Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for rapid detection of aneuploidy: experience in 911 prenatal cases

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed with probes specific for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y on 911 of 11123 (8.2%) amniotic fluid samples submitted to the present authors' laboratory for cytogenetic analysis over an 8‐year period. Altogether 3516 hybridizations were perform...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Prenatal diagnosis 2001-04, Vol.21 (4), p.262-269
Hauptverfasser: Weremowicz, Stanislawa, Sandstrom, Deborah J., Morton, Cynthia C., Niedzwiecki, Catherine A., Sandstrom, Mary McH, Bieber, Frederick R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 269
container_issue 4
container_start_page 262
container_title Prenatal diagnosis
container_volume 21
creator Weremowicz, Stanislawa
Sandstrom, Deborah J.
Morton, Cynthia C.
Niedzwiecki, Catherine A.
Sandstrom, Mary McH
Bieber, Frederick R.
description Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed with probes specific for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y on 911 of 11123 (8.2%) amniotic fluid samples submitted to the present authors' laboratory for cytogenetic analysis over an 8‐year period. Altogether 3516 hybridizations were performed with an interpretable FISH result on all chromosomes requested in 884/911 (97%) of cases. An uninformative FISH result occurred in 44 hybridizations among 27 cases (3%). Of a total of 89 karyotypically proven cases with aneuploidy that might have been detected by FISH, the overall detection rate was 84%. An inconclusive or incomplete FISH result occurred in 9/89 (10%) of these proven aneuploid cases. In the remaining 80 informative proven aneuploid cases, correct detection of aneuploidy was accomplished in 75/80 (94%) of samples. A false‐negative result occurred in the remaining 5/80 (6%) of such informative cases. Eighteen cases had karyotypically proven abnormalities that could not have been detected by the targeted FISH. Aside from these 18 cases, FISH allowed correct detection of normal disomy in 785/804 (98%) of such cases. An incomplete FISH result occurred in 18 normal disomic cases. There was a single possible ‘false‐positive’ FISH result for chromosome 21. Interphase FISH analysis of uncultured amniotic fluid cells has been shown to be a useful laboratory tool for rapid fetal aneuploidy screening during pregnancy. As with all clinical laboratory diagnostic tests, incomplete or inconclusive results (or even interpretive errors) occur in a small percentage of cases. Nevertheless, FISH results accompanied by other data and by appropriate counseling provide clinicians and patients with valuable information for clinical decision‐making surrounding family planning and pregnancy management. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pd.39
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77032033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77032033</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3719-b39c4a40f083acafecc30fc418b28488f0a4393489111a7716a5947af6bceb833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0F1v0zAUBmALMbFS9heQJcTXRYadk9Y2d2ijy6QKkAAhcWOdOMfCkCbBTrR1v5507cbNrmzJj97X5zB2IsWpFCJ_19enYB6xmRRGZSLP4TGbCTndQS_kMXua0u-J6dyoJ-xYylxrKYsZ26yasYuUHLWOeGh5CsPIf22rGOpwg0PoWv5mdfm1fMt9F3nEPtS8poHc7VPnObY09k0X6u17Ttc9xXAXZaTkfaQWB2y4w0TpGTvy2CQ6OZxz9n318dtZma0_X1yefVhnDpQ0WQXGFVgILzSgQ0_OgfCukLrKdaG1F1iAgUJPDRKVkktcmEKhX1aOKg0wZ6_2uX3s_o6UBrsJ04hNM322G5NVSkAuYAdf7qGLXUqRvO1j2GDcWinsbq-2r-1UNWfPD4FjtaH6vzoscgIvDgCTw8ZHbF1I984o0PlOvd6rq9DQ9uEu--X8tjDby5AGur6XGP_YpQK1sD8-XVhVLjSU69L-hH_U2Zpn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77032033</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for rapid detection of aneuploidy: experience in 911 prenatal cases</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Weremowicz, Stanislawa ; Sandstrom, Deborah J. ; Morton, Cynthia C. ; Niedzwiecki, Catherine A. ; Sandstrom, Mary McH ; Bieber, Frederick R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Weremowicz, Stanislawa ; Sandstrom, Deborah J. ; Morton, Cynthia C. ; Niedzwiecki, Catherine A. ; Sandstrom, Mary McH ; Bieber, Frederick R.</creatorcontrib><description>Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed with probes specific for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y on 911 of 11123 (8.2%) amniotic fluid samples submitted to the present authors' laboratory for cytogenetic analysis over an 8‐year period. Altogether 3516 hybridizations were performed with an interpretable FISH result on all chromosomes requested in 884/911 (97%) of cases. An uninformative FISH result occurred in 44 hybridizations among 27 cases (3%). Of a total of 89 karyotypically proven cases with aneuploidy that might have been detected by FISH, the overall detection rate was 84%. An inconclusive or incomplete FISH result occurred in 9/89 (10%) of these proven aneuploid cases. In the remaining 80 informative proven aneuploid cases, correct detection of aneuploidy was accomplished in 75/80 (94%) of samples. A false‐negative result occurred in the remaining 5/80 (6%) of such informative cases. Eighteen cases had karyotypically proven abnormalities that could not have been detected by the targeted FISH. Aside from these 18 cases, FISH allowed correct detection of normal disomy in 785/804 (98%) of such cases. An incomplete FISH result occurred in 18 normal disomic cases. There was a single possible ‘false‐positive’ FISH result for chromosome 21. Interphase FISH analysis of uncultured amniotic fluid cells has been shown to be a useful laboratory tool for rapid fetal aneuploidy screening during pregnancy. As with all clinical laboratory diagnostic tests, incomplete or inconclusive results (or even interpretive errors) occur in a small percentage of cases. Nevertheless, FISH results accompanied by other data and by appropriate counseling provide clinicians and patients with valuable information for clinical decision‐making surrounding family planning and pregnancy management. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-3851</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pd.39</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11288114</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PRDIDM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Amniocentesis ; amniotic fluid ; Amniotic Fluid - cytology ; Aneuploidy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 18 ; Cytogenetic Analysis ; cytogenetics ; DNA Probes ; Down Syndrome - diagnosis ; Down Syndrome - genetics ; False Negative Reactions ; False Positive Reactions ; Female ; fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; interphase ; Karyotyping ; Management. Prenatal diagnosis ; Maternal Age ; Medical sciences ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy, High-Risk ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta ; Prenatal Diagnosis ; Trisomy</subject><ispartof>Prenatal diagnosis, 2001-04, Vol.21 (4), p.262-269</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2001 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2001 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3719-b39c4a40f083acafecc30fc418b28488f0a4393489111a7716a5947af6bceb833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3719-b39c4a40f083acafecc30fc418b28488f0a4393489111a7716a5947af6bceb833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpd.39$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpd.39$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=973824$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11288114$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weremowicz, Stanislawa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandstrom, Deborah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morton, Cynthia C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niedzwiecki, Catherine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandstrom, Mary McH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bieber, Frederick R.</creatorcontrib><title>Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for rapid detection of aneuploidy: experience in 911 prenatal cases</title><title>Prenatal diagnosis</title><addtitle>Prenat. Diagn</addtitle><description>Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed with probes specific for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y on 911 of 11123 (8.2%) amniotic fluid samples submitted to the present authors' laboratory for cytogenetic analysis over an 8‐year period. Altogether 3516 hybridizations were performed with an interpretable FISH result on all chromosomes requested in 884/911 (97%) of cases. An uninformative FISH result occurred in 44 hybridizations among 27 cases (3%). Of a total of 89 karyotypically proven cases with aneuploidy that might have been detected by FISH, the overall detection rate was 84%. An inconclusive or incomplete FISH result occurred in 9/89 (10%) of these proven aneuploid cases. In the remaining 80 informative proven aneuploid cases, correct detection of aneuploidy was accomplished in 75/80 (94%) of samples. A false‐negative result occurred in the remaining 5/80 (6%) of such informative cases. Eighteen cases had karyotypically proven abnormalities that could not have been detected by the targeted FISH. Aside from these 18 cases, FISH allowed correct detection of normal disomy in 785/804 (98%) of such cases. An incomplete FISH result occurred in 18 normal disomic cases. There was a single possible ‘false‐positive’ FISH result for chromosome 21. Interphase FISH analysis of uncultured amniotic fluid cells has been shown to be a useful laboratory tool for rapid fetal aneuploidy screening during pregnancy. As with all clinical laboratory diagnostic tests, incomplete or inconclusive results (or even interpretive errors) occur in a small percentage of cases. Nevertheless, FISH results accompanied by other data and by appropriate counseling provide clinicians and patients with valuable information for clinical decision‐making surrounding family planning and pregnancy management. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Amniocentesis</subject><subject>amniotic fluid</subject><subject>Amniotic Fluid - cytology</subject><subject>Aneuploidy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chromosomes, Human, Pair 18</subject><subject>Cytogenetic Analysis</subject><subject>cytogenetics</subject><subject>DNA Probes</subject><subject>Down Syndrome - diagnosis</subject><subject>Down Syndrome - genetics</subject><subject>False Negative Reactions</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</subject><subject>interphase</subject><subject>Karyotyping</subject><subject>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</subject><subject>Maternal Age</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy, High-Risk</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis</subject><subject>Trisomy</subject><issn>0197-3851</issn><issn>1097-0223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0F1v0zAUBmALMbFS9heQJcTXRYadk9Y2d2ijy6QKkAAhcWOdOMfCkCbBTrR1v5507cbNrmzJj97X5zB2IsWpFCJ_19enYB6xmRRGZSLP4TGbCTndQS_kMXua0u-J6dyoJ-xYylxrKYsZ26yasYuUHLWOeGh5CsPIf22rGOpwg0PoWv5mdfm1fMt9F3nEPtS8poHc7VPnObY09k0X6u17Ttc9xXAXZaTkfaQWB2y4w0TpGTvy2CQ6OZxz9n318dtZma0_X1yefVhnDpQ0WQXGFVgILzSgQ0_OgfCukLrKdaG1F1iAgUJPDRKVkktcmEKhX1aOKg0wZ6_2uX3s_o6UBrsJ04hNM322G5NVSkAuYAdf7qGLXUqRvO1j2GDcWinsbq-2r-1UNWfPD4FjtaH6vzoscgIvDgCTw8ZHbF1I984o0PlOvd6rq9DQ9uEu--X8tjDby5AGur6XGP_YpQK1sD8-XVhVLjSU69L-hH_U2Zpn</recordid><startdate>200104</startdate><enddate>200104</enddate><creator>Weremowicz, Stanislawa</creator><creator>Sandstrom, Deborah J.</creator><creator>Morton, Cynthia C.</creator><creator>Niedzwiecki, Catherine A.</creator><creator>Sandstrom, Mary McH</creator><creator>Bieber, Frederick R.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200104</creationdate><title>Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for rapid detection of aneuploidy: experience in 911 prenatal cases</title><author>Weremowicz, Stanislawa ; Sandstrom, Deborah J. ; Morton, Cynthia C. ; Niedzwiecki, Catherine A. ; Sandstrom, Mary McH ; Bieber, Frederick R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3719-b39c4a40f083acafecc30fc418b28488f0a4393489111a7716a5947af6bceb833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Amniocentesis</topic><topic>amniotic fluid</topic><topic>Amniotic Fluid - cytology</topic><topic>Aneuploidy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chromosomes, Human, Pair 18</topic><topic>Cytogenetic Analysis</topic><topic>cytogenetics</topic><topic>DNA Probes</topic><topic>Down Syndrome - diagnosis</topic><topic>Down Syndrome - genetics</topic><topic>False Negative Reactions</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</topic><topic>interphase</topic><topic>Karyotyping</topic><topic>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</topic><topic>Maternal Age</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy, High-Risk</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis</topic><topic>Trisomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weremowicz, Stanislawa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandstrom, Deborah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morton, Cynthia C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niedzwiecki, Catherine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandstrom, Mary McH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bieber, Frederick R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Prenatal diagnosis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weremowicz, Stanislawa</au><au>Sandstrom, Deborah J.</au><au>Morton, Cynthia C.</au><au>Niedzwiecki, Catherine A.</au><au>Sandstrom, Mary McH</au><au>Bieber, Frederick R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for rapid detection of aneuploidy: experience in 911 prenatal cases</atitle><jtitle>Prenatal diagnosis</jtitle><addtitle>Prenat. Diagn</addtitle><date>2001-04</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>262</spage><epage>269</epage><pages>262-269</pages><issn>0197-3851</issn><eissn>1097-0223</eissn><coden>PRDIDM</coden><abstract>Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed with probes specific for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y on 911 of 11123 (8.2%) amniotic fluid samples submitted to the present authors' laboratory for cytogenetic analysis over an 8‐year period. Altogether 3516 hybridizations were performed with an interpretable FISH result on all chromosomes requested in 884/911 (97%) of cases. An uninformative FISH result occurred in 44 hybridizations among 27 cases (3%). Of a total of 89 karyotypically proven cases with aneuploidy that might have been detected by FISH, the overall detection rate was 84%. An inconclusive or incomplete FISH result occurred in 9/89 (10%) of these proven aneuploid cases. In the remaining 80 informative proven aneuploid cases, correct detection of aneuploidy was accomplished in 75/80 (94%) of samples. A false‐negative result occurred in the remaining 5/80 (6%) of such informative cases. Eighteen cases had karyotypically proven abnormalities that could not have been detected by the targeted FISH. Aside from these 18 cases, FISH allowed correct detection of normal disomy in 785/804 (98%) of such cases. An incomplete FISH result occurred in 18 normal disomic cases. There was a single possible ‘false‐positive’ FISH result for chromosome 21. Interphase FISH analysis of uncultured amniotic fluid cells has been shown to be a useful laboratory tool for rapid fetal aneuploidy screening during pregnancy. As with all clinical laboratory diagnostic tests, incomplete or inconclusive results (or even interpretive errors) occur in a small percentage of cases. Nevertheless, FISH results accompanied by other data and by appropriate counseling provide clinicians and patients with valuable information for clinical decision‐making surrounding family planning and pregnancy management. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>11288114</pmid><doi>10.1002/pd.39</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0197-3851
ispartof Prenatal diagnosis, 2001-04, Vol.21 (4), p.262-269
issn 0197-3851
1097-0223
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77032033
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Amniocentesis
amniotic fluid
Amniotic Fluid - cytology
Aneuploidy
Biological and medical sciences
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 18
Cytogenetic Analysis
cytogenetics
DNA Probes
Down Syndrome - diagnosis
Down Syndrome - genetics
False Negative Reactions
False Positive Reactions
Female
fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
interphase
Karyotyping
Management. Prenatal diagnosis
Maternal Age
Medical sciences
Pregnancy
Pregnancy, High-Risk
Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta
Prenatal Diagnosis
Trisomy
title Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for rapid detection of aneuploidy: experience in 911 prenatal cases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T03%3A46%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fluorescence%20in%20situ%20hybridization%20(FISH)%20for%20rapid%20detection%20of%20aneuploidy:%20experience%20in%20911%20prenatal%20cases&rft.jtitle=Prenatal%20diagnosis&rft.au=Weremowicz,%20Stanislawa&rft.date=2001-04&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=262&rft.epage=269&rft.pages=262-269&rft.issn=0197-3851&rft.eissn=1097-0223&rft.coden=PRDIDM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pd.39&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77032033%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77032033&rft_id=info:pmid/11288114&rfr_iscdi=true