Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase and U54 methyltransferase recognize conformations of the yeast tRNA(Phe) anticodon and T stem/loop domain

The enzyme-catalyzed posttranscriptional modification of tRNA and the contributions of modified nucleosides to tRNA structure and function can be investigated with chemically synthesized domains of the tRNA molecule. Heptadecamer RNAs with and without modified nucleosides and DNAs designed as analogs to the anticodon and T stem/loop domains of yeast tRNA(Phe) were produced by automated chemical synthesis. The unmodified T stem/loop domain of yeast tRNA(Phe) was a substrate for the E coli m5U54-tRNA methyltransferase activity, RUMT. Surprisingly, the DNA analog of the T stem/loop domain composed of d(A,U,G,C) was also a substrate. In addition, the DNA analog inhibited the methylation of unfractionated, undermodified E coli tRNA lacking the U54 methylation. RNA anticodon domains and DNA analogs differentially and specifically affected aminoacylation of the wild type yeast tRNA(Phe). Three differentially modified tRNA(Phe) anticodon domains with psi 39 alone, m1G37 and m5C40, or psi 39 with m1G37 and m5C40,stimulated phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase (FRS) activity. However, one anticodon domain, with m5C40 as the only modified nucleoside and a closed loop conformation, inhibited FRS activity. Modified and unmodified DNA analogs of the anticodon, tDNA(PheAC), inhibited FRS activity. Analysis of the enzyme activity in the presence of the DNA analog characterized the DNA/enzyme interaction as either partial or allosteric inhibition. The disparity of action between the DNA and RNA hairpins provides new insight into the potential allosteric relationship of anticodon binding and open loop conformational requirements for active site function of FRS and other aaRSs. The comparison of the stimulatory and inhibitory properties of variously modified RNA domains and DNA analogs demonstrates that conformation, in addition to primary sequence, is important for tRNA-protein interaction. The enzyme recognition of various DNA analogs as substrate and/or inhibitors of activity demonstrates that conformational determinants are not restricted to ribose and the standard A-form RNA structure.