Efficacy of a human anthrax vaccine in guinea pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin

The efficacy of a licensed human anthrax vaccine (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed (AVA)) was tested in guinea pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against spore challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin. Initially, groups of Hartley guinea pigs were vaccinated at 0 and 4 weeks w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vaccine 2001-04, Vol.19 (23-24), p.3241-3247
Hauptverfasser: Fellows, P.F., Linscott, M.K., Ivins, B.E., Pitt, M.L.M., Rossi, C.A., Gibbs, P.H., Friedlander, A.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3247
container_issue 23-24
container_start_page 3241
container_title Vaccine
container_volume 19
creator Fellows, P.F.
Linscott, M.K.
Ivins, B.E.
Pitt, M.L.M.
Rossi, C.A.
Gibbs, P.H.
Friedlander, A.M.
description The efficacy of a licensed human anthrax vaccine (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed (AVA)) was tested in guinea pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against spore challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin. Initially, groups of Hartley guinea pigs were vaccinated at 0 and 4 weeks with AVA, then challenged intramuscularly at 10 weeks with spores from 33 isolates of B. anthracis. Survival among the vaccinated groups varied from 6 to 100%, although there were no differences in mean time to death among the groups. There was no correlation between isolate virulence and variable number tandem repeat category or protective antigen genotype identified. New Zealand white rabbits were then vaccinated with AVA at 0 and 4 weeks, and challenged at 10 weeks by aerosol with spores from six of the isolates that were highly virulent in vaccinated guinea pigs. AVA completely protected the rabbits from four of the isolates, and protected 90% of the animals from the other two isolates. Subsequently, two of these six isolates were then used to challenge rhesus macaques, previously vaccinated with AVA at 0 and 4 weeks, and challenged at 10 weeks by aerosol. AVA protected 80 and 100% of the animals from these two isolates. These studies demonstrated that, although AVA confers variable protection against different B. anthracis isolates in guinea pigs, it is highly protective against these same isolates in both rabbits and rhesus macaques.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00021-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77074922</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X01000214</els_id><sourcerecordid>77074922</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-76af9966be7dc6dd297dffcfd54f21967004d2c6b83c9a7870ab4f372aa942013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EotPCI4C8QAgkArbjxJMVgqr8SJVYABI768a-TowSZ7CTEfM2PGqdzgjYdXXv4jvn_hxCnnD2mjNev_nKRC0LydmPF4y_ZIwJXsh7ZMO3qixExbf3yeYvckbOU_qZoarkzUNyxnnJBRNsQ_5cOecNmAOdHAXaLyMECmHuI_ymezDGB6Q-0G7JDdCd79IrGqFt_ZwbCJbGHtOS6AgGfi2YKHTgQ5qp6WEYMHRI2wN9D8YPQ8aO1sYn6tM0wJwFebD1e4wJaYdTF2HX540GOkXf-fCIPHAwJHx8qhfk-4erb5efiusvHz9fvrsujFTlXKgaXNPUdYvKmtpa0SjrnHG2kk7wplaMSStM3W5L04DaKgatdKUSAI0UjJcX5PnRdxen9Y5Zjz4ZHAYIOC1JK8WUbIS4E-TZvFZcZrA6giZOKUV0ehf9CPGgOdNrhvo2Q70GpBnXtxnqVff0NGBpR7T_VKfQMvDsBEDKj3IRQn7of-6VLNV60dsjhvlte49RJ-MxGLQ-opm1nfwdm9wAUx27Fg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17876714</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of a human anthrax vaccine in guinea pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Fellows, P.F. ; Linscott, M.K. ; Ivins, B.E. ; Pitt, M.L.M. ; Rossi, C.A. ; Gibbs, P.H. ; Friedlander, A.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fellows, P.F. ; Linscott, M.K. ; Ivins, B.E. ; Pitt, M.L.M. ; Rossi, C.A. ; Gibbs, P.H. ; Friedlander, A.M.</creatorcontrib><description>The efficacy of a licensed human anthrax vaccine (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed (AVA)) was tested in guinea pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against spore challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin. Initially, groups of Hartley guinea pigs were vaccinated at 0 and 4 weeks with AVA, then challenged intramuscularly at 10 weeks with spores from 33 isolates of B. anthracis. Survival among the vaccinated groups varied from 6 to 100%, although there were no differences in mean time to death among the groups. There was no correlation between isolate virulence and variable number tandem repeat category or protective antigen genotype identified. New Zealand white rabbits were then vaccinated with AVA at 0 and 4 weeks, and challenged at 10 weeks by aerosol with spores from six of the isolates that were highly virulent in vaccinated guinea pigs. AVA completely protected the rabbits from four of the isolates, and protected 90% of the animals from the other two isolates. Subsequently, two of these six isolates were then used to challenge rhesus macaques, previously vaccinated with AVA at 0 and 4 weeks, and challenged at 10 weeks by aerosol. AVA protected 80 and 100% of the animals from these two isolates. These studies demonstrated that, although AVA confers variable protection against different B. anthracis isolates in guinea pigs, it is highly protective against these same isolates in both rabbits and rhesus macaques.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00021-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11312020</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VACCDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anthrax ; Anthrax - immunology ; Anthrax - prevention &amp; control ; Anthrax Vaccines - pharmacology ; Bacillus anthracis ; Bacillus anthracis - immunology ; Bacillus anthracis - isolation &amp; purification ; Bacteriology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Guinea pig ; Guinea Pigs ; Humans ; Macaca mulatta ; Male ; Microbiology ; Rabbit ; Rabbits ; Rhesus macaque ; Species Specificity ; Spores, Bacterial - immunology ; Vaccine ; Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2001-04, Vol.19 (23-24), p.3241-3247</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-76af9966be7dc6dd297dffcfd54f21967004d2c6b83c9a7870ab4f372aa942013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-76af9966be7dc6dd297dffcfd54f21967004d2c6b83c9a7870ab4f372aa942013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X01000214$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1054371$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11312020$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fellows, P.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linscott, M.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivins, B.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitt, M.L.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, C.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbs, P.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedlander, A.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of a human anthrax vaccine in guinea pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>The efficacy of a licensed human anthrax vaccine (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed (AVA)) was tested in guinea pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against spore challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin. Initially, groups of Hartley guinea pigs were vaccinated at 0 and 4 weeks with AVA, then challenged intramuscularly at 10 weeks with spores from 33 isolates of B. anthracis. Survival among the vaccinated groups varied from 6 to 100%, although there were no differences in mean time to death among the groups. There was no correlation between isolate virulence and variable number tandem repeat category or protective antigen genotype identified. New Zealand white rabbits were then vaccinated with AVA at 0 and 4 weeks, and challenged at 10 weeks by aerosol with spores from six of the isolates that were highly virulent in vaccinated guinea pigs. AVA completely protected the rabbits from four of the isolates, and protected 90% of the animals from the other two isolates. Subsequently, two of these six isolates were then used to challenge rhesus macaques, previously vaccinated with AVA at 0 and 4 weeks, and challenged at 10 weeks by aerosol. AVA protected 80 and 100% of the animals from these two isolates. These studies demonstrated that, although AVA confers variable protection against different B. anthracis isolates in guinea pigs, it is highly protective against these same isolates in both rabbits and rhesus macaques.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthrax</subject><subject>Anthrax - immunology</subject><subject>Anthrax - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Anthrax Vaccines - pharmacology</subject><subject>Bacillus anthracis</subject><subject>Bacillus anthracis - immunology</subject><subject>Bacillus anthracis - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Guinea pig</subject><subject>Guinea Pigs</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Macaca mulatta</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Rabbit</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Rhesus macaque</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Spores, Bacterial - immunology</subject><subject>Vaccine</subject><subject>Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EotPCI4C8QAgkArbjxJMVgqr8SJVYABI768a-TowSZ7CTEfM2PGqdzgjYdXXv4jvn_hxCnnD2mjNev_nKRC0LydmPF4y_ZIwJXsh7ZMO3qixExbf3yeYvckbOU_qZoarkzUNyxnnJBRNsQ_5cOecNmAOdHAXaLyMECmHuI_ymezDGB6Q-0G7JDdCd79IrGqFt_ZwbCJbGHtOS6AgGfi2YKHTgQ5qp6WEYMHRI2wN9D8YPQ8aO1sYn6tM0wJwFebD1e4wJaYdTF2HX540GOkXf-fCIPHAwJHx8qhfk-4erb5efiusvHz9fvrsujFTlXKgaXNPUdYvKmtpa0SjrnHG2kk7wplaMSStM3W5L04DaKgatdKUSAI0UjJcX5PnRdxen9Y5Zjz4ZHAYIOC1JK8WUbIS4E-TZvFZcZrA6giZOKUV0ehf9CPGgOdNrhvo2Q70GpBnXtxnqVff0NGBpR7T_VKfQMvDsBEDKj3IRQn7of-6VLNV60dsjhvlte49RJ-MxGLQ-opm1nfwdm9wAUx27Fg</recordid><startdate>20010430</startdate><enddate>20010430</enddate><creator>Fellows, P.F.</creator><creator>Linscott, M.K.</creator><creator>Ivins, B.E.</creator><creator>Pitt, M.L.M.</creator><creator>Rossi, C.A.</creator><creator>Gibbs, P.H.</creator><creator>Friedlander, A.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010430</creationdate><title>Efficacy of a human anthrax vaccine in guinea pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin</title><author>Fellows, P.F. ; Linscott, M.K. ; Ivins, B.E. ; Pitt, M.L.M. ; Rossi, C.A. ; Gibbs, P.H. ; Friedlander, A.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-76af9966be7dc6dd297dffcfd54f21967004d2c6b83c9a7870ab4f372aa942013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthrax</topic><topic>Anthrax - immunology</topic><topic>Anthrax - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Anthrax Vaccines - pharmacology</topic><topic>Bacillus anthracis</topic><topic>Bacillus anthracis - immunology</topic><topic>Bacillus anthracis - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Guinea pig</topic><topic>Guinea Pigs</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Macaca mulatta</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Rabbit</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Rhesus macaque</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Spores, Bacterial - immunology</topic><topic>Vaccine</topic><topic>Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fellows, P.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linscott, M.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivins, B.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitt, M.L.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, C.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbs, P.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedlander, A.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fellows, P.F.</au><au>Linscott, M.K.</au><au>Ivins, B.E.</au><au>Pitt, M.L.M.</au><au>Rossi, C.A.</au><au>Gibbs, P.H.</au><au>Friedlander, A.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of a human anthrax vaccine in guinea pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2001-04-30</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>23-24</issue><spage>3241</spage><epage>3247</epage><pages>3241-3247</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><coden>VACCDE</coden><abstract>The efficacy of a licensed human anthrax vaccine (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed (AVA)) was tested in guinea pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against spore challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin. Initially, groups of Hartley guinea pigs were vaccinated at 0 and 4 weeks with AVA, then challenged intramuscularly at 10 weeks with spores from 33 isolates of B. anthracis. Survival among the vaccinated groups varied from 6 to 100%, although there were no differences in mean time to death among the groups. There was no correlation between isolate virulence and variable number tandem repeat category or protective antigen genotype identified. New Zealand white rabbits were then vaccinated with AVA at 0 and 4 weeks, and challenged at 10 weeks by aerosol with spores from six of the isolates that were highly virulent in vaccinated guinea pigs. AVA completely protected the rabbits from four of the isolates, and protected 90% of the animals from the other two isolates. Subsequently, two of these six isolates were then used to challenge rhesus macaques, previously vaccinated with AVA at 0 and 4 weeks, and challenged at 10 weeks by aerosol. AVA protected 80 and 100% of the animals from these two isolates. These studies demonstrated that, although AVA confers variable protection against different B. anthracis isolates in guinea pigs, it is highly protective against these same isolates in both rabbits and rhesus macaques.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11312020</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00021-4</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-410X
ispartof Vaccine, 2001-04, Vol.19 (23-24), p.3241-3247
issn 0264-410X
1873-2518
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77074922
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animals
Anthrax
Anthrax - immunology
Anthrax - prevention & control
Anthrax Vaccines - pharmacology
Bacillus anthracis
Bacillus anthracis - immunology
Bacillus anthracis - isolation & purification
Bacteriology
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Guinea pig
Guinea Pigs
Humans
Macaca mulatta
Male
Microbiology
Rabbit
Rabbits
Rhesus macaque
Species Specificity
Spores, Bacterial - immunology
Vaccine
Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies
title Efficacy of a human anthrax vaccine in guinea pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates of diverse geographical origin
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T03%3A31%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20a%20human%20anthrax%20vaccine%20in%20guinea%20pigs,%20rabbits,%20and%20rhesus%20macaques%20against%20challenge%20by%20Bacillus%20anthracis%20isolates%20of%20diverse%20geographical%20origin&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Fellows,%20P.F.&rft.date=2001-04-30&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=23-24&rft.spage=3241&rft.epage=3247&rft.pages=3241-3247&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft.coden=VACCDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00021-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77074922%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17876714&rft_id=info:pmid/11312020&rft_els_id=S0264410X01000214&rfr_iscdi=true