Making the "Rochester" criteria look good

Jaskiewicz and colleagues inflate the difference in the risk of serious bacterial infections (SBI) in febrile infants between their low risk and "not low risk" groups by including as an outcome variable infants who clearly have SBIS at the time of enrollment. For example, they use the pres...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatrics (Evanston) 1995-04, Vol.95 (4), p.619-619
1. Verfasser: Young, P C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 619
container_issue 4
container_start_page 619
container_title Pediatrics (Evanston)
container_volume 95
creator Young, P C
description Jaskiewicz and colleagues inflate the difference in the risk of serious bacterial infections (SBI) in febrile infants between their low risk and "not low risk" groups by including as an outcome variable infants who clearly have SBIS at the time of enrollment. For example, they use the presence of soft tissue infections on physical examination as both an exclusion criteria from the low risk category and as a diagnostic finding for an SBI. This seems a fundamentally flawed concept even if one considers a paronychia to be a "serious" bacterial infection.
doi_str_mv 10.1542/peds.95.4.619a
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77189494</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4508897</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-165e64e46b8c31f61f49c99230ebc4fadd25955cb5d19632509b4c5709d85dc93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLw0AUhQdRaq1u3QmhC8FF4rxuJncpxRdUBNH1kMxM2rRpp84kC_-9KS0uXJ3Ndw6Hj5BrRjMGkt_vnI0ZQiaznGF5QsaMYpFKruCUjCkVLJWUwjm5iHFFKZWg-IiMlAJQSozJ3Vu5braLpFu6ZPrhzdLFzoVpYkIzZFMmrffrZOG9vSRnddlGd3XMCfl6evycvaTz9-fX2cM8NVzxLmU5uFw6mVeFEazOWS3RIHJBXWVkXVrLAQFMBZZhLjhQrKQBRdEWYA2KCbk97O6C_-6HO3rTROPattw630etFCtQohzA6T9w5fuwHb5pzgshkCo2QNkBMsHHGFytd6HZlOFHM6r3AvVeoEbQUu8FDoWb42pfbZz9w4_GxC8UCGnj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>228339071</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Making the "Rochester" criteria look good</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Young, P C</creator><creatorcontrib>Young, P C</creatorcontrib><description>Jaskiewicz and colleagues inflate the difference in the risk of serious bacterial infections (SBI) in febrile infants between their low risk and "not low risk" groups by including as an outcome variable infants who clearly have SBIS at the time of enrollment. For example, they use the presence of soft tissue infections on physical examination as both an exclusion criteria from the low risk category and as a diagnostic finding for an SBI. This seems a fundamentally flawed concept even if one considers a paronychia to be a "serious" bacterial infection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-4005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-4275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1542/peds.95.4.619a</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7755773</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PEDIAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Academy of Pediatrics</publisher><subject>Bacterial Infections - diagnosis ; Fever - etiology ; Humans ; Infant ; Letters to the editor ; Pediatrics ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>Pediatrics (Evanston), 1995-04, Vol.95 (4), p.619-619</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Academy of Pediatrics Apr 1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7755773$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Young, P C</creatorcontrib><title>Making the "Rochester" criteria look good</title><title>Pediatrics (Evanston)</title><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><description>Jaskiewicz and colleagues inflate the difference in the risk of serious bacterial infections (SBI) in febrile infants between their low risk and "not low risk" groups by including as an outcome variable infants who clearly have SBIS at the time of enrollment. For example, they use the presence of soft tissue infections on physical examination as both an exclusion criteria from the low risk category and as a diagnostic finding for an SBI. This seems a fundamentally flawed concept even if one considers a paronychia to be a "serious" bacterial infection.</description><subject>Bacterial Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Fever - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Letters to the editor</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>0031-4005</issn><issn>1098-4275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLw0AUhQdRaq1u3QmhC8FF4rxuJncpxRdUBNH1kMxM2rRpp84kC_-9KS0uXJ3Ndw6Hj5BrRjMGkt_vnI0ZQiaznGF5QsaMYpFKruCUjCkVLJWUwjm5iHFFKZWg-IiMlAJQSozJ3Vu5braLpFu6ZPrhzdLFzoVpYkIzZFMmrffrZOG9vSRnddlGd3XMCfl6evycvaTz9-fX2cM8NVzxLmU5uFw6mVeFEazOWS3RIHJBXWVkXVrLAQFMBZZhLjhQrKQBRdEWYA2KCbk97O6C_-6HO3rTROPattw630etFCtQohzA6T9w5fuwHb5pzgshkCo2QNkBMsHHGFytd6HZlOFHM6r3AvVeoEbQUu8FDoWb42pfbZz9w4_GxC8UCGnj</recordid><startdate>19950401</startdate><enddate>19950401</enddate><creator>Young, P C</creator><general>American Academy of Pediatrics</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950401</creationdate><title>Making the "Rochester" criteria look good</title><author>Young, P C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-165e64e46b8c31f61f49c99230ebc4fadd25955cb5d19632509b4c5709d85dc93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Bacterial Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Fever - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Letters to the editor</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Young, P C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Young, P C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Making the "Rochester" criteria look good</atitle><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><date>1995-04-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>619</spage><epage>619</epage><pages>619-619</pages><issn>0031-4005</issn><eissn>1098-4275</eissn><coden>PEDIAU</coden><abstract>Jaskiewicz and colleagues inflate the difference in the risk of serious bacterial infections (SBI) in febrile infants between their low risk and "not low risk" groups by including as an outcome variable infants who clearly have SBIS at the time of enrollment. For example, they use the presence of soft tissue infections on physical examination as both an exclusion criteria from the low risk category and as a diagnostic finding for an SBI. This seems a fundamentally flawed concept even if one considers a paronychia to be a "serious" bacterial infection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Academy of Pediatrics</pub><pmid>7755773</pmid><doi>10.1542/peds.95.4.619a</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-4005
ispartof Pediatrics (Evanston), 1995-04, Vol.95 (4), p.619-619
issn 0031-4005
1098-4275
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77189494
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Bacterial Infections - diagnosis
Fever - etiology
Humans
Infant
Letters to the editor
Pediatrics
Risk Factors
title Making the "Rochester" criteria look good
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T02%3A21%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Making%20the%20%22Rochester%22%20criteria%20look%20good&rft.jtitle=Pediatrics%20(Evanston)&rft.au=Young,%20P%20C&rft.date=1995-04-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=619&rft.epage=619&rft.pages=619-619&rft.issn=0031-4005&rft.eissn=1098-4275&rft.coden=PEDIAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1542/peds.95.4.619a&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4508897%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=228339071&rft_id=info:pmid/7755773&rfr_iscdi=true