Which Research Results Should the Public Believe?

Which Research Results Should the Public Believe?

To the Editor: With respect to Angell and Kassirer's editorial (July 21 issue) 1 concerning the public's confusion about the results of clinical trials, I think the public and the media would be better able to assess research results if medical researchers themselves were more modest and c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 1995-04, Vol.332 (14), p.963-964
1. Verfasser: Chatterton, H T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Humans
Public Opinion
Publishing
Research - standards
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 964
container_issue 14
container_start_page 963
container_title The New England journal of medicine
container_volume 332
creator Chatterton, H T
description To the Editor: With respect to Angell and Kassirer's editorial (July 21 issue) 1 concerning the public's confusion about the results of clinical trials, I think the public and the media would be better able to assess research results if medical researchers themselves were more modest and careful when discussing their results with journalists. The Journal has led the way in embargoing research results until after publication, but such rules cannot prevent the ambitious or naive investigator (or the investigator's institution) from touting results and pushing conclusions beyond the limits of the data. This problem is likely to increase as corporate . . .
doi_str_mv 10.1056/NEJM199504063321420
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77166501</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77166501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-156a6f3a07adbbda08b71d30d6028b36fb76246ca269a24f1171824599de46ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtKxDAUDaKM4-gXiNCVG6nmJmkyWYkO44vxgQ9chrxKO6TTsWkF_95KB1fi3dzLPQ8OB6FDwKeAM372ML-7BykzzDCnlAAjeAuNIaM0Zf1rG40xJtOUCUl30V6MS9wPMDlCIyEko5SNEbwXpS2SZx-9boajC21MXoq6Cy5pC588dSaUNrn0ofSf_nwf7eQ6RH-w2RP0djV_nd2ki8fr29nFIrWU8DaFjGueU42FdsY4jadGgKPY8T6ToTw3ghPGrSZcasJyAAFTwjIpnWdcWzpBx4Pvuqk_Oh9bVZXR-hD0ytddVEIA5xmGnkgHom3qGBufq3VTVrr5UoDVT1Hqj6J61dHGvjOVd7-aTTM9fjLgVRXVyi-rf92-ARz8bU0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77166501</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Which Research Results Should the Public Believe?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>New England Journal of Medicine</source><creator>Chatterton, H T</creator><creatorcontrib>Chatterton, H T</creatorcontrib><description>To the Editor: With respect to Angell and Kassirer's editorial (July 21 issue) 1 concerning the public's confusion about the results of clinical trials, I think the public and the media would be better able to assess research results if medical researchers themselves were more modest and careful when discussing their results with journalists. The Journal has led the way in embargoing research results until after publication, but such rules cannot prevent the ambitious or naive investigator (or the investigator's institution) from touting results and pushing conclusions beyond the limits of the data. This problem is likely to increase as corporate . . .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199504063321420</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7794334</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><subject>Humans ; Public Opinion ; Publishing ; Research - standards</subject><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 1995-04, Vol.332 (14), p.963-964</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1995 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-156a6f3a07adbbda08b71d30d6028b36fb76246ca269a24f1171824599de46ac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJM199504063321420$$EPDF$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199504063321420$$EHTML$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2759,2760,26103,27924,27925,52382,54064,64387</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7794334$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chatterton, H T</creatorcontrib><title>Which Research Results Should the Public Believe?</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><description>To the Editor: With respect to Angell and Kassirer's editorial (July 21 issue) 1 concerning the public's confusion about the results of clinical trials, I think the public and the media would be better able to assess research results if medical researchers themselves were more modest and careful when discussing their results with journalists. The Journal has led the way in embargoing research results until after publication, but such rules cannot prevent the ambitious or naive investigator (or the investigator's institution) from touting results and pushing conclusions beyond the limits of the data. This problem is likely to increase as corporate . . .</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Publishing</subject><subject>Research - standards</subject><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtKxDAUDaKM4-gXiNCVG6nmJmkyWYkO44vxgQ9chrxKO6TTsWkF_95KB1fi3dzLPQ8OB6FDwKeAM372ML-7BykzzDCnlAAjeAuNIaM0Zf1rG40xJtOUCUl30V6MS9wPMDlCIyEko5SNEbwXpS2SZx-9boajC21MXoq6Cy5pC588dSaUNrn0ofSf_nwf7eQ6RH-w2RP0djV_nd2ki8fr29nFIrWU8DaFjGueU42FdsY4jadGgKPY8T6ToTw3ghPGrSZcasJyAAFTwjIpnWdcWzpBx4Pvuqk_Oh9bVZXR-hD0ytddVEIA5xmGnkgHom3qGBufq3VTVrr5UoDVT1Hqj6J61dHGvjOVd7-aTTM9fjLgVRXVyi-rf92-ARz8bU0</recordid><startdate>19950406</startdate><enddate>19950406</enddate><creator>Chatterton, H T</creator><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950406</creationdate><title>Which Research Results Should the Public Believe?</title><author>Chatterton, H T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-156a6f3a07adbbda08b71d30d6028b36fb76246ca269a24f1171824599de46ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Publishing</topic><topic>Research - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chatterton, H T</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chatterton, H T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Which Research Results Should the Public Believe?</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><date>1995-04-06</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>332</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>963</spage><epage>964</epage><pages>963-964</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><abstract>To the Editor: With respect to Angell and Kassirer's editorial (July 21 issue) 1 concerning the public's confusion about the results of clinical trials, I think the public and the media would be better able to assess research results if medical researchers themselves were more modest and careful when discussing their results with journalists. The Journal has led the way in embargoing research results until after publication, but such rules cannot prevent the ambitious or naive investigator (or the investigator's institution) from touting results and pushing conclusions beyond the limits of the data. This problem is likely to increase as corporate . . .</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><pmid>7794334</pmid><doi>10.1056/NEJM199504063321420</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-4793
ispartof The New England journal of medicine, 1995-04, Vol.332 (14), p.963-964
issn 0028-4793
1533-4406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77166501
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; New England Journal of Medicine
subjects Humans
Public Opinion
Publishing
Research - standards
title Which Research Results Should the Public Believe?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T19%3A02%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Which%20Research%20Results%20Should%20the%20Public%20Believe?&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=Chatterton,%20H%20T&rft.date=1995-04-06&rft.volume=332&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=963&rft.epage=964&rft.pages=963-964&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJM199504063321420&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77166501%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77166501&rft_id=info:pmid/7794334&rfr_iscdi=true