Clinical results of phacoemulsification with the use of Healon5 or Viscoat
To compare the ophthalmic viscosurgical devices Healon®5 (viscoadaptive) and Viscoat® (dispersive) regarding their overall clinical performance during phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation as well as their influence on intraocular pressure (IOP). Department of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cataract and refractive surgery 2001-03, Vol.27 (3), p.416-420 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 420 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 416 |
container_title | Journal of cataract and refractive surgery |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Tetz, Manfred R Holzer, Mike P Lundberg, Kerstin Auffarth, Gerd U Burk, Reinhard O.W Kruse, Friedrich E |
description | To compare the ophthalmic viscosurgical devices Healon®5 (viscoadaptive) and Viscoat® (dispersive) regarding their overall clinical performance during phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation as well as their influence on intraocular pressure (IOP).
Department of Ophthalmology, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
In this prospective randomized patient- and observer-masked clinical study, the performance of Healon5 (sodium hyaluronate 2.3%) and Viscoat (sodium hyaluronate 3.0%–chondroitin sulfate 4.0%) was assessed by 3 surgeons during cataract surgery in 90 patients. Surgeons used a 5-point scale for the subjective assessment of the ease of injection, maintenance capacity during continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis, remaining capacity during phacoemulsification, facilitation of IOL implantation, removal from the eye, transparency, and overall performance throughout surgery. Intraocular pressure was measured preoperatively and 24 hours and 7 days postoperatively. Best corrected visual acuity was assessed preoperatively and 7 days postoperatively.
Overall intraoperative product performance was assessed as good or very good in 34 of 44 patients (77%) in the Healon5 group and in 16 of 46 patients (35%) in the Viscoat group (
P < .001). Retention in the anterior chamber was graded good or very good in 36 patients (82%) in the Healon5 group and in 23 (50%) in the Viscoat group (
P = .001). There were no statistically significant between-group differences in mean IOP preoperatively and 24 hours postoperatively.
Surgeons graded Healon5 better than Viscoat in overall surgical performance and retention in the anterior chamber during phacoemulsification. These data support that Healon5 adapts to each step during surgery. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00569-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76983418</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0886335000005691</els_id><sourcerecordid>76983418</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-6d65f8ec1f969d07d87ed6132864e8c6b01cfae20b53b0c4efdb70b7aa9bee443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQQEVoyG6S_oQEQyG0Bycjy5LlUylL001Y6CFJr0KWR6yK19pKdkL-feXssjmGGZjDvPngEXJB4ZoCFTcPIKXIGePwFeAbABd1To_InMqK5SWH4hOZH5AZOY3xLwCUBeMnZEZpwTnwck7uF53rndFdFjCO3RAzb7PtWhuPm7GLzqbe4HyfvbhhnQ1rzMaIE7NE3fmeZz5kf1w0Xg_n5NjqLuLnfT0jT7c_HxfLfPX7193ixyo3TNZDLlrBrURDbS3qFqpWVtgKygopSpRGNECN1VhAw1kDpkTbNhU0ldZ1g1iW7Ixc7fZug_83YhzUJj2AXad79GNUlaglK6lMIN-BJvgYA1q1DW6jw6uioCaJ6k2imgwpmDJJVDTNXe4PjM0G2_epvbUEfNkDOiZ1NujeuHjgap5ior7vKEwynh0GFY3D3mDrAppBtd598Mh_4MOOMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76983418</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical results of phacoemulsification with the use of Healon5 or Viscoat</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Tetz, Manfred R ; Holzer, Mike P ; Lundberg, Kerstin ; Auffarth, Gerd U ; Burk, Reinhard O.W ; Kruse, Friedrich E</creator><creatorcontrib>Tetz, Manfred R ; Holzer, Mike P ; Lundberg, Kerstin ; Auffarth, Gerd U ; Burk, Reinhard O.W ; Kruse, Friedrich E</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the ophthalmic viscosurgical devices Healon®5 (viscoadaptive) and Viscoat® (dispersive) regarding their overall clinical performance during phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation as well as their influence on intraocular pressure (IOP).
Department of Ophthalmology, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
In this prospective randomized patient- and observer-masked clinical study, the performance of Healon5 (sodium hyaluronate 2.3%) and Viscoat (sodium hyaluronate 3.0%–chondroitin sulfate 4.0%) was assessed by 3 surgeons during cataract surgery in 90 patients. Surgeons used a 5-point scale for the subjective assessment of the ease of injection, maintenance capacity during continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis, remaining capacity during phacoemulsification, facilitation of IOL implantation, removal from the eye, transparency, and overall performance throughout surgery. Intraocular pressure was measured preoperatively and 24 hours and 7 days postoperatively. Best corrected visual acuity was assessed preoperatively and 7 days postoperatively.
Overall intraoperative product performance was assessed as good or very good in 34 of 44 patients (77%) in the Healon5 group and in 16 of 46 patients (35%) in the Viscoat group (
P < .001). Retention in the anterior chamber was graded good or very good in 36 patients (82%) in the Healon5 group and in 23 (50%) in the Viscoat group (
P = .001). There were no statistically significant between-group differences in mean IOP preoperatively and 24 hours postoperatively.
Surgeons graded Healon5 better than Viscoat in overall surgical performance and retention in the anterior chamber during phacoemulsification. These data support that Healon5 adapts to each step during surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-3350</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4502</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00569-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11255054</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCSUEV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anterior Chamber - anatomy & histology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chondroitin - therapeutic use ; Chondroitin Sulfates ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Combinations ; Female ; Humans ; Hyaluronic Acid - therapeutic use ; Intraocular Pressure ; Lens Implantation, Intraocular ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Phacoemulsification ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Safety ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the eye and orbit ; Visual Acuity</subject><ispartof>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2001-03, Vol.27 (3), p.416-420</ispartof><rights>2001 ASCRS and ESCRS</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-6d65f8ec1f969d07d87ed6132864e8c6b01cfae20b53b0c4efdb70b7aa9bee443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-6d65f8ec1f969d07d87ed6132864e8c6b01cfae20b53b0c4efdb70b7aa9bee443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00569-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=959594$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11255054$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tetz, Manfred R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzer, Mike P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auffarth, Gerd U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burk, Reinhard O.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruse, Friedrich E</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical results of phacoemulsification with the use of Healon5 or Viscoat</title><title>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title><addtitle>J Cataract Refract Surg</addtitle><description>To compare the ophthalmic viscosurgical devices Healon®5 (viscoadaptive) and Viscoat® (dispersive) regarding their overall clinical performance during phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation as well as their influence on intraocular pressure (IOP).
Department of Ophthalmology, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
In this prospective randomized patient- and observer-masked clinical study, the performance of Healon5 (sodium hyaluronate 2.3%) and Viscoat (sodium hyaluronate 3.0%–chondroitin sulfate 4.0%) was assessed by 3 surgeons during cataract surgery in 90 patients. Surgeons used a 5-point scale for the subjective assessment of the ease of injection, maintenance capacity during continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis, remaining capacity during phacoemulsification, facilitation of IOL implantation, removal from the eye, transparency, and overall performance throughout surgery. Intraocular pressure was measured preoperatively and 24 hours and 7 days postoperatively. Best corrected visual acuity was assessed preoperatively and 7 days postoperatively.
Overall intraoperative product performance was assessed as good or very good in 34 of 44 patients (77%) in the Healon5 group and in 16 of 46 patients (35%) in the Viscoat group (
P < .001). Retention in the anterior chamber was graded good or very good in 36 patients (82%) in the Healon5 group and in 23 (50%) in the Viscoat group (
P = .001). There were no statistically significant between-group differences in mean IOP preoperatively and 24 hours postoperatively.
Surgeons graded Healon5 better than Viscoat in overall surgical performance and retention in the anterior chamber during phacoemulsification. These data support that Healon5 adapts to each step during surgery.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anterior Chamber - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chondroitin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Chondroitin Sulfates</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug Combinations</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyaluronic Acid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Intraocular Pressure</subject><subject>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Phacoemulsification</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the eye and orbit</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><issn>0886-3350</issn><issn>1873-4502</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQQEVoyG6S_oQEQyG0Bycjy5LlUylL001Y6CFJr0KWR6yK19pKdkL-feXssjmGGZjDvPngEXJB4ZoCFTcPIKXIGePwFeAbABd1To_InMqK5SWH4hOZH5AZOY3xLwCUBeMnZEZpwTnwck7uF53rndFdFjCO3RAzb7PtWhuPm7GLzqbe4HyfvbhhnQ1rzMaIE7NE3fmeZz5kf1w0Xg_n5NjqLuLnfT0jT7c_HxfLfPX7193ixyo3TNZDLlrBrURDbS3qFqpWVtgKygopSpRGNECN1VhAw1kDpkTbNhU0ldZ1g1iW7Ixc7fZug_83YhzUJj2AXad79GNUlaglK6lMIN-BJvgYA1q1DW6jw6uioCaJ6k2imgwpmDJJVDTNXe4PjM0G2_epvbUEfNkDOiZ1NujeuHjgap5ior7vKEwynh0GFY3D3mDrAppBtd598Mh_4MOOMw</recordid><startdate>20010301</startdate><enddate>20010301</enddate><creator>Tetz, Manfred R</creator><creator>Holzer, Mike P</creator><creator>Lundberg, Kerstin</creator><creator>Auffarth, Gerd U</creator><creator>Burk, Reinhard O.W</creator><creator>Kruse, Friedrich E</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010301</creationdate><title>Clinical results of phacoemulsification with the use of Healon5 or Viscoat</title><author>Tetz, Manfred R ; Holzer, Mike P ; Lundberg, Kerstin ; Auffarth, Gerd U ; Burk, Reinhard O.W ; Kruse, Friedrich E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-6d65f8ec1f969d07d87ed6132864e8c6b01cfae20b53b0c4efdb70b7aa9bee443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anterior Chamber - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chondroitin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Chondroitin Sulfates</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug Combinations</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyaluronic Acid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Intraocular Pressure</topic><topic>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Phacoemulsification</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the eye and orbit</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tetz, Manfred R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzer, Mike P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundberg, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auffarth, Gerd U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burk, Reinhard O.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruse, Friedrich E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tetz, Manfred R</au><au>Holzer, Mike P</au><au>Lundberg, Kerstin</au><au>Auffarth, Gerd U</au><au>Burk, Reinhard O.W</au><au>Kruse, Friedrich E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical results of phacoemulsification with the use of Healon5 or Viscoat</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Cataract Refract Surg</addtitle><date>2001-03-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>416</spage><epage>420</epage><pages>416-420</pages><issn>0886-3350</issn><eissn>1873-4502</eissn><coden>JCSUEV</coden><abstract>To compare the ophthalmic viscosurgical devices Healon®5 (viscoadaptive) and Viscoat® (dispersive) regarding their overall clinical performance during phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation as well as their influence on intraocular pressure (IOP).
Department of Ophthalmology, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
In this prospective randomized patient- and observer-masked clinical study, the performance of Healon5 (sodium hyaluronate 2.3%) and Viscoat (sodium hyaluronate 3.0%–chondroitin sulfate 4.0%) was assessed by 3 surgeons during cataract surgery in 90 patients. Surgeons used a 5-point scale for the subjective assessment of the ease of injection, maintenance capacity during continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis, remaining capacity during phacoemulsification, facilitation of IOL implantation, removal from the eye, transparency, and overall performance throughout surgery. Intraocular pressure was measured preoperatively and 24 hours and 7 days postoperatively. Best corrected visual acuity was assessed preoperatively and 7 days postoperatively.
Overall intraoperative product performance was assessed as good or very good in 34 of 44 patients (77%) in the Healon5 group and in 16 of 46 patients (35%) in the Viscoat group (
P < .001). Retention in the anterior chamber was graded good or very good in 36 patients (82%) in the Healon5 group and in 23 (50%) in the Viscoat group (
P = .001). There were no statistically significant between-group differences in mean IOP preoperatively and 24 hours postoperatively.
Surgeons graded Healon5 better than Viscoat in overall surgical performance and retention in the anterior chamber during phacoemulsification. These data support that Healon5 adapts to each step during surgery.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11255054</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00569-1</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0886-3350 |
ispartof | Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2001-03, Vol.27 (3), p.416-420 |
issn | 0886-3350 1873-4502 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76983418 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Aged Anterior Chamber - anatomy & histology Biological and medical sciences Chondroitin - therapeutic use Chondroitin Sulfates Double-Blind Method Drug Combinations Female Humans Hyaluronic Acid - therapeutic use Intraocular Pressure Lens Implantation, Intraocular Male Medical sciences Phacoemulsification Prognosis Prospective Studies Safety Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the eye and orbit Visual Acuity |
title | Clinical results of phacoemulsification with the use of Healon5 or Viscoat |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T16%3A23%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20results%20of%20phacoemulsification%20with%20the%20use%20of%20Healon5%20or%20Viscoat&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cataract%20and%20refractive%20surgery&rft.au=Tetz,%20Manfred%20R&rft.date=2001-03-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=416&rft.epage=420&rft.pages=416-420&rft.issn=0886-3350&rft.eissn=1873-4502&rft.coden=JCSUEV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00569-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76983418%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76983418&rft_id=info:pmid/11255054&rft_els_id=S0886335000005691&rfr_iscdi=true |