Long-Term effects of multichannel cochlear implant usage
A major concern regarding multichannel (multi‐electrode) cochlear prosthesis usage has been the possibility of long‐term deleterious physiological effects such as the degeneration of spiral ganglion cells, neuronal degeneration, and new bone formation. These effects, if present, would become evident...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Laryngoscope 1986-10, Vol.96 (10), p.1083-1087 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1087 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 1083 |
| container_title | The Laryngoscope |
| container_volume | 96 |
| creator | Waltzman, Susan B. Cohen, Noel L. Shapiro, William H. |
| description | A major concern regarding multichannel (multi‐electrode) cochlear prosthesis usage has been the possibility of long‐term deleterious physiological effects such as the degeneration of spiral ganglion cells, neuronal degeneration, and new bone formation. These effects, if present, would become evident in the deterioration of hearing sensation and performance of the cochlear implant recipient on a battery of audiologic tests.
To date, five patients using the Australian multi‐electrode multichannel cochlear implant have undergone a 1‐year evaluation of the device. The assessment includes a check of electrical threshold and comfort levels for each electrode, sound field pure tone and speech thresholds, the MAC battery, vowel and consonant recognition tests, and speech tracking tasks.
All results were compared to those obtained postoperatively following stimulation and a 3‐month training period. Results to date have shown no deterioration in implant functioning in all patients tested. Periodic extensive monitoring of all implant recipients is advocated in order to evaluate the possibility of long‐term effects. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1288/00005537-198610000-00007 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77065252</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77065252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5337-7656e86b744a6eeef2b4c7c89f7053d5127b70d57e8f924ac36833bc5c5a68de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1v1DAQhq0KVLYtP6FSDohbWn9kPM6xKtBW2oJEi1hOluMdt4F8bO1E0H9P0l32jA-2PPPMO69exjLBz4Q05pxPB0BhLkqjxfzL5wsP2EKAEnlRlvCKLTiXKjcgV2_YUUo_OReogB-yQ4VaSlMsmFn23UN-T7HNKATyQ8r6kLVjM9T-0XUdNZnv_WNDLmZ1u2lcN2Rjcg90wl4H1yR6u3uP2bdPH-8vr_Pll6uby4tl7kFN_lCDJqMrLAqniSjIqvDoTRmQg1qDkFghXwOSCaUsnFfaKFV58OC0WZM6Zu-3upvYP42UBtvWyVMzOaF-TBaRa5AgJ9BsQR_7lCIFu4l16-KzFdzOodl_odl9aC8lnEZPdzvGqqX1fnCX0tR_t-u75F0Tout8nfaY4YJP5IR92GK_64ae_3u9XV58_QFQ8HKuzm7yrUydBvqzl3Hxl9WoEOz3z1d2BXewui3R3qq_FV6UyQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77065252</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-Term effects of multichannel cochlear implant usage</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Waltzman, Susan B. ; Cohen, Noel L. ; Shapiro, William H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Waltzman, Susan B. ; Cohen, Noel L. ; Shapiro, William H.</creatorcontrib><description>A major concern regarding multichannel (multi‐electrode) cochlear prosthesis usage has been the possibility of long‐term deleterious physiological effects such as the degeneration of spiral ganglion cells, neuronal degeneration, and new bone formation. These effects, if present, would become evident in the deterioration of hearing sensation and performance of the cochlear implant recipient on a battery of audiologic tests.
To date, five patients using the Australian multi‐electrode multichannel cochlear implant have undergone a 1‐year evaluation of the device. The assessment includes a check of electrical threshold and comfort levels for each electrode, sound field pure tone and speech thresholds, the MAC battery, vowel and consonant recognition tests, and speech tracking tasks.
All results were compared to those obtained postoperatively following stimulation and a 3‐month training period. Results to date have shown no deterioration in implant functioning in all patients tested. Periodic extensive monitoring of all implant recipients is advocated in order to evaluate the possibility of long‐term effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-852X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1288/00005537-198610000-00007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3762284</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LARYA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Audiometry, Pure-Tone ; Auditory Threshold - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cochlear Implants ; Deafness - rehabilitation ; Electric Stimulation ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hearing - physiology ; Humans ; Loudness Perception - physiology ; Medical sciences ; Speech Discrimination Tests ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>The Laryngoscope, 1986-10, Vol.96 (10), p.1083-1087</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1986 The Triological Society</rights><rights>1987 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5337-7656e86b744a6eeef2b4c7c89f7053d5127b70d57e8f924ac36833bc5c5a68de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5337-7656e86b744a6eeef2b4c7c89f7053d5127b70d57e8f924ac36833bc5c5a68de3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8010762$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3762284$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Waltzman, Susan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Noel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, William H.</creatorcontrib><title>Long-Term effects of multichannel cochlear implant usage</title><title>The Laryngoscope</title><addtitle>The Laryngoscope</addtitle><description>A major concern regarding multichannel (multi‐electrode) cochlear prosthesis usage has been the possibility of long‐term deleterious physiological effects such as the degeneration of spiral ganglion cells, neuronal degeneration, and new bone formation. These effects, if present, would become evident in the deterioration of hearing sensation and performance of the cochlear implant recipient on a battery of audiologic tests.
To date, five patients using the Australian multi‐electrode multichannel cochlear implant have undergone a 1‐year evaluation of the device. The assessment includes a check of electrical threshold and comfort levels for each electrode, sound field pure tone and speech thresholds, the MAC battery, vowel and consonant recognition tests, and speech tracking tasks.
All results were compared to those obtained postoperatively following stimulation and a 3‐month training period. Results to date have shown no deterioration in implant functioning in all patients tested. Periodic extensive monitoring of all implant recipients is advocated in order to evaluate the possibility of long‐term effects.</description><subject>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cochlear Implants</subject><subject>Deafness - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hearing - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Loudness Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Speech Discrimination Tests</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0023-852X</issn><issn>1531-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1v1DAQhq0KVLYtP6FSDohbWn9kPM6xKtBW2oJEi1hOluMdt4F8bO1E0H9P0l32jA-2PPPMO69exjLBz4Q05pxPB0BhLkqjxfzL5wsP2EKAEnlRlvCKLTiXKjcgV2_YUUo_OReogB-yQ4VaSlMsmFn23UN-T7HNKATyQ8r6kLVjM9T-0XUdNZnv_WNDLmZ1u2lcN2Rjcg90wl4H1yR6u3uP2bdPH-8vr_Pll6uby4tl7kFN_lCDJqMrLAqniSjIqvDoTRmQg1qDkFghXwOSCaUsnFfaKFV58OC0WZM6Zu-3upvYP42UBtvWyVMzOaF-TBaRa5AgJ9BsQR_7lCIFu4l16-KzFdzOodl_odl9aC8lnEZPdzvGqqX1fnCX0tR_t-u75F0Tout8nfaY4YJP5IR92GK_64ae_3u9XV58_QFQ8HKuzm7yrUydBvqzl3Hxl9WoEOz3z1d2BXewui3R3qq_FV6UyQ</recordid><startdate>198610</startdate><enddate>198610</enddate><creator>Waltzman, Susan B.</creator><creator>Cohen, Noel L.</creator><creator>Shapiro, William H.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198610</creationdate><title>Long-Term effects of multichannel cochlear implant usage</title><author>Waltzman, Susan B. ; Cohen, Noel L. ; Shapiro, William H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5337-7656e86b744a6eeef2b4c7c89f7053d5127b70d57e8f924ac36833bc5c5a68de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cochlear Implants</topic><topic>Deafness - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hearing - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Loudness Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Speech Discrimination Tests</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Waltzman, Susan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Noel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, William H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Waltzman, Susan B.</au><au>Cohen, Noel L.</au><au>Shapiro, William H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-Term effects of multichannel cochlear implant usage</atitle><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle><addtitle>The Laryngoscope</addtitle><date>1986-10</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1083</spage><epage>1087</epage><pages>1083-1087</pages><issn>0023-852X</issn><eissn>1531-4995</eissn><coden>LARYA8</coden><abstract>A major concern regarding multichannel (multi‐electrode) cochlear prosthesis usage has been the possibility of long‐term deleterious physiological effects such as the degeneration of spiral ganglion cells, neuronal degeneration, and new bone formation. These effects, if present, would become evident in the deterioration of hearing sensation and performance of the cochlear implant recipient on a battery of audiologic tests.
To date, five patients using the Australian multi‐electrode multichannel cochlear implant have undergone a 1‐year evaluation of the device. The assessment includes a check of electrical threshold and comfort levels for each electrode, sound field pure tone and speech thresholds, the MAC battery, vowel and consonant recognition tests, and speech tracking tasks.
All results were compared to those obtained postoperatively following stimulation and a 3‐month training period. Results to date have shown no deterioration in implant functioning in all patients tested. Periodic extensive monitoring of all implant recipients is advocated in order to evaluate the possibility of long‐term effects.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>3762284</pmid><doi>10.1288/00005537-198610000-00007</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0023-852X |
| ispartof | The Laryngoscope, 1986-10, Vol.96 (10), p.1083-1087 |
| issn | 0023-852X 1531-4995 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77065252 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
| subjects | Audiometry, Pure-Tone Auditory Threshold - physiology Biological and medical sciences Cochlear Implants Deafness - rehabilitation Electric Stimulation Follow-Up Studies Hearing - physiology Humans Loudness Perception - physiology Medical sciences Speech Discrimination Tests Time Factors |
| title | Long-Term effects of multichannel cochlear implant usage |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T21%3A25%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-Term%20effects%20of%20multichannel%20cochlear%20implant%20usage&rft.jtitle=The%20Laryngoscope&rft.au=Waltzman,%20Susan%20B.&rft.date=1986-10&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1083&rft.epage=1087&rft.pages=1083-1087&rft.issn=0023-852X&rft.eissn=1531-4995&rft.coden=LARYA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1288/00005537-198610000-00007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77065252%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77065252&rft_id=info:pmid/3762284&rfr_iscdi=true |