Healthcare ethics committees and the law: uneasy but inevitable bedfellows
Given the intellectual and institutional history of bioethics and HECs, it is not surprising that law continues to influence HECs and to shape HEC discussions of substantive issues. But it is not at all clear that the role currently played by law is optimum and represents the most appropriate means...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | HEC forum 2001-03, Vol.13 (1), p.13-31 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 31 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 13 |
| container_title | HEC forum |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | De Ville, K Hassler, G |
| description | Given the intellectual and institutional history of bioethics and HECs, it is not surprising that law continues to influence HECs and to shape HEC discussions of substantive issues. But it is not at all clear that the role currently played by law is optimum and represents the most appropriate means of resolving complicated and sensitive clinical and policy issues faced every day by HECs. At the same time, it would be unrealistic to expect that the law's influence could be, or should be, banished from the hearts and minds of HEC members, their discourse, and their deliberations. Therefore, legal habits of mind and legal considerations will likely continue to influence HECs because the issues they regularly face necessarily raise both legal and ethical questions, and because HEC members are drawn from a popular culture in which, rightly or wrongly, law is equated with rights, justice and morality. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1023/A:1011233409541 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77058749</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>352534901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p149t-88060b9bf7200466ff8c7308f7d5fb4c2ef2bd76eb1e28b5ed2aae2a28b2012b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLAzEUhYMotlbX7iS4cDd685hJprtSqlUKbnQ9JDM3dMo86iRj6b83YN24OpfDx-XjEHLL4JEBF0-LOQPGuBAS8lSyMzJlqeKJlrk-J9PYZQlXQk3Ilfc7AJApyEsyYUyASjVMydsaTRO2pRmQYtjWpadl37Z1CIiemq6iYYu0MYc5HTs0_kjtGGjd4XcdjG2QWqwcNk1_8NfkwpnG480pZ-TzefWxXCeb95fX5WKT7JnMQ6I1ZGBz6xSPPlnmnC6VAO1UlTorS46O20plaBlybVOsuDHITbw5MG7FjDz8_t0P_deIPhRt7cvoYDrsR18oBalWMo_g_T9w149DF90KzvM4GdcsQncnaLQtVsV-qFszHIu_icQP6C1n8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229340281</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Healthcare ethics committees and the law: uneasy but inevitable bedfellows</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>De Ville, K ; Hassler, G</creator><creatorcontrib>De Ville, K ; Hassler, G</creatorcontrib><description>Given the intellectual and institutional history of bioethics and HECs, it is not surprising that law continues to influence HECs and to shape HEC discussions of substantive issues. But it is not at all clear that the role currently played by law is optimum and represents the most appropriate means of resolving complicated and sensitive clinical and policy issues faced every day by HECs. At the same time, it would be unrealistic to expect that the law's influence could be, or should be, banished from the hearts and minds of HEC members, their discourse, and their deliberations. Therefore, legal habits of mind and legal considerations will likely continue to influence HECs because the issues they regularly face necessarily raise both legal and ethical questions, and because HEC members are drawn from a popular culture in which, rightly or wrongly, law is equated with rights, justice and morality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-2737</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8498</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1011233409541</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11307580</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Bioethics ; Decision Making, Organizational ; Ethics Committees - legislation & jurisprudence ; Health administration ; Health care ; Humans ; Jurisprudence ; Law ; Medical ethics ; Morals ; Organizational Policy ; Studies ; United States</subject><ispartof>HEC forum, 2001-03, Vol.13 (1), p.13-31</ispartof><rights>Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers Mar 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11307580$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Ville, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassler, G</creatorcontrib><title>Healthcare ethics committees and the law: uneasy but inevitable bedfellows</title><title>HEC forum</title><addtitle>HEC Forum</addtitle><description>Given the intellectual and institutional history of bioethics and HECs, it is not surprising that law continues to influence HECs and to shape HEC discussions of substantive issues. But it is not at all clear that the role currently played by law is optimum and represents the most appropriate means of resolving complicated and sensitive clinical and policy issues faced every day by HECs. At the same time, it would be unrealistic to expect that the law's influence could be, or should be, banished from the hearts and minds of HEC members, their discourse, and their deliberations. Therefore, legal habits of mind and legal considerations will likely continue to influence HECs because the issues they regularly face necessarily raise both legal and ethical questions, and because HEC members are drawn from a popular culture in which, rightly or wrongly, law is equated with rights, justice and morality.</description><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Decision Making, Organizational</subject><subject>Ethics Committees - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Jurisprudence</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Morals</subject><subject>Organizational Policy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0956-2737</issn><issn>1572-8498</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLAzEUhYMotlbX7iS4cDd685hJprtSqlUKbnQ9JDM3dMo86iRj6b83YN24OpfDx-XjEHLL4JEBF0-LOQPGuBAS8lSyMzJlqeKJlrk-J9PYZQlXQk3Ilfc7AJApyEsyYUyASjVMydsaTRO2pRmQYtjWpadl37Z1CIiemq6iYYu0MYc5HTs0_kjtGGjd4XcdjG2QWqwcNk1_8NfkwpnG480pZ-TzefWxXCeb95fX5WKT7JnMQ6I1ZGBz6xSPPlnmnC6VAO1UlTorS46O20plaBlybVOsuDHITbw5MG7FjDz8_t0P_deIPhRt7cvoYDrsR18oBalWMo_g_T9w149DF90KzvM4GdcsQncnaLQtVsV-qFszHIu_icQP6C1n8A</recordid><startdate>200103</startdate><enddate>200103</enddate><creator>De Ville, K</creator><creator>Hassler, G</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200103</creationdate><title>Healthcare ethics committees and the law: uneasy but inevitable bedfellows</title><author>De Ville, K ; Hassler, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p149t-88060b9bf7200466ff8c7308f7d5fb4c2ef2bd76eb1e28b5ed2aae2a28b2012b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Decision Making, Organizational</topic><topic>Ethics Committees - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Jurisprudence</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Morals</topic><topic>Organizational Policy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Ville, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassler, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>HEC forum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Ville, K</au><au>Hassler, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Healthcare ethics committees and the law: uneasy but inevitable bedfellows</atitle><jtitle>HEC forum</jtitle><addtitle>HEC Forum</addtitle><date>2001-03</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>13-31</pages><issn>0956-2737</issn><eissn>1572-8498</eissn><abstract>Given the intellectual and institutional history of bioethics and HECs, it is not surprising that law continues to influence HECs and to shape HEC discussions of substantive issues. But it is not at all clear that the role currently played by law is optimum and represents the most appropriate means of resolving complicated and sensitive clinical and policy issues faced every day by HECs. At the same time, it would be unrealistic to expect that the law's influence could be, or should be, banished from the hearts and minds of HEC members, their discourse, and their deliberations. Therefore, legal habits of mind and legal considerations will likely continue to influence HECs because the issues they regularly face necessarily raise both legal and ethical questions, and because HEC members are drawn from a popular culture in which, rightly or wrongly, law is equated with rights, justice and morality.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>11307580</pmid><doi>10.1023/A:1011233409541</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0956-2737 |
| ispartof | HEC forum, 2001-03, Vol.13 (1), p.13-31 |
| issn | 0956-2737 1572-8498 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77058749 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | Bioethics Decision Making, Organizational Ethics Committees - legislation & jurisprudence Health administration Health care Humans Jurisprudence Law Medical ethics Morals Organizational Policy Studies United States |
| title | Healthcare ethics committees and the law: uneasy but inevitable bedfellows |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T04%3A34%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Healthcare%20ethics%20committees%20and%20the%20law:%20uneasy%20but%20inevitable%20bedfellows&rft.jtitle=HEC%20forum&rft.au=De%20Ville,%20K&rft.date=2001-03&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=13-31&rft.issn=0956-2737&rft.eissn=1572-8498&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1011233409541&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E352534901%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229340281&rft_id=info:pmid/11307580&rfr_iscdi=true |