM, F. H ; CHAO, E. Y. S ; WALLRICHS, S. L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3513-460966cedd479014befda3515ebbab6af8a32308dea99a02365b8b770055136c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis - surgery</topic><topic>Osteolysis - surgery</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MALKANI, A. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SETTECERRI, J. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIM, F. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHAO, E. Y. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WALLRICHS, S. L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MALKANI, A. L</au><au>SETTECERRI, J. J</au><au>SIM, F. H</au><au>CHAO, E. Y. S</au><au>WALLRICHS, S. L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term results of proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic disorders</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Br</addtitle><date>1995-05</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>351</spage><epage>356</epage><pages>351-356</pages><issn>0301-620X</issn><eissn>2044-5377</eissn><coden>JBSUAK</coden><abstract>We reviewed retrospectively 50 consecutive total hip arthroplasties with proximal femoral replacement prostheses in 49 patients. All the patients had massive bone loss. There were 31 women and 18 men who had undergone a mean of 3.1 hip operations. At the last review, 15 patients had died and two had been lost to follow-up, so that 32 patients (33 hips) were available for assessment. The mean age of the patients at the time of the operation was 60.6 years. The mean length of clinical follow-up was 11.1 +/- 4 years, and mean radiographic follow-up was 7.6 +/- 3.2 years. The average preoperative Harris hip score was 46 +/- 13 points, which improved to 80 +/- 10 points after one year and to 76 +/- 16 points at the latest follow-up. The most frequent complication was dislocation, which occurred in 11 hips. Four femoral components and seven acetabular prostheses were revised because of aseptic loosening. With revision at the end point, survivorship after total hip arthroplasty with a proximal femoral replacement prosthesis was predicted to be 64% at 12 years. Although our preliminary results of hip salvage with a proximal femoral replacement prosthesis were encouraging, a longer follow-up has shown a higher rate of failure.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</pub><pmid>7744913</pmid><doi>10.1302/0301-620x.77b3.7744913</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-620X
ispartof Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume, 1995-05, Vol.77 (3), p.351-356
issn 0301-620X
2044-5377
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77257713
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Femur - surgery
Follow-Up Studies
Hip Prosthesis - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Orthopedic surgery
Osteoarthritis - surgery
Osteolysis - surgery
Prosthesis Failure
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
title Long-term results of proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic disorders
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T02%3A50%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20results%20of%20proximal%20femoral%20replacement%20for%20non-neoplastic%20disorders&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20British%20volume&rft.au=MALKANI,%20A.%20L&rft.date=1995-05&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=351&rft.epage=356&rft.pages=351-356&rft.issn=0301-620X&rft.eissn=2044-5377&rft.coden=JBSUAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1302/0301-620x.77b3.7744913&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77257713%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77257713&rft_id=info:pmid/7744913&rfr_iscdi=true