Comparison of immunohistochemistry and RT‐PCR for detection of CD44v‐expression, a new prognostic factor in human breast cancer
In different human tumors, splice variants of the surface glycoprotein CD44 (CD44v) are correlated with advanced stages of tumor growth and metastatic potential. In breast cancer and colon cancer, expression of epitopes encoded by exon v6 on primary tumors is an independent prognostic factor for poo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of cancer 1995-02, Vol.60 (4), p.471-477 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 477 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 471 |
container_title | International journal of cancer |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Dall, Peter Heider, Karl‐Heinz Sinn, Hans‐Peter Skroch‐Angel, Petra Adolf, GÜNther Kaufmann, Manfred Herrlich, Peter Ponta, Helmut |
description | In different human tumors, splice variants of the surface glycoprotein CD44 (CD44v) are correlated with advanced stages of tumor growth and metastatic potential. In breast cancer and colon cancer, expression of epitopes encoded by exon v6 on primary tumors is an independent prognostic factor for poor patient survival. Two different screening methods for the detection of CD44 variants in tumors have been applied: immunohistochemistry (IHC) and semi‐quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT‐PCR). In this study, we have compared the predictive capacity and the applicability of both approaches, using 31 human breast‐tissue specimens (normal and neoplastic). IHC reveals lack of expression of CD44v on normal ductal epithelial cells but strong expression on myoepithelial cells. The majority of tumors express CD44 epitopes encoded by several variant exons. RT‐PCR detects splice variants in normal epithelium, probably derived from RNA expressed in the myoepithelium. In tumors, RT‐PCR reveals expression of a wide range of splice variants, including new ones that are not detected in normal breast tissue, e.g. ones that contain all variant exons. The conclusion of this comparison is that IHC is the better method for breast‐tumor sample screening but that the increased sensitivity of RT‐PCR can help to distinguish CD44v‐positive from CD44v‐negative tumors in cases where only a few tumor cells express variants or where epitopes are masked. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ijc.2910600408 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77131295</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77131295</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4668-cd67787d2dd32c28cf21e76dccaaab34f1b32375f93ae5d6bc8260cc9370538f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EKkNhyw7JC8SKTP0T28kShZ-2qlRUlXXkXNuMq8Qe7IQyOyRegGfkSXA1o8Kuqyv5fuf63HsQeknJmhLCTvwNrFlLiSSkJs0jtKKkVRVhVDxGqwKQSlEun6JnOd8QQqkg9RE6UoITxtUK_eritNXJ5xhwdNhP0xLixuc5wsZOpaYd1sHgq-s_P39_7q6wiwkbO1uY_V7Sva_r76Vpf2yTzbm8vsUaB3uLtyl-DTHPHrDTMBehD3izTDrgIVmdZww6gE3P0ROnx2xfHOox-vLxw3V3Wl1cfjrr3l1UUEvZVGCkUo0yzBjOgDXgGLVKGgCt9cBrRwdedhKu5doKIwdomCQALVdE8MbxY_RmP7cY-7bYPPdlQbDjqIONS-5VuRRlrXgQpEKSWtCmgOs9CCnmnKzrt8lPOu16Svq7ePoST_8vniJ4dZi8DJM19_ghj9J_fejrDHp0qRzI53uM11Qxfmew3WO3frS7Bz7tz867_yz8BXIVq5I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15604518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of immunohistochemistry and RT‐PCR for detection of CD44v‐expression, a new prognostic factor in human breast cancer</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Dall, Peter ; Heider, Karl‐Heinz ; Sinn, Hans‐Peter ; Skroch‐Angel, Petra ; Adolf, GÜNther ; Kaufmann, Manfred ; Herrlich, Peter ; Ponta, Helmut</creator><creatorcontrib>Dall, Peter ; Heider, Karl‐Heinz ; Sinn, Hans‐Peter ; Skroch‐Angel, Petra ; Adolf, GÜNther ; Kaufmann, Manfred ; Herrlich, Peter ; Ponta, Helmut</creatorcontrib><description>In different human tumors, splice variants of the surface glycoprotein CD44 (CD44v) are correlated with advanced stages of tumor growth and metastatic potential. In breast cancer and colon cancer, expression of epitopes encoded by exon v6 on primary tumors is an independent prognostic factor for poor patient survival. Two different screening methods for the detection of CD44 variants in tumors have been applied: immunohistochemistry (IHC) and semi‐quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT‐PCR). In this study, we have compared the predictive capacity and the applicability of both approaches, using 31 human breast‐tissue specimens (normal and neoplastic). IHC reveals lack of expression of CD44v on normal ductal epithelial cells but strong expression on myoepithelial cells. The majority of tumors express CD44 epitopes encoded by several variant exons. RT‐PCR detects splice variants in normal epithelium, probably derived from RNA expressed in the myoepithelium. In tumors, RT‐PCR reveals expression of a wide range of splice variants, including new ones that are not detected in normal breast tissue, e.g. ones that contain all variant exons. The conclusion of this comparison is that IHC is the better method for breast‐tumor sample screening but that the increased sensitivity of RT‐PCR can help to distinguish CD44v‐positive from CD44v‐negative tumors in cases where only a few tumor cells express variants or where epitopes are masked.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910600408</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7530237</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJCNAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Antigens, Neoplasm - analysis ; Antigens, Neoplasm - biosynthesis ; Antigens, Neoplasm - genetics ; Base Sequence ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis ; Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics ; Blotting, Southern ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - immunology ; Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis ; Carcinoma in Situ - immunology ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnosis ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - immunology ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - diagnosis ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - immunology ; Carcinoma, Lobular - diagnosis ; Carcinoma, Lobular - immunology ; Carrier Proteins - analysis ; Carrier Proteins - biosynthesis ; Carrier Proteins - genetics ; DNA, Neoplasm - genetics ; Epitopes - analysis ; Female ; Fibroadenoma - diagnosis ; Fibroadenoma - immunology ; Gene Expression ; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic ; Genital system. Mammary gland ; Humans ; Hyaluronan Receptors ; Immunohistochemistry ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Medical sciences ; Molecular Sequence Data ; Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prognosis ; Receptors, Cell Surface - analysis ; Receptors, Cell Surface - biosynthesis ; Receptors, Cell Surface - genetics ; Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing - analysis ; Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing - biosynthesis ; Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing - genetics ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>International journal of cancer, 1995-02, Vol.60 (4), p.471-477</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4668-cd67787d2dd32c28cf21e76dccaaab34f1b32375f93ae5d6bc8260cc9370538f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4668-cd67787d2dd32c28cf21e76dccaaab34f1b32375f93ae5d6bc8260cc9370538f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fijc.2910600408$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fijc.2910600408$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3417235$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7530237$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dall, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heider, Karl‐Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinn, Hans‐Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skroch‐Angel, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adolf, GÜNther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufmann, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrlich, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponta, Helmut</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of immunohistochemistry and RT‐PCR for detection of CD44v‐expression, a new prognostic factor in human breast cancer</title><title>International journal of cancer</title><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><description>In different human tumors, splice variants of the surface glycoprotein CD44 (CD44v) are correlated with advanced stages of tumor growth and metastatic potential. In breast cancer and colon cancer, expression of epitopes encoded by exon v6 on primary tumors is an independent prognostic factor for poor patient survival. Two different screening methods for the detection of CD44 variants in tumors have been applied: immunohistochemistry (IHC) and semi‐quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT‐PCR). In this study, we have compared the predictive capacity and the applicability of both approaches, using 31 human breast‐tissue specimens (normal and neoplastic). IHC reveals lack of expression of CD44v on normal ductal epithelial cells but strong expression on myoepithelial cells. The majority of tumors express CD44 epitopes encoded by several variant exons. RT‐PCR detects splice variants in normal epithelium, probably derived from RNA expressed in the myoepithelium. In tumors, RT‐PCR reveals expression of a wide range of splice variants, including new ones that are not detected in normal breast tissue, e.g. ones that contain all variant exons. The conclusion of this comparison is that IHC is the better method for breast‐tumor sample screening but that the increased sensitivity of RT‐PCR can help to distinguish CD44v‐positive from CD44v‐negative tumors in cases where only a few tumor cells express variants or where epitopes are masked.</description><subject>Antigens, Neoplasm - analysis</subject><subject>Antigens, Neoplasm - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Antigens, Neoplasm - genetics</subject><subject>Base Sequence</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</subject><subject>Blotting, Southern</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - immunology</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - immunology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - immunology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - immunology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - immunology</subject><subject>Carrier Proteins - analysis</subject><subject>Carrier Proteins - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Carrier Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>DNA, Neoplasm - genetics</subject><subject>Epitopes - analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fibroadenoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Fibroadenoma - immunology</subject><subject>Gene Expression</subject><subject>Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic</subject><subject>Genital system. Mammary gland</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyaluronan Receptors</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Molecular Sequence Data</subject><subject>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Receptors, Cell Surface - analysis</subject><subject>Receptors, Cell Surface - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Receptors, Cell Surface - genetics</subject><subject>Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing - analysis</subject><subject>Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing - genetics</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0020-7136</issn><issn>1097-0215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EKkNhyw7JC8SKTP0T28kShZ-2qlRUlXXkXNuMq8Qe7IQyOyRegGfkSXA1o8Kuqyv5fuf63HsQeknJmhLCTvwNrFlLiSSkJs0jtKKkVRVhVDxGqwKQSlEun6JnOd8QQqkg9RE6UoITxtUK_eritNXJ5xhwdNhP0xLixuc5wsZOpaYd1sHgq-s_P39_7q6wiwkbO1uY_V7Sva_r76Vpf2yTzbm8vsUaB3uLtyl-DTHPHrDTMBehD3izTDrgIVmdZww6gE3P0ROnx2xfHOox-vLxw3V3Wl1cfjrr3l1UUEvZVGCkUo0yzBjOgDXgGLVKGgCt9cBrRwdedhKu5doKIwdomCQALVdE8MbxY_RmP7cY-7bYPPdlQbDjqIONS-5VuRRlrXgQpEKSWtCmgOs9CCnmnKzrt8lPOu16Svq7ePoST_8vniJ4dZi8DJM19_ghj9J_fejrDHp0qRzI53uM11Qxfmew3WO3frS7Bz7tz867_yz8BXIVq5I</recordid><startdate>19950208</startdate><enddate>19950208</enddate><creator>Dall, Peter</creator><creator>Heider, Karl‐Heinz</creator><creator>Sinn, Hans‐Peter</creator><creator>Skroch‐Angel, Petra</creator><creator>Adolf, GÜNther</creator><creator>Kaufmann, Manfred</creator><creator>Herrlich, Peter</creator><creator>Ponta, Helmut</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950208</creationdate><title>Comparison of immunohistochemistry and RT‐PCR for detection of CD44v‐expression, a new prognostic factor in human breast cancer</title><author>Dall, Peter ; Heider, Karl‐Heinz ; Sinn, Hans‐Peter ; Skroch‐Angel, Petra ; Adolf, GÜNther ; Kaufmann, Manfred ; Herrlich, Peter ; Ponta, Helmut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4668-cd67787d2dd32c28cf21e76dccaaab34f1b32375f93ae5d6bc8260cc9370538f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Antigens, Neoplasm - analysis</topic><topic>Antigens, Neoplasm - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Antigens, Neoplasm - genetics</topic><topic>Base Sequence</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</topic><topic>Blotting, Southern</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - immunology</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - immunology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - immunology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - immunology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - immunology</topic><topic>Carrier Proteins - analysis</topic><topic>Carrier Proteins - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Carrier Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>DNA, Neoplasm - genetics</topic><topic>Epitopes - analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fibroadenoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Fibroadenoma - immunology</topic><topic>Gene Expression</topic><topic>Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic</topic><topic>Genital system. Mammary gland</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyaluronan Receptors</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Molecular Sequence Data</topic><topic>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Receptors, Cell Surface - analysis</topic><topic>Receptors, Cell Surface - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Receptors, Cell Surface - genetics</topic><topic>Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing - analysis</topic><topic>Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing - genetics</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dall, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heider, Karl‐Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinn, Hans‐Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skroch‐Angel, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adolf, GÜNther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufmann, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrlich, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponta, Helmut</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dall, Peter</au><au>Heider, Karl‐Heinz</au><au>Sinn, Hans‐Peter</au><au>Skroch‐Angel, Petra</au><au>Adolf, GÜNther</au><au>Kaufmann, Manfred</au><au>Herrlich, Peter</au><au>Ponta, Helmut</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of immunohistochemistry and RT‐PCR for detection of CD44v‐expression, a new prognostic factor in human breast cancer</atitle><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><date>1995-02-08</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>471</spage><epage>477</epage><pages>471-477</pages><issn>0020-7136</issn><eissn>1097-0215</eissn><coden>IJCNAW</coden><abstract>In different human tumors, splice variants of the surface glycoprotein CD44 (CD44v) are correlated with advanced stages of tumor growth and metastatic potential. In breast cancer and colon cancer, expression of epitopes encoded by exon v6 on primary tumors is an independent prognostic factor for poor patient survival. Two different screening methods for the detection of CD44 variants in tumors have been applied: immunohistochemistry (IHC) and semi‐quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT‐PCR). In this study, we have compared the predictive capacity and the applicability of both approaches, using 31 human breast‐tissue specimens (normal and neoplastic). IHC reveals lack of expression of CD44v on normal ductal epithelial cells but strong expression on myoepithelial cells. The majority of tumors express CD44 epitopes encoded by several variant exons. RT‐PCR detects splice variants in normal epithelium, probably derived from RNA expressed in the myoepithelium. In tumors, RT‐PCR reveals expression of a wide range of splice variants, including new ones that are not detected in normal breast tissue, e.g. ones that contain all variant exons. The conclusion of this comparison is that IHC is the better method for breast‐tumor sample screening but that the increased sensitivity of RT‐PCR can help to distinguish CD44v‐positive from CD44v‐negative tumors in cases where only a few tumor cells express variants or where epitopes are masked.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>7530237</pmid><doi>10.1002/ijc.2910600408</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-7136 |
ispartof | International journal of cancer, 1995-02, Vol.60 (4), p.471-477 |
issn | 0020-7136 1097-0215 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77131295 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Antigens, Neoplasm - analysis Antigens, Neoplasm - biosynthesis Antigens, Neoplasm - genetics Base Sequence Biological and medical sciences Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics Blotting, Southern Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis Breast Neoplasms - immunology Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis Carcinoma in Situ - immunology Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnosis Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - immunology Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - diagnosis Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - immunology Carcinoma, Lobular - diagnosis Carcinoma, Lobular - immunology Carrier Proteins - analysis Carrier Proteins - biosynthesis Carrier Proteins - genetics DNA, Neoplasm - genetics Epitopes - analysis Female Fibroadenoma - diagnosis Fibroadenoma - immunology Gene Expression Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic Genital system. Mammary gland Humans Hyaluronan Receptors Immunohistochemistry Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Medical sciences Molecular Sequence Data Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods Predictive Value of Tests Prognosis Receptors, Cell Surface - analysis Receptors, Cell Surface - biosynthesis Receptors, Cell Surface - genetics Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing - analysis Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing - biosynthesis Receptors, Lymphocyte Homing - genetics Sensitivity and Specificity |
title | Comparison of immunohistochemistry and RT‐PCR for detection of CD44v‐expression, a new prognostic factor in human breast cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T10%3A39%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20immunohistochemistry%20and%20RT%E2%80%90PCR%20for%20detection%20of%20CD44v%E2%80%90expression,%20a%20new%20prognostic%20factor%20in%20human%20breast%20cancer&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.au=Dall,%20Peter&rft.date=1995-02-08&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=471&rft.epage=477&rft.pages=471-477&rft.issn=0020-7136&rft.eissn=1097-0215&rft.coden=IJCNAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ijc.2910600408&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77131295%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15604518&rft_id=info:pmid/7530237&rfr_iscdi=true |