Screening for colorectal cancer: what is the most cost‐effective approach?

ABSTRACT In Western countries, including Australia, colorectal cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in non‐smokers. Development of most colorectal cancers can be prevented by adenoma removal. The current screening strategies of faecal occult blood testing (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical journal of Australia 2001-03, Vol.174 (6), p.298-301
Hauptverfasser: Bolin, Terry D, Lapsley, Helen M, Korman, Melvyn G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 301
container_issue 6
container_start_page 298
container_title Medical journal of Australia
container_volume 174
creator Bolin, Terry D
Lapsley, Helen M
Korman, Melvyn G
description ABSTRACT In Western countries, including Australia, colorectal cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in non‐smokers. Development of most colorectal cancers can be prevented by adenoma removal. The current screening strategies of faecal occult blood testing (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy combined with FOBT and colonoscopy are all cost effective. In clinical practice, a range of options should be offered to allow for individual patients' preferences. A public education program is essential to the success of any screening strategy.
doi_str_mv 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143276.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77042074</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77042074</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4086-de4d7c583ca7572d93a3a0a6924d0e2d0bd429b8b3ed09237fe465d8500f2a3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkM9O3DAQhy3Uit1CXwFFouKW1B47cdIeKkDbFrSIA1uJm-XYEzar7GZrZwt74xH6jDxJvUr4c-1pNJpv5jf6CDlmNEmzQnxeJIxDFqdcygQoZUlXMsFBZsnDHhm_zN6RMaWQxhKK2xH54P0itCwFuU9GjEEhGdAxmd4Yh7iqV3dR1brItE3r0HS6iYxeGXRfovu57qLaR90co2Xru8D47unxL1ZVAOs_GOn12rXazL8dkveVbjx-HOoB-fV9Mjv_GU-vf1ycn05jI2iexRaFlSbNudEylWALrrmmOitAWIpgaWkFFGVecrS0AC4rFFlq85TSCjQv-QE56e-G3N8b9J1a1t5g0-gVthuvpKQCqBQB_NqDxrXeO6zU2tVL7baKUbWTqRZqJ0zthKmdTPUsUz2E7aMhZlMu0b7uDvYC8GkAtDe6qVxQVvs3GSIHDgGb9Nh93eD2f15QV5enMDvrW_4PHnqTvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77042074</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Screening for colorectal cancer: what is the most cost‐effective approach?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Online service)</source><creator>Bolin, Terry D ; Lapsley, Helen M ; Korman, Melvyn G</creator><creatorcontrib>Bolin, Terry D ; Lapsley, Helen M ; Korman, Melvyn G</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT In Western countries, including Australia, colorectal cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in non‐smokers. Development of most colorectal cancers can be prevented by adenoma removal. The current screening strategies of faecal occult blood testing (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy combined with FOBT and colonoscopy are all cost effective. In clinical practice, a range of options should be offered to allow for individual patients' preferences. A public education program is essential to the success of any screening strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-729X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1326-5377</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143276.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11297120</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MJAUAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sydney: Australasian Medical Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Aged ; Australia ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colonoscopy - economics ; Colorectal Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Humans ; Mass Screening - economics ; Mass Screening - methods ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Occult Blood ; Patient Compliance ; Sigmoidoscopy - economics ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Tropical medicine ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Medical journal of Australia, 2001-03, Vol.174 (6), p.298-301</ispartof><rights>2001 AMPCo Pty Ltd. All rights reserved</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4086-de4d7c583ca7572d93a3a0a6924d0e2d0bd429b8b3ed09237fe465d8500f2a3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4086-de4d7c583ca7572d93a3a0a6924d0e2d0bd429b8b3ed09237fe465d8500f2a3b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.5694%2Fj.1326-5377.2001.tb143276.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.5694%2Fj.1326-5377.2001.tb143276.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1048232$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11297120$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bolin, Terry D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lapsley, Helen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korman, Melvyn G</creatorcontrib><title>Screening for colorectal cancer: what is the most cost‐effective approach?</title><title>Medical journal of Australia</title><addtitle>Med J Aust</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT In Western countries, including Australia, colorectal cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in non‐smokers. Development of most colorectal cancers can be prevented by adenoma removal. The current screening strategies of faecal occult blood testing (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy combined with FOBT and colonoscopy are all cost effective. In clinical practice, a range of options should be offered to allow for individual patients' preferences. A public education program is essential to the success of any screening strategy.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - economics</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Screening - economics</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Occult Blood</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>Sigmoidoscopy - economics</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Tropical medicine</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0025-729X</issn><issn>1326-5377</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkM9O3DAQhy3Uit1CXwFFouKW1B47cdIeKkDbFrSIA1uJm-XYEzar7GZrZwt74xH6jDxJvUr4c-1pNJpv5jf6CDlmNEmzQnxeJIxDFqdcygQoZUlXMsFBZsnDHhm_zN6RMaWQxhKK2xH54P0itCwFuU9GjEEhGdAxmd4Yh7iqV3dR1brItE3r0HS6iYxeGXRfovu57qLaR90co2Xru8D47unxL1ZVAOs_GOn12rXazL8dkveVbjx-HOoB-fV9Mjv_GU-vf1ycn05jI2iexRaFlSbNudEylWALrrmmOitAWIpgaWkFFGVecrS0AC4rFFlq85TSCjQv-QE56e-G3N8b9J1a1t5g0-gVthuvpKQCqBQB_NqDxrXeO6zU2tVL7baKUbWTqRZqJ0zthKmdTPUsUz2E7aMhZlMu0b7uDvYC8GkAtDe6qVxQVvs3GSIHDgGb9Nh93eD2f15QV5enMDvrW_4PHnqTvg</recordid><startdate>20010319</startdate><enddate>20010319</enddate><creator>Bolin, Terry D</creator><creator>Lapsley, Helen M</creator><creator>Korman, Melvyn G</creator><general>Australasian Medical Publishing Company</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010319</creationdate><title>Screening for colorectal cancer: what is the most cost‐effective approach?</title><author>Bolin, Terry D ; Lapsley, Helen M ; Korman, Melvyn G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4086-de4d7c583ca7572d93a3a0a6924d0e2d0bd429b8b3ed09237fe465d8500f2a3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - economics</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Screening - economics</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Occult Blood</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>Sigmoidoscopy - economics</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Tropical medicine</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bolin, Terry D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lapsley, Helen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korman, Melvyn G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical journal of Australia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bolin, Terry D</au><au>Lapsley, Helen M</au><au>Korman, Melvyn G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Screening for colorectal cancer: what is the most cost‐effective approach?</atitle><jtitle>Medical journal of Australia</jtitle><addtitle>Med J Aust</addtitle><date>2001-03-19</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>174</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>298</spage><epage>301</epage><pages>298-301</pages><issn>0025-729X</issn><eissn>1326-5377</eissn><coden>MJAUAJ</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT In Western countries, including Australia, colorectal cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in non‐smokers. Development of most colorectal cancers can be prevented by adenoma removal. The current screening strategies of faecal occult blood testing (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy combined with FOBT and colonoscopy are all cost effective. In clinical practice, a range of options should be offered to allow for individual patients' preferences. A public education program is essential to the success of any screening strategy.</abstract><cop>Sydney</cop><pub>Australasian Medical Publishing Company</pub><pmid>11297120</pmid><doi>10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143276.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-729X
ispartof Medical journal of Australia, 2001-03, Vol.174 (6), p.298-301
issn 0025-729X
1326-5377
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77042074
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library (Online service)
subjects Aged
Australia
Biological and medical sciences
Colonoscopy - economics
Colorectal Neoplasms - prevention & control
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Humans
Mass Screening - economics
Mass Screening - methods
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Occult Blood
Patient Compliance
Sigmoidoscopy - economics
Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus
Tropical medicine
Tumors
title Screening for colorectal cancer: what is the most cost‐effective approach?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A51%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Screening%20for%20colorectal%20cancer:%20what%20is%20the%20most%20cost%E2%80%90effective%20approach?&rft.jtitle=Medical%20journal%20of%20Australia&rft.au=Bolin,%20Terry%20D&rft.date=2001-03-19&rft.volume=174&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=298&rft.epage=301&rft.pages=298-301&rft.issn=0025-729X&rft.eissn=1326-5377&rft.coden=MJAUAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143276.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77042074%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77042074&rft_id=info:pmid/11297120&rfr_iscdi=true