Effect of liquid bolus consistency and delivery method on aspiration and pharyngeal retention in dysphagia patients
There is no empirically derived consensus as to what food consistency types and method of food delivery (spoon, cup, straw) should be included in the videofluoroscopic swallowing (VFSS) studies. In the present study, we examine the rates of aspiration and pharyngeal retention in 190 dysphagic patien...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Dysphagia 2001-03, Vol.16 (2), p.119-122 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 122 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 119 |
| container_title | Dysphagia |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | Kuhlemeier, K V Palmer, J B Rosenberg, D |
| description | There is no empirically derived consensus as to what food consistency types and method of food delivery (spoon, cup, straw) should be included in the videofluoroscopic swallowing (VFSS) studies. In the present study, we examine the rates of aspiration and pharyngeal retention in 190 dysphagic patients given thin (apple juice) and thick (apricot nectar) liquids delivered by teaspoon and cup and ultrathick (pudding-like) liquid delivered by teaspoon. Each patient was tested with each of the bolus/delivery method combinations. The fractions of patients exhibiting aspiration for each bolus/method of delivery combination were (1) thick liquids (cup), 13.2%; (2) thick liquids (spoon), 8.9%; (3) thin liquids (cup), 23.7%; (4) thin liquids (spoon), 15.8%, (5) ultrathick liquids (spoon), 5.8%. In each comparison [thick liquid (cup) vs. thick liquid (spoon), thin liquid (cup) vs. thin liquid (spoon), thick liquid (cup) vs. thin liquid (cup), thick liquid (spoon) vs. thin liquid (spoon), and thick liquid (spoon) vs. ultrathick liquid (spoon)], the p value for chi 2 was < 0.001. These results suggest that utilizing thin, thick, and ultrathick liquids and delivery by cup and spoon during a VFSS of a patient with mild or moderate dysphagia can increase the chances of identifying a consistency that the patient can swallow without aspirating and without pharyngeal retention after swallowing. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s004550011003 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77052933</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77052933</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-bb02a1936436c1262eb0dc25b312cf4e7fb4eb89181017749bae2c2d83421c073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkEtLw0AUhQdRbK0u3cqs3EXvPJI0Sym-oOBGwV2Yx007kldnEiH_3qktiKv7ON-9cA4h1wzuGEB-HwBkmgKwOIkTMmdS8ARkBqdkDiwvEkjZ54xchPAVIV5k4pzMGBOQcs7mJDxWFZqBdhWt3W50luquHgM1XRtcGLA1E1WtpRZr941-og0O287SrqUq9M6rwe3bSPRb5ad2g6qmHuPhr-BaaqcQpY1TtI9w3IdLclapOuDVsS7Ix9Pj--olWb89v64e1okRaTokWgNXrBCZFJlhPOOowRqeasG4qSTmlZaolwVbsmg0l4VWyA23SyE5M5CLBbk9_O19txsxDGXjgsG6Vi12YyjzPIZQCBHB5AAa34XgsSp775pop2RQ7lMu_6Uc-Zvj41E3aP_oY6ziB1FqeOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77052933</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of liquid bolus consistency and delivery method on aspiration and pharyngeal retention in dysphagia patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Kuhlemeier, K V ; Palmer, J B ; Rosenberg, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuhlemeier, K V ; Palmer, J B ; Rosenberg, D</creatorcontrib><description>There is no empirically derived consensus as to what food consistency types and method of food delivery (spoon, cup, straw) should be included in the videofluoroscopic swallowing (VFSS) studies. In the present study, we examine the rates of aspiration and pharyngeal retention in 190 dysphagic patients given thin (apple juice) and thick (apricot nectar) liquids delivered by teaspoon and cup and ultrathick (pudding-like) liquid delivered by teaspoon. Each patient was tested with each of the bolus/delivery method combinations. The fractions of patients exhibiting aspiration for each bolus/method of delivery combination were (1) thick liquids (cup), 13.2%; (2) thick liquids (spoon), 8.9%; (3) thin liquids (cup), 23.7%; (4) thin liquids (spoon), 15.8%, (5) ultrathick liquids (spoon), 5.8%. In each comparison [thick liquid (cup) vs. thick liquid (spoon), thin liquid (cup) vs. thin liquid (spoon), thick liquid (cup) vs. thin liquid (cup), thick liquid (spoon) vs. thin liquid (spoon), and thick liquid (spoon) vs. ultrathick liquid (spoon)], the p value for chi 2 was < 0.001. These results suggest that utilizing thin, thick, and ultrathick liquids and delivery by cup and spoon during a VFSS of a patient with mild or moderate dysphagia can increase the chances of identifying a consistency that the patient can swallow without aspirating and without pharyngeal retention after swallowing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0179-051X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0460</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s004550011003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11305221</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Deglutition Disorders - diagnosis ; Deglutition Disorders - physiopathology ; Dentistry ; Female ; Food ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pharynx - physiopathology ; Severity of Illness Index</subject><ispartof>Dysphagia, 2001-03, Vol.16 (2), p.119-122</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-bb02a1936436c1262eb0dc25b312cf4e7fb4eb89181017749bae2c2d83421c073</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11305221$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuhlemeier, K V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, J B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenberg, D</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of liquid bolus consistency and delivery method on aspiration and pharyngeal retention in dysphagia patients</title><title>Dysphagia</title><addtitle>Dysphagia</addtitle><description>There is no empirically derived consensus as to what food consistency types and method of food delivery (spoon, cup, straw) should be included in the videofluoroscopic swallowing (VFSS) studies. In the present study, we examine the rates of aspiration and pharyngeal retention in 190 dysphagic patients given thin (apple juice) and thick (apricot nectar) liquids delivered by teaspoon and cup and ultrathick (pudding-like) liquid delivered by teaspoon. Each patient was tested with each of the bolus/delivery method combinations. The fractions of patients exhibiting aspiration for each bolus/method of delivery combination were (1) thick liquids (cup), 13.2%; (2) thick liquids (spoon), 8.9%; (3) thin liquids (cup), 23.7%; (4) thin liquids (spoon), 15.8%, (5) ultrathick liquids (spoon), 5.8%. In each comparison [thick liquid (cup) vs. thick liquid (spoon), thin liquid (cup) vs. thin liquid (spoon), thick liquid (cup) vs. thin liquid (cup), thick liquid (spoon) vs. thin liquid (spoon), and thick liquid (spoon) vs. ultrathick liquid (spoon)], the p value for chi 2 was < 0.001. These results suggest that utilizing thin, thick, and ultrathick liquids and delivery by cup and spoon during a VFSS of a patient with mild or moderate dysphagia can increase the chances of identifying a consistency that the patient can swallow without aspirating and without pharyngeal retention after swallowing.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Deglutition Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Deglutition Disorders - physiopathology</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pharynx - physiopathology</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><issn>0179-051X</issn><issn>1432-0460</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkEtLw0AUhQdRbK0u3cqs3EXvPJI0Sym-oOBGwV2Yx007kldnEiH_3qktiKv7ON-9cA4h1wzuGEB-HwBkmgKwOIkTMmdS8ARkBqdkDiwvEkjZ54xchPAVIV5k4pzMGBOQcs7mJDxWFZqBdhWt3W50luquHgM1XRtcGLA1E1WtpRZr941-og0O287SrqUq9M6rwe3bSPRb5ad2g6qmHuPhr-BaaqcQpY1TtI9w3IdLclapOuDVsS7Ix9Pj--olWb89v64e1okRaTokWgNXrBCZFJlhPOOowRqeasG4qSTmlZaolwVbsmg0l4VWyA23SyE5M5CLBbk9_O19txsxDGXjgsG6Vi12YyjzPIZQCBHB5AAa34XgsSp775pop2RQ7lMu_6Uc-Zvj41E3aP_oY6ziB1FqeOQ</recordid><startdate>20010301</startdate><enddate>20010301</enddate><creator>Kuhlemeier, K V</creator><creator>Palmer, J B</creator><creator>Rosenberg, D</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010301</creationdate><title>Effect of liquid bolus consistency and delivery method on aspiration and pharyngeal retention in dysphagia patients</title><author>Kuhlemeier, K V ; Palmer, J B ; Rosenberg, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-bb02a1936436c1262eb0dc25b312cf4e7fb4eb89181017749bae2c2d83421c073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Deglutition Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Deglutition Disorders - physiopathology</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pharynx - physiopathology</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuhlemeier, K V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, J B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenberg, D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Dysphagia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuhlemeier, K V</au><au>Palmer, J B</au><au>Rosenberg, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of liquid bolus consistency and delivery method on aspiration and pharyngeal retention in dysphagia patients</atitle><jtitle>Dysphagia</jtitle><addtitle>Dysphagia</addtitle><date>2001-03-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>119</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>119-122</pages><issn>0179-051X</issn><eissn>1432-0460</eissn><abstract>There is no empirically derived consensus as to what food consistency types and method of food delivery (spoon, cup, straw) should be included in the videofluoroscopic swallowing (VFSS) studies. In the present study, we examine the rates of aspiration and pharyngeal retention in 190 dysphagic patients given thin (apple juice) and thick (apricot nectar) liquids delivered by teaspoon and cup and ultrathick (pudding-like) liquid delivered by teaspoon. Each patient was tested with each of the bolus/delivery method combinations. The fractions of patients exhibiting aspiration for each bolus/method of delivery combination were (1) thick liquids (cup), 13.2%; (2) thick liquids (spoon), 8.9%; (3) thin liquids (cup), 23.7%; (4) thin liquids (spoon), 15.8%, (5) ultrathick liquids (spoon), 5.8%. In each comparison [thick liquid (cup) vs. thick liquid (spoon), thin liquid (cup) vs. thin liquid (spoon), thick liquid (cup) vs. thin liquid (cup), thick liquid (spoon) vs. thin liquid (spoon), and thick liquid (spoon) vs. ultrathick liquid (spoon)], the p value for chi 2 was < 0.001. These results suggest that utilizing thin, thick, and ultrathick liquids and delivery by cup and spoon during a VFSS of a patient with mild or moderate dysphagia can increase the chances of identifying a consistency that the patient can swallow without aspirating and without pharyngeal retention after swallowing.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>11305221</pmid><doi>10.1007/s004550011003</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0179-051X |
| ispartof | Dysphagia, 2001-03, Vol.16 (2), p.119-122 |
| issn | 0179-051X 1432-0460 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77052933 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Administration, Oral Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Deglutition Disorders - diagnosis Deglutition Disorders - physiopathology Dentistry Female Food Humans Male Middle Aged Pharynx - physiopathology Severity of Illness Index |
| title | Effect of liquid bolus consistency and delivery method on aspiration and pharyngeal retention in dysphagia patients |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T19%3A34%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20liquid%20bolus%20consistency%20and%20delivery%20method%20on%20aspiration%20and%20pharyngeal%20retention%20in%20dysphagia%20patients&rft.jtitle=Dysphagia&rft.au=Kuhlemeier,%20K%20V&rft.date=2001-03-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=119&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=119-122&rft.issn=0179-051X&rft.eissn=1432-0460&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s004550011003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77052933%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77052933&rft_id=info:pmid/11305221&rfr_iscdi=true |