Michigan's struggle with assisted suicide and related issues as illuminated by current case law: an overview of People v. Kevorkian
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | University of Detroit Mercy law review 1995, Vol.72 (4), p.959-987 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 987 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 959 |
container_title | University of Detroit Mercy law review |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Branigan, Janet M |
description | |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77079340</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77079340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p122t-b7fb71aedfc2fa60a65d58d5dd6a97cc8d40209812160b650e6cc91f138f69ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kMlOwzAURbMA0VL4BeQVrILsDHbCDlVMoggWsI5e7JfW4Az4Jam65scJUFZXOjpv0D0I5oKnWZjEUTwLjoneOedZouRRMBNCpkms5Dz4erJ6Y9fQXBCj3g_rtUO2tf2GAZGlHg2jwWprkEFjmEcHP8wSDUiTw6xzQ22bX1rumB68x6ZnGgiZg-3VNMbaEf1occvair1g200nxkv2iGPrPyw0J8FhBY7wdJ-L4O325nV5H66e7x6W16uwE1HUh6WqSiUATaWjCiQHmZo0M6kxEnKldWYSHvE8E5GQvJQpR6l1LioRZ5XMEeJFcP63t_Pt5_R-X9SWNDoHDbYDFUpxlccJn8SzvTiUNZqi87YGvyv-a4u_AXA0arg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77079340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Michigan's struggle with assisted suicide and related issues as illuminated by current case law: an overview of People v. Kevorkian</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Branigan, Janet M</creator><creatorcontrib>Branigan, Janet M</creatorcontrib><identifier>ISSN: 1058-4323</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11654376</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Advisory Committees ; Bioethics ; Civil Rights ; Criminal Law ; Federal Government ; Freedom ; Government ; Government Regulation ; Homicide ; Humans ; Judicial Role ; Jurisprudence ; Legislation as Topic ; Michigan ; Personal Autonomy ; Physicians ; Privacy ; Public Policy ; Social Control, Formal ; State Government ; Suicide, Assisted ; Supreme Court Decisions ; Treatment Refusal ; United States</subject><ispartof>University of Detroit Mercy law review, 1995, Vol.72 (4), p.959-987</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11654376$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Branigan, Janet M</creatorcontrib><title>Michigan's struggle with assisted suicide and related issues as illuminated by current case law: an overview of People v. Kevorkian</title><title>University of Detroit Mercy law review</title><addtitle>Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev</addtitle><subject>Advisory Committees</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Civil Rights</subject><subject>Criminal Law</subject><subject>Federal Government</subject><subject>Freedom</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Government Regulation</subject><subject>Homicide</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judicial Role</subject><subject>Jurisprudence</subject><subject>Legislation as Topic</subject><subject>Michigan</subject><subject>Personal Autonomy</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Privacy</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>Social Control, Formal</subject><subject>State Government</subject><subject>Suicide, Assisted</subject><subject>Supreme Court Decisions</subject><subject>Treatment Refusal</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1058-4323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kMlOwzAURbMA0VL4BeQVrILsDHbCDlVMoggWsI5e7JfW4Az4Jam65scJUFZXOjpv0D0I5oKnWZjEUTwLjoneOedZouRRMBNCpkms5Dz4erJ6Y9fQXBCj3g_rtUO2tf2GAZGlHg2jwWprkEFjmEcHP8wSDUiTw6xzQ22bX1rumB68x6ZnGgiZg-3VNMbaEf1occvair1g200nxkv2iGPrPyw0J8FhBY7wdJ-L4O325nV5H66e7x6W16uwE1HUh6WqSiUATaWjCiQHmZo0M6kxEnKldWYSHvE8E5GQvJQpR6l1LioRZ5XMEeJFcP63t_Pt5_R-X9SWNDoHDbYDFUpxlccJn8SzvTiUNZqi87YGvyv-a4u_AXA0arg</recordid><startdate>1995</startdate><enddate>1995</enddate><creator>Branigan, Janet M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1995</creationdate><title>Michigan's struggle with assisted suicide and related issues as illuminated by current case law: an overview of People v. Kevorkian</title><author>Branigan, Janet M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p122t-b7fb71aedfc2fa60a65d58d5dd6a97cc8d40209812160b650e6cc91f138f69ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Advisory Committees</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Civil Rights</topic><topic>Criminal Law</topic><topic>Federal Government</topic><topic>Freedom</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Government Regulation</topic><topic>Homicide</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judicial Role</topic><topic>Jurisprudence</topic><topic>Legislation as Topic</topic><topic>Michigan</topic><topic>Personal Autonomy</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Privacy</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>Social Control, Formal</topic><topic>State Government</topic><topic>Suicide, Assisted</topic><topic>Supreme Court Decisions</topic><topic>Treatment Refusal</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Branigan, Janet M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>University of Detroit Mercy law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Branigan, Janet M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Michigan's struggle with assisted suicide and related issues as illuminated by current case law: an overview of People v. Kevorkian</atitle><jtitle>University of Detroit Mercy law review</jtitle><addtitle>Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev</addtitle><date>1995</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>959</spage><epage>987</epage><pages>959-987</pages><issn>1058-4323</issn><cop>United States</cop><pmid>11654376</pmid><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-4323 |
ispartof | University of Detroit Mercy law review, 1995, Vol.72 (4), p.959-987 |
issn | 1058-4323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77079340 |
source | MEDLINE; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Advisory Committees Bioethics Civil Rights Criminal Law Federal Government Freedom Government Government Regulation Homicide Humans Judicial Role Jurisprudence Legislation as Topic Michigan Personal Autonomy Physicians Privacy Public Policy Social Control, Formal State Government Suicide, Assisted Supreme Court Decisions Treatment Refusal United States |
title | Michigan's struggle with assisted suicide and related issues as illuminated by current case law: an overview of People v. Kevorkian |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T22%3A29%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Michigan's%20struggle%20with%20assisted%20suicide%20and%20related%20issues%20as%20illuminated%20by%20current%20case%20law:%20an%20overview%20of%20People%20v.%20Kevorkian&rft.jtitle=University%20of%20Detroit%20Mercy%20law%20review&rft.au=Branigan,%20Janet%20M&rft.date=1995&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=959&rft.epage=987&rft.pages=959-987&rft.issn=1058-4323&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E77079340%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77079340&rft_id=info:pmid/11654376&rfr_iscdi=true |