Gene Expression Analysis of the Catalytic Subunit of Human Telomerase (hEST2) in the Differential Diagnosis of Serous Effusions

Diagnostic accuracy in effusion cytology based on morphologic examination is not always satisfactory. Therefore, various diagnostic adjuncts such as immunocytochemistry or deoxyribonucleic acid cytometry are employed in this diagnostic field. Recently, demonstration of telomerase activity has been p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diagnostic molecular pathology 2001-03, Vol.10 (1), p.60-65
Hauptverfasser: Nagel, Holger, Schlott, Thilo, Schulz, Gesa–Maria, Droese, Manfred
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 65
container_issue 1
container_start_page 60
container_title Diagnostic molecular pathology
container_volume 10
creator Nagel, Holger
Schlott, Thilo
Schulz, Gesa–Maria
Droese, Manfred
description Diagnostic accuracy in effusion cytology based on morphologic examination is not always satisfactory. Therefore, various diagnostic adjuncts such as immunocytochemistry or deoxyribonucleic acid cytometry are employed in this diagnostic field. Recently, demonstration of telomerase activity has been proposed as a possible marker for malignancy. In this study a seminested reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) strategy for expression analysis of the catalytic subunit of human telomerase (hEST2) was used in 58 serous effusions. RT-PCR results correlated with cytologic diagnoses in 14 of 17 malignant effusions. In eight effusions cytologically suspicious for malignancy, PCR results were in accordance with the clinical follow-up. However, hEST2 RT-PCR was also positive in six of 15 cytologically benign effusions that consisted predominantly of inflammatory and mesothelial cells. Using the telomeric repeat amplification protocol, it could be demonstrated that cultured, proliferating benign mesothelial cells may present a weak telomerase activity, as is known in other benign cells including activated lymphocytes. In conclusion, the simple and rapid method of hEST2 RT-PCR serves to support the cytologic diagnosis of malignancy, but false-positive PCR results resulting from activated lymphocytes and proliferating mesothelial cells must be considered.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00019606-200103000-00010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77008125</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77008125</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-ff925ca4668bba63e6df4f663a788198341e22fa8de45495db30e0f1b1fea8cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFP3DAQha2qVaHAX6h8QuUQGMex4xzRsgUkJA67PVtOdtx16ziLnQg48dfxstty4uSZ5-_NWM-EUAbnDJr6AgBYI0EWZS6A57bYSvCJHDLBeVGBlJ9zDaIsGiHYAfmW0p-M8EqJr-SAsbKueVMfkpdrDEjnT5uIKbkh0Mtg_HNyiQ6WjmukMzNmYXQdXUztFNy4vbiZehPoEv3QYzQJ6Y_1fLEsz6gLb6YrZy1GDKMzPjfmdxj2IxcYhynRubXTdl06Jl-s8QlP9ucR-fVzvpzdFHf317ezy7ui40JCYW1Tis5UUqq2NZKjXNnKSslNrRRrFK8YlqU1aoWVqBqxajkgWNYyi0Z1lh-R093cTRweJkyj7l3q0HsTMD9I1zWAYqXIoNqBXRxSimj1JrrexGfNQG_D1__C1__Df5MgW7_vd0xtj6t34z7tDFQ74HHwI8b010-PGPUajR_X-qNP5a_5M4-8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77008125</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gene Expression Analysis of the Catalytic Subunit of Human Telomerase (hEST2) in the Differential Diagnosis of Serous Effusions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Nagel, Holger ; Schlott, Thilo ; Schulz, Gesa–Maria ; Droese, Manfred</creator><creatorcontrib>Nagel, Holger ; Schlott, Thilo ; Schulz, Gesa–Maria ; Droese, Manfred</creatorcontrib><description>Diagnostic accuracy in effusion cytology based on morphologic examination is not always satisfactory. Therefore, various diagnostic adjuncts such as immunocytochemistry or deoxyribonucleic acid cytometry are employed in this diagnostic field. Recently, demonstration of telomerase activity has been proposed as a possible marker for malignancy. In this study a seminested reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) strategy for expression analysis of the catalytic subunit of human telomerase (hEST2) was used in 58 serous effusions. RT-PCR results correlated with cytologic diagnoses in 14 of 17 malignant effusions. In eight effusions cytologically suspicious for malignancy, PCR results were in accordance with the clinical follow-up. However, hEST2 RT-PCR was also positive in six of 15 cytologically benign effusions that consisted predominantly of inflammatory and mesothelial cells. Using the telomeric repeat amplification protocol, it could be demonstrated that cultured, proliferating benign mesothelial cells may present a weak telomerase activity, as is known in other benign cells including activated lymphocytes. In conclusion, the simple and rapid method of hEST2 RT-PCR serves to support the cytologic diagnosis of malignancy, but false-positive PCR results resulting from activated lymphocytes and proliferating mesothelial cells must be considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-9551</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4066</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00019606-200103000-00010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11277397</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Ascitic Fluid - diagnosis ; Ascitic Fluid - enzymology ; Ascitic Fluid - genetics ; Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis ; Catalytic Domain - genetics ; Cells, Cultured ; Diagnosis, Differential ; DNA, Complementary - analysis ; DNA, Neoplasm - analysis ; DNA-Binding Proteins ; False Positive Reactions ; Female ; Gene Expression Profiling ; Humans ; Pleural Effusion, Malignant - diagnosis ; Pleural Effusion, Malignant - enzymology ; Pleural Effusion, Malignant - genetics ; RNA ; RNA, Neoplasm - analysis ; Telomerase - analysis ; Telomerase - genetics</subject><ispartof>Diagnostic molecular pathology, 2001-03, Vol.10 (1), p.60-65</ispartof><rights>2001 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-ff925ca4668bba63e6df4f663a788198341e22fa8de45495db30e0f1b1fea8cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-ff925ca4668bba63e6df4f663a788198341e22fa8de45495db30e0f1b1fea8cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11277397$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nagel, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlott, Thilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Gesa–Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Droese, Manfred</creatorcontrib><title>Gene Expression Analysis of the Catalytic Subunit of Human Telomerase (hEST2) in the Differential Diagnosis of Serous Effusions</title><title>Diagnostic molecular pathology</title><addtitle>Diagn Mol Pathol</addtitle><description>Diagnostic accuracy in effusion cytology based on morphologic examination is not always satisfactory. Therefore, various diagnostic adjuncts such as immunocytochemistry or deoxyribonucleic acid cytometry are employed in this diagnostic field. Recently, demonstration of telomerase activity has been proposed as a possible marker for malignancy. In this study a seminested reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) strategy for expression analysis of the catalytic subunit of human telomerase (hEST2) was used in 58 serous effusions. RT-PCR results correlated with cytologic diagnoses in 14 of 17 malignant effusions. In eight effusions cytologically suspicious for malignancy, PCR results were in accordance with the clinical follow-up. However, hEST2 RT-PCR was also positive in six of 15 cytologically benign effusions that consisted predominantly of inflammatory and mesothelial cells. Using the telomeric repeat amplification protocol, it could be demonstrated that cultured, proliferating benign mesothelial cells may present a weak telomerase activity, as is known in other benign cells including activated lymphocytes. In conclusion, the simple and rapid method of hEST2 RT-PCR serves to support the cytologic diagnosis of malignancy, but false-positive PCR results resulting from activated lymphocytes and proliferating mesothelial cells must be considered.</description><subject>Ascitic Fluid - diagnosis</subject><subject>Ascitic Fluid - enzymology</subject><subject>Ascitic Fluid - genetics</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</subject><subject>Catalytic Domain - genetics</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>DNA, Complementary - analysis</subject><subject>DNA, Neoplasm - analysis</subject><subject>DNA-Binding Proteins</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene Expression Profiling</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pleural Effusion, Malignant - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pleural Effusion, Malignant - enzymology</subject><subject>Pleural Effusion, Malignant - genetics</subject><subject>RNA</subject><subject>RNA, Neoplasm - analysis</subject><subject>Telomerase - analysis</subject><subject>Telomerase - genetics</subject><issn>1052-9551</issn><issn>1533-4066</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFP3DAQha2qVaHAX6h8QuUQGMex4xzRsgUkJA67PVtOdtx16ziLnQg48dfxstty4uSZ5-_NWM-EUAbnDJr6AgBYI0EWZS6A57bYSvCJHDLBeVGBlJ9zDaIsGiHYAfmW0p-M8EqJr-SAsbKueVMfkpdrDEjnT5uIKbkh0Mtg_HNyiQ6WjmukMzNmYXQdXUztFNy4vbiZehPoEv3QYzQJ6Y_1fLEsz6gLb6YrZy1GDKMzPjfmdxj2IxcYhynRubXTdl06Jl-s8QlP9ucR-fVzvpzdFHf317ezy7ui40JCYW1Tis5UUqq2NZKjXNnKSslNrRRrFK8YlqU1aoWVqBqxajkgWNYyi0Z1lh-R093cTRweJkyj7l3q0HsTMD9I1zWAYqXIoNqBXRxSimj1JrrexGfNQG_D1__C1__Df5MgW7_vd0xtj6t34z7tDFQ74HHwI8b010-PGPUajR_X-qNP5a_5M4-8</recordid><startdate>200103</startdate><enddate>200103</enddate><creator>Nagel, Holger</creator><creator>Schlott, Thilo</creator><creator>Schulz, Gesa–Maria</creator><creator>Droese, Manfred</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200103</creationdate><title>Gene Expression Analysis of the Catalytic Subunit of Human Telomerase (hEST2) in the Differential Diagnosis of Serous Effusions</title><author>Nagel, Holger ; Schlott, Thilo ; Schulz, Gesa–Maria ; Droese, Manfred</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-ff925ca4668bba63e6df4f663a788198341e22fa8de45495db30e0f1b1fea8cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Ascitic Fluid - diagnosis</topic><topic>Ascitic Fluid - enzymology</topic><topic>Ascitic Fluid - genetics</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</topic><topic>Catalytic Domain - genetics</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>DNA, Complementary - analysis</topic><topic>DNA, Neoplasm - analysis</topic><topic>DNA-Binding Proteins</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene Expression Profiling</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pleural Effusion, Malignant - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pleural Effusion, Malignant - enzymology</topic><topic>Pleural Effusion, Malignant - genetics</topic><topic>RNA</topic><topic>RNA, Neoplasm - analysis</topic><topic>Telomerase - analysis</topic><topic>Telomerase - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nagel, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlott, Thilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Gesa–Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Droese, Manfred</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diagnostic molecular pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nagel, Holger</au><au>Schlott, Thilo</au><au>Schulz, Gesa–Maria</au><au>Droese, Manfred</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gene Expression Analysis of the Catalytic Subunit of Human Telomerase (hEST2) in the Differential Diagnosis of Serous Effusions</atitle><jtitle>Diagnostic molecular pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Diagn Mol Pathol</addtitle><date>2001-03</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>60</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>60-65</pages><issn>1052-9551</issn><eissn>1533-4066</eissn><abstract>Diagnostic accuracy in effusion cytology based on morphologic examination is not always satisfactory. Therefore, various diagnostic adjuncts such as immunocytochemistry or deoxyribonucleic acid cytometry are employed in this diagnostic field. Recently, demonstration of telomerase activity has been proposed as a possible marker for malignancy. In this study a seminested reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) strategy for expression analysis of the catalytic subunit of human telomerase (hEST2) was used in 58 serous effusions. RT-PCR results correlated with cytologic diagnoses in 14 of 17 malignant effusions. In eight effusions cytologically suspicious for malignancy, PCR results were in accordance with the clinical follow-up. However, hEST2 RT-PCR was also positive in six of 15 cytologically benign effusions that consisted predominantly of inflammatory and mesothelial cells. Using the telomeric repeat amplification protocol, it could be demonstrated that cultured, proliferating benign mesothelial cells may present a weak telomerase activity, as is known in other benign cells including activated lymphocytes. In conclusion, the simple and rapid method of hEST2 RT-PCR serves to support the cytologic diagnosis of malignancy, but false-positive PCR results resulting from activated lymphocytes and proliferating mesothelial cells must be considered.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>11277397</pmid><doi>10.1097/00019606-200103000-00010</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1052-9551
ispartof Diagnostic molecular pathology, 2001-03, Vol.10 (1), p.60-65
issn 1052-9551
1533-4066
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77008125
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Ascitic Fluid - diagnosis
Ascitic Fluid - enzymology
Ascitic Fluid - genetics
Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis
Catalytic Domain - genetics
Cells, Cultured
Diagnosis, Differential
DNA, Complementary - analysis
DNA, Neoplasm - analysis
DNA-Binding Proteins
False Positive Reactions
Female
Gene Expression Profiling
Humans
Pleural Effusion, Malignant - diagnosis
Pleural Effusion, Malignant - enzymology
Pleural Effusion, Malignant - genetics
RNA
RNA, Neoplasm - analysis
Telomerase - analysis
Telomerase - genetics
title Gene Expression Analysis of the Catalytic Subunit of Human Telomerase (hEST2) in the Differential Diagnosis of Serous Effusions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T05%3A41%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gene%20Expression%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Catalytic%20Subunit%20of%20Human%20Telomerase%20(hEST2)%20in%20the%20Differential%20Diagnosis%20of%20Serous%20Effusions&rft.jtitle=Diagnostic%20molecular%20pathology&rft.au=Nagel,%20Holger&rft.date=2001-03&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=60-65&rft.issn=1052-9551&rft.eissn=1533-4066&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00019606-200103000-00010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77008125%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77008125&rft_id=info:pmid/11277397&rfr_iscdi=true