High-frequency ventilation versus conventional ventilation in dogs with right ventricular dysfunction

A randomized crossover protocol was used to compare conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) and high-frequency ventilation (HFV) in mongrel dogs experiencing right ventricular dysfunction after right ventriculotomy. When inspired oxygen, pH, Pco2, core temperature, and preload were held constant,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care medicine 1986-09, Vol.14 (9), p.798-801
Hauptverfasser: LUCKING, STEVEN E, FIELDS, ALAN I, MAHFOOD, SAADE, KASSIR, M MARK, MIDGLEY, FRANK M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 801
container_issue 9
container_start_page 798
container_title Critical care medicine
container_volume 14
creator LUCKING, STEVEN E
FIELDS, ALAN I
MAHFOOD, SAADE
KASSIR, M MARK
MIDGLEY, FRANK M
description A randomized crossover protocol was used to compare conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) and high-frequency ventilation (HFV) in mongrel dogs experiencing right ventricular dysfunction after right ventriculotomy. When inspired oxygen, pH, Pco2, core temperature, and preload were held constant, cardiac output increased significantly (p < .05) from 1.16 ± 0.24 to 1.38 ± 0.25 L/min and pulmonary vascular resistance decreased significantly (p < .05) from 734 ± 257 to 554 ± 169 dyne sec/cm5 during HFV relative to CMV. We also noted a significant (p < .05) increase in mean arterial pressure from 116 ± 27 to 124 ± 23 mm Hg and a significant (p < .05) increase in left ventricular stroke work from 10.2 ± 3.5 to 12.3 ± 2.6 gm during HFV. During the inspiratory phase of CMV there were increases in CVP, pulmonary artery pressure, and systemic arterial pressure, and decreases in pulmonary artery flow which did not occur during HFV. HFV may be preferable to CMV in the presence of right ventricular dysfunction.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00003246-198609000-00008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76995166</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76995166</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3558-148d2895ab71687f9d20f5fe78a5d3b037905d5739aaf09908d9e4ca31686b1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UU1PAyEUJEZTa_UnmOzJ2yosywJH06g1MfGiZ8Iu0KIUKuza9N9LP2ziQS7wZubNyxsAKBC8RZDTO5gPruqmRJw1kOeq3ELsBIwRwbmoOD4FY5ipEtccn4OLlD4gRDWheARGmNY4-4yBntn5ojRRfw3ad5viW_veOtnb4PM7piEVXfA7NHjp_vDWFyrMU7G2_aKI2aff0dF2g5OxUJtkBt9tpZfgzEiX9NXhnoD3x4e36ax8eX16nt6_lB0mhJWoZqpinMiWooZRw1UFDTGaMkkUbiGmHBKVN-BSGsg5ZIrrupM4q5sWtXgCbva-qxjyQqkXS5s67Zz0OgxJ0IZzgpomC9le2MWQUtRGrKJdyrgRCIptwuI3YXFMeAex3Hp9mDG0S62OjYdIM1_v-XVwfU7w0w1rHcVCS9cvxH8fh38A16OIJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76995166</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>High-frequency ventilation versus conventional ventilation in dogs with right ventricular dysfunction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>LUCKING, STEVEN E ; FIELDS, ALAN I ; MAHFOOD, SAADE ; KASSIR, M MARK ; MIDGLEY, FRANK M</creator><creatorcontrib>LUCKING, STEVEN E ; FIELDS, ALAN I ; MAHFOOD, SAADE ; KASSIR, M MARK ; MIDGLEY, FRANK M</creatorcontrib><description>A randomized crossover protocol was used to compare conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) and high-frequency ventilation (HFV) in mongrel dogs experiencing right ventricular dysfunction after right ventriculotomy. When inspired oxygen, pH, Pco2, core temperature, and preload were held constant, cardiac output increased significantly (p &lt; .05) from 1.16 ± 0.24 to 1.38 ± 0.25 L/min and pulmonary vascular resistance decreased significantly (p &lt; .05) from 734 ± 257 to 554 ± 169 dyne sec/cm5 during HFV relative to CMV. We also noted a significant (p &lt; .05) increase in mean arterial pressure from 116 ± 27 to 124 ± 23 mm Hg and a significant (p &lt; .05) increase in left ventricular stroke work from 10.2 ± 3.5 to 12.3 ± 2.6 gm during HFV. During the inspiratory phase of CMV there were increases in CVP, pulmonary artery pressure, and systemic arterial pressure, and decreases in pulmonary artery flow which did not occur during HFV. HFV may be preferable to CMV in the presence of right ventricular dysfunction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-3493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0293</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00003246-198609000-00008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3743097</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Animals ; Blood Pressure ; Cardiac Output ; Child, Preschool ; Dogs ; Heart Diseases - physiopathology ; Heart Ventricles - physiopathology ; Heart Ventricles - surgery ; Humans ; Pulmonary Circulation ; Random Allocation ; Respiration, Artificial - methods</subject><ispartof>Critical care medicine, 1986-09, Vol.14 (9), p.798-801</ispartof><rights>Williams &amp; Wilkins 1986. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3558-148d2895ab71687f9d20f5fe78a5d3b037905d5739aaf09908d9e4ca31686b1b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3743097$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LUCKING, STEVEN E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FIELDS, ALAN I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAHFOOD, SAADE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KASSIR, M MARK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIDGLEY, FRANK M</creatorcontrib><title>High-frequency ventilation versus conventional ventilation in dogs with right ventricular dysfunction</title><title>Critical care medicine</title><addtitle>Crit Care Med</addtitle><description>A randomized crossover protocol was used to compare conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) and high-frequency ventilation (HFV) in mongrel dogs experiencing right ventricular dysfunction after right ventriculotomy. When inspired oxygen, pH, Pco2, core temperature, and preload were held constant, cardiac output increased significantly (p &lt; .05) from 1.16 ± 0.24 to 1.38 ± 0.25 L/min and pulmonary vascular resistance decreased significantly (p &lt; .05) from 734 ± 257 to 554 ± 169 dyne sec/cm5 during HFV relative to CMV. We also noted a significant (p &lt; .05) increase in mean arterial pressure from 116 ± 27 to 124 ± 23 mm Hg and a significant (p &lt; .05) increase in left ventricular stroke work from 10.2 ± 3.5 to 12.3 ± 2.6 gm during HFV. During the inspiratory phase of CMV there were increases in CVP, pulmonary artery pressure, and systemic arterial pressure, and decreases in pulmonary artery flow which did not occur during HFV. HFV may be preferable to CMV in the presence of right ventricular dysfunction.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Blood Pressure</subject><subject>Cardiac Output</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Heart Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Heart Ventricles - physiopathology</subject><subject>Heart Ventricles - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pulmonary Circulation</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - methods</subject><issn>0090-3493</issn><issn>1530-0293</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UU1PAyEUJEZTa_UnmOzJ2yosywJH06g1MfGiZ8Iu0KIUKuza9N9LP2ziQS7wZubNyxsAKBC8RZDTO5gPruqmRJw1kOeq3ELsBIwRwbmoOD4FY5ipEtccn4OLlD4gRDWheARGmNY4-4yBntn5ojRRfw3ad5viW_veOtnb4PM7piEVXfA7NHjp_vDWFyrMU7G2_aKI2aff0dF2g5OxUJtkBt9tpZfgzEiX9NXhnoD3x4e36ax8eX16nt6_lB0mhJWoZqpinMiWooZRw1UFDTGaMkkUbiGmHBKVN-BSGsg5ZIrrupM4q5sWtXgCbva-qxjyQqkXS5s67Zz0OgxJ0IZzgpomC9le2MWQUtRGrKJdyrgRCIptwuI3YXFMeAex3Hp9mDG0S62OjYdIM1_v-XVwfU7w0w1rHcVCS9cvxH8fh38A16OIJQ</recordid><startdate>198609</startdate><enddate>198609</enddate><creator>LUCKING, STEVEN E</creator><creator>FIELDS, ALAN I</creator><creator>MAHFOOD, SAADE</creator><creator>KASSIR, M MARK</creator><creator>MIDGLEY, FRANK M</creator><general>Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198609</creationdate><title>High-frequency ventilation versus conventional ventilation in dogs with right ventricular dysfunction</title><author>LUCKING, STEVEN E ; FIELDS, ALAN I ; MAHFOOD, SAADE ; KASSIR, M MARK ; MIDGLEY, FRANK M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3558-148d2895ab71687f9d20f5fe78a5d3b037905d5739aaf09908d9e4ca31686b1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Blood Pressure</topic><topic>Cardiac Output</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Heart Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Heart Ventricles - physiopathology</topic><topic>Heart Ventricles - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pulmonary Circulation</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LUCKING, STEVEN E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FIELDS, ALAN I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAHFOOD, SAADE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KASSIR, M MARK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIDGLEY, FRANK M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Critical care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LUCKING, STEVEN E</au><au>FIELDS, ALAN I</au><au>MAHFOOD, SAADE</au><au>KASSIR, M MARK</au><au>MIDGLEY, FRANK M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>High-frequency ventilation versus conventional ventilation in dogs with right ventricular dysfunction</atitle><jtitle>Critical care medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Care Med</addtitle><date>1986-09</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>798</spage><epage>801</epage><pages>798-801</pages><issn>0090-3493</issn><eissn>1530-0293</eissn><abstract>A randomized crossover protocol was used to compare conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) and high-frequency ventilation (HFV) in mongrel dogs experiencing right ventricular dysfunction after right ventriculotomy. When inspired oxygen, pH, Pco2, core temperature, and preload were held constant, cardiac output increased significantly (p &lt; .05) from 1.16 ± 0.24 to 1.38 ± 0.25 L/min and pulmonary vascular resistance decreased significantly (p &lt; .05) from 734 ± 257 to 554 ± 169 dyne sec/cm5 during HFV relative to CMV. We also noted a significant (p &lt; .05) increase in mean arterial pressure from 116 ± 27 to 124 ± 23 mm Hg and a significant (p &lt; .05) increase in left ventricular stroke work from 10.2 ± 3.5 to 12.3 ± 2.6 gm during HFV. During the inspiratory phase of CMV there were increases in CVP, pulmonary artery pressure, and systemic arterial pressure, and decreases in pulmonary artery flow which did not occur during HFV. HFV may be preferable to CMV in the presence of right ventricular dysfunction.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>3743097</pmid><doi>10.1097/00003246-198609000-00008</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-3493
ispartof Critical care medicine, 1986-09, Vol.14 (9), p.798-801
issn 0090-3493
1530-0293
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76995166
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Animals
Blood Pressure
Cardiac Output
Child, Preschool
Dogs
Heart Diseases - physiopathology
Heart Ventricles - physiopathology
Heart Ventricles - surgery
Humans
Pulmonary Circulation
Random Allocation
Respiration, Artificial - methods
title High-frequency ventilation versus conventional ventilation in dogs with right ventricular dysfunction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T08%3A17%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High-frequency%20ventilation%20versus%20conventional%20ventilation%20in%20dogs%20with%20right%20ventricular%20dysfunction&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20medicine&rft.au=LUCKING,%20STEVEN%20E&rft.date=1986-09&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=798&rft.epage=801&rft.pages=798-801&rft.issn=0090-3493&rft.eissn=1530-0293&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00003246-198609000-00008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76995166%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76995166&rft_id=info:pmid/3743097&rfr_iscdi=true