Chloramphenicol treatment for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteremia
To evaluate the results of treating vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) bacteremia with chloramphenicol. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all adult patients with VREF bacteremia treated with chloramphenicol during the calendar year 1998 at a 522-bed tertiary referral center in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical microbiology and infection 2001-01, Vol.7 (1), p.17-21 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 21 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 17 |
container_title | Clinical microbiology and infection |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Ricaurte, J.C. Boucher, H.W. Turett, G.S. Moellering, R.C. LaBombardi, V.J. Kislak, J.W. |
description | To evaluate the results of treating vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) bacteremia with chloramphenicol.
We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all adult patients with VREF bacteremia treated with chloramphenicol during the calendar year 1998 at a 522-bed tertiary referral center in New York City. Patients were identified by reviewing microbiology laboratory records. Patients with clinically significant VREF bacteremia who received chloramphenicol for at least 48 h were included in the study. Clinical and microbiological outcomes were determined. Microbiological and molecular tests were performed on a small representative sample of isolates to identify the presence of resistance mechanisms and to look for similarity among the isolates.
Seven episodes of significant VREF bacteremia occurred in six patients. Mean age was 54 years. All patients had cancer and three had severe neutropenia. Five of seven episodes were associated with chronic indwelling devices, but in only one of these cases was the device removed. All isolates were susceptible to chloramphenicol in vitro. All six microbiologically evaluable episodes had a favorable response to chloramphenicol treatment, and four of seven (57%) clinically evaluable episodes had favorable outcomes. Only one death may have been due to VREF bacteremia, so the maximal attributable mortality was 14%. The three representative samples that were tested further were indistinguishable from one another and they displayed no evidence of resistance mechanisms.
In a cohort of severely ill cancer patients, chloramphenicol was effective in treating VREF bacteremia. The use of chloramphenicol should be considered in treating infections with this highly resistant organism, where therapeutic options are limited. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2001.00189.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77027265</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1198743X14637277</els_id><sourcerecordid>77027265</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5619-b56f870eeeaf8a5ddefc55af98e7ff57005558777c95cc464fdfc3d0269b58543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1rFDEUhgex2Fr9CzIoiDczJpPJF3hTl6qFFUEUvAvZMyc0y8xkTWZq99-bcZcWeqFehISc5z3J4SmKkpKakla83da0FboiQtO6IYTWeSld3z4qzu4Kj_OZalXJlv04LZ6mtCWENIy1T4pTShvVaqbOiq-r6z5EO-yucfQQ-nKKaKcBx6l0IZY3doQw7MGPVcTk02Rz4XKcMAYIAHMqnUXw81BuLORbHLx9Vpw42yd8ftzPi-8fLr-tPlXrLx-vVhfrCrigutpw4ZQkiGidsrzr0AHn1mmF0jkuCeGcKyklaA7QitZ1DlhHGqE3XPGWnRevD313MfycMU1m8Amw7-2IYU5GStLIRvAMvvkrSLkglEmhFvTlA3Qb5jjmMUzTUKGY5jRD6gBBDClFdGYX_WDj3lBiFj9maxYNZtFgFj_mjx9zm6Mvjv3nzYDdffAoJAOvjoBNYHsXswCf7jitqGTLN98dqF--x_1_P29W68_5kOPvD3HMem48RpPA4wjY-YgwmS74f4_yG3FKwN0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221683951</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chloramphenicol treatment for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteremia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Ricaurte, J.C. ; Boucher, H.W. ; Turett, G.S. ; Moellering, R.C. ; LaBombardi, V.J. ; Kislak, J.W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ricaurte, J.C. ; Boucher, H.W. ; Turett, G.S. ; Moellering, R.C. ; LaBombardi, V.J. ; Kislak, J.W.</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the results of treating vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) bacteremia with chloramphenicol.
We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all adult patients with VREF bacteremia treated with chloramphenicol during the calendar year 1998 at a 522-bed tertiary referral center in New York City. Patients were identified by reviewing microbiology laboratory records. Patients with clinically significant VREF bacteremia who received chloramphenicol for at least 48 h were included in the study. Clinical and microbiological outcomes were determined. Microbiological and molecular tests were performed on a small representative sample of isolates to identify the presence of resistance mechanisms and to look for similarity among the isolates.
Seven episodes of significant VREF bacteremia occurred in six patients. Mean age was 54 years. All patients had cancer and three had severe neutropenia. Five of seven episodes were associated with chronic indwelling devices, but in only one of these cases was the device removed. All isolates were susceptible to chloramphenicol in vitro. All six microbiologically evaluable episodes had a favorable response to chloramphenicol treatment, and four of seven (57%) clinically evaluable episodes had favorable outcomes. Only one death may have been due to VREF bacteremia, so the maximal attributable mortality was 14%. The three representative samples that were tested further were indistinguishable from one another and they displayed no evidence of resistance mechanisms.
In a cohort of severely ill cancer patients, chloramphenicol was effective in treating VREF bacteremia. The use of chloramphenicol should be considered in treating infections with this highly resistant organism, where therapeutic options are limited.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1198-743X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-0691</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2001.00189.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11284938</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Antibacterial agents ; Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents ; Bacteremia - drug therapy ; Bacteremia - microbiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; chloramphenicol ; Chloramphenicol - therapeutic use ; Enterococcus ; Enterococcus faecium ; Enterococcus faecium - drug effects ; Female ; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - drug therapy ; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - microbiology ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; resistance ; Retrospective Studies ; vancomycin ; Vancomycin Resistance</subject><ispartof>Clinical microbiology and infection, 2001-01, Vol.7 (1), p.17-21</ispartof><rights>2001 European Society of Clinical Infectious Diseases</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Decker Periodicals, Inc. Jan 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5619-b56f870eeeaf8a5ddefc55af98e7ff57005558777c95cc464fdfc3d0269b58543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5619-b56f870eeeaf8a5ddefc55af98e7ff57005558777c95cc464fdfc3d0269b58543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1469-0691.2001.00189.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/221683951?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27933,27934,45583,45584,64394,64396,64398,72478</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=981735$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11284938$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ricaurte, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boucher, H.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turett, G.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moellering, R.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaBombardi, V.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kislak, J.W.</creatorcontrib><title>Chloramphenicol treatment for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteremia</title><title>Clinical microbiology and infection</title><addtitle>Clin Microbiol Infect</addtitle><description>To evaluate the results of treating vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) bacteremia with chloramphenicol.
We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all adult patients with VREF bacteremia treated with chloramphenicol during the calendar year 1998 at a 522-bed tertiary referral center in New York City. Patients were identified by reviewing microbiology laboratory records. Patients with clinically significant VREF bacteremia who received chloramphenicol for at least 48 h were included in the study. Clinical and microbiological outcomes were determined. Microbiological and molecular tests were performed on a small representative sample of isolates to identify the presence of resistance mechanisms and to look for similarity among the isolates.
Seven episodes of significant VREF bacteremia occurred in six patients. Mean age was 54 years. All patients had cancer and three had severe neutropenia. Five of seven episodes were associated with chronic indwelling devices, but in only one of these cases was the device removed. All isolates were susceptible to chloramphenicol in vitro. All six microbiologically evaluable episodes had a favorable response to chloramphenicol treatment, and four of seven (57%) clinically evaluable episodes had favorable outcomes. Only one death may have been due to VREF bacteremia, so the maximal attributable mortality was 14%. The three representative samples that were tested further were indistinguishable from one another and they displayed no evidence of resistance mechanisms.
In a cohort of severely ill cancer patients, chloramphenicol was effective in treating VREF bacteremia. The use of chloramphenicol should be considered in treating infections with this highly resistant organism, where therapeutic options are limited.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibacterial agents</subject><subject>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Bacteremia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Bacteremia - microbiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>chloramphenicol</subject><subject>Chloramphenicol - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Enterococcus</subject><subject>Enterococcus faecium</subject><subject>Enterococcus faecium - drug effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>resistance</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>vancomycin</subject><subject>Vancomycin Resistance</subject><issn>1198-743X</issn><issn>1469-0691</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1rFDEUhgex2Fr9CzIoiDczJpPJF3hTl6qFFUEUvAvZMyc0y8xkTWZq99-bcZcWeqFehISc5z3J4SmKkpKakla83da0FboiQtO6IYTWeSld3z4qzu4Kj_OZalXJlv04LZ6mtCWENIy1T4pTShvVaqbOiq-r6z5EO-yucfQQ-nKKaKcBx6l0IZY3doQw7MGPVcTk02Rz4XKcMAYIAHMqnUXw81BuLORbHLx9Vpw42yd8ftzPi-8fLr-tPlXrLx-vVhfrCrigutpw4ZQkiGidsrzr0AHn1mmF0jkuCeGcKyklaA7QitZ1DlhHGqE3XPGWnRevD313MfycMU1m8Amw7-2IYU5GStLIRvAMvvkrSLkglEmhFvTlA3Qb5jjmMUzTUKGY5jRD6gBBDClFdGYX_WDj3lBiFj9maxYNZtFgFj_mjx9zm6Mvjv3nzYDdffAoJAOvjoBNYHsXswCf7jitqGTLN98dqF--x_1_P29W68_5kOPvD3HMem48RpPA4wjY-YgwmS74f4_yG3FKwN0</recordid><startdate>20010101</startdate><enddate>20010101</enddate><creator>Ricaurte, J.C.</creator><creator>Boucher, H.W.</creator><creator>Turett, G.S.</creator><creator>Moellering, R.C.</creator><creator>LaBombardi, V.J.</creator><creator>Kislak, J.W.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010101</creationdate><title>Chloramphenicol treatment for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteremia</title><author>Ricaurte, J.C. ; Boucher, H.W. ; Turett, G.S. ; Moellering, R.C. ; LaBombardi, V.J. ; Kislak, J.W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5619-b56f870eeeaf8a5ddefc55af98e7ff57005558777c95cc464fdfc3d0269b58543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibacterial agents</topic><topic>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Bacteremia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Bacteremia - microbiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>chloramphenicol</topic><topic>Chloramphenicol - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Enterococcus</topic><topic>Enterococcus faecium</topic><topic>Enterococcus faecium - drug effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>resistance</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>vancomycin</topic><topic>Vancomycin Resistance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ricaurte, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boucher, H.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turett, G.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moellering, R.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaBombardi, V.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kislak, J.W.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest CBCA Complete</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical microbiology and infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ricaurte, J.C.</au><au>Boucher, H.W.</au><au>Turett, G.S.</au><au>Moellering, R.C.</au><au>LaBombardi, V.J.</au><au>Kislak, J.W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chloramphenicol treatment for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteremia</atitle><jtitle>Clinical microbiology and infection</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Microbiol Infect</addtitle><date>2001-01-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>17</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>17-21</pages><issn>1198-743X</issn><eissn>1469-0691</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the results of treating vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) bacteremia with chloramphenicol.
We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all adult patients with VREF bacteremia treated with chloramphenicol during the calendar year 1998 at a 522-bed tertiary referral center in New York City. Patients were identified by reviewing microbiology laboratory records. Patients with clinically significant VREF bacteremia who received chloramphenicol for at least 48 h were included in the study. Clinical and microbiological outcomes were determined. Microbiological and molecular tests were performed on a small representative sample of isolates to identify the presence of resistance mechanisms and to look for similarity among the isolates.
Seven episodes of significant VREF bacteremia occurred in six patients. Mean age was 54 years. All patients had cancer and three had severe neutropenia. Five of seven episodes were associated with chronic indwelling devices, but in only one of these cases was the device removed. All isolates were susceptible to chloramphenicol in vitro. All six microbiologically evaluable episodes had a favorable response to chloramphenicol treatment, and four of seven (57%) clinically evaluable episodes had favorable outcomes. Only one death may have been due to VREF bacteremia, so the maximal attributable mortality was 14%. The three representative samples that were tested further were indistinguishable from one another and they displayed no evidence of resistance mechanisms.
In a cohort of severely ill cancer patients, chloramphenicol was effective in treating VREF bacteremia. The use of chloramphenicol should be considered in treating infections with this highly resistant organism, where therapeutic options are limited.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11284938</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1469-0691.2001.00189.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1198-743X |
ispartof | Clinical microbiology and infection, 2001-01, Vol.7 (1), p.17-21 |
issn | 1198-743X 1469-0691 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77027265 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use Antibacterial agents Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents Bacteremia - drug therapy Bacteremia - microbiology Biological and medical sciences chloramphenicol Chloramphenicol - therapeutic use Enterococcus Enterococcus faecium Enterococcus faecium - drug effects Female Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - drug therapy Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - microbiology Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Pharmacology. Drug treatments resistance Retrospective Studies vancomycin Vancomycin Resistance |
title | Chloramphenicol treatment for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteremia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-11-29T18%3A29%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chloramphenicol%20treatment%20for%20vancomycin-resistant%20Enterococcus%20faecium%20bacteremia&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20microbiology%20and%20infection&rft.au=Ricaurte,%20J.C.&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=17-21&rft.issn=1198-743X&rft.eissn=1469-0691&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1469-0691.2001.00189.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77027265%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221683951&rft_id=info:pmid/11284938&rft_els_id=S1198743X14637277&rfr_iscdi=true |