Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention: Outcomes Associated With a Differential Response Program in California
Traditionally, the American child welfare system intervenes in cases of evident and severe maltreatment. Families in need of help, but who have not reached a crisis, are excluded from typical services. Some suggest that if these families were served, few would be rereferred to the child welfare syst...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Child maltreatment 2010-11, Vol.15 (4), p.282-292 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 292 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 282 |
container_title | Child maltreatment |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Conley, Amy Duerr Berrick, Jill |
description | Traditionally, the American child welfare system intervenes in cases of evident and severe maltreatment. Families in need of help, but who have not reached a crisis, are excluded from typical services. Some suggest that if these families were served, few would be rereferred to the child welfare system. California’s Differential Response (DR) has three tracks, of which ‘‘Track 1’’ targets families screened out of child protective services (CPS) and refers them to agencies that provide voluntary, home-based services and referrals. This study examined child-welfare trajectories for families receiving Track 1 DR services in one California county. Using survival analysis, treatment group children (N = 134) were compared to children eligible for services but denied due to program capacity (comparison group N = 511). Findings suggest no statistically significant differences between groups on the likelihood of a re-report following program participation, timing of maltreatment reports, or report investigations. The ability to draw strong conclusions from this study, however, is limited by selection bias because prior child maltreatment reports were more common in the treatment group. The intervention may provide families with important supports, but evidence for maltreatment prevention may not be supported. Future studies should examine potential effects on a range of family domains. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1077559510376236 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_772270595</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1077559510376236</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1928202262</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-4e421af5a7cb731099e280280e63c5b7323564d298ac0abc84c8dde24ba9a6df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1r3DAQxUVoadJt7zkFQQk9uZVkfdi9bdxPCKSUlhzNWB4nCra0kexC_vtqu9s0BEpBIKH5vTcjPUKOOXvDuTFvOTNGqVpxVhotSn1AjrhSotCc10_yOZeLbf2QPE_phjHGpVbPyKFgWhqh1BHxTZimxbv5rjiDhD1trt3Y03W3JKRfI_5EP7vg39GLZbZhwkTXKQXrYM7spZuvKdD3bhgwbkEY6TdMm-B_i8NVhIk6TxsY3RCid_CCPB1gTPhyv6_Ij48fvjefi_OLT1-a9Xlhpa7mQqIUHAYFxnam5KyuUVQsL9SlVflKlErLXtQVWAadraSt-h6F7KAG3Q_lirze-W5iuF0wze3kksVxBI9hSa0xQhiWf-b_pDLc1HmcTL56RN6EJfr8jJbXohJMiJzBirAdZWNIKeLQbqKbIN61nLXb0NrHoWXJyd546Sbs7wV_UsrA6R6AZGEcInjr0l-uLKXWcmtU7LgEV_hgun81_gXi8Kqp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928202262</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention: Outcomes Associated With a Differential Response Program in California</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Conley, Amy ; Duerr Berrick, Jill</creator><creatorcontrib>Conley, Amy ; Duerr Berrick, Jill</creatorcontrib><description>Traditionally, the American child welfare system intervenes in cases of evident and severe maltreatment. Families in need of help, but who have not reached a crisis, are excluded from typical services. Some suggest that if these families were served, few would be rereferred to the child welfare system. California’s Differential Response (DR) has three tracks, of which ‘‘Track 1’’ targets families screened out of child protective services (CPS) and refers them to agencies that provide voluntary, home-based services and referrals. This study examined child-welfare trajectories for families receiving Track 1 DR services in one California county. Using survival analysis, treatment group children (N = 134) were compared to children eligible for services but denied due to program capacity (comparison group N = 511). Findings suggest no statistically significant differences between groups on the likelihood of a re-report following program participation, timing of maltreatment reports, or report investigations. The ability to draw strong conclusions from this study, however, is limited by selection bias because prior child maltreatment reports were more common in the treatment group. The intervention may provide families with important supports, but evidence for maltreatment prevention may not be supported. Future studies should examine potential effects on a range of family domains.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1077-5595</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6119</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1077559510376236</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20647255</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CMALFA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adolescent ; Adult ; Aid to Families with Dependent Children - statistics & numerical data ; Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; California ; Child ; Child Abuse ; Child abuse & neglect ; Child Abuse - prevention & control ; Child Abuse - rehabilitation ; Child Abuse - statistics & numerical data ; Child maltreatment ; Child protection ; Child Welfare ; Child Welfare - statistics & numerical data ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Community based preventive programmes ; Community Networks - organization & administration ; Families & family life ; Family (Sociological Unit) ; Female ; Home based ; Home Care Services - organization & administration ; Humans ; Male ; Maltreatment ; Medical referrals ; Medical sciences ; Mental health ; Middle Aged ; Participation ; Prevention ; Prevention programs ; Prevention. Health policy. Planification ; Preventive Health Services - organization & administration ; Program Evaluation ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Quasi-experimental methods ; Referrals ; Selection bias ; Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Survival analysis ; Treatment Outcome ; United States ; Victimology ; Volunteers - statistics & numerical data]]></subject><ispartof>Child maltreatment, 2010-11, Vol.15 (4), p.282-292</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-4e421af5a7cb731099e280280e63c5b7323564d298ac0abc84c8dde24ba9a6df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-4e421af5a7cb731099e280280e63c5b7323564d298ac0abc84c8dde24ba9a6df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1077559510376236$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1077559510376236$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21802,27907,27908,30982,30983,33757,43604,43605</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23346646$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20647255$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Conley, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duerr Berrick, Jill</creatorcontrib><title>Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention: Outcomes Associated With a Differential Response Program in California</title><title>Child maltreatment</title><addtitle>Child Maltreat</addtitle><description>Traditionally, the American child welfare system intervenes in cases of evident and severe maltreatment. Families in need of help, but who have not reached a crisis, are excluded from typical services. Some suggest that if these families were served, few would be rereferred to the child welfare system. California’s Differential Response (DR) has three tracks, of which ‘‘Track 1’’ targets families screened out of child protective services (CPS) and refers them to agencies that provide voluntary, home-based services and referrals. This study examined child-welfare trajectories for families receiving Track 1 DR services in one California county. Using survival analysis, treatment group children (N = 134) were compared to children eligible for services but denied due to program capacity (comparison group N = 511). Findings suggest no statistically significant differences between groups on the likelihood of a re-report following program participation, timing of maltreatment reports, or report investigations. The ability to draw strong conclusions from this study, however, is limited by selection bias because prior child maltreatment reports were more common in the treatment group. The intervention may provide families with important supports, but evidence for maltreatment prevention may not be supported. Future studies should examine potential effects on a range of family domains.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aid to Families with Dependent Children - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Abuse</subject><subject>Child abuse & neglect</subject><subject>Child Abuse - prevention & control</subject><subject>Child Abuse - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Child Abuse - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Child maltreatment</subject><subject>Child protection</subject><subject>Child Welfare</subject><subject>Child Welfare - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Community based preventive programmes</subject><subject>Community Networks - organization & administration</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Family (Sociological Unit)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Home based</subject><subject>Home Care Services - organization & administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maltreatment</subject><subject>Medical referrals</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Prevention programs</subject><subject>Prevention. Health policy. Planification</subject><subject>Preventive Health Services - organization & administration</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Quasi-experimental methods</subject><subject>Referrals</subject><subject>Selection bias</subject><subject>Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Victimology</subject><subject>Volunteers - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>1077-5595</issn><issn>1552-6119</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1r3DAQxUVoadJt7zkFQQk9uZVkfdi9bdxPCKSUlhzNWB4nCra0kexC_vtqu9s0BEpBIKH5vTcjPUKOOXvDuTFvOTNGqVpxVhotSn1AjrhSotCc10_yOZeLbf2QPE_phjHGpVbPyKFgWhqh1BHxTZimxbv5rjiDhD1trt3Y03W3JKRfI_5EP7vg39GLZbZhwkTXKQXrYM7spZuvKdD3bhgwbkEY6TdMm-B_i8NVhIk6TxsY3RCid_CCPB1gTPhyv6_Ij48fvjefi_OLT1-a9Xlhpa7mQqIUHAYFxnam5KyuUVQsL9SlVflKlErLXtQVWAadraSt-h6F7KAG3Q_lirze-W5iuF0wze3kksVxBI9hSa0xQhiWf-b_pDLc1HmcTL56RN6EJfr8jJbXohJMiJzBirAdZWNIKeLQbqKbIN61nLXb0NrHoWXJyd546Sbs7wV_UsrA6R6AZGEcInjr0l-uLKXWcmtU7LgEV_hgun81_gXi8Kqp</recordid><startdate>20101101</startdate><enddate>20101101</enddate><creator>Conley, Amy</creator><creator>Duerr Berrick, Jill</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101101</creationdate><title>Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention: Outcomes Associated With a Differential Response Program in California</title><author>Conley, Amy ; Duerr Berrick, Jill</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-4e421af5a7cb731099e280280e63c5b7323564d298ac0abc84c8dde24ba9a6df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aid to Families with Dependent Children - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Abuse</topic><topic>Child abuse & neglect</topic><topic>Child Abuse - prevention & control</topic><topic>Child Abuse - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Child Abuse - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Child maltreatment</topic><topic>Child protection</topic><topic>Child Welfare</topic><topic>Child Welfare - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Community based preventive programmes</topic><topic>Community Networks - organization & administration</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Family (Sociological Unit)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Home based</topic><topic>Home Care Services - organization & administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maltreatment</topic><topic>Medical referrals</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Prevention programs</topic><topic>Prevention. Health policy. Planification</topic><topic>Preventive Health Services - organization & administration</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Quasi-experimental methods</topic><topic>Referrals</topic><topic>Selection bias</topic><topic>Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Victimology</topic><topic>Volunteers - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Conley, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duerr Berrick, Jill</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Child maltreatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Conley, Amy</au><au>Duerr Berrick, Jill</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention: Outcomes Associated With a Differential Response Program in California</atitle><jtitle>Child maltreatment</jtitle><addtitle>Child Maltreat</addtitle><date>2010-11-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>282</spage><epage>292</epage><pages>282-292</pages><issn>1077-5595</issn><eissn>1552-6119</eissn><coden>CMALFA</coden><abstract>Traditionally, the American child welfare system intervenes in cases of evident and severe maltreatment. Families in need of help, but who have not reached a crisis, are excluded from typical services. Some suggest that if these families were served, few would be rereferred to the child welfare system. California’s Differential Response (DR) has three tracks, of which ‘‘Track 1’’ targets families screened out of child protective services (CPS) and refers them to agencies that provide voluntary, home-based services and referrals. This study examined child-welfare trajectories for families receiving Track 1 DR services in one California county. Using survival analysis, treatment group children (N = 134) were compared to children eligible for services but denied due to program capacity (comparison group N = 511). Findings suggest no statistically significant differences between groups on the likelihood of a re-report following program participation, timing of maltreatment reports, or report investigations. The ability to draw strong conclusions from this study, however, is limited by selection bias because prior child maltreatment reports were more common in the treatment group. The intervention may provide families with important supports, but evidence for maltreatment prevention may not be supported. Future studies should examine potential effects on a range of family domains.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>20647255</pmid><doi>10.1177/1077559510376236</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1077-5595 |
ispartof | Child maltreatment, 2010-11, Vol.15 (4), p.282-292 |
issn | 1077-5595 1552-6119 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_772270595 |
source | MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aid to Families with Dependent Children - statistics & numerical data Bias Biological and medical sciences California Child Child Abuse Child abuse & neglect Child Abuse - prevention & control Child Abuse - rehabilitation Child Abuse - statistics & numerical data Child maltreatment Child protection Child Welfare Child Welfare - statistics & numerical data Child, Preschool Children Community based preventive programmes Community Networks - organization & administration Families & family life Family (Sociological Unit) Female Home based Home Care Services - organization & administration Humans Male Maltreatment Medical referrals Medical sciences Mental health Middle Aged Participation Prevention Prevention programs Prevention. Health policy. Planification Preventive Health Services - organization & administration Program Evaluation Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Quasi-experimental methods Referrals Selection bias Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry Socioeconomic Factors Survival analysis Treatment Outcome United States Victimology Volunteers - statistics & numerical data |
title | Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention: Outcomes Associated With a Differential Response Program in California |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T23%3A21%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Community-Based%20Child%20Abuse%20Prevention:%20Outcomes%20Associated%20With%20a%20Differential%20Response%20Program%20in%20California&rft.jtitle=Child%20maltreatment&rft.au=Conley,%20Amy&rft.date=2010-11-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=282&rft.epage=292&rft.pages=282-292&rft.issn=1077-5595&rft.eissn=1552-6119&rft.coden=CMALFA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1077559510376236&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1928202262%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928202262&rft_id=info:pmid/20647255&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1077559510376236&rfr_iscdi=true |