Intimate partner violence screening and intervention: Data from eleven Pennsylvania and California community hospital emergency departments

Objective: To provide clinical practice recommendations for screening and interventions for intimate partner violence (IPV) in ED settings. Setting: Eleven mid-sized community-level hospital emergency departments (20,000 to 40,000 admissions annually) in Pennsylvania and California. Participants: Al...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of emergency nursing 2001-04, Vol.27 (2), p.141-149
Hauptverfasser: Glass, Nancy, Dearwater, Stephen, Campbell, Jacquelyn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 149
container_issue 2
container_start_page 141
container_title Journal of emergency nursing
container_volume 27
creator Glass, Nancy
Dearwater, Stephen
Campbell, Jacquelyn
description Objective: To provide clinical practice recommendations for screening and interventions for intimate partner violence (IPV) in ED settings. Setting: Eleven mid-sized community-level hospital emergency departments (20,000 to 40,000 admissions annually) in Pennsylvania and California. Participants: All women (4641) aged 18 years or older who came to the emergency department during 309 selected shifts. Methods: An anonymous survey inquiring about physical, sexual, and emotional IPV was conducted from 1995 through 1997. In addition, medical records were abstracted for every woman (18 years and older) seen in the 11 participating emergency departments during the study period. Results: The vast majority of both abused and nonabused women supported routine screening for IPV; however, fewer than 25% of women said they were asked about IPV by ED staff. ED screening rates for IPV were higher among women who came to the emergency department because of acute trauma from abuse (39%) than for women who reported that they had been abused within the past year (13%). The prevalence of past year and lifetime IPV was significantly higher when the questionnaire was self-administered than when it was administered by a nurse. More than a third of women who had recently been abused and 76% of women who acknowledged experiencing physical or sexual IPV within the past year reported that they did not come to the emergency department for treatment of an injury. Although the majority of women (76% to 90%) agreed with the concept of health care providers reporting IPV to the police, women abused recently were significantly less likely to support this practice. Conclusion: The study provides evidence supporting standard protocols for routine screening for IPV among women who come to emergency departments and chart prompts for both screening and interventions. These actions are acceptable to the majority of both abused and nonabused women seen in the emergency department and should be considered in systematic repeated training of health care professionals in emergency departments. This information is important for health care providers who are seeking to improve their identification of and care for abused women.
doi_str_mv 10.1067/men.2001.114387
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77009127</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0099176701749768</els_id><sourcerecordid>77009127</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-bde4ee6ff091660e3df4ee5f6daf1a669063bb29585b9e72e096e19b43ab33203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwsyFPbGntpLFrNlQ-pUowwGw5ybkYJXax3Uj9DfxpHFqJiel0p8fv-R6ELimZUsL4rAM7zQmhU0rnxYIfoTEtc57lgrFjNCZEiIxyxkfoLIRPQkjJqThFI0pzXi4YHaPvZxtNpyLgjfLRgse9cS3YGnCoPYA1do2VbbCxEXwPiXb2Bt-pqLD2rsPQQpriV7A27NpeWaN--aVqjXZ-aGvXdVtr4g5_uLAxUbUYOvDrtGWHGxgWpztiOEcnWrUBLg51gt4f7t-WT9nq5fF5ebvK6rxcxKxqYA7AtCaCMkagaHTqS80apaliTBBWVFUuykVZCeA5EMGAimpeqKooclJM0PU-d-Pd1xZClJ0JNbStsuC2QXKexCVDCZztwdq7EDxoufFJlt9JSuTgX6Z_y8G_3PtPL64O0duqg-aPPwhPgNgDkA7sDXgZajPoboyHOsrGmX_DfwCog5iR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77009127</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intimate partner violence screening and intervention: Data from eleven Pennsylvania and California community hospital emergency departments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Glass, Nancy ; Dearwater, Stephen ; Campbell, Jacquelyn</creator><creatorcontrib>Glass, Nancy ; Dearwater, Stephen ; Campbell, Jacquelyn</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To provide clinical practice recommendations for screening and interventions for intimate partner violence (IPV) in ED settings. Setting: Eleven mid-sized community-level hospital emergency departments (20,000 to 40,000 admissions annually) in Pennsylvania and California. Participants: All women (4641) aged 18 years or older who came to the emergency department during 309 selected shifts. Methods: An anonymous survey inquiring about physical, sexual, and emotional IPV was conducted from 1995 through 1997. In addition, medical records were abstracted for every woman (18 years and older) seen in the 11 participating emergency departments during the study period. Results: The vast majority of both abused and nonabused women supported routine screening for IPV; however, fewer than 25% of women said they were asked about IPV by ED staff. ED screening rates for IPV were higher among women who came to the emergency department because of acute trauma from abuse (39%) than for women who reported that they had been abused within the past year (13%). The prevalence of past year and lifetime IPV was significantly higher when the questionnaire was self-administered than when it was administered by a nurse. More than a third of women who had recently been abused and 76% of women who acknowledged experiencing physical or sexual IPV within the past year reported that they did not come to the emergency department for treatment of an injury. Although the majority of women (76% to 90%) agreed with the concept of health care providers reporting IPV to the police, women abused recently were significantly less likely to support this practice. Conclusion: The study provides evidence supporting standard protocols for routine screening for IPV among women who come to emergency departments and chart prompts for both screening and interventions. These actions are acceptable to the majority of both abused and nonabused women seen in the emergency department and should be considered in systematic repeated training of health care professionals in emergency departments. This information is important for health care providers who are seeking to improve their identification of and care for abused women.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0099-1767</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-2966</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/men.2001.114387</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11275861</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>California - epidemiology ; Clinical Protocols ; Emergency Service, Hospital - standards ; Emergency Treatment - psychology ; Emergency Treatment - standards ; Female ; Hospitals, Community - standards ; Humans ; Mandatory Reporting ; Mass Screening - psychology ; Mass Screening - standards ; Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Medical History Taking - standards ; Needs Assessment ; Nursing ; Organizational Innovation ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Pennsylvania - epidemiology ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Prevalence ; Spouse Abuse - diagnosis ; Spouse Abuse - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Journal of emergency nursing, 2001-04, Vol.27 (2), p.141-149</ispartof><rights>2001 Emergency Nurses Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-bde4ee6ff091660e3df4ee5f6daf1a669063bb29585b9e72e096e19b43ab33203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-bde4ee6ff091660e3df4ee5f6daf1a669063bb29585b9e72e096e19b43ab33203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1067/men.2001.114387$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11275861$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Glass, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dearwater, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Jacquelyn</creatorcontrib><title>Intimate partner violence screening and intervention: Data from eleven Pennsylvania and California community hospital emergency departments</title><title>Journal of emergency nursing</title><addtitle>J Emerg Nurs</addtitle><description>Objective: To provide clinical practice recommendations for screening and interventions for intimate partner violence (IPV) in ED settings. Setting: Eleven mid-sized community-level hospital emergency departments (20,000 to 40,000 admissions annually) in Pennsylvania and California. Participants: All women (4641) aged 18 years or older who came to the emergency department during 309 selected shifts. Methods: An anonymous survey inquiring about physical, sexual, and emotional IPV was conducted from 1995 through 1997. In addition, medical records were abstracted for every woman (18 years and older) seen in the 11 participating emergency departments during the study period. Results: The vast majority of both abused and nonabused women supported routine screening for IPV; however, fewer than 25% of women said they were asked about IPV by ED staff. ED screening rates for IPV were higher among women who came to the emergency department because of acute trauma from abuse (39%) than for women who reported that they had been abused within the past year (13%). The prevalence of past year and lifetime IPV was significantly higher when the questionnaire was self-administered than when it was administered by a nurse. More than a third of women who had recently been abused and 76% of women who acknowledged experiencing physical or sexual IPV within the past year reported that they did not come to the emergency department for treatment of an injury. Although the majority of women (76% to 90%) agreed with the concept of health care providers reporting IPV to the police, women abused recently were significantly less likely to support this practice. Conclusion: The study provides evidence supporting standard protocols for routine screening for IPV among women who come to emergency departments and chart prompts for both screening and interventions. These actions are acceptable to the majority of both abused and nonabused women seen in the emergency department and should be considered in systematic repeated training of health care professionals in emergency departments. This information is important for health care providers who are seeking to improve their identification of and care for abused women.</description><subject>California - epidemiology</subject><subject>Clinical Protocols</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - standards</subject><subject>Emergency Treatment - psychology</subject><subject>Emergency Treatment - standards</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals, Community - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mandatory Reporting</subject><subject>Mass Screening - psychology</subject><subject>Mass Screening - standards</subject><subject>Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Medical History Taking - standards</subject><subject>Needs Assessment</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Organizational Innovation</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Pennsylvania - epidemiology</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Spouse Abuse - diagnosis</subject><subject>Spouse Abuse - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0099-1767</issn><issn>1527-2966</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwsyFPbGntpLFrNlQ-pUowwGw5ybkYJXax3Uj9DfxpHFqJiel0p8fv-R6ELimZUsL4rAM7zQmhU0rnxYIfoTEtc57lgrFjNCZEiIxyxkfoLIRPQkjJqThFI0pzXi4YHaPvZxtNpyLgjfLRgse9cS3YGnCoPYA1do2VbbCxEXwPiXb2Bt-pqLD2rsPQQpriV7A27NpeWaN--aVqjXZ-aGvXdVtr4g5_uLAxUbUYOvDrtGWHGxgWpztiOEcnWrUBLg51gt4f7t-WT9nq5fF5ebvK6rxcxKxqYA7AtCaCMkagaHTqS80apaliTBBWVFUuykVZCeA5EMGAimpeqKooclJM0PU-d-Pd1xZClJ0JNbStsuC2QXKexCVDCZztwdq7EDxoufFJlt9JSuTgX6Z_y8G_3PtPL64O0duqg-aPPwhPgNgDkA7sDXgZajPoboyHOsrGmX_DfwCog5iR</recordid><startdate>200104</startdate><enddate>200104</enddate><creator>Glass, Nancy</creator><creator>Dearwater, Stephen</creator><creator>Campbell, Jacquelyn</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200104</creationdate><title>Intimate partner violence screening and intervention: Data from eleven Pennsylvania and California community hospital emergency departments</title><author>Glass, Nancy ; Dearwater, Stephen ; Campbell, Jacquelyn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-bde4ee6ff091660e3df4ee5f6daf1a669063bb29585b9e72e096e19b43ab33203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>California - epidemiology</topic><topic>Clinical Protocols</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - standards</topic><topic>Emergency Treatment - psychology</topic><topic>Emergency Treatment - standards</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals, Community - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mandatory Reporting</topic><topic>Mass Screening - psychology</topic><topic>Mass Screening - standards</topic><topic>Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Medical History Taking - standards</topic><topic>Needs Assessment</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Organizational Innovation</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Pennsylvania - epidemiology</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Spouse Abuse - diagnosis</topic><topic>Spouse Abuse - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glass, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dearwater, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Jacquelyn</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of emergency nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glass, Nancy</au><au>Dearwater, Stephen</au><au>Campbell, Jacquelyn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intimate partner violence screening and intervention: Data from eleven Pennsylvania and California community hospital emergency departments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of emergency nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Emerg Nurs</addtitle><date>2001-04</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>149</epage><pages>141-149</pages><issn>0099-1767</issn><eissn>1527-2966</eissn><abstract>Objective: To provide clinical practice recommendations for screening and interventions for intimate partner violence (IPV) in ED settings. Setting: Eleven mid-sized community-level hospital emergency departments (20,000 to 40,000 admissions annually) in Pennsylvania and California. Participants: All women (4641) aged 18 years or older who came to the emergency department during 309 selected shifts. Methods: An anonymous survey inquiring about physical, sexual, and emotional IPV was conducted from 1995 through 1997. In addition, medical records were abstracted for every woman (18 years and older) seen in the 11 participating emergency departments during the study period. Results: The vast majority of both abused and nonabused women supported routine screening for IPV; however, fewer than 25% of women said they were asked about IPV by ED staff. ED screening rates for IPV were higher among women who came to the emergency department because of acute trauma from abuse (39%) than for women who reported that they had been abused within the past year (13%). The prevalence of past year and lifetime IPV was significantly higher when the questionnaire was self-administered than when it was administered by a nurse. More than a third of women who had recently been abused and 76% of women who acknowledged experiencing physical or sexual IPV within the past year reported that they did not come to the emergency department for treatment of an injury. Although the majority of women (76% to 90%) agreed with the concept of health care providers reporting IPV to the police, women abused recently were significantly less likely to support this practice. Conclusion: The study provides evidence supporting standard protocols for routine screening for IPV among women who come to emergency departments and chart prompts for both screening and interventions. These actions are acceptable to the majority of both abused and nonabused women seen in the emergency department and should be considered in systematic repeated training of health care professionals in emergency departments. This information is important for health care providers who are seeking to improve their identification of and care for abused women.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>11275861</pmid><doi>10.1067/men.2001.114387</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0099-1767
ispartof Journal of emergency nursing, 2001-04, Vol.27 (2), p.141-149
issn 0099-1767
1527-2966
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77009127
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects California - epidemiology
Clinical Protocols
Emergency Service, Hospital - standards
Emergency Treatment - psychology
Emergency Treatment - standards
Female
Hospitals, Community - standards
Humans
Mandatory Reporting
Mass Screening - psychology
Mass Screening - standards
Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data
Medical History Taking - standards
Needs Assessment
Nursing
Organizational Innovation
Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data
Pennsylvania - epidemiology
Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data
Prevalence
Spouse Abuse - diagnosis
Spouse Abuse - statistics & numerical data
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Intimate partner violence screening and intervention: Data from eleven Pennsylvania and California community hospital emergency departments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T06%3A27%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intimate%20partner%20violence%20screening%20and%20intervention:%20Data%20from%20eleven%20Pennsylvania%20and%20California%20community%20hospital%20emergency%20departments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20emergency%20nursing&rft.au=Glass,%20Nancy&rft.date=2001-04&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=149&rft.pages=141-149&rft.issn=0099-1767&rft.eissn=1527-2966&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/men.2001.114387&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77009127%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77009127&rft_id=info:pmid/11275861&rft_els_id=S0099176701749768&rfr_iscdi=true