The management of peripheral vascular complications associated with the use of percutaneous suture–mediated closure devices
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify the peripheral vascular complications associated with the use of percutaneous suture–mediated closure (PSMC) devices and compare them with postcatheterization femoral artery complications not associated with PSMC devices. Methods: This is a retrospec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of vascular surgery 2001-04, Vol.33 (4), p.688-693 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 693 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 688 |
container_title | Journal of vascular surgery |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Sprouse, L.Richard Botta, Donald M. Hamilton, Ian N. |
description | Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify the peripheral vascular complications associated with the use of percutaneous suture–mediated closure (PSMC) devices and compare them with postcatheterization femoral artery complications not associated with PSMC devices. Methods: This is a retrospective review of all patients admitted to the vascular surgery service at the Chattanooga Unit of the University of Tennessee Department of Surgery with a peripheral vascular complication after percutaneous femoral arteriotomy between July 1, 1998, and December 1, 1999. The complications followed the use of PSMC devices (group I, n = 11) and traditional compression therapy (group II, n = 14) to achieve arterial hemostasis. Group II was subdivided into patients who required operative intervention (group IIA, n = 8), and those who were treated without operation (group IIB, n = 6). Results: No significant difference was found between groups I and II with regard to age (P =.227), time to vascular surgery consultation (P =.987), or diagnostic versus therapeutic catheterization (P =.897). A significant difference was found with regard to mean pseudoaneurysm size (group I = 5.9 cm, group II 2.9 cm; P =.003). Ultrasound compression was successfully performed in 66.6% of group II patients, but no (0.0%) patient in group I responded to this therapy (P =.016). Groups I and IIA had a significant difference for mean estimated blood loss (group I = 377.2 mL, group II = 121.8 mL; P =.017) and requirement for transfusion (P =.013). More patients in group I required extensive surgical treatment (P =.007), with six of these patients requiring vein patch angioplasty during their treatment. More patients in group I also had infectious complications (n = 3) compared with group IIA (n = 1). Conclusion: In comparison with complications that follow percutaneous arteriotomy when PSMC devices are not used for hemostasis: (1) pseudoaneurysms after the use of PSMC devices are larger and do not respond to ultrasound compression, (2) complications associated with PSMC devices result in more blood loss and increased need for transfusion and are more likely to require extensive operative procedures, and (3) arterial infections after the use of PSMC devices are more common and require aggressive surgical management. (J Vasc Surg 2001;33:688-93.) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1067/mva.2001.112324 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77045409</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0741521401171582</els_id><sourcerecordid>77045409</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-1523aa97869651a6dba79ee8165e7f34d95f487582636e48098df2f21faf3a8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE2L1TAUhoMoznV07U4CgrveSdI0aZYy-AUDbsZ1OJOeeCNtU5P0igvB_-A_9JeYoUVXrg4cnvflnIeQ55wdOVP6ajrDUTDGj5yLVsgH5MCZ0Y3qmXlIDkxL3nSCywvyJOcvleNdrx-Ti0ob1fL-QH7cnpBOMMNnnHAuNHq6YArLCROM9AzZrSMk6uK0jMFBCXHOFHKOLkDBgX4L5URL7Vgz7mG3FpgxrpnmtawJf__8NeGw4W6Mua7ogOfgMD8ljzyMGZ_t85J8evvm9vp9c_Px3Yfr1zeNk5KXhneiBTC6V0Z1HNRwB9og9lx1qH0rB9N52euuF6pVKOvz_eCFF9yDb6Ef2kvyautdUvy6Yi52CtnhOG6HWq2Z7CQzFbzaQJdizgm9XVKYIH23nNl747Yat_fG7Wa8Jl7s1etdffMfvyuuwMsdqDJh9AlmF_JfzighOK-U2SisGs4Bk80u4OyquISu2CGG_57wByuBn4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77045409</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The management of peripheral vascular complications associated with the use of percutaneous suture–mediated closure devices</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sprouse, L.Richard ; Botta, Donald M. ; Hamilton, Ian N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sprouse, L.Richard ; Botta, Donald M. ; Hamilton, Ian N.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify the peripheral vascular complications associated with the use of percutaneous suture–mediated closure (PSMC) devices and compare them with postcatheterization femoral artery complications not associated with PSMC devices. Methods: This is a retrospective review of all patients admitted to the vascular surgery service at the Chattanooga Unit of the University of Tennessee Department of Surgery with a peripheral vascular complication after percutaneous femoral arteriotomy between July 1, 1998, and December 1, 1999. The complications followed the use of PSMC devices (group I, n = 11) and traditional compression therapy (group II, n = 14) to achieve arterial hemostasis. Group II was subdivided into patients who required operative intervention (group IIA, n = 8), and those who were treated without operation (group IIB, n = 6). Results: No significant difference was found between groups I and II with regard to age (P =.227), time to vascular surgery consultation (P =.987), or diagnostic versus therapeutic catheterization (P =.897). A significant difference was found with regard to mean pseudoaneurysm size (group I = 5.9 cm, group II 2.9 cm; P =.003). Ultrasound compression was successfully performed in 66.6% of group II patients, but no (0.0%) patient in group I responded to this therapy (P =.016). Groups I and IIA had a significant difference for mean estimated blood loss (group I = 377.2 mL, group II = 121.8 mL; P =.017) and requirement for transfusion (P =.013). More patients in group I required extensive surgical treatment (P =.007), with six of these patients requiring vein patch angioplasty during their treatment. More patients in group I also had infectious complications (n = 3) compared with group IIA (n = 1). Conclusion: In comparison with complications that follow percutaneous arteriotomy when PSMC devices are not used for hemostasis: (1) pseudoaneurysms after the use of PSMC devices are larger and do not respond to ultrasound compression, (2) complications associated with PSMC devices result in more blood loss and increased need for transfusion and are more likely to require extensive operative procedures, and (3) arterial infections after the use of PSMC devices are more common and require aggressive surgical management. (J Vasc Surg 2001;33:688-93.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-5214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/mva.2001.112324</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11296318</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JVSUES</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aneurysm, False - etiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; Blood Transfusion ; Catheterization, Peripheral ; Equipment Failure ; Femoral Artery - injuries ; Femoral Artery - surgery ; Hemostatic Techniques - adverse effects ; Hemostatic Techniques - instrumentation ; Humans ; Ischemia - etiology ; Ischemia - surgery ; Leg - blood supply ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Hemorrhage - etiology ; Pressure ; Punctures ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Suture Techniques - adverse effects ; Suture Techniques - instrumentation ; Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</subject><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery, 2001-04, Vol.33 (4), p.688-693</ispartof><rights>2001 Society for Vascular Surgery and The American Association for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-1523aa97869651a6dba79ee8165e7f34d95f487582636e48098df2f21faf3a8d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-1523aa97869651a6dba79ee8165e7f34d95f487582636e48098df2f21faf3a8d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mva.2001.112324$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>310,311,315,781,785,790,791,3551,23931,23932,25141,27925,27926,45996</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=962211$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11296318$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sprouse, L.Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botta, Donald M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Ian N.</creatorcontrib><title>The management of peripheral vascular complications associated with the use of percutaneous suture–mediated closure devices</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify the peripheral vascular complications associated with the use of percutaneous suture–mediated closure (PSMC) devices and compare them with postcatheterization femoral artery complications not associated with PSMC devices. Methods: This is a retrospective review of all patients admitted to the vascular surgery service at the Chattanooga Unit of the University of Tennessee Department of Surgery with a peripheral vascular complication after percutaneous femoral arteriotomy between July 1, 1998, and December 1, 1999. The complications followed the use of PSMC devices (group I, n = 11) and traditional compression therapy (group II, n = 14) to achieve arterial hemostasis. Group II was subdivided into patients who required operative intervention (group IIA, n = 8), and those who were treated without operation (group IIB, n = 6). Results: No significant difference was found between groups I and II with regard to age (P =.227), time to vascular surgery consultation (P =.987), or diagnostic versus therapeutic catheterization (P =.897). A significant difference was found with regard to mean pseudoaneurysm size (group I = 5.9 cm, group II 2.9 cm; P =.003). Ultrasound compression was successfully performed in 66.6% of group II patients, but no (0.0%) patient in group I responded to this therapy (P =.016). Groups I and IIA had a significant difference for mean estimated blood loss (group I = 377.2 mL, group II = 121.8 mL; P =.017) and requirement for transfusion (P =.013). More patients in group I required extensive surgical treatment (P =.007), with six of these patients requiring vein patch angioplasty during their treatment. More patients in group I also had infectious complications (n = 3) compared with group IIA (n = 1). Conclusion: In comparison with complications that follow percutaneous arteriotomy when PSMC devices are not used for hemostasis: (1) pseudoaneurysms after the use of PSMC devices are larger and do not respond to ultrasound compression, (2) complications associated with PSMC devices result in more blood loss and increased need for transfusion and are more likely to require extensive operative procedures, and (3) arterial infections after the use of PSMC devices are more common and require aggressive surgical management. (J Vasc Surg 2001;33:688-93.)</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aneurysm, False - etiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Loss, Surgical</subject><subject>Blood Transfusion</subject><subject>Catheterization, Peripheral</subject><subject>Equipment Failure</subject><subject>Femoral Artery - injuries</subject><subject>Femoral Artery - surgery</subject><subject>Hemostatic Techniques - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hemostatic Techniques - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ischemia - etiology</subject><subject>Ischemia - surgery</subject><subject>Leg - blood supply</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Hemorrhage - etiology</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Punctures</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Suture Techniques - adverse effects</subject><subject>Suture Techniques - instrumentation</subject><subject>Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</subject><issn>0741-5214</issn><issn>1097-6809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE2L1TAUhoMoznV07U4CgrveSdI0aZYy-AUDbsZ1OJOeeCNtU5P0igvB_-A_9JeYoUVXrg4cnvflnIeQ55wdOVP6ajrDUTDGj5yLVsgH5MCZ0Y3qmXlIDkxL3nSCywvyJOcvleNdrx-Ti0ob1fL-QH7cnpBOMMNnnHAuNHq6YArLCROM9AzZrSMk6uK0jMFBCXHOFHKOLkDBgX4L5URL7Vgz7mG3FpgxrpnmtawJf__8NeGw4W6Mua7ogOfgMD8ljzyMGZ_t85J8evvm9vp9c_Px3Yfr1zeNk5KXhneiBTC6V0Z1HNRwB9og9lx1qH0rB9N52euuF6pVKOvz_eCFF9yDb6Ef2kvyautdUvy6Yi52CtnhOG6HWq2Z7CQzFbzaQJdizgm9XVKYIH23nNl747Yat_fG7Wa8Jl7s1etdffMfvyuuwMsdqDJh9AlmF_JfzighOK-U2SisGs4Bk80u4OyquISu2CGG_57wByuBn4w</recordid><startdate>20010401</startdate><enddate>20010401</enddate><creator>Sprouse, L.Richard</creator><creator>Botta, Donald M.</creator><creator>Hamilton, Ian N.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010401</creationdate><title>The management of peripheral vascular complications associated with the use of percutaneous suture–mediated closure devices</title><author>Sprouse, L.Richard ; Botta, Donald M. ; Hamilton, Ian N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-1523aa97869651a6dba79ee8165e7f34d95f487582636e48098df2f21faf3a8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aneurysm, False - etiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Loss, Surgical</topic><topic>Blood Transfusion</topic><topic>Catheterization, Peripheral</topic><topic>Equipment Failure</topic><topic>Femoral Artery - injuries</topic><topic>Femoral Artery - surgery</topic><topic>Hemostatic Techniques - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hemostatic Techniques - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ischemia - etiology</topic><topic>Ischemia - surgery</topic><topic>Leg - blood supply</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Hemorrhage - etiology</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Punctures</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Suture Techniques - adverse effects</topic><topic>Suture Techniques - instrumentation</topic><topic>Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sprouse, L.Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botta, Donald M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Ian N.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sprouse, L.Richard</au><au>Botta, Donald M.</au><au>Hamilton, Ian N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The management of peripheral vascular complications associated with the use of percutaneous suture–mediated closure devices</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2001-04-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>688</spage><epage>693</epage><pages>688-693</pages><issn>0741-5214</issn><eissn>1097-6809</eissn><coden>JVSUES</coden><abstract>Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify the peripheral vascular complications associated with the use of percutaneous suture–mediated closure (PSMC) devices and compare them with postcatheterization femoral artery complications not associated with PSMC devices. Methods: This is a retrospective review of all patients admitted to the vascular surgery service at the Chattanooga Unit of the University of Tennessee Department of Surgery with a peripheral vascular complication after percutaneous femoral arteriotomy between July 1, 1998, and December 1, 1999. The complications followed the use of PSMC devices (group I, n = 11) and traditional compression therapy (group II, n = 14) to achieve arterial hemostasis. Group II was subdivided into patients who required operative intervention (group IIA, n = 8), and those who were treated without operation (group IIB, n = 6). Results: No significant difference was found between groups I and II with regard to age (P =.227), time to vascular surgery consultation (P =.987), or diagnostic versus therapeutic catheterization (P =.897). A significant difference was found with regard to mean pseudoaneurysm size (group I = 5.9 cm, group II 2.9 cm; P =.003). Ultrasound compression was successfully performed in 66.6% of group II patients, but no (0.0%) patient in group I responded to this therapy (P =.016). Groups I and IIA had a significant difference for mean estimated blood loss (group I = 377.2 mL, group II = 121.8 mL; P =.017) and requirement for transfusion (P =.013). More patients in group I required extensive surgical treatment (P =.007), with six of these patients requiring vein patch angioplasty during their treatment. More patients in group I also had infectious complications (n = 3) compared with group IIA (n = 1). Conclusion: In comparison with complications that follow percutaneous arteriotomy when PSMC devices are not used for hemostasis: (1) pseudoaneurysms after the use of PSMC devices are larger and do not respond to ultrasound compression, (2) complications associated with PSMC devices result in more blood loss and increased need for transfusion and are more likely to require extensive operative procedures, and (3) arterial infections after the use of PSMC devices are more common and require aggressive surgical management. (J Vasc Surg 2001;33:688-93.)</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11296318</pmid><doi>10.1067/mva.2001.112324</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0741-5214 |
ispartof | Journal of vascular surgery, 2001-04, Vol.33 (4), p.688-693 |
issn | 0741-5214 1097-6809 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77045409 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Aneurysm, False - etiology Biological and medical sciences Blood Loss, Surgical Blood Transfusion Catheterization, Peripheral Equipment Failure Femoral Artery - injuries Femoral Artery - surgery Hemostatic Techniques - adverse effects Hemostatic Techniques - instrumentation Humans Ischemia - etiology Ischemia - surgery Leg - blood supply Medical sciences Middle Aged Postoperative Hemorrhage - etiology Pressure Punctures Reoperation Retrospective Studies Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Suture Techniques - adverse effects Suture Techniques - instrumentation Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels |
title | The management of peripheral vascular complications associated with the use of percutaneous suture–mediated closure devices |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T14%3A01%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20management%20of%20peripheral%20vascular%20complications%20associated%20with%20the%20use%20of%20percutaneous%20suture%E2%80%93mediated%20closure%20devices&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Sprouse,%20L.Richard&rft.date=2001-04-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=688&rft.epage=693&rft.pages=688-693&rft.issn=0741-5214&rft.eissn=1097-6809&rft.coden=JVSUES&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/mva.2001.112324&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77045409%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77045409&rft_id=info:pmid/11296318&rft_els_id=S0741521401171582&rfr_iscdi=true |