Theoretical Perspectives on the Relation Between Catastrophizing and Pain
The tendency to "catastrophize" during painful stimulation contributes to more intense pain experience and increased emotional distress. Catastrophizing has been broadly conceived as an exaggerated negative "mental set" brought to bear during painful experiences. Although finding...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Clinical journal of pain 2001-03, Vol.17 (1), p.52-64 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 64 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 52 |
container_title | The Clinical journal of pain |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Sullivan, Michael J. L Thorn, Beverly Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A Keefe, Francis Martin, Michelle Bradley, Laurence A Lefebvre, John C |
description | The tendency to "catastrophize" during painful stimulation contributes to more intense pain experience and increased emotional distress. Catastrophizing has been broadly conceived as an exaggerated negative "mental set" brought to bear during painful experiences. Although findings have been consistent in showing a relation between catastrophizing and pain, research in this area has proceeded in the relative absence of a guiding theoretical framework. This article reviews the literature on the relation between catastrophizing and pain and examines the relative strengths and limitations of different theoretical models that could be advanced to account for the pattern of available findings. The article evaluates the explanatory power of a schema activation model, an appraisal model, an attention model, and a communal coping model of pain perception. It is suggested that catastrophizing might best be viewed from the perspective of hierarchical levels of analysis, where social factors and social goals may play a role in the development and maintenance of catastrophizing, whereas appraisal-related processes may point to the mechanisms that link catastrophizing to pain experience. Directions for future research are suggested. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00002508-200103000-00008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77019989</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77019989</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5008-d86e17bf412574e625b92615235a9ec66cba23519e68bb2d05dc7a65d5566c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd9PwyAQgInRuDn9F0wTE9-qQAuFR138sWSJi9k7ofRq0a6dwFz0r5e5OZ_kBe747rh8IJQQfEWwLK5xXJRhkVKMCc5ilG5S4gANCct4ynIsD9EQF7lMBc6LATrx_jWyjAp8jAaEUCGxkEM0mTfQOwjW6DaZgfNLMMF-gE_6LgkNJM_Q6mBjcAthDdAlYx20D65fNvbLdi-J7qpkpm13io5q3Xo42-0jNL-_m48f0-nTw2R8M00NixOmleBAirLOCWVFDpyyUlIeB8uYlmA4N6WOZyKBi7KkFWaVKTRnFWPxTmYjdLltu3T9-wp8UAvrDbSt7qBfeVUUmEgpNqDYgsb13juo1dLZhXafimC1sah-Laq9xZ-UiKXnuzdW5QKqv8Kdtghc7ADto7ja6c5Yv-dkLjnNIpVvqXXfhqj2rV2twakGdBsa9d8fZt9tMIg4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77019989</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Theoretical Perspectives on the Relation Between Catastrophizing and Pain</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Sullivan, Michael J. L ; Thorn, Beverly ; Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A ; Keefe, Francis ; Martin, Michelle ; Bradley, Laurence A ; Lefebvre, John C</creator><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Michael J. L ; Thorn, Beverly ; Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A ; Keefe, Francis ; Martin, Michelle ; Bradley, Laurence A ; Lefebvre, John C</creatorcontrib><description>The tendency to "catastrophize" during painful stimulation contributes to more intense pain experience and increased emotional distress. Catastrophizing has been broadly conceived as an exaggerated negative "mental set" brought to bear during painful experiences. Although findings have been consistent in showing a relation between catastrophizing and pain, research in this area has proceeded in the relative absence of a guiding theoretical framework. This article reviews the literature on the relation between catastrophizing and pain and examines the relative strengths and limitations of different theoretical models that could be advanced to account for the pattern of available findings. The article evaluates the explanatory power of a schema activation model, an appraisal model, an attention model, and a communal coping model of pain perception. It is suggested that catastrophizing might best be viewed from the perspective of hierarchical levels of analysis, where social factors and social goals may play a role in the development and maintenance of catastrophizing, whereas appraisal-related processes may point to the mechanisms that link catastrophizing to pain experience. Directions for future research are suggested.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-8047</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00002508-200103000-00008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11289089</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJPAEU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Attention ; Biological and medical sciences ; Disabled Persons ; Humans ; Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment) ; Medical sciences ; Models, Psychological ; Pain - physiopathology ; Pain - psychology ; Sex Characteristics ; Stress, Psychological - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>The Clinical journal of pain, 2001-03, Vol.17 (1), p.52-64</ispartof><rights>2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5008-d86e17bf412574e625b92615235a9ec66cba23519e68bb2d05dc7a65d5566c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5008-d86e17bf412574e625b92615235a9ec66cba23519e68bb2d05dc7a65d5566c93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=949623$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11289089$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Michael J. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorn, Beverly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keefe, Francis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Laurence A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lefebvre, John C</creatorcontrib><title>Theoretical Perspectives on the Relation Between Catastrophizing and Pain</title><title>The Clinical journal of pain</title><addtitle>Clin J Pain</addtitle><description>The tendency to "catastrophize" during painful stimulation contributes to more intense pain experience and increased emotional distress. Catastrophizing has been broadly conceived as an exaggerated negative "mental set" brought to bear during painful experiences. Although findings have been consistent in showing a relation between catastrophizing and pain, research in this area has proceeded in the relative absence of a guiding theoretical framework. This article reviews the literature on the relation between catastrophizing and pain and examines the relative strengths and limitations of different theoretical models that could be advanced to account for the pattern of available findings. The article evaluates the explanatory power of a schema activation model, an appraisal model, an attention model, and a communal coping model of pain perception. It is suggested that catastrophizing might best be viewed from the perspective of hierarchical levels of analysis, where social factors and social goals may play a role in the development and maintenance of catastrophizing, whereas appraisal-related processes may point to the mechanisms that link catastrophizing to pain experience. Directions for future research are suggested.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Disabled Persons</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pain - psychology</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - physiopathology</subject><issn>0749-8047</issn><issn>1536-5409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kd9PwyAQgInRuDn9F0wTE9-qQAuFR138sWSJi9k7ofRq0a6dwFz0r5e5OZ_kBe747rh8IJQQfEWwLK5xXJRhkVKMCc5ilG5S4gANCct4ynIsD9EQF7lMBc6LATrx_jWyjAp8jAaEUCGxkEM0mTfQOwjW6DaZgfNLMMF-gE_6LgkNJM_Q6mBjcAthDdAlYx20D65fNvbLdi-J7qpkpm13io5q3Xo42-0jNL-_m48f0-nTw2R8M00NixOmleBAirLOCWVFDpyyUlIeB8uYlmA4N6WOZyKBi7KkFWaVKTRnFWPxTmYjdLltu3T9-wp8UAvrDbSt7qBfeVUUmEgpNqDYgsb13juo1dLZhXafimC1sah-Laq9xZ-UiKXnuzdW5QKqv8Kdtghc7ADto7ja6c5Yv-dkLjnNIpVvqXXfhqj2rV2twakGdBsa9d8fZt9tMIg4</recordid><startdate>200103</startdate><enddate>200103</enddate><creator>Sullivan, Michael J. L</creator><creator>Thorn, Beverly</creator><creator>Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A</creator><creator>Keefe, Francis</creator><creator>Martin, Michelle</creator><creator>Bradley, Laurence A</creator><creator>Lefebvre, John C</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams and Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200103</creationdate><title>Theoretical Perspectives on the Relation Between Catastrophizing and Pain</title><author>Sullivan, Michael J. L ; Thorn, Beverly ; Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A ; Keefe, Francis ; Martin, Michelle ; Bradley, Laurence A ; Lefebvre, John C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5008-d86e17bf412574e625b92615235a9ec66cba23519e68bb2d05dc7a65d5566c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Disabled Persons</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pain - psychology</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Michael J. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorn, Beverly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keefe, Francis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Laurence A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lefebvre, John C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Clinical journal of pain</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sullivan, Michael J. L</au><au>Thorn, Beverly</au><au>Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A</au><au>Keefe, Francis</au><au>Martin, Michelle</au><au>Bradley, Laurence A</au><au>Lefebvre, John C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Theoretical Perspectives on the Relation Between Catastrophizing and Pain</atitle><jtitle>The Clinical journal of pain</jtitle><addtitle>Clin J Pain</addtitle><date>2001-03</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>52</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>52-64</pages><issn>0749-8047</issn><eissn>1536-5409</eissn><coden>CJPAEU</coden><abstract>The tendency to "catastrophize" during painful stimulation contributes to more intense pain experience and increased emotional distress. Catastrophizing has been broadly conceived as an exaggerated negative "mental set" brought to bear during painful experiences. Although findings have been consistent in showing a relation between catastrophizing and pain, research in this area has proceeded in the relative absence of a guiding theoretical framework. This article reviews the literature on the relation between catastrophizing and pain and examines the relative strengths and limitations of different theoretical models that could be advanced to account for the pattern of available findings. The article evaluates the explanatory power of a schema activation model, an appraisal model, an attention model, and a communal coping model of pain perception. It is suggested that catastrophizing might best be viewed from the perspective of hierarchical levels of analysis, where social factors and social goals may play a role in the development and maintenance of catastrophizing, whereas appraisal-related processes may point to the mechanisms that link catastrophizing to pain experience. Directions for future research are suggested.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>11289089</pmid><doi>10.1097/00002508-200103000-00008</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0749-8047 |
ispartof | The Clinical journal of pain, 2001-03, Vol.17 (1), p.52-64 |
issn | 0749-8047 1536-5409 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77019989 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adaptation, Psychological Anesthesia Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Attention Biological and medical sciences Disabled Persons Humans Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment) Medical sciences Models, Psychological Pain - physiopathology Pain - psychology Sex Characteristics Stress, Psychological - physiopathology |
title | Theoretical Perspectives on the Relation Between Catastrophizing and Pain |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T20%3A38%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Theoretical%20Perspectives%20on%20the%20Relation%20Between%20Catastrophizing%20and%20Pain&rft.jtitle=The%20Clinical%20journal%20of%20pain&rft.au=Sullivan,%20Michael%20J.%20L&rft.date=2001-03&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=52&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=52-64&rft.issn=0749-8047&rft.eissn=1536-5409&rft.coden=CJPAEU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00002508-200103000-00008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77019989%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77019989&rft_id=info:pmid/11289089&rfr_iscdi=true |