Confirmation of cecal intubation during colonoscopy
Establishing intubation of the cecum can be a laborious, frustrating, and sometimes erroneous endeavor. Following confirmed colonoscopic intubation of the cecum, the presence of three anatomic landmarks (alone and in combination) were evaluated to precisely define their reliability. Between February...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Diseases of the colon & rectum 1995-04, Vol.38 (4), p.402-406 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 406 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 402 |
| container_title | Diseases of the colon & rectum |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | CIROCCO, W. C RUSIN, L. C |
| description | Establishing intubation of the cecum can be a laborious, frustrating, and sometimes erroneous endeavor. Following confirmed colonoscopic intubation of the cecum, the presence of three anatomic landmarks (alone and in combination) were evaluated to precisely define their reliability.
Between February 1991 and January 1992, 771 of 904 consecutive colonoscopic examinations were completed to the cecum as confirmed by fluoroscopy.
All three cecal landmarks studied (ileocecal valve, appendiceal orifice, and transillumination) were present in 64 percent of patients, and two landmarks were seen in 32 percent (96 percent of patients had multiple landmarks). The ileocecal valve was the most reliable cecal landmark (98 percent), followed by the appendiceal orifice (87 percent) and transillumination through the abdominal wall (75 percent).
The ileocecal valve is the most reliable cecal landmark and is invariably visualized, even when all other cecal landmarks are obscure. Although other cecal landmarks are usually identifiable, they are most valuable when found in association with the ileocecal valve. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF02054230 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77218941</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77218941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-4bc5bf29442448eece47a757a548e44ce53ba13b7e00e20565b65112a70dc5a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEFLAzEQhYMotVYv3oU9iAdhdZJMmu7RFqtCwYuelyTNSmQ3qcnuof_eSJd6Gt68j8fMI-SawgMFkI_LNTAQyDickCkVHErgYnFKpgCUlVzC_JxcpPSdZQblhEykZIBYTQlfBd-42KneBV-EpjDWqLZwvh_0YbcdovNfhQlt8CGZsNtfkrNGtclejXNGPtfPH6vXcvP-8rZ62pSGU9qXqI3QDasQGeLCWmNRKimkElkhGiu4VpRraQFsvn8u9FxQypSErRGK8Rm5O-TuYvgZbOrrziVj21Z5G4ZU5yfookKawfsDaGJIKdqm3kXXqbivKdR_DdX_DWX4ZkwddGe3R3SsJPu3o69SrqKJyhuXjhjHqsoc_wWadGuj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77218941</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Confirmation of cecal intubation during colonoscopy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>CIROCCO, W. C ; RUSIN, L. C</creator><creatorcontrib>CIROCCO, W. C ; RUSIN, L. C</creatorcontrib><description>Establishing intubation of the cecum can be a laborious, frustrating, and sometimes erroneous endeavor. Following confirmed colonoscopic intubation of the cecum, the presence of three anatomic landmarks (alone and in combination) were evaluated to precisely define their reliability.
Between February 1991 and January 1992, 771 of 904 consecutive colonoscopic examinations were completed to the cecum as confirmed by fluoroscopy.
All three cecal landmarks studied (ileocecal valve, appendiceal orifice, and transillumination) were present in 64 percent of patients, and two landmarks were seen in 32 percent (96 percent of patients had multiple landmarks). The ileocecal valve was the most reliable cecal landmark (98 percent), followed by the appendiceal orifice (87 percent) and transillumination through the abdominal wall (75 percent).
The ileocecal valve is the most reliable cecal landmark and is invariably visualized, even when all other cecal landmarks are obscure. Although other cecal landmarks are usually identifiable, they are most valuable when found in association with the ileocecal valve.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-3706</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0358</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02054230</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7720449</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DICRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Secaucus, NJ: Springer</publisher><subject>Abdominal Muscles ; Appendix ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cecum ; Colonoscopy - methods ; Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data ; Digestive system. Abdomen ; Endoscopy ; Fluoroscopy ; Humans ; Ileocecal Valve ; Intubation, Gastrointestinal - methods ; Intubation, Gastrointestinal - statistics & numerical data ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Medical sciences ; Observer Variation ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Diseases of the colon & rectum, 1995-04, Vol.38 (4), p.402-406</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-4bc5bf29442448eece47a757a548e44ce53ba13b7e00e20565b65112a70dc5a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-4bc5bf29442448eece47a757a548e44ce53ba13b7e00e20565b65112a70dc5a23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3499044$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7720449$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CIROCCO, W. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUSIN, L. C</creatorcontrib><title>Confirmation of cecal intubation during colonoscopy</title><title>Diseases of the colon & rectum</title><addtitle>Dis Colon Rectum</addtitle><description>Establishing intubation of the cecum can be a laborious, frustrating, and sometimes erroneous endeavor. Following confirmed colonoscopic intubation of the cecum, the presence of three anatomic landmarks (alone and in combination) were evaluated to precisely define their reliability.
Between February 1991 and January 1992, 771 of 904 consecutive colonoscopic examinations were completed to the cecum as confirmed by fluoroscopy.
All three cecal landmarks studied (ileocecal valve, appendiceal orifice, and transillumination) were present in 64 percent of patients, and two landmarks were seen in 32 percent (96 percent of patients had multiple landmarks). The ileocecal valve was the most reliable cecal landmark (98 percent), followed by the appendiceal orifice (87 percent) and transillumination through the abdominal wall (75 percent).
The ileocecal valve is the most reliable cecal landmark and is invariably visualized, even when all other cecal landmarks are obscure. Although other cecal landmarks are usually identifiable, they are most valuable when found in association with the ileocecal valve.</description><subject>Abdominal Muscles</subject><subject>Appendix</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cecum</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Digestive system. Abdomen</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Fluoroscopy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ileocecal Valve</subject><subject>Intubation, Gastrointestinal - methods</subject><subject>Intubation, Gastrointestinal - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>0012-3706</issn><issn>1530-0358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEFLAzEQhYMotVYv3oU9iAdhdZJMmu7RFqtCwYuelyTNSmQ3qcnuof_eSJd6Gt68j8fMI-SawgMFkI_LNTAQyDickCkVHErgYnFKpgCUlVzC_JxcpPSdZQblhEykZIBYTQlfBd-42KneBV-EpjDWqLZwvh_0YbcdovNfhQlt8CGZsNtfkrNGtclejXNGPtfPH6vXcvP-8rZ62pSGU9qXqI3QDasQGeLCWmNRKimkElkhGiu4VpRraQFsvn8u9FxQypSErRGK8Rm5O-TuYvgZbOrrziVj21Z5G4ZU5yfookKawfsDaGJIKdqm3kXXqbivKdR_DdX_DWX4ZkwddGe3R3SsJPu3o69SrqKJyhuXjhjHqsoc_wWadGuj</recordid><startdate>19950401</startdate><enddate>19950401</enddate><creator>CIROCCO, W. C</creator><creator>RUSIN, L. C</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950401</creationdate><title>Confirmation of cecal intubation during colonoscopy</title><author>CIROCCO, W. C ; RUSIN, L. C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-4bc5bf29442448eece47a757a548e44ce53ba13b7e00e20565b65112a70dc5a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Muscles</topic><topic>Appendix</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cecum</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Digestive system. Abdomen</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Fluoroscopy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ileocecal Valve</topic><topic>Intubation, Gastrointestinal - methods</topic><topic>Intubation, Gastrointestinal - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CIROCCO, W. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUSIN, L. C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diseases of the colon & rectum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CIROCCO, W. C</au><au>RUSIN, L. C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Confirmation of cecal intubation during colonoscopy</atitle><jtitle>Diseases of the colon & rectum</jtitle><addtitle>Dis Colon Rectum</addtitle><date>1995-04-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>402</spage><epage>406</epage><pages>402-406</pages><issn>0012-3706</issn><eissn>1530-0358</eissn><coden>DICRAG</coden><abstract>Establishing intubation of the cecum can be a laborious, frustrating, and sometimes erroneous endeavor. Following confirmed colonoscopic intubation of the cecum, the presence of three anatomic landmarks (alone and in combination) were evaluated to precisely define their reliability.
Between February 1991 and January 1992, 771 of 904 consecutive colonoscopic examinations were completed to the cecum as confirmed by fluoroscopy.
All three cecal landmarks studied (ileocecal valve, appendiceal orifice, and transillumination) were present in 64 percent of patients, and two landmarks were seen in 32 percent (96 percent of patients had multiple landmarks). The ileocecal valve was the most reliable cecal landmark (98 percent), followed by the appendiceal orifice (87 percent) and transillumination through the abdominal wall (75 percent).
The ileocecal valve is the most reliable cecal landmark and is invariably visualized, even when all other cecal landmarks are obscure. Although other cecal landmarks are usually identifiable, they are most valuable when found in association with the ileocecal valve.</abstract><cop>Secaucus, NJ</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>7720449</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF02054230</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0012-3706 |
| ispartof | Diseases of the colon & rectum, 1995-04, Vol.38 (4), p.402-406 |
| issn | 0012-3706 1530-0358 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77218941 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Abdominal Muscles Appendix Biological and medical sciences Cecum Colonoscopy - methods Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data Digestive system. Abdomen Endoscopy Fluoroscopy Humans Ileocecal Valve Intubation, Gastrointestinal - methods Intubation, Gastrointestinal - statistics & numerical data Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Medical sciences Observer Variation Reproducibility of Results |
| title | Confirmation of cecal intubation during colonoscopy |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T11%3A28%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Confirmation%20of%20cecal%20intubation%20during%20colonoscopy&rft.jtitle=Diseases%20of%20the%20colon%20&%20rectum&rft.au=CIROCCO,%20W.%20C&rft.date=1995-04-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=402&rft.epage=406&rft.pages=402-406&rft.issn=0012-3706&rft.eissn=1530-0358&rft.coden=DICRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02054230&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77218941%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77218941&rft_id=info:pmid/7720449&rfr_iscdi=true |