CALGB 9380: a prospective trial of the feasibility of thoracoscopy/laparoscopy in staging esophageal cancer

Background. The staging of esophageal cancer is imprecise. Thoracoscopic/laparoscopic (TS/LS) staging has been proposed as a more accurate lymph node (LN) staging method. We report the experience of an Intergroup NCI trial (CALGB 9380) evaluating the feasibility and accuracy of this staging modality...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Annals of thoracic surgery 2001-04, Vol.71 (4), p.1073-1079
Hauptverfasser: Krasna, Mark J, Reed, Carolyn E, Nedzwiecki, Donna, Hollis, Donna R, Luketich, James D, DeCamp, Malcolm M, Mayer, Robert J, Sugarbaker, David J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1079
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1073
container_title The Annals of thoracic surgery
container_volume 71
creator Krasna, Mark J
Reed, Carolyn E
Nedzwiecki, Donna
Hollis, Donna R
Luketich, James D
DeCamp, Malcolm M
Mayer, Robert J
Sugarbaker, David J
description Background. The staging of esophageal cancer is imprecise. Thoracoscopic/laparoscopic (TS/LS) staging has been proposed as a more accurate lymph node (LN) staging method. We report the experience of an Intergroup NCI trial (CALGB 9380) evaluating the feasibility and accuracy of this staging modality. Patients and Methods. From February 1995 to September 1999, 134 patients were entered in the study. This study represents the analysis of final data on 113 patients. TS/LS was considered feasible if TS and 1 LN sampled at least 3 LN by LS; a confirmed positive node was found; or T4 or M1 disease was documented. If this was accomplished in more than 70% of patients, TS/LS was believed to be feasible. Results. The LN stations most frequently sampled in the thorax (134 patients) were levels 2 (33%), 3 (38%), 4 (40%), 7 (76%), 8 (69%), 9 (55%), and 10 (43%) and in the abdomen levels 17 (70%) and 20 (55%). The frequency of positive LN by level were as follows: 2 (10%), 3 (8%), 4 (10%), 7 (10%), 8 (25%), 9 (10%), 10 (10%), 17 (34%), and 20 (27%). Noninvasive tests (computed tomographic scan, magnetic resonance imaging, esophageal ultrasound scan) each incorrectly identified TN staging as noted by missed positive or false-negative LN or metastatic disease found at TS/LS staging in 50%, 40%, and 30% of patients, respectively. Median operating time was 210 minutes (range, 40 to 865 minutes). Median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days (range, 1 to 35 days). There were no deaths or major complications. Seventy-three percent of patients met the definition for feasibility. In 30 patients TS was not feasible. Positive LN disease was found in 43 patients; 32 were deemed N0. Ten patients had T4/M1 disease. Of the 32 potentially resectable N0 patients, 14 patients had preoperative induction therapy; 13 patients went directly to operation with N0 confirmed in 9 patients, NX in 1 and N1 in 3. Three patients were unresectable, 1 patient died, and 1 was lost to follow-up. Conclusions. In summary, the feasibility of TS/LS was confirmed. It doubled the number of positive LNs identified by conventional, noninvasive staging. The overall accuracy remains to be defined by analysis of the LN negative group in follow-up. Although the positive predictive value was high, further study is warranted to confirm the role of TS/LS in the staging algorithm of esophageal cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0003-4975(00)02680-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77066036</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003497500026801</els_id><sourcerecordid>77066036</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-57330586df75ae88a0be9ee55a5b363ee35ac21a9f4d4933de6b084a538285553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v2zAMhoVhw5pm-wkrdBrWgxfKsmx5l6IL-gUE6GHbWaBlOlHrxJ7kBMi_rxIH7bEnitTLl-TD2DcBPwWIfPYHAGSSlYX6AXAJaa4hER_YRCiVJnmqyo9s8io5Y-chPMU0jd-f2ZkQErSQ5YQ9z68Xd795KTX84sh734We7OB2xAfvsOVdw4cV8YYwuMq1btiPpc6j7YLt-v2sxR79-OZuw8OAS7dZcgpdv8IlRROLG0v-C_vUYBvo6ylO2b_bm7_z-2TxePcQ90hslmVDogopQem8bgqFpDVCRSWRUqgqmUsiqdCmAssmq7NSypryCnSGSupUK6XklH0ffeM1_7cUBrN2wVLb4oa6bTBFAXkO0WrK1Ci0cf3gqTG9d2v0eyPAHCibI2VzQGgAzJGyEbHv4jRgW62pfus6YY2Cq1FA8cydI2-CdRQZ1M5Huqbu3DsjXgByn4vw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77066036</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CALGB 9380: a prospective trial of the feasibility of thoracoscopy/laparoscopy in staging esophageal cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Krasna, Mark J ; Reed, Carolyn E ; Nedzwiecki, Donna ; Hollis, Donna R ; Luketich, James D ; DeCamp, Malcolm M ; Mayer, Robert J ; Sugarbaker, David J</creator><creatorcontrib>Krasna, Mark J ; Reed, Carolyn E ; Nedzwiecki, Donna ; Hollis, Donna R ; Luketich, James D ; DeCamp, Malcolm M ; Mayer, Robert J ; Sugarbaker, David J ; the CALGB Thoracic Surgeons ; CALGB Thoracic Surgeons</creatorcontrib><description>Background. The staging of esophageal cancer is imprecise. Thoracoscopic/laparoscopic (TS/LS) staging has been proposed as a more accurate lymph node (LN) staging method. We report the experience of an Intergroup NCI trial (CALGB 9380) evaluating the feasibility and accuracy of this staging modality. Patients and Methods. From February 1995 to September 1999, 134 patients were entered in the study. This study represents the analysis of final data on 113 patients. TS/LS was considered feasible if TS and 1 LN sampled at least 3 LN by LS; a confirmed positive node was found; or T4 or M1 disease was documented. If this was accomplished in more than 70% of patients, TS/LS was believed to be feasible. Results. The LN stations most frequently sampled in the thorax (134 patients) were levels 2 (33%), 3 (38%), 4 (40%), 7 (76%), 8 (69%), 9 (55%), and 10 (43%) and in the abdomen levels 17 (70%) and 20 (55%). The frequency of positive LN by level were as follows: 2 (10%), 3 (8%), 4 (10%), 7 (10%), 8 (25%), 9 (10%), 10 (10%), 17 (34%), and 20 (27%). Noninvasive tests (computed tomographic scan, magnetic resonance imaging, esophageal ultrasound scan) each incorrectly identified TN staging as noted by missed positive or false-negative LN or metastatic disease found at TS/LS staging in 50%, 40%, and 30% of patients, respectively. Median operating time was 210 minutes (range, 40 to 865 minutes). Median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days (range, 1 to 35 days). There were no deaths or major complications. Seventy-three percent of patients met the definition for feasibility. In 30 patients TS was not feasible. Positive LN disease was found in 43 patients; 32 were deemed N0. Ten patients had T4/M1 disease. Of the 32 potentially resectable N0 patients, 14 patients had preoperative induction therapy; 13 patients went directly to operation with N0 confirmed in 9 patients, NX in 1 and N1 in 3. Three patients were unresectable, 1 patient died, and 1 was lost to follow-up. Conclusions. In summary, the feasibility of TS/LS was confirmed. It doubled the number of positive LNs identified by conventional, noninvasive staging. The overall accuracy remains to be defined by analysis of the LN negative group in follow-up. Although the positive predictive value was high, further study is warranted to confirm the role of TS/LS in the staging algorithm of esophageal cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4975</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6259</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(00)02680-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11308139</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biopsy, Needle ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnosis ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery ; Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology ; Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery ; Esophagectomy ; Esophagoscopy ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging - methods ; North Carolina ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Thoracoscopy - methods</subject><ispartof>The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2001-04, Vol.71 (4), p.1073-1079</ispartof><rights>2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-57330586df75ae88a0be9ee55a5b363ee35ac21a9f4d4933de6b084a538285553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-57330586df75ae88a0be9ee55a5b363ee35ac21a9f4d4933de6b084a538285553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(00)02680-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11308139$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krasna, Mark J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Carolyn E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nedzwiecki, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollis, Donna R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luketich, James D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeCamp, Malcolm M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugarbaker, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the CALGB Thoracic Surgeons</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CALGB Thoracic Surgeons</creatorcontrib><title>CALGB 9380: a prospective trial of the feasibility of thoracoscopy/laparoscopy in staging esophageal cancer</title><title>The Annals of thoracic surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Thorac Surg</addtitle><description>Background. The staging of esophageal cancer is imprecise. Thoracoscopic/laparoscopic (TS/LS) staging has been proposed as a more accurate lymph node (LN) staging method. We report the experience of an Intergroup NCI trial (CALGB 9380) evaluating the feasibility and accuracy of this staging modality. Patients and Methods. From February 1995 to September 1999, 134 patients were entered in the study. This study represents the analysis of final data on 113 patients. TS/LS was considered feasible if TS and 1 LN sampled at least 3 LN by LS; a confirmed positive node was found; or T4 or M1 disease was documented. If this was accomplished in more than 70% of patients, TS/LS was believed to be feasible. Results. The LN stations most frequently sampled in the thorax (134 patients) were levels 2 (33%), 3 (38%), 4 (40%), 7 (76%), 8 (69%), 9 (55%), and 10 (43%) and in the abdomen levels 17 (70%) and 20 (55%). The frequency of positive LN by level were as follows: 2 (10%), 3 (8%), 4 (10%), 7 (10%), 8 (25%), 9 (10%), 10 (10%), 17 (34%), and 20 (27%). Noninvasive tests (computed tomographic scan, magnetic resonance imaging, esophageal ultrasound scan) each incorrectly identified TN staging as noted by missed positive or false-negative LN or metastatic disease found at TS/LS staging in 50%, 40%, and 30% of patients, respectively. Median operating time was 210 minutes (range, 40 to 865 minutes). Median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days (range, 1 to 35 days). There were no deaths or major complications. Seventy-three percent of patients met the definition for feasibility. In 30 patients TS was not feasible. Positive LN disease was found in 43 patients; 32 were deemed N0. Ten patients had T4/M1 disease. Of the 32 potentially resectable N0 patients, 14 patients had preoperative induction therapy; 13 patients went directly to operation with N0 confirmed in 9 patients, NX in 1 and N1 in 3. Three patients were unresectable, 1 patient died, and 1 was lost to follow-up. Conclusions. In summary, the feasibility of TS/LS was confirmed. It doubled the number of positive LNs identified by conventional, noninvasive staging. The overall accuracy remains to be defined by analysis of the LN negative group in follow-up. Although the positive predictive value was high, further study is warranted to confirm the role of TS/LS in the staging algorithm of esophageal cancer.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biopsy, Needle</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Esophagectomy</subject><subject>Esophagoscopy</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging - methods</subject><subject>North Carolina</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Thoracoscopy - methods</subject><issn>0003-4975</issn><issn>1552-6259</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1v2zAMhoVhw5pm-wkrdBrWgxfKsmx5l6IL-gUE6GHbWaBlOlHrxJ7kBMi_rxIH7bEnitTLl-TD2DcBPwWIfPYHAGSSlYX6AXAJaa4hER_YRCiVJnmqyo9s8io5Y-chPMU0jd-f2ZkQErSQ5YQ9z68Xd795KTX84sh734We7OB2xAfvsOVdw4cV8YYwuMq1btiPpc6j7YLt-v2sxR79-OZuw8OAS7dZcgpdv8IlRROLG0v-C_vUYBvo6ylO2b_bm7_z-2TxePcQ90hslmVDogopQem8bgqFpDVCRSWRUqgqmUsiqdCmAssmq7NSypryCnSGSupUK6XklH0ffeM1_7cUBrN2wVLb4oa6bTBFAXkO0WrK1Ci0cf3gqTG9d2v0eyPAHCibI2VzQGgAzJGyEbHv4jRgW62pfus6YY2Cq1FA8cydI2-CdRQZ1M5Huqbu3DsjXgByn4vw</recordid><startdate>20010401</startdate><enddate>20010401</enddate><creator>Krasna, Mark J</creator><creator>Reed, Carolyn E</creator><creator>Nedzwiecki, Donna</creator><creator>Hollis, Donna R</creator><creator>Luketich, James D</creator><creator>DeCamp, Malcolm M</creator><creator>Mayer, Robert J</creator><creator>Sugarbaker, David J</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010401</creationdate><title>CALGB 9380: a prospective trial of the feasibility of thoracoscopy/laparoscopy in staging esophageal cancer</title><author>Krasna, Mark J ; Reed, Carolyn E ; Nedzwiecki, Donna ; Hollis, Donna R ; Luketich, James D ; DeCamp, Malcolm M ; Mayer, Robert J ; Sugarbaker, David J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-57330586df75ae88a0be9ee55a5b363ee35ac21a9f4d4933de6b084a538285553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biopsy, Needle</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Esophagectomy</topic><topic>Esophagoscopy</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging - methods</topic><topic>North Carolina</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Thoracoscopy - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krasna, Mark J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Carolyn E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nedzwiecki, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollis, Donna R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luketich, James D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeCamp, Malcolm M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugarbaker, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the CALGB Thoracic Surgeons</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CALGB Thoracic Surgeons</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Annals of thoracic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krasna, Mark J</au><au>Reed, Carolyn E</au><au>Nedzwiecki, Donna</au><au>Hollis, Donna R</au><au>Luketich, James D</au><au>DeCamp, Malcolm M</au><au>Mayer, Robert J</au><au>Sugarbaker, David J</au><aucorp>the CALGB Thoracic Surgeons</aucorp><aucorp>CALGB Thoracic Surgeons</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CALGB 9380: a prospective trial of the feasibility of thoracoscopy/laparoscopy in staging esophageal cancer</atitle><jtitle>The Annals of thoracic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Thorac Surg</addtitle><date>2001-04-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1073</spage><epage>1079</epage><pages>1073-1079</pages><issn>0003-4975</issn><eissn>1552-6259</eissn><abstract>Background. The staging of esophageal cancer is imprecise. Thoracoscopic/laparoscopic (TS/LS) staging has been proposed as a more accurate lymph node (LN) staging method. We report the experience of an Intergroup NCI trial (CALGB 9380) evaluating the feasibility and accuracy of this staging modality. Patients and Methods. From February 1995 to September 1999, 134 patients were entered in the study. This study represents the analysis of final data on 113 patients. TS/LS was considered feasible if TS and 1 LN sampled at least 3 LN by LS; a confirmed positive node was found; or T4 or M1 disease was documented. If this was accomplished in more than 70% of patients, TS/LS was believed to be feasible. Results. The LN stations most frequently sampled in the thorax (134 patients) were levels 2 (33%), 3 (38%), 4 (40%), 7 (76%), 8 (69%), 9 (55%), and 10 (43%) and in the abdomen levels 17 (70%) and 20 (55%). The frequency of positive LN by level were as follows: 2 (10%), 3 (8%), 4 (10%), 7 (10%), 8 (25%), 9 (10%), 10 (10%), 17 (34%), and 20 (27%). Noninvasive tests (computed tomographic scan, magnetic resonance imaging, esophageal ultrasound scan) each incorrectly identified TN staging as noted by missed positive or false-negative LN or metastatic disease found at TS/LS staging in 50%, 40%, and 30% of patients, respectively. Median operating time was 210 minutes (range, 40 to 865 minutes). Median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days (range, 1 to 35 days). There were no deaths or major complications. Seventy-three percent of patients met the definition for feasibility. In 30 patients TS was not feasible. Positive LN disease was found in 43 patients; 32 were deemed N0. Ten patients had T4/M1 disease. Of the 32 potentially resectable N0 patients, 14 patients had preoperative induction therapy; 13 patients went directly to operation with N0 confirmed in 9 patients, NX in 1 and N1 in 3. Three patients were unresectable, 1 patient died, and 1 was lost to follow-up. Conclusions. In summary, the feasibility of TS/LS was confirmed. It doubled the number of positive LNs identified by conventional, noninvasive staging. The overall accuracy remains to be defined by analysis of the LN negative group in follow-up. Although the positive predictive value was high, further study is warranted to confirm the role of TS/LS in the staging algorithm of esophageal cancer.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11308139</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0003-4975(00)02680-1</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4975
ispartof The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2001-04, Vol.71 (4), p.1073-1079
issn 0003-4975
1552-6259
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77066036
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adenocarcinoma - pathology
Adenocarcinoma - surgery
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biopsy, Needle
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnosis
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery
Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology
Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery
Esophagectomy
Esophagoscopy
Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Laparoscopy - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging - methods
North Carolina
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Thoracoscopy - methods
title CALGB 9380: a prospective trial of the feasibility of thoracoscopy/laparoscopy in staging esophageal cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A40%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CALGB%209380:%20a%20prospective%20trial%20of%20the%20feasibility%20of%20thoracoscopy/laparoscopy%20in%20staging%20esophageal%20cancer&rft.jtitle=The%20Annals%20of%20thoracic%20surgery&rft.au=Krasna,%20Mark%20J&rft.aucorp=the%20CALGB%20Thoracic%20Surgeons&rft.date=2001-04-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1073&rft.epage=1079&rft.pages=1073-1079&rft.issn=0003-4975&rft.eissn=1552-6259&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0003-4975(00)02680-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77066036%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77066036&rft_id=info:pmid/11308139&rft_els_id=S0003497500026801&rfr_iscdi=true