Physician Compliance With Advanced Cardiac Life Support Guidelines

Study objective: To determine compliance with advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) guidelines among ACLS-certified and non-ACLS-certified physicians. Design: Retrospective review of consecutive cardiac arrests between July 1989 and June 1990, including assessment of the resuscitation leaders' A...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of emergency medicine 1995, Vol.25 (1), p.52-57
Hauptverfasser: Cline, David M, Welch, Kenneth J, Cline, Lisa S, Brown, Charles K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 57
container_issue 1
container_start_page 52
container_title Annals of emergency medicine
container_volume 25
creator Cline, David M
Welch, Kenneth J
Cline, Lisa S
Brown, Charles K
description Study objective: To determine compliance with advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) guidelines among ACLS-certified and non-ACLS-certified physicians. Design: Retrospective review of consecutive cardiac arrests between July 1989 and June 1990, including assessment of the resuscitation leaders' ACLS certification. Setting and participants: All nontraumatic prehospital and hospital cardiac arrests in a rural university hospital. Results: Two hundred seven arrests were studied for a total of 436 rhythms with a maximum of 4 rhythms per arrest. There were 78 resuscitations (36.3%) with return of spontaneous circulation. A total of 2,038 interventions were recorded for all rhythms, with 1,320 (64.8%) compliant with ACLS guidelines compared with 718 (35.2%) deviations. Synchronized cardioversion, calcium chloride and sodium bicarbonate were used with significantly higher noncompliance. Ventricular fibrillation had significantly higher mean rhythm deviation scores, whereas scores were significantly lower for sinus rhythm and stable bradycardia ( P
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0196-0644(95)70355-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77085410</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196064495703551</els_id><sourcerecordid>77085410</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-1ddb3e18889dc5499225d293ed1bcd9c894248abb9b96da0108299f77401e56c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFFLwzAQx4Moc04_wqBPog_VS9skzZNo0SkMFKb4GNrkyiLdWpN2sG9vu429-nR33P_uf_cjZErhjgLl9wugkofAk-RGslsBMWMhPSFjClKEXHA4JeOj5JxceP8DADKJ6IiMRApRLGBMnj6WW2-1zddBVq-aqk80Bt-2XQaPZjMUJshyZ2yug7ktMVh0TVO7Nph11mBl1-gvyVmZVx6vDnFCvl6eP7PXcP4-e8se56GOObQhNaaIkaZpKo1miZRRxEwkYzS00EbqtD8tSfOikIXkJgcKaSRlKUQCFBnX8YRc7_c2rv7t0LdqZb3GqsrXWHdeCQEpSyj0QrYXald777BUjbOr3G0VBTWwUzt2agCjJFM7dor2c9ODQVes0BynDrD6_sO-j_2XG4tOeW1xQGQd6laZ2v7j8AeYyH0W</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77085410</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physician Compliance With Advanced Cardiac Life Support Guidelines</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Cline, David M ; Welch, Kenneth J ; Cline, Lisa S ; Brown, Charles K</creator><creatorcontrib>Cline, David M ; Welch, Kenneth J ; Cline, Lisa S ; Brown, Charles K</creatorcontrib><description>Study objective: To determine compliance with advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) guidelines among ACLS-certified and non-ACLS-certified physicians. Design: Retrospective review of consecutive cardiac arrests between July 1989 and June 1990, including assessment of the resuscitation leaders' ACLS certification. Setting and participants: All nontraumatic prehospital and hospital cardiac arrests in a rural university hospital. Results: Two hundred seven arrests were studied for a total of 436 rhythms with a maximum of 4 rhythms per arrest. There were 78 resuscitations (36.3%) with return of spontaneous circulation. A total of 2,038 interventions were recorded for all rhythms, with 1,320 (64.8%) compliant with ACLS guidelines compared with 718 (35.2%) deviations. Synchronized cardioversion, calcium chloride and sodium bicarbonate were used with significantly higher noncompliance. Ventricular fibrillation had significantly higher mean rhythm deviation scores, whereas scores were significantly lower for sinus rhythm and stable bradycardia ( P&lt;.003). Resuscitations led by ACLS-certified and nonACLS-certified physicians were compared for mean number of deviations per resuscitation attempt, and no differences were found. Resuscitations with return of spontaneous circulation were compared with unsuccessful resuscitations, and there was no difference between groups in controlled deviation scores. No differences could be found between ACLS-certified and nonACLS-certified physicians for return of spontaneous circulation and survival-to-discharge rates. Conclusion: Despite biannual ACLS training of all medical residents and ICU nurses, noncompliance with ACLS guidelines was noted in 35.2% of treatments. We found no correlation between ACLS certification and ACLS guideline compliance. [Cline DM, Welch KJ, Cline LS, Brown CK: Physician compliance with advanced cardiac life support guidelines. Ann Emerg Med January 1995;25:52-57.]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-0644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6760</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0196-0644(95)70355-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7802370</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - standards ; Certification ; Electric Countershock ; Emergency Medicine - standards ; Emergency Service, Hospital - standards ; Heart Arrest - therapy ; Humans ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Retrospective Studies ; United States</subject><ispartof>Annals of emergency medicine, 1995, Vol.25 (1), p.52-57</ispartof><rights>1995 Mosby, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-1ddb3e18889dc5499225d293ed1bcd9c894248abb9b96da0108299f77401e56c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196064495703551$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,4009,27902,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7802370$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cline, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, Kenneth J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cline, Lisa S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Charles K</creatorcontrib><title>Physician Compliance With Advanced Cardiac Life Support Guidelines</title><title>Annals of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Study objective: To determine compliance with advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) guidelines among ACLS-certified and non-ACLS-certified physicians. Design: Retrospective review of consecutive cardiac arrests between July 1989 and June 1990, including assessment of the resuscitation leaders' ACLS certification. Setting and participants: All nontraumatic prehospital and hospital cardiac arrests in a rural university hospital. Results: Two hundred seven arrests were studied for a total of 436 rhythms with a maximum of 4 rhythms per arrest. There were 78 resuscitations (36.3%) with return of spontaneous circulation. A total of 2,038 interventions were recorded for all rhythms, with 1,320 (64.8%) compliant with ACLS guidelines compared with 718 (35.2%) deviations. Synchronized cardioversion, calcium chloride and sodium bicarbonate were used with significantly higher noncompliance. Ventricular fibrillation had significantly higher mean rhythm deviation scores, whereas scores were significantly lower for sinus rhythm and stable bradycardia ( P&lt;.003). Resuscitations led by ACLS-certified and nonACLS-certified physicians were compared for mean number of deviations per resuscitation attempt, and no differences were found. Resuscitations with return of spontaneous circulation were compared with unsuccessful resuscitations, and there was no difference between groups in controlled deviation scores. No differences could be found between ACLS-certified and nonACLS-certified physicians for return of spontaneous circulation and survival-to-discharge rates. Conclusion: Despite biannual ACLS training of all medical residents and ICU nurses, noncompliance with ACLS guidelines was noted in 35.2% of treatments. We found no correlation between ACLS certification and ACLS guideline compliance. [Cline DM, Welch KJ, Cline LS, Brown CK: Physician compliance with advanced cardiac life support guidelines. Ann Emerg Med January 1995;25:52-57.]</description><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - standards</subject><subject>Certification</subject><subject>Electric Countershock</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine - standards</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - standards</subject><subject>Heart Arrest - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0196-0644</issn><issn>1097-6760</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkFFLwzAQx4Moc04_wqBPog_VS9skzZNo0SkMFKb4GNrkyiLdWpN2sG9vu429-nR33P_uf_cjZErhjgLl9wugkofAk-RGslsBMWMhPSFjClKEXHA4JeOj5JxceP8DADKJ6IiMRApRLGBMnj6WW2-1zddBVq-aqk80Bt-2XQaPZjMUJshyZ2yug7ktMVh0TVO7Nph11mBl1-gvyVmZVx6vDnFCvl6eP7PXcP4-e8se56GOObQhNaaIkaZpKo1miZRRxEwkYzS00EbqtD8tSfOikIXkJgcKaSRlKUQCFBnX8YRc7_c2rv7t0LdqZb3GqsrXWHdeCQEpSyj0QrYXald777BUjbOr3G0VBTWwUzt2agCjJFM7dor2c9ODQVes0BynDrD6_sO-j_2XG4tOeW1xQGQd6laZ2v7j8AeYyH0W</recordid><startdate>1995</startdate><enddate>1995</enddate><creator>Cline, David M</creator><creator>Welch, Kenneth J</creator><creator>Cline, Lisa S</creator><creator>Brown, Charles K</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1995</creationdate><title>Physician Compliance With Advanced Cardiac Life Support Guidelines</title><author>Cline, David M ; Welch, Kenneth J ; Cline, Lisa S ; Brown, Charles K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-1ddb3e18889dc5499225d293ed1bcd9c894248abb9b96da0108299f77401e56c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - standards</topic><topic>Certification</topic><topic>Electric Countershock</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine - standards</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - standards</topic><topic>Heart Arrest - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cline, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, Kenneth J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cline, Lisa S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Charles K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cline, David M</au><au>Welch, Kenneth J</au><au>Cline, Lisa S</au><au>Brown, Charles K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physician Compliance With Advanced Cardiac Life Support Guidelines</atitle><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><date>1995</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>52</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>52-57</pages><issn>0196-0644</issn><eissn>1097-6760</eissn><abstract>Study objective: To determine compliance with advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) guidelines among ACLS-certified and non-ACLS-certified physicians. Design: Retrospective review of consecutive cardiac arrests between July 1989 and June 1990, including assessment of the resuscitation leaders' ACLS certification. Setting and participants: All nontraumatic prehospital and hospital cardiac arrests in a rural university hospital. Results: Two hundred seven arrests were studied for a total of 436 rhythms with a maximum of 4 rhythms per arrest. There were 78 resuscitations (36.3%) with return of spontaneous circulation. A total of 2,038 interventions were recorded for all rhythms, with 1,320 (64.8%) compliant with ACLS guidelines compared with 718 (35.2%) deviations. Synchronized cardioversion, calcium chloride and sodium bicarbonate were used with significantly higher noncompliance. Ventricular fibrillation had significantly higher mean rhythm deviation scores, whereas scores were significantly lower for sinus rhythm and stable bradycardia ( P&lt;.003). Resuscitations led by ACLS-certified and nonACLS-certified physicians were compared for mean number of deviations per resuscitation attempt, and no differences were found. Resuscitations with return of spontaneous circulation were compared with unsuccessful resuscitations, and there was no difference between groups in controlled deviation scores. No differences could be found between ACLS-certified and nonACLS-certified physicians for return of spontaneous circulation and survival-to-discharge rates. Conclusion: Despite biannual ACLS training of all medical residents and ICU nurses, noncompliance with ACLS guidelines was noted in 35.2% of treatments. We found no correlation between ACLS certification and ACLS guideline compliance. [Cline DM, Welch KJ, Cline LS, Brown CK: Physician compliance with advanced cardiac life support guidelines. Ann Emerg Med January 1995;25:52-57.]</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>7802370</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0196-0644(95)70355-1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-0644
ispartof Annals of emergency medicine, 1995, Vol.25 (1), p.52-57
issn 0196-0644
1097-6760
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77085410
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - standards
Certification
Electric Countershock
Emergency Medicine - standards
Emergency Service, Hospital - standards
Heart Arrest - therapy
Humans
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Practice Patterns, Physicians
Retrospective Studies
United States
title Physician Compliance With Advanced Cardiac Life Support Guidelines
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T18%3A44%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physician%20Compliance%20With%20Advanced%20Cardiac%20Life%20Support%20Guidelines&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Cline,%20David%20M&rft.date=1995&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=52&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=52-57&rft.issn=0196-0644&rft.eissn=1097-6760&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0196-0644(95)70355-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77085410%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77085410&rft_id=info:pmid/7802370&rft_els_id=S0196064495703551&rfr_iscdi=true