Reflexology and bronchial asthma
Many asthma patients seek alternative or adjunctive therapies. One such modality is reflexology, whereby finger pressure is applied to certain parts of the body. The aim of the study was to examine the popular claim that reflexology treatment benefits bronchial asthma. Ten weeks of active or simulat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Respiratory medicine 2001-03, Vol.95 (3), p.173-179 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 179 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 173 |
container_title | Respiratory medicine |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | BRYGGE, T. HEINIG, J.H. COLLINS, P. RONBORG, S. GEHRCHEN, P.M. HILDEN, J. HEEGAARD, S. POULSEN, L.K. |
description | Many asthma patients seek alternative or adjunctive therapies. One such modality is reflexology, whereby finger pressure is applied to certain parts of the body. The aim of the study was to examine the popular claim that reflexology treatment benefits bronchial asthma. Ten weeks of active or simulated (placebo) reflexology given by an experienced reflexologist, were compared in an otherwise blind, controlled trial of 20+20 outpatients with asthma.
Objective lung function tests (peak flow morning and evening, and weekly spirometry at the clinic) did not change. Subjective scores (describing symptoms,β2 -inhalations and quality of life) and also bronchial sensitivity to histamine improved on both regimens, but no differences were found between groups receiving active or placebo reflexology. However, a trend in favour of reflexology became significant when a supplementary analysis of symptom diaries was carried out. It was accompanied by a significant pattern compatible with subconscious un-blinding, in that patients tended to guess which treatment they had been receiving.
No evidence was found that reflexology has a specific effect on asthma beyond placebo influence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1053/rmed.2000.0975 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76995440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0954611100909752</els_id><sourcerecordid>76995440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-b47609994e9ea20980dfde34fcc9b65fe5d36e4eeadcaa3fdd48ee5d905a63613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LwzAYwPEgipvTq0cpCN5anzQva44ivsFAED2HNHniKn2ZSSfu29uyspunQPLLQ_In5JJCRkGw29Cgy3IAyEAtxRGZU8HylIHkx2QOSvBUUkpn5CzGr0EpzuGUzCjNpcwZm5PkDX2Nv13dfe4S07qkDF1r15WpExP7dWPOyYk3dcSLaV2Qj8eH9_vndPX69HJ_t0oth6JPS76UoJTiqNDkoApw3iHj3lpVSuFROCaRIxpnjWHeOV7gsKlAGMkkZQtys5-7Cd33FmOvmyparGvTYreNeinV8BsOA8z20IYuxoBeb0LVmLDTFPTYRI9N9NhEj02GC1fT5G05nhz4FGEA1xMw0ZraB9PaKh6cogJEMahir3Co8FNh0NFW2Fp0VUDba9dV_73gD7aQfDM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76995440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reflexology and bronchial asthma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>BRYGGE, T. ; HEINIG, J.H. ; COLLINS, P. ; RONBORG, S. ; GEHRCHEN, P.M. ; HILDEN, J. ; HEEGAARD, S. ; POULSEN, L.K.</creator><creatorcontrib>BRYGGE, T. ; HEINIG, J.H. ; COLLINS, P. ; RONBORG, S. ; GEHRCHEN, P.M. ; HILDEN, J. ; HEEGAARD, S. ; POULSEN, L.K.</creatorcontrib><description>Many asthma patients seek alternative or adjunctive therapies. One such modality is reflexology, whereby finger pressure is applied to certain parts of the body. The aim of the study was to examine the popular claim that reflexology treatment benefits bronchial asthma. Ten weeks of active or simulated (placebo) reflexology given by an experienced reflexologist, were compared in an otherwise blind, controlled trial of 20+20 outpatients with asthma.
Objective lung function tests (peak flow morning and evening, and weekly spirometry at the clinic) did not change. Subjective scores (describing symptoms,β2 -inhalations and quality of life) and also bronchial sensitivity to histamine improved on both regimens, but no differences were found between groups receiving active or placebo reflexology. However, a trend in favour of reflexology became significant when a supplementary analysis of symptom diaries was carried out. It was accompanied by a significant pattern compatible with subconscious un-blinding, in that patients tended to guess which treatment they had been receiving.
No evidence was found that reflexology has a specific effect on asthma beyond placebo influence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-6111</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3064</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/rmed.2000.0975</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11266233</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; alternative medicine ; asthma ; Asthma - physiopathology ; Asthma - rehabilitation ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bronchial Provocation Tests ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Forced Expiratory Volume ; Humans ; Male ; Massage - methods ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Peak Expiratory Flow Rate ; Pneumology ; Quality of Life ; Regression Analysis ; Treatment Outcome ; Vital Capacity</subject><ispartof>Respiratory medicine, 2001-03, Vol.95 (3), p.173-179</ispartof><rights>2001 Harcourt Publishers Ltd</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-b47609994e9ea20980dfde34fcc9b65fe5d36e4eeadcaa3fdd48ee5d905a63613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-b47609994e9ea20980dfde34fcc9b65fe5d36e4eeadcaa3fdd48ee5d905a63613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/rmed.2000.0975$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27926,27927,45997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=915058$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11266233$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BRYGGE, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEINIG, J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COLLINS, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RONBORG, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GEHRCHEN, P.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HILDEN, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEEGAARD, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POULSEN, L.K.</creatorcontrib><title>Reflexology and bronchial asthma</title><title>Respiratory medicine</title><addtitle>Respir Med</addtitle><description>Many asthma patients seek alternative or adjunctive therapies. One such modality is reflexology, whereby finger pressure is applied to certain parts of the body. The aim of the study was to examine the popular claim that reflexology treatment benefits bronchial asthma. Ten weeks of active or simulated (placebo) reflexology given by an experienced reflexologist, were compared in an otherwise blind, controlled trial of 20+20 outpatients with asthma.
Objective lung function tests (peak flow morning and evening, and weekly spirometry at the clinic) did not change. Subjective scores (describing symptoms,β2 -inhalations and quality of life) and also bronchial sensitivity to histamine improved on both regimens, but no differences were found between groups receiving active or placebo reflexology. However, a trend in favour of reflexology became significant when a supplementary analysis of symptom diaries was carried out. It was accompanied by a significant pattern compatible with subconscious un-blinding, in that patients tended to guess which treatment they had been receiving.
No evidence was found that reflexology has a specific effect on asthma beyond placebo influence.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>alternative medicine</subject><subject>asthma</subject><subject>Asthma - physiopathology</subject><subject>Asthma - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bronchial Provocation Tests</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forced Expiratory Volume</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Massage - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Peak Expiratory Flow Rate</subject><subject>Pneumology</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vital Capacity</subject><issn>0954-6111</issn><issn>1532-3064</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1LwzAYwPEgipvTq0cpCN5anzQva44ivsFAED2HNHniKn2ZSSfu29uyspunQPLLQ_In5JJCRkGw29Cgy3IAyEAtxRGZU8HylIHkx2QOSvBUUkpn5CzGr0EpzuGUzCjNpcwZm5PkDX2Nv13dfe4S07qkDF1r15WpExP7dWPOyYk3dcSLaV2Qj8eH9_vndPX69HJ_t0oth6JPS76UoJTiqNDkoApw3iHj3lpVSuFROCaRIxpnjWHeOV7gsKlAGMkkZQtys5-7Cd33FmOvmyparGvTYreNeinV8BsOA8z20IYuxoBeb0LVmLDTFPTYRI9N9NhEj02GC1fT5G05nhz4FGEA1xMw0ZraB9PaKh6cogJEMahir3Co8FNh0NFW2Fp0VUDba9dV_73gD7aQfDM</recordid><startdate>20010301</startdate><enddate>20010301</enddate><creator>BRYGGE, T.</creator><creator>HEINIG, J.H.</creator><creator>COLLINS, P.</creator><creator>RONBORG, S.</creator><creator>GEHRCHEN, P.M.</creator><creator>HILDEN, J.</creator><creator>HEEGAARD, S.</creator><creator>POULSEN, L.K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010301</creationdate><title>Reflexology and bronchial asthma</title><author>BRYGGE, T. ; HEINIG, J.H. ; COLLINS, P. ; RONBORG, S. ; GEHRCHEN, P.M. ; HILDEN, J. ; HEEGAARD, S. ; POULSEN, L.K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-b47609994e9ea20980dfde34fcc9b65fe5d36e4eeadcaa3fdd48ee5d905a63613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>alternative medicine</topic><topic>asthma</topic><topic>Asthma - physiopathology</topic><topic>Asthma - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bronchial Provocation Tests</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forced Expiratory Volume</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Massage - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Peak Expiratory Flow Rate</topic><topic>Pneumology</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vital Capacity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BRYGGE, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEINIG, J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COLLINS, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RONBORG, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GEHRCHEN, P.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HILDEN, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEEGAARD, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POULSEN, L.K.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Respiratory medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BRYGGE, T.</au><au>HEINIG, J.H.</au><au>COLLINS, P.</au><au>RONBORG, S.</au><au>GEHRCHEN, P.M.</au><au>HILDEN, J.</au><au>HEEGAARD, S.</au><au>POULSEN, L.K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reflexology and bronchial asthma</atitle><jtitle>Respiratory medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Respir Med</addtitle><date>2001-03-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>173</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>173-179</pages><issn>0954-6111</issn><eissn>1532-3064</eissn><abstract>Many asthma patients seek alternative or adjunctive therapies. One such modality is reflexology, whereby finger pressure is applied to certain parts of the body. The aim of the study was to examine the popular claim that reflexology treatment benefits bronchial asthma. Ten weeks of active or simulated (placebo) reflexology given by an experienced reflexologist, were compared in an otherwise blind, controlled trial of 20+20 outpatients with asthma.
Objective lung function tests (peak flow morning and evening, and weekly spirometry at the clinic) did not change. Subjective scores (describing symptoms,β2 -inhalations and quality of life) and also bronchial sensitivity to histamine improved on both regimens, but no differences were found between groups receiving active or placebo reflexology. However, a trend in favour of reflexology became significant when a supplementary analysis of symptom diaries was carried out. It was accompanied by a significant pattern compatible with subconscious un-blinding, in that patients tended to guess which treatment they had been receiving.
No evidence was found that reflexology has a specific effect on asthma beyond placebo influence.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11266233</pmid><doi>10.1053/rmed.2000.0975</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0954-6111 |
ispartof | Respiratory medicine, 2001-03, Vol.95 (3), p.173-179 |
issn | 0954-6111 1532-3064 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76995440 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adolescent Adult alternative medicine asthma Asthma - physiopathology Asthma - rehabilitation Biological and medical sciences Bronchial Provocation Tests Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma Double-Blind Method Female Forced Expiratory Volume Humans Male Massage - methods Medical sciences Middle Aged Peak Expiratory Flow Rate Pneumology Quality of Life Regression Analysis Treatment Outcome Vital Capacity |
title | Reflexology and bronchial asthma |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T05%3A25%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reflexology%20and%20bronchial%20asthma&rft.jtitle=Respiratory%20medicine&rft.au=BRYGGE,%20T.&rft.date=2001-03-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=173&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=173-179&rft.issn=0954-6111&rft.eissn=1532-3064&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/rmed.2000.0975&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76995440%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76995440&rft_id=info:pmid/11266233&rft_els_id=S0954611100909752&rfr_iscdi=true |