Efficacy of a human anthrax vaccine in guinea pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin
The efficacy of a licensed human anthrax vaccine (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed (AVA)) was tested in guinea pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against spore challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin. Initially, groups of Hartley guinea pigs were vaccinated at 0 and 4 weeks w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vaccine 2001-04, Vol.19 (23-24), p.3241-3247 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3247 |
---|---|
container_issue | 23-24 |
container_start_page | 3241 |
container_title | Vaccine |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Fellows, P.F. Linscott, M.K. Ivins, B.E. Pitt, M.L.M. Rossi, C.A. Gibbs, P.H. Friedlander, A.M. |
description | The efficacy of a licensed human anthrax vaccine (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed (AVA)) was tested in guinea pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against spore challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin. Initially, groups of Hartley guinea pigs were vaccinated at 0 and 4 weeks with AVA, then challenged intramuscularly at 10 weeks with spores from 33 isolates of B. anthracis. Survival among the vaccinated groups varied from 6 to 100%, although there were no differences in mean time to death among the groups. There was no correlation between isolate virulence and variable number tandem repeat category or protective antigen genotype identified. New Zealand white rabbits were then vaccinated with AVA at 0 and 4 weeks, and challenged at 10 weeks by aerosol with spores from six of the isolates that were highly virulent in vaccinated guinea pigs. AVA completely protected the rabbits from four of the isolates, and protected 90% of the animals from the other two isolates. Subsequently, two of these six isolates were then used to challenge rhesus macaques, previously vaccinated with AVA at 0 and 4 weeks, and challenged at 10 weeks by aerosol. AVA protected 80 and 100% of the animals from these two isolates. These studies demonstrated that, although AVA confers variable protection against different B. anthracis isolates in guinea pigs, it is highly protective against these same isolates in both rabbits and rhesus macaques. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00021-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77074922</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X01000214</els_id><sourcerecordid>77074922</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-76af9966be7dc6dd297dffcfd54f21967004d2c6b83c9a7870ab4f372aa942013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EotPCI4C8QAgkArbjxJMVgqr8SJVYABI768a-TowSZ7CTEfM2PGqdzgjYdXXv4jvn_hxCnnD2mjNev_nKRC0LydmPF4y_ZIwJXsh7ZMO3qixExbf3yeYvckbOU_qZoarkzUNyxnnJBRNsQ_5cOecNmAOdHAXaLyMECmHuI_ymezDGB6Q-0G7JDdCd79IrGqFt_ZwbCJbGHtOS6AgGfi2YKHTgQ5qp6WEYMHRI2wN9D8YPQ8aO1sYn6tM0wJwFebD1e4wJaYdTF2HX540GOkXf-fCIPHAwJHx8qhfk-4erb5efiusvHz9fvrsujFTlXKgaXNPUdYvKmtpa0SjrnHG2kk7wplaMSStM3W5L04DaKgatdKUSAI0UjJcX5PnRdxen9Y5Zjz4ZHAYIOC1JK8WUbIS4E-TZvFZcZrA6giZOKUV0ehf9CPGgOdNrhvo2Q70GpBnXtxnqVff0NGBpR7T_VKfQMvDsBEDKj3IRQn7of-6VLNV60dsjhvlte49RJ-MxGLQ-opm1nfwdm9wAUx27Fg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17876714</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of a human anthrax vaccine in guinea pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Fellows, P.F. ; Linscott, M.K. ; Ivins, B.E. ; Pitt, M.L.M. ; Rossi, C.A. ; Gibbs, P.H. ; Friedlander, A.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fellows, P.F. ; Linscott, M.K. ; Ivins, B.E. ; Pitt, M.L.M. ; Rossi, C.A. ; Gibbs, P.H. ; Friedlander, A.M.</creatorcontrib><description>The efficacy of a licensed human anthrax vaccine (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed (AVA)) was tested in guinea pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against spore challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin. Initially, groups of Hartley guinea pigs were vaccinated at 0 and 4 weeks with AVA, then challenged intramuscularly at 10 weeks with spores from 33 isolates of B. anthracis. Survival among the vaccinated groups varied from 6 to 100%, although there were no differences in mean time to death among the groups. There was no correlation between isolate virulence and variable number tandem repeat category or protective antigen genotype identified. New Zealand white rabbits were then vaccinated with AVA at 0 and 4 weeks, and challenged at 10 weeks by aerosol with spores from six of the isolates that were highly virulent in vaccinated guinea pigs. AVA completely protected the rabbits from four of the isolates, and protected 90% of the animals from the other two isolates. Subsequently, two of these six isolates were then used to challenge rhesus macaques, previously vaccinated with AVA at 0 and 4 weeks, and challenged at 10 weeks by aerosol. AVA protected 80 and 100% of the animals from these two isolates. These studies demonstrated that, although AVA confers variable protection against different B. anthracis isolates in guinea pigs, it is highly protective against these same isolates in both rabbits and rhesus macaques.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00021-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11312020</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VACCDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anthrax ; Anthrax - immunology ; Anthrax - prevention & control ; Anthrax Vaccines - pharmacology ; Bacillus anthracis ; Bacillus anthracis - immunology ; Bacillus anthracis - isolation & purification ; Bacteriology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Guinea pig ; Guinea Pigs ; Humans ; Macaca mulatta ; Male ; Microbiology ; Rabbit ; Rabbits ; Rhesus macaque ; Species Specificity ; Spores, Bacterial - immunology ; Vaccine ; Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2001-04, Vol.19 (23-24), p.3241-3247</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-76af9966be7dc6dd297dffcfd54f21967004d2c6b83c9a7870ab4f372aa942013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-76af9966be7dc6dd297dffcfd54f21967004d2c6b83c9a7870ab4f372aa942013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X01000214$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1054371$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11312020$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fellows, P.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linscott, M.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivins, B.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitt, M.L.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, C.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbs, P.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedlander, A.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of a human anthrax vaccine in guinea pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>The efficacy of a licensed human anthrax vaccine (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed (AVA)) was tested in guinea pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against spore challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin. Initially, groups of Hartley guinea pigs were vaccinated at 0 and 4 weeks with AVA, then challenged intramuscularly at 10 weeks with spores from 33 isolates of B. anthracis. Survival among the vaccinated groups varied from 6 to 100%, although there were no differences in mean time to death among the groups. There was no correlation between isolate virulence and variable number tandem repeat category or protective antigen genotype identified. New Zealand white rabbits were then vaccinated with AVA at 0 and 4 weeks, and challenged at 10 weeks by aerosol with spores from six of the isolates that were highly virulent in vaccinated guinea pigs. AVA completely protected the rabbits from four of the isolates, and protected 90% of the animals from the other two isolates. Subsequently, two of these six isolates were then used to challenge rhesus macaques, previously vaccinated with AVA at 0 and 4 weeks, and challenged at 10 weeks by aerosol. AVA protected 80 and 100% of the animals from these two isolates. These studies demonstrated that, although AVA confers variable protection against different B. anthracis isolates in guinea pigs, it is highly protective against these same isolates in both rabbits and rhesus macaques.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthrax</subject><subject>Anthrax - immunology</subject><subject>Anthrax - prevention & control</subject><subject>Anthrax Vaccines - pharmacology</subject><subject>Bacillus anthracis</subject><subject>Bacillus anthracis - immunology</subject><subject>Bacillus anthracis - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Guinea pig</subject><subject>Guinea Pigs</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Macaca mulatta</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Rabbit</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Rhesus macaque</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Spores, Bacterial - immunology</subject><subject>Vaccine</subject><subject>Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EotPCI4C8QAgkArbjxJMVgqr8SJVYABI768a-TowSZ7CTEfM2PGqdzgjYdXXv4jvn_hxCnnD2mjNev_nKRC0LydmPF4y_ZIwJXsh7ZMO3qixExbf3yeYvckbOU_qZoarkzUNyxnnJBRNsQ_5cOecNmAOdHAXaLyMECmHuI_ymezDGB6Q-0G7JDdCd79IrGqFt_ZwbCJbGHtOS6AgGfi2YKHTgQ5qp6WEYMHRI2wN9D8YPQ8aO1sYn6tM0wJwFebD1e4wJaYdTF2HX540GOkXf-fCIPHAwJHx8qhfk-4erb5efiusvHz9fvrsujFTlXKgaXNPUdYvKmtpa0SjrnHG2kk7wplaMSStM3W5L04DaKgatdKUSAI0UjJcX5PnRdxen9Y5Zjz4ZHAYIOC1JK8WUbIS4E-TZvFZcZrA6giZOKUV0ehf9CPGgOdNrhvo2Q70GpBnXtxnqVff0NGBpR7T_VKfQMvDsBEDKj3IRQn7of-6VLNV60dsjhvlte49RJ-MxGLQ-opm1nfwdm9wAUx27Fg</recordid><startdate>20010430</startdate><enddate>20010430</enddate><creator>Fellows, P.F.</creator><creator>Linscott, M.K.</creator><creator>Ivins, B.E.</creator><creator>Pitt, M.L.M.</creator><creator>Rossi, C.A.</creator><creator>Gibbs, P.H.</creator><creator>Friedlander, A.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010430</creationdate><title>Efficacy of a human anthrax vaccine in guinea pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin</title><author>Fellows, P.F. ; Linscott, M.K. ; Ivins, B.E. ; Pitt, M.L.M. ; Rossi, C.A. ; Gibbs, P.H. ; Friedlander, A.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-76af9966be7dc6dd297dffcfd54f21967004d2c6b83c9a7870ab4f372aa942013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthrax</topic><topic>Anthrax - immunology</topic><topic>Anthrax - prevention & control</topic><topic>Anthrax Vaccines - pharmacology</topic><topic>Bacillus anthracis</topic><topic>Bacillus anthracis - immunology</topic><topic>Bacillus anthracis - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Guinea pig</topic><topic>Guinea Pigs</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Macaca mulatta</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Rabbit</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Rhesus macaque</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Spores, Bacterial - immunology</topic><topic>Vaccine</topic><topic>Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fellows, P.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linscott, M.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivins, B.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitt, M.L.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, C.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbs, P.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedlander, A.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fellows, P.F.</au><au>Linscott, M.K.</au><au>Ivins, B.E.</au><au>Pitt, M.L.M.</au><au>Rossi, C.A.</au><au>Gibbs, P.H.</au><au>Friedlander, A.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of a human anthrax vaccine in guinea pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2001-04-30</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>23-24</issue><spage>3241</spage><epage>3247</epage><pages>3241-3247</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><coden>VACCDE</coden><abstract>The efficacy of a licensed human anthrax vaccine (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed (AVA)) was tested in guinea pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against spore challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin. Initially, groups of Hartley guinea pigs were vaccinated at 0 and 4 weeks with AVA, then challenged intramuscularly at 10 weeks with spores from 33 isolates of B. anthracis. Survival among the vaccinated groups varied from 6 to 100%, although there were no differences in mean time to death among the groups. There was no correlation between isolate virulence and variable number tandem repeat category or protective antigen genotype identified. New Zealand white rabbits were then vaccinated with AVA at 0 and 4 weeks, and challenged at 10 weeks by aerosol with spores from six of the isolates that were highly virulent in vaccinated guinea pigs. AVA completely protected the rabbits from four of the isolates, and protected 90% of the animals from the other two isolates. Subsequently, two of these six isolates were then used to challenge rhesus macaques, previously vaccinated with AVA at 0 and 4 weeks, and challenged at 10 weeks by aerosol. AVA protected 80 and 100% of the animals from these two isolates. These studies demonstrated that, although AVA confers variable protection against different B. anthracis isolates in guinea pigs, it is highly protective against these same isolates in both rabbits and rhesus macaques.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11312020</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00021-4</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
ispartof | Vaccine, 2001-04, Vol.19 (23-24), p.3241-3247 |
issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77074922 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Animals Anthrax Anthrax - immunology Anthrax - prevention & control Anthrax Vaccines - pharmacology Bacillus anthracis Bacillus anthracis - immunology Bacillus anthracis - isolation & purification Bacteriology Biological and medical sciences Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Guinea pig Guinea Pigs Humans Macaca mulatta Male Microbiology Rabbit Rabbits Rhesus macaque Species Specificity Spores, Bacterial - immunology Vaccine Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies |
title | Efficacy of a human anthrax vaccine in guinea pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T03%3A31%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20a%20human%20anthrax%20vaccine%20in%20guinea%20pigs,%20rabbits,%20and%20rhesus%20macaques%20against%20challenge%20by%20Bacillus%20anthracis%20isolates%20of%20diverse%20geographical%20origin&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Fellows,%20P.F.&rft.date=2001-04-30&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=23-24&rft.spage=3241&rft.epage=3247&rft.pages=3241-3247&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft.coden=VACCDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00021-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77074922%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17876714&rft_id=info:pmid/11312020&rft_els_id=S0264410X01000214&rfr_iscdi=true |