Hawthorne effects and research into professional practice

The Hawthorne studies in the 1930s demonstrated how difficult it is to understand workplace behaviour, and this includes professional performance. Studies of interventions to improve professional performance, such as audit, can provide useful information for those considering using such methods, but...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 2001-02, Vol.7 (1), p.65-70
1. Verfasser:	Holden, John D.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	audit Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic Family Practice - standards general practice Hawthorne effects Humans Medical Audit - methods professional practice State Medicine - standards United Kingdom
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	70
container_issue	1
container_start_page	65
container_title	Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
container_volume	7
creator	Holden, John D.
description	The Hawthorne studies in the 1930s demonstrated how difficult it is to understand workplace behaviour, and this includes professional performance. Studies of interventions to improve professional performance, such as audit, can provide useful information for those considering using such methods, but cannot replace judgement. In particular, there is no single phenomenon that can be labelled ‘the Hawthorne effect’. The process of triangulation, considering a subject from different perspectives, might overcome the problems of Hawthorne effects better than using a single method such as controlled trials.
doi_str_mv	10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00280.x
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76992183</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76992183</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4520-614ed45177667452c7f26e21b9dd329c8f192d518f9ea811228f0ad78938940e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMlOwzAQhi0EomyvgHLiluAl8SJxQQhaUAUIsd0s44zVlDQBO1XL2-OQCq6cPLa_f2b0IZQQnBGc89N5RhgvUioKllGMSYYxlThbb6G934_tvi54SqjKR2g_hHkEGS7ELhoRQnMsc7yH1MSsulnrG0jAObBdSExTJh4CGG9nSdV0bfLhWwchVG1j6ngxtqssHKIdZ-oAR5vzAD1dXT5eTNLp3fj64nya2rygOOUkhzIviBCci_hihaMcKHlTZcmostIRRcuCSKfAyLgYlQ6bUkjFpMoxsAN0MvSNW3wuIXR6UQULdW0aaJdBC64UJZJFUA6g9W0IHpz-8NXC-C9NsO616bnu7ejeju616R9teh2jx5sZy7cFlH_BjacInA3Aqqrh69-N9c3lfSxiPB3iVehg_Rs3_l1zwUShX27Hmr0-jxmZTPUD-wbfWYjG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76992183</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hawthorne effects and research into professional practice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Holden, John D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Holden, John D.</creatorcontrib><description>The Hawthorne studies in the 1930s demonstrated how difficult it is to understand workplace behaviour, and this includes professional performance. Studies of interventions to improve professional performance, such as audit, can provide useful information for those considering using such methods, but cannot replace judgement. In particular, there is no single phenomenon that can be labelled ‘the Hawthorne effect’. The process of triangulation, considering a subject from different perspectives, might overcome the problems of Hawthorne effects better than using a single method such as controlled trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-1294</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2753</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00280.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11240840</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>audit ; Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic ; Family Practice - standards ; general practice ; Hawthorne effects ; Humans ; Medical Audit - methods ; professional practice ; State Medicine - standards ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2001-02, Vol.7 (1), p.65-70</ispartof><rights>2001 Blackwell Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4520-614ed45177667452c7f26e21b9dd329c8f192d518f9ea811228f0ad78938940e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4520-614ed45177667452c7f26e21b9dd329c8f192d518f9ea811228f0ad78938940e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2753.2001.00280.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2753.2001.00280.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11240840$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holden, John D.</creatorcontrib><title>Hawthorne effects and research into professional practice</title><title>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</title><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><description>The Hawthorne studies in the 1930s demonstrated how difficult it is to understand workplace behaviour, and this includes professional performance. Studies of interventions to improve professional performance, such as audit, can provide useful information for those considering using such methods, but cannot replace judgement. In particular, there is no single phenomenon that can be labelled ‘the Hawthorne effect’. The process of triangulation, considering a subject from different perspectives, might overcome the problems of Hawthorne effects better than using a single method such as controlled trials.</description><subject>audit</subject><subject>Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic</subject><subject>Family Practice - standards</subject><subject>general practice</subject><subject>Hawthorne effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical Audit - methods</subject><subject>professional practice</subject><subject>State Medicine - standards</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1356-1294</issn><issn>1365-2753</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMlOwzAQhi0EomyvgHLiluAl8SJxQQhaUAUIsd0s44zVlDQBO1XL2-OQCq6cPLa_f2b0IZQQnBGc89N5RhgvUioKllGMSYYxlThbb6G934_tvi54SqjKR2g_hHkEGS7ELhoRQnMsc7yH1MSsulnrG0jAObBdSExTJh4CGG9nSdV0bfLhWwchVG1j6ngxtqssHKIdZ-oAR5vzAD1dXT5eTNLp3fj64nya2rygOOUkhzIviBCci_hihaMcKHlTZcmostIRRcuCSKfAyLgYlQ6bUkjFpMoxsAN0MvSNW3wuIXR6UQULdW0aaJdBC64UJZJFUA6g9W0IHpz-8NXC-C9NsO616bnu7ejeju616R9teh2jx5sZy7cFlH_BjacInA3Aqqrh69-N9c3lfSxiPB3iVehg_Rs3_l1zwUShX27Hmr0-jxmZTPUD-wbfWYjG</recordid><startdate>200102</startdate><enddate>200102</enddate><creator>Holden, John D.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200102</creationdate><title>Hawthorne effects and research into professional practice</title><author>Holden, John D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4520-614ed45177667452c7f26e21b9dd329c8f192d518f9ea811228f0ad78938940e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>audit</topic><topic>Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic</topic><topic>Family Practice - standards</topic><topic>general practice</topic><topic>Hawthorne effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical Audit - methods</topic><topic>professional practice</topic><topic>State Medicine - standards</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holden, John D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holden, John D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hawthorne effects and research into professional practice</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><date>2001-02</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>70</epage><pages>65-70</pages><issn>1356-1294</issn><eissn>1365-2753</eissn><abstract>The Hawthorne studies in the 1930s demonstrated how difficult it is to understand workplace behaviour, and this includes professional performance. Studies of interventions to improve professional performance, such as audit, can provide useful information for those considering using such methods, but cannot replace judgement. In particular, there is no single phenomenon that can be labelled ‘the Hawthorne effect’. The process of triangulation, considering a subject from different perspectives, might overcome the problems of Hawthorne effects better than using a single method such as controlled trials.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>11240840</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00280.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 1356-1294
ispartof	Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2001-02, Vol.7 (1), p.65-70
issn	1356-1294 1365-2753
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76992183
source	MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects	audit Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic Family Practice - standards general practice Hawthorne effects Humans Medical Audit - methods professional practice State Medicine - standards United Kingdom
title	Hawthorne effects and research into professional practice
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T08%3A47%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hawthorne%20effects%20and%20research%20into%20professional%20practice&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evaluation%20in%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Holden,%20John%20D.&rft.date=2001-02&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=70&rft.pages=65-70&rft.issn=1356-1294&rft.eissn=1365-2753&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00280.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76992183%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76992183&rft_id=info:pmid/11240840&rfr_iscdi=true