Gene Expression Analysis of the Catalytic Subunit of Human Telomerase (hEST2) in the Differential Diagnosis of Serous Effusions
Diagnostic accuracy in effusion cytology based on morphologic examination is not always satisfactory. Therefore, various diagnostic adjuncts such as immunocytochemistry or deoxyribonucleic acid cytometry are employed in this diagnostic field. Recently, demonstration of telomerase activity has been p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diagnostic molecular pathology 2001-03, Vol.10 (1), p.60-65 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 65 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 60 |
container_title | Diagnostic molecular pathology |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Nagel, Holger Schlott, Thilo Schulz, Gesa–Maria Droese, Manfred |
description | Diagnostic accuracy in effusion cytology based on morphologic examination is not always satisfactory. Therefore, various diagnostic adjuncts such as immunocytochemistry or deoxyribonucleic acid cytometry are employed in this diagnostic field. Recently, demonstration of telomerase activity has been proposed as a possible marker for malignancy. In this study a seminested reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) strategy for expression analysis of the catalytic subunit of human telomerase (hEST2) was used in 58 serous effusions. RT-PCR results correlated with cytologic diagnoses in 14 of 17 malignant effusions. In eight effusions cytologically suspicious for malignancy, PCR results were in accordance with the clinical follow-up. However, hEST2 RT-PCR was also positive in six of 15 cytologically benign effusions that consisted predominantly of inflammatory and mesothelial cells. Using the telomeric repeat amplification protocol, it could be demonstrated that cultured, proliferating benign mesothelial cells may present a weak telomerase activity, as is known in other benign cells including activated lymphocytes. In conclusion, the simple and rapid method of hEST2 RT-PCR serves to support the cytologic diagnosis of malignancy, but false-positive PCR results resulting from activated lymphocytes and proliferating mesothelial cells must be considered. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00019606-200103000-00010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77008125</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77008125</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-ff925ca4668bba63e6df4f663a788198341e22fa8de45495db30e0f1b1fea8cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFP3DAQha2qVaHAX6h8QuUQGMex4xzRsgUkJA67PVtOdtx16ziLnQg48dfxstty4uSZ5-_NWM-EUAbnDJr6AgBYI0EWZS6A57bYSvCJHDLBeVGBlJ9zDaIsGiHYAfmW0p-M8EqJr-SAsbKueVMfkpdrDEjnT5uIKbkh0Mtg_HNyiQ6WjmukMzNmYXQdXUztFNy4vbiZehPoEv3QYzQJ6Y_1fLEsz6gLb6YrZy1GDKMzPjfmdxj2IxcYhynRubXTdl06Jl-s8QlP9ucR-fVzvpzdFHf317ezy7ui40JCYW1Tis5UUqq2NZKjXNnKSslNrRRrFK8YlqU1aoWVqBqxajkgWNYyi0Z1lh-R093cTRweJkyj7l3q0HsTMD9I1zWAYqXIoNqBXRxSimj1JrrexGfNQG_D1__C1__Df5MgW7_vd0xtj6t34z7tDFQ74HHwI8b010-PGPUajR_X-qNP5a_5M4-8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77008125</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gene Expression Analysis of the Catalytic Subunit of Human Telomerase (hEST2) in the Differential Diagnosis of Serous Effusions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Nagel, Holger ; Schlott, Thilo ; Schulz, Gesa–Maria ; Droese, Manfred</creator><creatorcontrib>Nagel, Holger ; Schlott, Thilo ; Schulz, Gesa–Maria ; Droese, Manfred</creatorcontrib><description>Diagnostic accuracy in effusion cytology based on morphologic examination is not always satisfactory. Therefore, various diagnostic adjuncts such as immunocytochemistry or deoxyribonucleic acid cytometry are employed in this diagnostic field. Recently, demonstration of telomerase activity has been proposed as a possible marker for malignancy. In this study a seminested reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) strategy for expression analysis of the catalytic subunit of human telomerase (hEST2) was used in 58 serous effusions. RT-PCR results correlated with cytologic diagnoses in 14 of 17 malignant effusions. In eight effusions cytologically suspicious for malignancy, PCR results were in accordance with the clinical follow-up. However, hEST2 RT-PCR was also positive in six of 15 cytologically benign effusions that consisted predominantly of inflammatory and mesothelial cells. Using the telomeric repeat amplification protocol, it could be demonstrated that cultured, proliferating benign mesothelial cells may present a weak telomerase activity, as is known in other benign cells including activated lymphocytes. In conclusion, the simple and rapid method of hEST2 RT-PCR serves to support the cytologic diagnosis of malignancy, but false-positive PCR results resulting from activated lymphocytes and proliferating mesothelial cells must be considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-9551</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4066</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00019606-200103000-00010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11277397</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Ascitic Fluid - diagnosis ; Ascitic Fluid - enzymology ; Ascitic Fluid - genetics ; Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis ; Catalytic Domain - genetics ; Cells, Cultured ; Diagnosis, Differential ; DNA, Complementary - analysis ; DNA, Neoplasm - analysis ; DNA-Binding Proteins ; False Positive Reactions ; Female ; Gene Expression Profiling ; Humans ; Pleural Effusion, Malignant - diagnosis ; Pleural Effusion, Malignant - enzymology ; Pleural Effusion, Malignant - genetics ; RNA ; RNA, Neoplasm - analysis ; Telomerase - analysis ; Telomerase - genetics</subject><ispartof>Diagnostic molecular pathology, 2001-03, Vol.10 (1), p.60-65</ispartof><rights>2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-ff925ca4668bba63e6df4f663a788198341e22fa8de45495db30e0f1b1fea8cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-ff925ca4668bba63e6df4f663a788198341e22fa8de45495db30e0f1b1fea8cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11277397$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nagel, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlott, Thilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Gesa–Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Droese, Manfred</creatorcontrib><title>Gene Expression Analysis of the Catalytic Subunit of Human Telomerase (hEST2) in the Differential Diagnosis of Serous Effusions</title><title>Diagnostic molecular pathology</title><addtitle>Diagn Mol Pathol</addtitle><description>Diagnostic accuracy in effusion cytology based on morphologic examination is not always satisfactory. Therefore, various diagnostic adjuncts such as immunocytochemistry or deoxyribonucleic acid cytometry are employed in this diagnostic field. Recently, demonstration of telomerase activity has been proposed as a possible marker for malignancy. In this study a seminested reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) strategy for expression analysis of the catalytic subunit of human telomerase (hEST2) was used in 58 serous effusions. RT-PCR results correlated with cytologic diagnoses in 14 of 17 malignant effusions. In eight effusions cytologically suspicious for malignancy, PCR results were in accordance with the clinical follow-up. However, hEST2 RT-PCR was also positive in six of 15 cytologically benign effusions that consisted predominantly of inflammatory and mesothelial cells. Using the telomeric repeat amplification protocol, it could be demonstrated that cultured, proliferating benign mesothelial cells may present a weak telomerase activity, as is known in other benign cells including activated lymphocytes. In conclusion, the simple and rapid method of hEST2 RT-PCR serves to support the cytologic diagnosis of malignancy, but false-positive PCR results resulting from activated lymphocytes and proliferating mesothelial cells must be considered.</description><subject>Ascitic Fluid - diagnosis</subject><subject>Ascitic Fluid - enzymology</subject><subject>Ascitic Fluid - genetics</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</subject><subject>Catalytic Domain - genetics</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>DNA, Complementary - analysis</subject><subject>DNA, Neoplasm - analysis</subject><subject>DNA-Binding Proteins</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene Expression Profiling</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pleural Effusion, Malignant - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pleural Effusion, Malignant - enzymology</subject><subject>Pleural Effusion, Malignant - genetics</subject><subject>RNA</subject><subject>RNA, Neoplasm - analysis</subject><subject>Telomerase - analysis</subject><subject>Telomerase - genetics</subject><issn>1052-9551</issn><issn>1533-4066</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFP3DAQha2qVaHAX6h8QuUQGMex4xzRsgUkJA67PVtOdtx16ziLnQg48dfxstty4uSZ5-_NWM-EUAbnDJr6AgBYI0EWZS6A57bYSvCJHDLBeVGBlJ9zDaIsGiHYAfmW0p-M8EqJr-SAsbKueVMfkpdrDEjnT5uIKbkh0Mtg_HNyiQ6WjmukMzNmYXQdXUztFNy4vbiZehPoEv3QYzQJ6Y_1fLEsz6gLb6YrZy1GDKMzPjfmdxj2IxcYhynRubXTdl06Jl-s8QlP9ucR-fVzvpzdFHf317ezy7ui40JCYW1Tis5UUqq2NZKjXNnKSslNrRRrFK8YlqU1aoWVqBqxajkgWNYyi0Z1lh-R093cTRweJkyj7l3q0HsTMD9I1zWAYqXIoNqBXRxSimj1JrrexGfNQG_D1__C1__Df5MgW7_vd0xtj6t34z7tDFQ74HHwI8b010-PGPUajR_X-qNP5a_5M4-8</recordid><startdate>200103</startdate><enddate>200103</enddate><creator>Nagel, Holger</creator><creator>Schlott, Thilo</creator><creator>Schulz, Gesa–Maria</creator><creator>Droese, Manfred</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200103</creationdate><title>Gene Expression Analysis of the Catalytic Subunit of Human Telomerase (hEST2) in the Differential Diagnosis of Serous Effusions</title><author>Nagel, Holger ; Schlott, Thilo ; Schulz, Gesa–Maria ; Droese, Manfred</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-ff925ca4668bba63e6df4f663a788198341e22fa8de45495db30e0f1b1fea8cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Ascitic Fluid - diagnosis</topic><topic>Ascitic Fluid - enzymology</topic><topic>Ascitic Fluid - genetics</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</topic><topic>Catalytic Domain - genetics</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>DNA, Complementary - analysis</topic><topic>DNA, Neoplasm - analysis</topic><topic>DNA-Binding Proteins</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene Expression Profiling</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pleural Effusion, Malignant - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pleural Effusion, Malignant - enzymology</topic><topic>Pleural Effusion, Malignant - genetics</topic><topic>RNA</topic><topic>RNA, Neoplasm - analysis</topic><topic>Telomerase - analysis</topic><topic>Telomerase - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nagel, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlott, Thilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Gesa–Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Droese, Manfred</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diagnostic molecular pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nagel, Holger</au><au>Schlott, Thilo</au><au>Schulz, Gesa–Maria</au><au>Droese, Manfred</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gene Expression Analysis of the Catalytic Subunit of Human Telomerase (hEST2) in the Differential Diagnosis of Serous Effusions</atitle><jtitle>Diagnostic molecular pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Diagn Mol Pathol</addtitle><date>2001-03</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>60</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>60-65</pages><issn>1052-9551</issn><eissn>1533-4066</eissn><abstract>Diagnostic accuracy in effusion cytology based on morphologic examination is not always satisfactory. Therefore, various diagnostic adjuncts such as immunocytochemistry or deoxyribonucleic acid cytometry are employed in this diagnostic field. Recently, demonstration of telomerase activity has been proposed as a possible marker for malignancy. In this study a seminested reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) strategy for expression analysis of the catalytic subunit of human telomerase (hEST2) was used in 58 serous effusions. RT-PCR results correlated with cytologic diagnoses in 14 of 17 malignant effusions. In eight effusions cytologically suspicious for malignancy, PCR results were in accordance with the clinical follow-up. However, hEST2 RT-PCR was also positive in six of 15 cytologically benign effusions that consisted predominantly of inflammatory and mesothelial cells. Using the telomeric repeat amplification protocol, it could be demonstrated that cultured, proliferating benign mesothelial cells may present a weak telomerase activity, as is known in other benign cells including activated lymphocytes. In conclusion, the simple and rapid method of hEST2 RT-PCR serves to support the cytologic diagnosis of malignancy, but false-positive PCR results resulting from activated lymphocytes and proliferating mesothelial cells must be considered.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>11277397</pmid><doi>10.1097/00019606-200103000-00010</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1052-9551 |
ispartof | Diagnostic molecular pathology, 2001-03, Vol.10 (1), p.60-65 |
issn | 1052-9551 1533-4066 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77008125 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Ascitic Fluid - diagnosis Ascitic Fluid - enzymology Ascitic Fluid - genetics Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis Catalytic Domain - genetics Cells, Cultured Diagnosis, Differential DNA, Complementary - analysis DNA, Neoplasm - analysis DNA-Binding Proteins False Positive Reactions Female Gene Expression Profiling Humans Pleural Effusion, Malignant - diagnosis Pleural Effusion, Malignant - enzymology Pleural Effusion, Malignant - genetics RNA RNA, Neoplasm - analysis Telomerase - analysis Telomerase - genetics |
title | Gene Expression Analysis of the Catalytic Subunit of Human Telomerase (hEST2) in the Differential Diagnosis of Serous Effusions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T05%3A41%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gene%20Expression%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Catalytic%20Subunit%20of%20Human%20Telomerase%20(hEST2)%20in%20the%20Differential%20Diagnosis%20of%20Serous%20Effusions&rft.jtitle=Diagnostic%20molecular%20pathology&rft.au=Nagel,%20Holger&rft.date=2001-03&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=60-65&rft.issn=1052-9551&rft.eissn=1533-4066&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00019606-200103000-00010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77008125%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77008125&rft_id=info:pmid/11277397&rfr_iscdi=true |