The BVS 5000 Biventricular Assist Device: The Worldwide Registry Experience

The BVS 5000 is an extracorporeal pulsatile assist device for temporary univentricular or biventricular support. A registry of BVS 5000 usage has enrolled 420 patients between June 1987 and February 1994. Data were voluntarily contributed from more than 60 centers in 15 countries. The device has bee...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ASAIO journal (1992) 1994-07, Vol.40 (3), p.M460-M464
Hauptverfasser: Gray, Laman A, Champsaur, Gerard G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page M464
container_issue 3
container_start_page M460
container_title ASAIO journal (1992)
container_volume 40
creator Gray, Laman A
Champsaur, Gerard G
description The BVS 5000 is an extracorporeal pulsatile assist device for temporary univentricular or biventricular support. A registry of BVS 5000 usage has enrolled 420 patients between June 1987 and February 1994. Data were voluntarily contributed from more than 60 centers in 15 countries. The device has been implanted for post-cardiotomy shock (n = 211), cardiomyopathy (n = 94), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) shock (n = 44), failed transplant (n = 45), and other indications (n = 26).Device support was biventricular in 65% of patients, left in 29%, and right in 5%. Mean length of support was 5.2 days. Of the patients, 78% were men and 81% were 60 years of age or younger. In the post-cardiotomy group, 116 (55%) were weaned or bridged, and 27% were discharged. Seventy percent of cardiomyopathy patients went on to transplant, of which 39 (58%) were discharged. Of the patients with AMI shock, 52% underwent transplant, and 16 (70%) of these were discharged.The use of ventricular support in the setting of post-cardiotomy is explored and compared with the standard practice of supporting patients with inotropes and intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP). Analysis of the poor outcomes and high cost of standard practice suggests that ventricular assist may positively affect outcomes in this population.This multi-institutional experience supports the use of the BVS 5000 for short-term ventricular assistance and suggests the need for additional study of ventricular support in the post-cardiotomy setting.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00002480-199407000-00042
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77122004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16909451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2752-b3f79340f5fd21f12ffefc31aad689251597017f62255e5b0b5dd908bf8a768a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtvEzEURi0EKmnLT0DyArGb4sd4bLNLSlsQkSrRB-wsj-eaGJxMsGca-u9xSMiu4kqWbX3nXkvHCGFKzijR8h0pxWpFKqp1TWS5VWXV7BmaUMFVpWv-7Xk5E6EqpmnzEh3n_IOQEnJ6hI6U2JaaoM-3C8Cz-xssSj-ehQdYDSm4MdqEpzmHPOAP8BAcvMdb8mufYrcJHeAv8L2E6RFf_F5DCrBycIpeeBszvNrvJ-ju8uL2_GM1v776dD6dV45JwaqWe6l5TbzwHaOeMu_BO06t7RqlmaBCS0KlbxgTAkRLWtF1mqjWKysbZfkJerubu079rxHyYJYhO4jRrqAfs5GSMlZs_BekjSa6FrSAage61OecwJt1CkubHg0lZivc_BNuDsLNX-Gl9fX-jbFdQndo3Bsu-Zt9brOz0Se7ciEfMC6EbhQpWL3DNn0cIOWfcdxAMguwcViYp76b_wHdqZVh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16909451</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The BVS 5000 Biventricular Assist Device: The Worldwide Registry Experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Gray, Laman A ; Champsaur, Gerard G</creator><creatorcontrib>Gray, Laman A ; Champsaur, Gerard G</creatorcontrib><description>The BVS 5000 is an extracorporeal pulsatile assist device for temporary univentricular or biventricular support. A registry of BVS 5000 usage has enrolled 420 patients between June 1987 and February 1994. Data were voluntarily contributed from more than 60 centers in 15 countries. The device has been implanted for post-cardiotomy shock (n = 211), cardiomyopathy (n = 94), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) shock (n = 44), failed transplant (n = 45), and other indications (n = 26).Device support was biventricular in 65% of patients, left in 29%, and right in 5%. Mean length of support was 5.2 days. Of the patients, 78% were men and 81% were 60 years of age or younger. In the post-cardiotomy group, 116 (55%) were weaned or bridged, and 27% were discharged. Seventy percent of cardiomyopathy patients went on to transplant, of which 39 (58%) were discharged. Of the patients with AMI shock, 52% underwent transplant, and 16 (70%) of these were discharged.The use of ventricular support in the setting of post-cardiotomy is explored and compared with the standard practice of supporting patients with inotropes and intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP). Analysis of the poor outcomes and high cost of standard practice suggests that ventricular assist may positively affect outcomes in this population.This multi-institutional experience supports the use of the BVS 5000 for short-term ventricular assistance and suggests the need for additional study of ventricular support in the post-cardiotomy setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-943X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00002480-199407000-00042</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8555558</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOUET</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Amercian Society of Artificial Internal Organs</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - mortality ; Cardiomyopathies - therapy ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care ; Female ; Heart-Assist Devices - adverse effects ; Heart-Assist Devices - economics ; Humans ; Intensive care medicine ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - mortality ; Postoperative Complications - therapy ; Prognosis ; Registries ; Shock, Cardiogenic - etiology ; Shock, Cardiogenic - mortality ; Shock, Cardiogenic - therapy ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>ASAIO journal (1992), 1994-07, Vol.40 (3), p.M460-M464</ispartof><rights>1994Amercian Society of Artificial Internal Organs</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf><![CDATA[$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&PDF=y&D=ovft&AN=00002480-199407000-00042$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H]]></linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;NEWS=n&amp;CSC=Y&amp;PAGE=fulltext&amp;D=ovft&amp;AN=00002480-199407000-00042$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4609,27924,27925,64666,65461</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3559680$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8555558$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gray, Laman A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Champsaur, Gerard G</creatorcontrib><title>The BVS 5000 Biventricular Assist Device: The Worldwide Registry Experience</title><title>ASAIO journal (1992)</title><addtitle>ASAIO J</addtitle><description>The BVS 5000 is an extracorporeal pulsatile assist device for temporary univentricular or biventricular support. A registry of BVS 5000 usage has enrolled 420 patients between June 1987 and February 1994. Data were voluntarily contributed from more than 60 centers in 15 countries. The device has been implanted for post-cardiotomy shock (n = 211), cardiomyopathy (n = 94), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) shock (n = 44), failed transplant (n = 45), and other indications (n = 26).Device support was biventricular in 65% of patients, left in 29%, and right in 5%. Mean length of support was 5.2 days. Of the patients, 78% were men and 81% were 60 years of age or younger. In the post-cardiotomy group, 116 (55%) were weaned or bridged, and 27% were discharged. Seventy percent of cardiomyopathy patients went on to transplant, of which 39 (58%) were discharged. Of the patients with AMI shock, 52% underwent transplant, and 16 (70%) of these were discharged.The use of ventricular support in the setting of post-cardiotomy is explored and compared with the standard practice of supporting patients with inotropes and intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP). Analysis of the poor outcomes and high cost of standard practice suggests that ventricular assist may positively affect outcomes in this population.This multi-institutional experience supports the use of the BVS 5000 for short-term ventricular assistance and suggests the need for additional study of ventricular support in the post-cardiotomy setting.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - mortality</subject><subject>Cardiomyopathies - therapy</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart-Assist Devices - adverse effects</subject><subject>Heart-Assist Devices - economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - mortality</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - therapy</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Shock, Cardiogenic - etiology</subject><subject>Shock, Cardiogenic - mortality</subject><subject>Shock, Cardiogenic - therapy</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1058-2916</issn><issn>1538-943X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtvEzEURi0EKmnLT0DyArGb4sd4bLNLSlsQkSrRB-wsj-eaGJxMsGca-u9xSMiu4kqWbX3nXkvHCGFKzijR8h0pxWpFKqp1TWS5VWXV7BmaUMFVpWv-7Xk5E6EqpmnzEh3n_IOQEnJ6hI6U2JaaoM-3C8Cz-xssSj-ehQdYDSm4MdqEpzmHPOAP8BAcvMdb8mufYrcJHeAv8L2E6RFf_F5DCrBycIpeeBszvNrvJ-ju8uL2_GM1v776dD6dV45JwaqWe6l5TbzwHaOeMu_BO06t7RqlmaBCS0KlbxgTAkRLWtF1mqjWKysbZfkJerubu079rxHyYJYhO4jRrqAfs5GSMlZs_BekjSa6FrSAage61OecwJt1CkubHg0lZivc_BNuDsLNX-Gl9fX-jbFdQndo3Bsu-Zt9brOz0Se7ciEfMC6EbhQpWL3DNn0cIOWfcdxAMguwcViYp76b_wHdqZVh</recordid><startdate>199407</startdate><enddate>199407</enddate><creator>Gray, Laman A</creator><creator>Champsaur, Gerard G</creator><general>Amercian Society of Artificial Internal Organs</general><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199407</creationdate><title>The BVS 5000 Biventricular Assist Device: The Worldwide Registry Experience</title><author>Gray, Laman A ; Champsaur, Gerard G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2752-b3f79340f5fd21f12ffefc31aad689251597017f62255e5b0b5dd908bf8a768a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - mortality</topic><topic>Cardiomyopathies - therapy</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart-Assist Devices - adverse effects</topic><topic>Heart-Assist Devices - economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - mortality</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - therapy</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Shock, Cardiogenic - etiology</topic><topic>Shock, Cardiogenic - mortality</topic><topic>Shock, Cardiogenic - therapy</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gray, Laman A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Champsaur, Gerard G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>ASAIO journal (1992)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gray, Laman A</au><au>Champsaur, Gerard G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The BVS 5000 Biventricular Assist Device: The Worldwide Registry Experience</atitle><jtitle>ASAIO journal (1992)</jtitle><addtitle>ASAIO J</addtitle><date>1994-07</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>M460</spage><epage>M464</epage><pages>M460-M464</pages><issn>1058-2916</issn><eissn>1538-943X</eissn><coden>AJOUET</coden><abstract>The BVS 5000 is an extracorporeal pulsatile assist device for temporary univentricular or biventricular support. A registry of BVS 5000 usage has enrolled 420 patients between June 1987 and February 1994. Data were voluntarily contributed from more than 60 centers in 15 countries. The device has been implanted for post-cardiotomy shock (n = 211), cardiomyopathy (n = 94), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) shock (n = 44), failed transplant (n = 45), and other indications (n = 26).Device support was biventricular in 65% of patients, left in 29%, and right in 5%. Mean length of support was 5.2 days. Of the patients, 78% were men and 81% were 60 years of age or younger. In the post-cardiotomy group, 116 (55%) were weaned or bridged, and 27% were discharged. Seventy percent of cardiomyopathy patients went on to transplant, of which 39 (58%) were discharged. Of the patients with AMI shock, 52% underwent transplant, and 16 (70%) of these were discharged.The use of ventricular support in the setting of post-cardiotomy is explored and compared with the standard practice of supporting patients with inotropes and intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP). Analysis of the poor outcomes and high cost of standard practice suggests that ventricular assist may positively affect outcomes in this population.This multi-institutional experience supports the use of the BVS 5000 for short-term ventricular assistance and suggests the need for additional study of ventricular support in the post-cardiotomy setting.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Amercian Society of Artificial Internal Organs</pub><pmid>8555558</pmid><doi>10.1097/00002480-199407000-00042</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-2916
ispartof ASAIO journal (1992), 1994-07, Vol.40 (3), p.M460-M464
issn 1058-2916
1538-943X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77122004
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Cardiac Surgical Procedures - mortality
Cardiomyopathies - therapy
Child
Child, Preschool
Costs and Cost Analysis
Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care
Female
Heart-Assist Devices - adverse effects
Heart-Assist Devices - economics
Humans
Intensive care medicine
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Postoperative Complications - mortality
Postoperative Complications - therapy
Prognosis
Registries
Shock, Cardiogenic - etiology
Shock, Cardiogenic - mortality
Shock, Cardiogenic - therapy
Time Factors
title The BVS 5000 Biventricular Assist Device: The Worldwide Registry Experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A44%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20BVS%205000%20Biventricular%20Assist%20Device:%20The%20Worldwide%20Registry%20Experience&rft.jtitle=ASAIO%20journal%20(1992)&rft.au=Gray,%20Laman%20A&rft.date=1994-07&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=M460&rft.epage=M464&rft.pages=M460-M464&rft.issn=1058-2916&rft.eissn=1538-943X&rft.coden=AJOUET&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00002480-199407000-00042&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16909451%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16909451&rft_id=info:pmid/8555558&rfr_iscdi=true