Relationship of the size of the invasive component of the primary breast carcinoma to axillary lymph node metastasis

Background. Invasive ductal carcinomas of the breast frequently have an intraductal (in situ) component at the tumor periphery that, in some cases, is included in the measurement of the tumor and thereby increases the size of the tumor beyond that of the invasive component. Methods. Thirty‐seven duc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 1995-01, Vol.75 (1), p.65-71
Hauptverfasser: Seidman, Jeffrey D., Schnaper, Lauren A., Aisner, Seena C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 71
container_issue 1
container_start_page 65
container_title Cancer
container_volume 75
creator Seidman, Jeffrey D.
Schnaper, Lauren A.
Aisner, Seena C.
description Background. Invasive ductal carcinomas of the breast frequently have an intraductal (in situ) component at the tumor periphery that, in some cases, is included in the measurement of the tumor and thereby increases the size of the tumor beyond that of the invasive component. Methods. Thirty‐seven ductal carcinomas containing intraductal and invasive components were analyzed. The total tumor size, the size of the invasive component, the percentage of intraductal component, and the estimated tumor volume were assessed for each tumor. Results. The mean size of the invasive component was 6.5 mm in axillary lymph node negative patients and 14.3 mm in those with axillary lymph node metastasis (P = 0.0001). The mean total tumor size was 13.7 mm and 17.6 mm (P = 0.035) and the mean percent of intraductal component was 52% and 26% (P = 0.015) in patients with negative and positive axillary lymph nodes, respectively. Ninety‐two and four tenths percent of the difference in mean estimated total tumor volume between patients with negative and positive axillary lymph nodes was attributable to the difference in the volume of the invasive component alone. Conclusions. In small ductal carcinomas of the breast, the size of only the invasive component, as determined by microscopic measurement, is a better predictor of axillary lymph node status than is the total tumor size. The well established prognostic value of total tumor size largely is due to its reflection of the size of the invasive component.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/1097-0142(19950101)75:1<65::AID-CNCR2820750112>3.0.CO;2-B
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77090308</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77090308</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4922-2a9e0c19964735f1d210064bdadbbf488fd3fbe5f6ca241b5796480b7af0d7623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVUV2L1DAUDaKss6s_QciDiD50vEmaphlFmK1fC4sDi4I-hbRNmEjb1Kaz6_jrTZnOgD4IPuWGc-7h3HMQWhNYEgD6koAUCZCUPidSciBAXgi-Iq8zvlqtr94mxafihuYURMQIfcOWsCw2r2hyeQ8tTrv30QIA8oSn7OtDdB7C9_gVlLMzdCZySKWQCzTemEaPzndh63rsLR63Bgf3yxxn193q4G4Nrnzb-8504xHpB9fqYY_Lwegw4koPlet8q_Hosf7pmmYCm33bb3Hna4NbM0ZeFAuP0AOrm2Aez-8F-vL-3efiY3K9-XBVrK-TKpWUJlRLA1VMIEsF45bUNIaTpWWt67K0aZ7bmtnScJtVmqak5CIycyiFtlCLjLIL9Oyg2w_-x86EUbUuVCY664zfBSUESGCQR-K3A7EafAiDsWo-ThFQUyNqSlVNqapjI0pwRVTGlYqNqD8bUUyBKjaKqsuo_WQ2sStbU5-U5woi_nTGdah0YwfdVS6caIxJkcvplvpAu3ON2f-Pv3_a-wthvwGdaran</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77090308</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relationship of the size of the invasive component of the primary breast carcinoma to axillary lymph node metastasis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Seidman, Jeffrey D. ; Schnaper, Lauren A. ; Aisner, Seena C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Seidman, Jeffrey D. ; Schnaper, Lauren A. ; Aisner, Seena C.</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Invasive ductal carcinomas of the breast frequently have an intraductal (in situ) component at the tumor periphery that, in some cases, is included in the measurement of the tumor and thereby increases the size of the tumor beyond that of the invasive component. Methods. Thirty‐seven ductal carcinomas containing intraductal and invasive components were analyzed. The total tumor size, the size of the invasive component, the percentage of intraductal component, and the estimated tumor volume were assessed for each tumor. Results. The mean size of the invasive component was 6.5 mm in axillary lymph node negative patients and 14.3 mm in those with axillary lymph node metastasis (P = 0.0001). The mean total tumor size was 13.7 mm and 17.6 mm (P = 0.035) and the mean percent of intraductal component was 52% and 26% (P = 0.015) in patients with negative and positive axillary lymph nodes, respectively. Ninety‐two and four tenths percent of the difference in mean estimated total tumor volume between patients with negative and positive axillary lymph nodes was attributable to the difference in the volume of the invasive component alone. Conclusions. In small ductal carcinomas of the breast, the size of only the invasive component, as determined by microscopic measurement, is a better predictor of axillary lymph node status than is the total tumor size. The well established prognostic value of total tumor size largely is due to its reflection of the size of the invasive component.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950101)75:1&lt;65::AID-CNCR2820750112&gt;3.0.CO;2-B</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7804979</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CANCAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Axilla ; Biological and medical sciences ; breast carcinoma ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Carcinoma in Situ - pathology ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; in situ carcinoma ; intraductal carcinoma ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Mammary gland diseases ; Medical sciences ; microinvasion ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; Prognosis ; tumor staging ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 1995-01, Vol.75 (1), p.65-71</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1995 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4922-2a9e0c19964735f1d210064bdadbbf488fd3fbe5f6ca241b5796480b7af0d7623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3397892$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7804979$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seidman, Jeffrey D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnaper, Lauren A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aisner, Seena C.</creatorcontrib><title>Relationship of the size of the invasive component of the primary breast carcinoma to axillary lymph node metastasis</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Background. Invasive ductal carcinomas of the breast frequently have an intraductal (in situ) component at the tumor periphery that, in some cases, is included in the measurement of the tumor and thereby increases the size of the tumor beyond that of the invasive component. Methods. Thirty‐seven ductal carcinomas containing intraductal and invasive components were analyzed. The total tumor size, the size of the invasive component, the percentage of intraductal component, and the estimated tumor volume were assessed for each tumor. Results. The mean size of the invasive component was 6.5 mm in axillary lymph node negative patients and 14.3 mm in those with axillary lymph node metastasis (P = 0.0001). The mean total tumor size was 13.7 mm and 17.6 mm (P = 0.035) and the mean percent of intraductal component was 52% and 26% (P = 0.015) in patients with negative and positive axillary lymph nodes, respectively. Ninety‐two and four tenths percent of the difference in mean estimated total tumor volume between patients with negative and positive axillary lymph nodes was attributable to the difference in the volume of the invasive component alone. Conclusions. In small ductal carcinomas of the breast, the size of only the invasive component, as determined by microscopic measurement, is a better predictor of axillary lymph node status than is the total tumor size. The well established prognostic value of total tumor size largely is due to its reflection of the size of the invasive component.</description><subject>Axilla</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>breast carcinoma</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>in situ carcinoma</subject><subject>intraductal carcinoma</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>microinvasion</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>tumor staging</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVUV2L1DAUDaKss6s_QciDiD50vEmaphlFmK1fC4sDi4I-hbRNmEjb1Kaz6_jrTZnOgD4IPuWGc-7h3HMQWhNYEgD6koAUCZCUPidSciBAXgi-Iq8zvlqtr94mxafihuYURMQIfcOWsCw2r2hyeQ8tTrv30QIA8oSn7OtDdB7C9_gVlLMzdCZySKWQCzTemEaPzndh63rsLR63Bgf3yxxn193q4G4Nrnzb-8504xHpB9fqYY_Lwegw4koPlet8q_Hosf7pmmYCm33bb3Hna4NbM0ZeFAuP0AOrm2Aez-8F-vL-3efiY3K9-XBVrK-TKpWUJlRLA1VMIEsF45bUNIaTpWWt67K0aZ7bmtnScJtVmqak5CIycyiFtlCLjLIL9Oyg2w_-x86EUbUuVCY664zfBSUESGCQR-K3A7EafAiDsWo-ThFQUyNqSlVNqapjI0pwRVTGlYqNqD8bUUyBKjaKqsuo_WQ2sStbU5-U5woi_nTGdah0YwfdVS6caIxJkcvplvpAu3ON2f-Pv3_a-wthvwGdaran</recordid><startdate>19950101</startdate><enddate>19950101</enddate><creator>Seidman, Jeffrey D.</creator><creator>Schnaper, Lauren A.</creator><creator>Aisner, Seena C.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950101</creationdate><title>Relationship of the size of the invasive component of the primary breast carcinoma to axillary lymph node metastasis</title><author>Seidman, Jeffrey D. ; Schnaper, Lauren A. ; Aisner, Seena C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4922-2a9e0c19964735f1d210064bdadbbf488fd3fbe5f6ca241b5796480b7af0d7623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Axilla</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>breast carcinoma</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>in situ carcinoma</topic><topic>intraductal carcinoma</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>microinvasion</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>tumor staging</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seidman, Jeffrey D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnaper, Lauren A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aisner, Seena C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seidman, Jeffrey D.</au><au>Schnaper, Lauren A.</au><au>Aisner, Seena C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relationship of the size of the invasive component of the primary breast carcinoma to axillary lymph node metastasis</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>1995-01-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>65-71</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><coden>CANCAR</coden><abstract>Background. Invasive ductal carcinomas of the breast frequently have an intraductal (in situ) component at the tumor periphery that, in some cases, is included in the measurement of the tumor and thereby increases the size of the tumor beyond that of the invasive component. Methods. Thirty‐seven ductal carcinomas containing intraductal and invasive components were analyzed. The total tumor size, the size of the invasive component, the percentage of intraductal component, and the estimated tumor volume were assessed for each tumor. Results. The mean size of the invasive component was 6.5 mm in axillary lymph node negative patients and 14.3 mm in those with axillary lymph node metastasis (P = 0.0001). The mean total tumor size was 13.7 mm and 17.6 mm (P = 0.035) and the mean percent of intraductal component was 52% and 26% (P = 0.015) in patients with negative and positive axillary lymph nodes, respectively. Ninety‐two and four tenths percent of the difference in mean estimated total tumor volume between patients with negative and positive axillary lymph nodes was attributable to the difference in the volume of the invasive component alone. Conclusions. In small ductal carcinomas of the breast, the size of only the invasive component, as determined by microscopic measurement, is a better predictor of axillary lymph node status than is the total tumor size. The well established prognostic value of total tumor size largely is due to its reflection of the size of the invasive component.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>7804979</pmid><doi>10.1002/1097-0142(19950101)75:1&lt;65::AID-CNCR2820750112&gt;3.0.CO;2-B</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 1995-01, Vol.75 (1), p.65-71
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77090308
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Axilla
Biological and medical sciences
breast carcinoma
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Carcinoma in Situ - pathology
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
in situ carcinoma
intraductal carcinoma
Lymphatic Metastasis
Mammary gland diseases
Medical sciences
microinvasion
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Prognosis
tumor staging
Tumors
title Relationship of the size of the invasive component of the primary breast carcinoma to axillary lymph node metastasis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A21%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relationship%20of%20the%20size%20of%20the%20invasive%20component%20of%20the%20primary%20breast%20carcinoma%20to%20axillary%20lymph%20node%20metastasis&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Seidman,%20Jeffrey%20D.&rft.date=1995-01-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=65-71&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft.coden=CANCAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1097-0142(19950101)75:1%3C65::AID-CNCR2820750112%3E3.0.CO;2-B&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77090308%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77090308&rft_id=info:pmid/7804979&rfr_iscdi=true