Comparison of immunohistochemistry and RT‐PCR for detection of CD44v‐expression, a new prognostic factor in human breast cancer

In different human tumors, splice variants of the surface glycoprotein CD44 (CD44v) are correlated with advanced stages of tumor growth and metastatic potential. In breast cancer and colon cancer, expression of epitopes encoded by exon v6 on primary tumors is an independent prognostic factor for poo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cancer 1995-02, Vol.60 (4), p.471-477
Hauptverfasser: Dall, Peter, Heider, Karl‐Heinz, Sinn, Hans‐Peter, Skroch‐Angel, Petra, Adolf, GÜNther, Kaufmann, Manfred, Herrlich, Peter, Ponta, Helmut
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 477
container_issue 4
container_start_page 471
container_title International journal of cancer
container_volume 60
creator Dall, Peter
Heider, Karl‐Heinz
Sinn, Hans‐Peter
Skroch‐Angel, Petra
Adolf, GÜNther
Kaufmann, Manfred
Herrlich, Peter
Ponta, Helmut
description In different human tumors, splice variants of the surface glycoprotein CD44 (CD44v) are correlated with advanced stages of tumor growth and metastatic potential. In breast cancer and colon cancer, expression of epitopes encoded by exon v6 on primary tumors is an independent prognostic factor for poor patient survival. Two different screening methods for the detection of CD44 variants in tumors have been applied: immunohistochemistry (IHC) and semi‐quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT‐PCR). In this study, we have compared the predictive capacity and the applicability of both approaches, using 31 human breast‐tissue specimens (normal and neoplastic). IHC reveals lack of expression of CD44v on normal ductal epithelial cells but strong expression on myoepithelial cells. The majority of tumors express CD44 epitopes encoded by several variant exons. RT‐PCR detects splice variants in normal epithelium, probably derived from RNA expressed in the myoepithelium. In tumors, RT‐PCR reveals expression of a wide range of splice variants, including new ones that are not detected in normal breast tissue, e.g. ones that contain all variant exons. The conclusion of this comparison is that IHC is the better method for breast‐tumor sample screening but that the increased sensitivity of RT‐PCR can help to distinguish CD44v‐positive from CD44v‐negative tumors in cases where only a few tumor cells express variants or where epitopes are masked.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ijc.2910600408
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77131295</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77131295</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4668-cd67787d2dd32c28cf21e76dccaaab34f1b32375f93ae5d6bc8260cc9370538f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EKkNhyw7JC8SKTP0T28kShZ-2qlRUlXXkXNuMq8Qe7IQyOyRegGfkSXA1o8Kuqyv5fuf63HsQeknJmhLCTvwNrFlLiSSkJs0jtKKkVRVhVDxGqwKQSlEun6JnOd8QQqkg9RE6UoITxtUK_eritNXJ5xhwdNhP0xLixuc5wsZOpaYd1sHgq-s_P39_7q6wiwkbO1uY_V7Sva_r76Vpf2yTzbm8vsUaB3uLtyl-DTHPHrDTMBehD3izTDrgIVmdZww6gE3P0ROnx2xfHOox-vLxw3V3Wl1cfjrr3l1UUEvZVGCkUo0yzBjOgDXgGLVKGgCt9cBrRwdedhKu5doKIwdomCQALVdE8MbxY_RmP7cY-7bYPPdlQbDjqIONS-5VuRRlrXgQpEKSWtCmgOs9CCnmnKzrt8lPOu16Svq7ePoST_8vniJ4dZi8DJM19_ghj9J_fejrDHp0qRzI53uM11Qxfmew3WO3frS7Bz7tz867_yz8BXIVq5I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15604518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of immunohistochemistry and RT‐PCR for detection of CD44v‐expression, a new prognostic factor in human breast cancer</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Dall, Peter ; Heider, Karl‐Heinz ; Sinn, Hans‐Peter ; Skroch‐Angel, Petra ; Adolf, GÜNther ; Kaufmann, Manfred ; Herrlich, Peter ; Ponta, Helmut</creator><creatorcontrib>Dall, Peter ; Heider, Karl‐Heinz ; Sinn, Hans‐Peter ; Skroch‐Angel, Petra ; Adolf, GÜNther ; Kaufmann, Manfred ; Herrlich, Peter ; Ponta, Helmut</creatorcontrib><description>In different human tumors, splice variants of the surface glycoprotein CD44 (CD44v) are correlated with advanced stages of tumor growth and metastatic potential. In breast cancer and colon cancer, expression of epitopes encoded by exon v6 on primary tumors is an independent prognostic factor for poor patient survival. Two different screening methods for the detection of CD44 variants in tumors have been applied: immunohistochemistry (IHC) and semi‐quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT‐PCR). In this study, we have compared the predictive capacity and the applicability of both approaches, using 31 human breast‐tissue specimens (normal and neoplastic). IHC reveals lack of expression of CD44v on normal ductal epithelial cells but strong expression on myoepithelial cells. The majority of tumors express CD44 epitopes encoded by several variant exons. RT‐PCR detects splice variants in normal epithelium, probably derived from RNA expressed in the myoepithelium. In tumors, RT‐PCR reveals expression of a wide range of splice variants, including new ones that are not detected in normal breast tissue, e.g. ones that contain all variant exons. The conclusion of this comparison is that IHC is the better method for breast‐tumor sample screening but that the increased sensitivity of RT‐PCR can help to distinguish CD44v‐positive from CD44v‐negative tumors in cases where only a few tumor cells express variants or where epitopes are masked.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910600408</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7530237</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJCNAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Antigens, Neoplasm - analysis ; Antigens, Neoplasm - biosynthesis ; Antigens, Neoplasm - genetics ; Base Sequence ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis ; Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics ; Blotting, Southern ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - immunology ; Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis ; Carcinoma in Situ - immunology ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnosis ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - immunology ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - diagnosis ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - immunology ; Carcinoma, Lobular - diagnosis ; Carcinoma, Lobular - immunology ; Carrier Proteins - analysis ; Carrier Proteins - biosynthesis ; Carrier Proteins - genetics ; DNA, Neoplasm - genetics ; Epitopes - analysis ; Female ; Fibroadenoma - diagnosis ; Fibroadenoma - immunology ; Gene Expression ; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic ; Genital system. Mammary gland ; Humans ; Hyaluronan Receptors ; Immunohistochemistry ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Medical sciences ; Molecular Sequence Data ; Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prognosis ; Receptors, Cell Surface - analysis ; Receptors, Cell Surface - biosynthesis ; Receptors, Cell Surface - genetics ; Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing - analysis ; Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing - biosynthesis ; Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing - genetics ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>International journal of cancer, 1995-02, Vol.60 (4), p.471-477</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4668-cd67787d2dd32c28cf21e76dccaaab34f1b32375f93ae5d6bc8260cc9370538f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4668-cd67787d2dd32c28cf21e76dccaaab34f1b32375f93ae5d6bc8260cc9370538f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fijc.2910600408$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fijc.2910600408$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3417235$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7530237$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dall, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heider, Karl‐Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinn, Hans‐Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skroch‐Angel, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adolf, GÜNther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufmann, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrlich, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponta, Helmut</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of immunohistochemistry and RT‐PCR for detection of CD44v‐expression, a new prognostic factor in human breast cancer</title><title>International journal of cancer</title><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><description>In different human tumors, splice variants of the surface glycoprotein CD44 (CD44v) are correlated with advanced stages of tumor growth and metastatic potential. In breast cancer and colon cancer, expression of epitopes encoded by exon v6 on primary tumors is an independent prognostic factor for poor patient survival. Two different screening methods for the detection of CD44 variants in tumors have been applied: immunohistochemistry (IHC) and semi‐quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT‐PCR). In this study, we have compared the predictive capacity and the applicability of both approaches, using 31 human breast‐tissue specimens (normal and neoplastic). IHC reveals lack of expression of CD44v on normal ductal epithelial cells but strong expression on myoepithelial cells. The majority of tumors express CD44 epitopes encoded by several variant exons. RT‐PCR detects splice variants in normal epithelium, probably derived from RNA expressed in the myoepithelium. In tumors, RT‐PCR reveals expression of a wide range of splice variants, including new ones that are not detected in normal breast tissue, e.g. ones that contain all variant exons. The conclusion of this comparison is that IHC is the better method for breast‐tumor sample screening but that the increased sensitivity of RT‐PCR can help to distinguish CD44v‐positive from CD44v‐negative tumors in cases where only a few tumor cells express variants or where epitopes are masked.</description><subject>Antigens, Neoplasm - analysis</subject><subject>Antigens, Neoplasm - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Antigens, Neoplasm - genetics</subject><subject>Base Sequence</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</subject><subject>Blotting, Southern</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - immunology</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - immunology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - immunology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - immunology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - immunology</subject><subject>Carrier Proteins - analysis</subject><subject>Carrier Proteins - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Carrier Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>DNA, Neoplasm - genetics</subject><subject>Epitopes - analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fibroadenoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Fibroadenoma - immunology</subject><subject>Gene Expression</subject><subject>Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic</subject><subject>Genital system. Mammary gland</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyaluronan Receptors</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Molecular Sequence Data</subject><subject>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Receptors, Cell Surface - analysis</subject><subject>Receptors, Cell Surface - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Receptors, Cell Surface - genetics</subject><subject>Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing - analysis</subject><subject>Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing - genetics</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0020-7136</issn><issn>1097-0215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EKkNhyw7JC8SKTP0T28kShZ-2qlRUlXXkXNuMq8Qe7IQyOyRegGfkSXA1o8Kuqyv5fuf63HsQeknJmhLCTvwNrFlLiSSkJs0jtKKkVRVhVDxGqwKQSlEun6JnOd8QQqkg9RE6UoITxtUK_eritNXJ5xhwdNhP0xLixuc5wsZOpaYd1sHgq-s_P39_7q6wiwkbO1uY_V7Sva_r76Vpf2yTzbm8vsUaB3uLtyl-DTHPHrDTMBehD3izTDrgIVmdZww6gE3P0ROnx2xfHOox-vLxw3V3Wl1cfjrr3l1UUEvZVGCkUo0yzBjOgDXgGLVKGgCt9cBrRwdedhKu5doKIwdomCQALVdE8MbxY_RmP7cY-7bYPPdlQbDjqIONS-5VuRRlrXgQpEKSWtCmgOs9CCnmnKzrt8lPOu16Svq7ePoST_8vniJ4dZi8DJM19_ghj9J_fejrDHp0qRzI53uM11Qxfmew3WO3frS7Bz7tz867_yz8BXIVq5I</recordid><startdate>19950208</startdate><enddate>19950208</enddate><creator>Dall, Peter</creator><creator>Heider, Karl‐Heinz</creator><creator>Sinn, Hans‐Peter</creator><creator>Skroch‐Angel, Petra</creator><creator>Adolf, GÜNther</creator><creator>Kaufmann, Manfred</creator><creator>Herrlich, Peter</creator><creator>Ponta, Helmut</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950208</creationdate><title>Comparison of immunohistochemistry and RT‐PCR for detection of CD44v‐expression, a new prognostic factor in human breast cancer</title><author>Dall, Peter ; Heider, Karl‐Heinz ; Sinn, Hans‐Peter ; Skroch‐Angel, Petra ; Adolf, GÜNther ; Kaufmann, Manfred ; Herrlich, Peter ; Ponta, Helmut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4668-cd67787d2dd32c28cf21e76dccaaab34f1b32375f93ae5d6bc8260cc9370538f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Antigens, Neoplasm - analysis</topic><topic>Antigens, Neoplasm - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Antigens, Neoplasm - genetics</topic><topic>Base Sequence</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</topic><topic>Blotting, Southern</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - immunology</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - immunology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - immunology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - immunology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - immunology</topic><topic>Carrier Proteins - analysis</topic><topic>Carrier Proteins - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Carrier Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>DNA, Neoplasm - genetics</topic><topic>Epitopes - analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fibroadenoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Fibroadenoma - immunology</topic><topic>Gene Expression</topic><topic>Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic</topic><topic>Genital system. Mammary gland</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyaluronan Receptors</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Molecular Sequence Data</topic><topic>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Receptors, Cell Surface - analysis</topic><topic>Receptors, Cell Surface - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Receptors, Cell Surface - genetics</topic><topic>Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing - analysis</topic><topic>Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing - genetics</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dall, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heider, Karl‐Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinn, Hans‐Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skroch‐Angel, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adolf, GÜNther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufmann, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrlich, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponta, Helmut</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dall, Peter</au><au>Heider, Karl‐Heinz</au><au>Sinn, Hans‐Peter</au><au>Skroch‐Angel, Petra</au><au>Adolf, GÜNther</au><au>Kaufmann, Manfred</au><au>Herrlich, Peter</au><au>Ponta, Helmut</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of immunohistochemistry and RT‐PCR for detection of CD44v‐expression, a new prognostic factor in human breast cancer</atitle><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><date>1995-02-08</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>471</spage><epage>477</epage><pages>471-477</pages><issn>0020-7136</issn><eissn>1097-0215</eissn><coden>IJCNAW</coden><abstract>In different human tumors, splice variants of the surface glycoprotein CD44 (CD44v) are correlated with advanced stages of tumor growth and metastatic potential. In breast cancer and colon cancer, expression of epitopes encoded by exon v6 on primary tumors is an independent prognostic factor for poor patient survival. Two different screening methods for the detection of CD44 variants in tumors have been applied: immunohistochemistry (IHC) and semi‐quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT‐PCR). In this study, we have compared the predictive capacity and the applicability of both approaches, using 31 human breast‐tissue specimens (normal and neoplastic). IHC reveals lack of expression of CD44v on normal ductal epithelial cells but strong expression on myoepithelial cells. The majority of tumors express CD44 epitopes encoded by several variant exons. RT‐PCR detects splice variants in normal epithelium, probably derived from RNA expressed in the myoepithelium. In tumors, RT‐PCR reveals expression of a wide range of splice variants, including new ones that are not detected in normal breast tissue, e.g. ones that contain all variant exons. The conclusion of this comparison is that IHC is the better method for breast‐tumor sample screening but that the increased sensitivity of RT‐PCR can help to distinguish CD44v‐positive from CD44v‐negative tumors in cases where only a few tumor cells express variants or where epitopes are masked.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>7530237</pmid><doi>10.1002/ijc.2910600408</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7136
ispartof International journal of cancer, 1995-02, Vol.60 (4), p.471-477
issn 0020-7136
1097-0215
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77131295
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Antigens, Neoplasm - analysis
Antigens, Neoplasm - biosynthesis
Antigens, Neoplasm - genetics
Base Sequence
Biological and medical sciences
Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis
Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics
Blotting, Southern
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Breast Neoplasms - immunology
Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis
Carcinoma in Situ - immunology
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnosis
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - immunology
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - diagnosis
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - immunology
Carcinoma, Lobular - diagnosis
Carcinoma, Lobular - immunology
Carrier Proteins - analysis
Carrier Proteins - biosynthesis
Carrier Proteins - genetics
DNA, Neoplasm - genetics
Epitopes - analysis
Female
Fibroadenoma - diagnosis
Fibroadenoma - immunology
Gene Expression
Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
Genital system. Mammary gland
Humans
Hyaluronan Receptors
Immunohistochemistry
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Medical sciences
Molecular Sequence Data
Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques
Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Receptors, Cell Surface - analysis
Receptors, Cell Surface - biosynthesis
Receptors, Cell Surface - genetics
Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing - analysis
Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing - biosynthesis
Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing - genetics
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Comparison of immunohistochemistry and RT‐PCR for detection of CD44v‐expression, a new prognostic factor in human breast cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T10%3A39%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20immunohistochemistry%20and%20RT%E2%80%90PCR%20for%20detection%20of%20CD44v%E2%80%90expression,%20a%20new%20prognostic%20factor%20in%20human%20breast%20cancer&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.au=Dall,%20Peter&rft.date=1995-02-08&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=471&rft.epage=477&rft.pages=471-477&rft.issn=0020-7136&rft.eissn=1097-0215&rft.coden=IJCNAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ijc.2910600408&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77131295%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15604518&rft_id=info:pmid/7530237&rfr_iscdi=true