The BVS 5000 Biventricular Assist Device: The Worldwide Registry Experience
The BVS 5000 is an extracorporeal pulsatile assist device for temporary univentricular or biventricular support. A registry of BVS 5000 usage has enrolled 420 patients between June 1987 and February 1994. Data were voluntarily contributed from more than 60 centers in 15 countries. The device has bee...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | ASAIO journal (1992) 1994-07, Vol.40 (3), p.M460-M464 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | M464 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | M460 |
container_title | ASAIO journal (1992) |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Gray, Laman A Champsaur, Gerard G |
description | The BVS 5000 is an extracorporeal pulsatile assist device for temporary univentricular or biventricular support. A registry of BVS 5000 usage has enrolled 420 patients between June 1987 and February 1994. Data were voluntarily contributed from more than 60 centers in 15 countries. The device has been implanted for post-cardiotomy shock (n = 211), cardiomyopathy (n = 94), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) shock (n = 44), failed transplant (n = 45), and other indications (n = 26).Device support was biventricular in 65% of patients, left in 29%, and right in 5%. Mean length of support was 5.2 days. Of the patients, 78% were men and 81% were 60 years of age or younger. In the post-cardiotomy group, 116 (55%) were weaned or bridged, and 27% were discharged. Seventy percent of cardiomyopathy patients went on to transplant, of which 39 (58%) were discharged. Of the patients with AMI shock, 52% underwent transplant, and 16 (70%) of these were discharged.The use of ventricular support in the setting of post-cardiotomy is explored and compared with the standard practice of supporting patients with inotropes and intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP). Analysis of the poor outcomes and high cost of standard practice suggests that ventricular assist may positively affect outcomes in this population.This multi-institutional experience supports the use of the BVS 5000 for short-term ventricular assistance and suggests the need for additional study of ventricular support in the post-cardiotomy setting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00002480-199407000-00042 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77122004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16909451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2752-b3f79340f5fd21f12ffefc31aad689251597017f62255e5b0b5dd908bf8a768a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtvEzEURi0EKmnLT0DyArGb4sd4bLNLSlsQkSrRB-wsj-eaGJxMsGca-u9xSMiu4kqWbX3nXkvHCGFKzijR8h0pxWpFKqp1TWS5VWXV7BmaUMFVpWv-7Xk5E6EqpmnzEh3n_IOQEnJ6hI6U2JaaoM-3C8Cz-xssSj-ehQdYDSm4MdqEpzmHPOAP8BAcvMdb8mufYrcJHeAv8L2E6RFf_F5DCrBycIpeeBszvNrvJ-ju8uL2_GM1v776dD6dV45JwaqWe6l5TbzwHaOeMu_BO06t7RqlmaBCS0KlbxgTAkRLWtF1mqjWKysbZfkJerubu079rxHyYJYhO4jRrqAfs5GSMlZs_BekjSa6FrSAage61OecwJt1CkubHg0lZivc_BNuDsLNX-Gl9fX-jbFdQndo3Bsu-Zt9brOz0Se7ciEfMC6EbhQpWL3DNn0cIOWfcdxAMguwcViYp76b_wHdqZVh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16909451</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The BVS 5000 Biventricular Assist Device: The Worldwide Registry Experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Gray, Laman A ; Champsaur, Gerard G</creator><creatorcontrib>Gray, Laman A ; Champsaur, Gerard G</creatorcontrib><description>The BVS 5000 is an extracorporeal pulsatile assist device for temporary univentricular or biventricular support. A registry of BVS 5000 usage has enrolled 420 patients between June 1987 and February 1994. Data were voluntarily contributed from more than 60 centers in 15 countries. The device has been implanted for post-cardiotomy shock (n = 211), cardiomyopathy (n = 94), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) shock (n = 44), failed transplant (n = 45), and other indications (n = 26).Device support was biventricular in 65% of patients, left in 29%, and right in 5%. Mean length of support was 5.2 days. Of the patients, 78% were men and 81% were 60 years of age or younger. In the post-cardiotomy group, 116 (55%) were weaned or bridged, and 27% were discharged. Seventy percent of cardiomyopathy patients went on to transplant, of which 39 (58%) were discharged. Of the patients with AMI shock, 52% underwent transplant, and 16 (70%) of these were discharged.The use of ventricular support in the setting of post-cardiotomy is explored and compared with the standard practice of supporting patients with inotropes and intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP). Analysis of the poor outcomes and high cost of standard practice suggests that ventricular assist may positively affect outcomes in this population.This multi-institutional experience supports the use of the BVS 5000 for short-term ventricular assistance and suggests the need for additional study of ventricular support in the post-cardiotomy setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-943X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00002480-199407000-00042</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8555558</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOUET</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Amercian Society of Artificial Internal Organs</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - mortality ; Cardiomyopathies - therapy ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care ; Female ; Heart-Assist Devices - adverse effects ; Heart-Assist Devices - economics ; Humans ; Intensive care medicine ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - mortality ; Postoperative Complications - therapy ; Prognosis ; Registries ; Shock, Cardiogenic - etiology ; Shock, Cardiogenic - mortality ; Shock, Cardiogenic - therapy ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>ASAIO journal (1992), 1994-07, Vol.40 (3), p.M460-M464</ispartof><rights>1994Amercian Society of Artificial Internal Organs</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf><![CDATA[$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&PDF=y&D=ovft&AN=00002480-199407000-00042$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H]]></linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00002480-199407000-00042$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4609,27924,27925,64666,65461</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3559680$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8555558$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gray, Laman A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Champsaur, Gerard G</creatorcontrib><title>The BVS 5000 Biventricular Assist Device: The Worldwide Registry Experience</title><title>ASAIO journal (1992)</title><addtitle>ASAIO J</addtitle><description>The BVS 5000 is an extracorporeal pulsatile assist device for temporary univentricular or biventricular support. A registry of BVS 5000 usage has enrolled 420 patients between June 1987 and February 1994. Data were voluntarily contributed from more than 60 centers in 15 countries. The device has been implanted for post-cardiotomy shock (n = 211), cardiomyopathy (n = 94), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) shock (n = 44), failed transplant (n = 45), and other indications (n = 26).Device support was biventricular in 65% of patients, left in 29%, and right in 5%. Mean length of support was 5.2 days. Of the patients, 78% were men and 81% were 60 years of age or younger. In the post-cardiotomy group, 116 (55%) were weaned or bridged, and 27% were discharged. Seventy percent of cardiomyopathy patients went on to transplant, of which 39 (58%) were discharged. Of the patients with AMI shock, 52% underwent transplant, and 16 (70%) of these were discharged.The use of ventricular support in the setting of post-cardiotomy is explored and compared with the standard practice of supporting patients with inotropes and intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP). Analysis of the poor outcomes and high cost of standard practice suggests that ventricular assist may positively affect outcomes in this population.This multi-institutional experience supports the use of the BVS 5000 for short-term ventricular assistance and suggests the need for additional study of ventricular support in the post-cardiotomy setting.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - mortality</subject><subject>Cardiomyopathies - therapy</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart-Assist Devices - adverse effects</subject><subject>Heart-Assist Devices - economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - mortality</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - therapy</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Shock, Cardiogenic - etiology</subject><subject>Shock, Cardiogenic - mortality</subject><subject>Shock, Cardiogenic - therapy</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1058-2916</issn><issn>1538-943X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtvEzEURi0EKmnLT0DyArGb4sd4bLNLSlsQkSrRB-wsj-eaGJxMsGca-u9xSMiu4kqWbX3nXkvHCGFKzijR8h0pxWpFKqp1TWS5VWXV7BmaUMFVpWv-7Xk5E6EqpmnzEh3n_IOQEnJ6hI6U2JaaoM-3C8Cz-xssSj-ehQdYDSm4MdqEpzmHPOAP8BAcvMdb8mufYrcJHeAv8L2E6RFf_F5DCrBycIpeeBszvNrvJ-ju8uL2_GM1v776dD6dV45JwaqWe6l5TbzwHaOeMu_BO06t7RqlmaBCS0KlbxgTAkRLWtF1mqjWKysbZfkJerubu079rxHyYJYhO4jRrqAfs5GSMlZs_BekjSa6FrSAage61OecwJt1CkubHg0lZivc_BNuDsLNX-Gl9fX-jbFdQndo3Bsu-Zt9brOz0Se7ciEfMC6EbhQpWL3DNn0cIOWfcdxAMguwcViYp76b_wHdqZVh</recordid><startdate>199407</startdate><enddate>199407</enddate><creator>Gray, Laman A</creator><creator>Champsaur, Gerard G</creator><general>Amercian Society of Artificial Internal Organs</general><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199407</creationdate><title>The BVS 5000 Biventricular Assist Device: The Worldwide Registry Experience</title><author>Gray, Laman A ; Champsaur, Gerard G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2752-b3f79340f5fd21f12ffefc31aad689251597017f62255e5b0b5dd908bf8a768a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - mortality</topic><topic>Cardiomyopathies - therapy</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart-Assist Devices - adverse effects</topic><topic>Heart-Assist Devices - economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - mortality</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - therapy</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Shock, Cardiogenic - etiology</topic><topic>Shock, Cardiogenic - mortality</topic><topic>Shock, Cardiogenic - therapy</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gray, Laman A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Champsaur, Gerard G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>ASAIO journal (1992)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gray, Laman A</au><au>Champsaur, Gerard G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The BVS 5000 Biventricular Assist Device: The Worldwide Registry Experience</atitle><jtitle>ASAIO journal (1992)</jtitle><addtitle>ASAIO J</addtitle><date>1994-07</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>M460</spage><epage>M464</epage><pages>M460-M464</pages><issn>1058-2916</issn><eissn>1538-943X</eissn><coden>AJOUET</coden><abstract>The BVS 5000 is an extracorporeal pulsatile assist device for temporary univentricular or biventricular support. A registry of BVS 5000 usage has enrolled 420 patients between June 1987 and February 1994. Data were voluntarily contributed from more than 60 centers in 15 countries. The device has been implanted for post-cardiotomy shock (n = 211), cardiomyopathy (n = 94), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) shock (n = 44), failed transplant (n = 45), and other indications (n = 26).Device support was biventricular in 65% of patients, left in 29%, and right in 5%. Mean length of support was 5.2 days. Of the patients, 78% were men and 81% were 60 years of age or younger. In the post-cardiotomy group, 116 (55%) were weaned or bridged, and 27% were discharged. Seventy percent of cardiomyopathy patients went on to transplant, of which 39 (58%) were discharged. Of the patients with AMI shock, 52% underwent transplant, and 16 (70%) of these were discharged.The use of ventricular support in the setting of post-cardiotomy is explored and compared with the standard practice of supporting patients with inotropes and intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP). Analysis of the poor outcomes and high cost of standard practice suggests that ventricular assist may positively affect outcomes in this population.This multi-institutional experience supports the use of the BVS 5000 for short-term ventricular assistance and suggests the need for additional study of ventricular support in the post-cardiotomy setting.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Amercian Society of Artificial Internal Organs</pub><pmid>8555558</pmid><doi>10.1097/00002480-199407000-00042</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-2916 |
ispartof | ASAIO journal (1992), 1994-07, Vol.40 (3), p.M460-M464 |
issn | 1058-2916 1538-943X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77122004 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Biological and medical sciences Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Cardiac Surgical Procedures - mortality Cardiomyopathies - therapy Child Child, Preschool Costs and Cost Analysis Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care Female Heart-Assist Devices - adverse effects Heart-Assist Devices - economics Humans Intensive care medicine Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Postoperative Complications - etiology Postoperative Complications - mortality Postoperative Complications - therapy Prognosis Registries Shock, Cardiogenic - etiology Shock, Cardiogenic - mortality Shock, Cardiogenic - therapy Time Factors |
title | The BVS 5000 Biventricular Assist Device: The Worldwide Registry Experience |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A44%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20BVS%205000%20Biventricular%20Assist%20Device:%20The%20Worldwide%20Registry%20Experience&rft.jtitle=ASAIO%20journal%20(1992)&rft.au=Gray,%20Laman%20A&rft.date=1994-07&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=M460&rft.epage=M464&rft.pages=M460-M464&rft.issn=1058-2916&rft.eissn=1538-943X&rft.coden=AJOUET&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00002480-199407000-00042&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16909451%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16909451&rft_id=info:pmid/8555558&rfr_iscdi=true |