The Hartford Study of Supported Employment for Persons With Severe Mental Illness
The authors compared 3 approaches to vocational rehabilitation for severe mental illness (SMI): the individual placement and support (IPS) model of supported employment, a psychosocial rehabilitation (PSR) program, and standard services. Two hundred four unemployed clients (46% African American, 30%...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 2004-06, Vol.72 (3), p.479-490 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 490 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 479 |
| container_title | Journal of consulting and clinical psychology |
| container_volume | 72 |
| creator | Mueser, Kim T Clark, Robin E Haines, Michael Drake, Robert E McHugo, Gregory J Bond, Gary R Essock, Susan M Becker, Deborah R Wolfe, Rosemarie Swain, Karin |
| description | The authors compared 3 approaches to vocational rehabilitation for severe mental illness (SMI): the individual placement and support (IPS) model of supported employment, a psychosocial rehabilitation (PSR) program, and standard services. Two hundred four unemployed clients (46% African American, 30% Latino) with SMI were randomly assigned to IPS, PSR, or standard services and followed for 2 years. Clients in IPS had significantly better employment outcomes than clients in PSR and standard services, including more competitive work (73.9% vs. 18.2% vs. 27.5%, respectively) and any paid work (73.9% vs. 34.8% vs. 53.6%, respectively). There were few differences in nonvocational outcomes between programs. IPS is a more effective model than PSR or standard brokered vocational services for improving employment outcomes in clients with SMI. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0022-006X.72.3.479 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_771658474</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ684689</ericid><sourcerecordid>66760655</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a641t-96e53f8bc5b80f2482c3a65e40a95c8165bc532225148bb9138b69c2a364240b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ltrFDEUB_Agit1Wv4CIBPHyILOe3JNHKautVFS2om8hk83QKXMzmSnstzfjLrWKtE95-P9yEs45CD0hsCTA1FsASgsA-WOp6JItuTL30IIYZgpKiLqPFtfgAB2mdAkARIJ4iA6IoMoIRhbo6_lFwCcujlUfN3g9Tpst7iu8noahj2PY4FU7NP22Dd2IM8FfQkx9l_D3erzA63AVYsCfcugafNo0XUjpEXpQuSaFx_vzCH17vzo_PinOPn84PX53VjjJyVgYGQSrdOlFqaGiXFPPnBSBgzPCayJFjhilVBCuy9IQpktpPHVMcsqhZEfo9a7uEPufU0ijbevkQ9O4LvRTskrlGpornuWrW6WUSoIU4k4oFDCqJLkTMqWNJgYyfP4PvOyn2OW-WEk4M4YDvw1RApKBMDOiO-Rjn1IMlR1i3bq4tQTsvA52nradp20VtczmdciXnu0rT2UbNn-u7Oefwcs9cMm7poqu83W64ZRR5HcLn-5ciLW_jlcfpeZSz--82cVucHZIW58XqvZNSH6KMW-H9X64-asX_9d_s1_b0t6b</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614399404</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Hartford Study of Supported Employment for Persons With Severe Mental Illness</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Mueser, Kim T ; Clark, Robin E ; Haines, Michael ; Drake, Robert E ; McHugo, Gregory J ; Bond, Gary R ; Essock, Susan M ; Becker, Deborah R ; Wolfe, Rosemarie ; Swain, Karin</creator><contributor>Sobell, Mark</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mueser, Kim T ; Clark, Robin E ; Haines, Michael ; Drake, Robert E ; McHugo, Gregory J ; Bond, Gary R ; Essock, Susan M ; Becker, Deborah R ; Wolfe, Rosemarie ; Swain, Karin ; Sobell, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>The authors compared 3 approaches to vocational rehabilitation for severe mental illness (SMI): the individual placement and support (IPS) model of supported employment, a psychosocial rehabilitation (PSR) program, and standard services. Two hundred four unemployed clients (46% African American, 30% Latino) with SMI were randomly assigned to IPS, PSR, or standard services and followed for 2 years. Clients in IPS had significantly better employment outcomes than clients in PSR and standard services, including more competitive work (73.9% vs. 18.2% vs. 27.5%, respectively) and any paid work (73.9% vs. 34.8% vs. 53.6%, respectively). There were few differences in nonvocational outcomes between programs. IPS is a more effective model than PSR or standard brokered vocational services for improving employment outcomes in clients with SMI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-006X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.3.479</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15279531</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCLPBC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical psychology ; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ; Employment ; Employment Patterns ; Employment Status ; Employment, Supported ; Female ; Human ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Mental Disorders ; Mental Disorders - diagnosis ; Mental Disorders - psychology ; Mental illness ; Mentally ill people ; Minority Groups ; Program Effectiveness ; Psychological Patterns ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Psychosocial Rehabilitation ; Reeducation. Readaptation. Sociotherapy ; Schizophrenia ; Serious Mental Illness ; Severely ; Severity (Disorders) ; Severity of Illness Index ; Social Development ; Supported Employment ; Treatment Outcomes ; Treatments ; USA ; Vocational Rehabilitation</subject><ispartof>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2004-06, Vol.72 (3), p.479-490</ispartof><rights>2004 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>(c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jun 2004</rights><rights>2004, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a641t-96e53f8bc5b80f2482c3a65e40a95c8165bc532225148bb9138b69c2a364240b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a641t-96e53f8bc5b80f2482c3a65e40a95c8165bc532225148bb9138b69c2a364240b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ684689$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15797174$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15279531$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Sobell, Mark</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mueser, Kim T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Robin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haines, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drake, Robert E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McHugo, Gregory J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bond, Gary R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Essock, Susan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Deborah R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfe, Rosemarie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swain, Karin</creatorcontrib><title>The Hartford Study of Supported Employment for Persons With Severe Mental Illness</title><title>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology</title><addtitle>J Consult Clin Psychol</addtitle><description>The authors compared 3 approaches to vocational rehabilitation for severe mental illness (SMI): the individual placement and support (IPS) model of supported employment, a psychosocial rehabilitation (PSR) program, and standard services. Two hundred four unemployed clients (46% African American, 30% Latino) with SMI were randomly assigned to IPS, PSR, or standard services and followed for 2 years. Clients in IPS had significantly better employment outcomes than clients in PSR and standard services, including more competitive work (73.9% vs. 18.2% vs. 27.5%, respectively) and any paid work (73.9% vs. 34.8% vs. 53.6%, respectively). There were few differences in nonvocational outcomes between programs. IPS is a more effective model than PSR or standard brokered vocational services for improving employment outcomes in clients with SMI.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical psychology</subject><subject>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Employment Patterns</subject><subject>Employment Status</subject><subject>Employment, Supported</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mental Disorders</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Mental illness</subject><subject>Mentally ill people</subject><subject>Minority Groups</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Psychological Patterns</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychosocial Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Reeducation. Readaptation. Sociotherapy</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Serious Mental Illness</subject><subject>Severely</subject><subject>Severity (Disorders)</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Social Development</subject><subject>Supported Employment</subject><subject>Treatment Outcomes</subject><subject>Treatments</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>Vocational Rehabilitation</subject><issn>0022-006X</issn><issn>1939-2117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0ltrFDEUB_Agit1Wv4CIBPHyILOe3JNHKautVFS2om8hk83QKXMzmSnstzfjLrWKtE95-P9yEs45CD0hsCTA1FsASgsA-WOp6JItuTL30IIYZgpKiLqPFtfgAB2mdAkARIJ4iA6IoMoIRhbo6_lFwCcujlUfN3g9Tpst7iu8noahj2PY4FU7NP22Dd2IM8FfQkx9l_D3erzA63AVYsCfcugafNo0XUjpEXpQuSaFx_vzCH17vzo_PinOPn84PX53VjjJyVgYGQSrdOlFqaGiXFPPnBSBgzPCayJFjhilVBCuy9IQpktpPHVMcsqhZEfo9a7uEPufU0ijbevkQ9O4LvRTskrlGpornuWrW6WUSoIU4k4oFDCqJLkTMqWNJgYyfP4PvOyn2OW-WEk4M4YDvw1RApKBMDOiO-Rjn1IMlR1i3bq4tQTsvA52nradp20VtczmdciXnu0rT2UbNn-u7Oefwcs9cMm7poqu83W64ZRR5HcLn-5ciLW_jlcfpeZSz--82cVucHZIW58XqvZNSH6KMW-H9X64-asX_9d_s1_b0t6b</recordid><startdate>20040601</startdate><enddate>20040601</enddate><creator>Mueser, Kim T</creator><creator>Clark, Robin E</creator><creator>Haines, Michael</creator><creator>Drake, Robert E</creator><creator>McHugo, Gregory J</creator><creator>Bond, Gary R</creator><creator>Essock, Susan M</creator><creator>Becker, Deborah R</creator><creator>Wolfe, Rosemarie</creator><creator>Swain, Karin</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>APA Service Center</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040601</creationdate><title>The Hartford Study of Supported Employment for Persons With Severe Mental Illness</title><author>Mueser, Kim T ; Clark, Robin E ; Haines, Michael ; Drake, Robert E ; McHugo, Gregory J ; Bond, Gary R ; Essock, Susan M ; Becker, Deborah R ; Wolfe, Rosemarie ; Swain, Karin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a641t-96e53f8bc5b80f2482c3a65e40a95c8165bc532225148bb9138b69c2a364240b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical psychology</topic><topic>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Employment Patterns</topic><topic>Employment Status</topic><topic>Employment, Supported</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mental Disorders</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Mental illness</topic><topic>Mentally ill people</topic><topic>Minority Groups</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Psychological Patterns</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychosocial Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Reeducation. Readaptation. Sociotherapy</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Serious Mental Illness</topic><topic>Severely</topic><topic>Severity (Disorders)</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Social Development</topic><topic>Supported Employment</topic><topic>Treatment Outcomes</topic><topic>Treatments</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>Vocational Rehabilitation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mueser, Kim T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Robin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haines, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drake, Robert E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McHugo, Gregory J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bond, Gary R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Essock, Susan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Deborah R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfe, Rosemarie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swain, Karin</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mueser, Kim T</au><au>Clark, Robin E</au><au>Haines, Michael</au><au>Drake, Robert E</au><au>McHugo, Gregory J</au><au>Bond, Gary R</au><au>Essock, Susan M</au><au>Becker, Deborah R</au><au>Wolfe, Rosemarie</au><au>Swain, Karin</au><au>Sobell, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ684689</ericid><atitle>The Hartford Study of Supported Employment for Persons With Severe Mental Illness</atitle><jtitle>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Consult Clin Psychol</addtitle><date>2004-06-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>479</spage><epage>490</epage><pages>479-490</pages><issn>0022-006X</issn><eissn>1939-2117</eissn><coden>JCLPBC</coden><abstract>The authors compared 3 approaches to vocational rehabilitation for severe mental illness (SMI): the individual placement and support (IPS) model of supported employment, a psychosocial rehabilitation (PSR) program, and standard services. Two hundred four unemployed clients (46% African American, 30% Latino) with SMI were randomly assigned to IPS, PSR, or standard services and followed for 2 years. Clients in IPS had significantly better employment outcomes than clients in PSR and standard services, including more competitive work (73.9% vs. 18.2% vs. 27.5%, respectively) and any paid work (73.9% vs. 34.8% vs. 53.6%, respectively). There were few differences in nonvocational outcomes between programs. IPS is a more effective model than PSR or standard brokered vocational services for improving employment outcomes in clients with SMI.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>15279531</pmid><doi>10.1037/0022-006X.72.3.479</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-006X |
| ispartof | Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2004-06, Vol.72 (3), p.479-490 |
| issn | 0022-006X 1939-2117 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_771658474 |
| source | APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE |
| subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Clinical psychology Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Employment Employment Patterns Employment Status Employment, Supported Female Human Humans Male Medical sciences Mental Disorders Mental Disorders - diagnosis Mental Disorders - psychology Mental illness Mentally ill people Minority Groups Program Effectiveness Psychological Patterns Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Psychosocial Rehabilitation Reeducation. Readaptation. Sociotherapy Schizophrenia Serious Mental Illness Severely Severity (Disorders) Severity of Illness Index Social Development Supported Employment Treatment Outcomes Treatments USA Vocational Rehabilitation |
| title | The Hartford Study of Supported Employment for Persons With Severe Mental Illness |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A27%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Hartford%20Study%20of%20Supported%20Employment%20for%20Persons%20With%20Severe%20Mental%20Illness&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20consulting%20and%20clinical%20psychology&rft.au=Mueser,%20Kim%20T&rft.date=2004-06-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=479&rft.epage=490&rft.pages=479-490&rft.issn=0022-006X&rft.eissn=1939-2117&rft.coden=JCLPBC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0022-006X.72.3.479&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66760655%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614399404&rft_id=info:pmid/15279531&rft_ericid=EJ684689&rfr_iscdi=true |