New wheelie aid for wheelchairs: Controlled trial of safety and efficacy
Kirby RL, Lugar JA, Breckenridge C. New wheelie aid for wheelchairs: controlled trial of safety and efficacy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:380-90. Objective: To test hypotheses that people learning to perform aided wheelies (AW) with a new self-deploying wheelie aid (WA) (1) are safer than those wh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2001-03, Vol.82 (3), p.380-390 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 390 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 380 |
container_title | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |
container_volume | 82 |
creator | Kirby, R.Lee Lugar, Judy A. Breckenridge, Catharine |
description | Kirby RL, Lugar JA, Breckenridge C. New wheelie aid for wheelchairs: controlled trial of safety and efficacy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:380-90. Objective: To test hypotheses that people learning to perform aided wheelies (AW) with a new self-deploying wheelie aid (WA) (1) are safer than those who use the conventional wheelie (CW), (2) are more successful at learning the skills, (3) learn more quickly, and (4) find such skills less difficult. Design: Randomized, controlled study. Setting: Wheelchair obstacle course. Participants: Forty-two subjects (12 wheelchair users, 30 able-bodied) randomly assigned to the CW (n = 23) or AW (n = 19) groups. Interventions: We performed static tests on a WA-modified wheelchair occupied by a test dummy. We also attempted to teach each subject to perform a set of 14 wheelie-related skills. Main Outcome Measures: Visual analog scale (VAS) of safety, percentage of subjects able to learn the skills, the time required, and subjective difficulty scores (from 1 for “very easy” to 5 for “very difficult”). Results: Up to 11.2° of antitip-device stability was available without the WA extending beyond the rearmost aspect of the rear wheel in the resting position. For the CW and AW groups, the mean ± standard deviation VAS safety scores were 43% ± 27% and 98% ± 2% (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1053/apmr.2001.20830 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76970465</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003999301150884</els_id><sourcerecordid>76970465</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-180ae16c1b9ae620e26f955612dcb8bb52b1a0031902fc8254b624abdfc533093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWqtnbxIQvK1mks12402KXyB6UfAWZrMTjGx3a7K19N-7tUVPXmYYeOZl5mHsBMQFCK0ucT6LF1IIGEqpxA4bgVYyKyW87bKREEJlxhh1wA5T-hjGQivYZwcAMteTQo7Y_RMt-fKdqAnEMdTcd3Ezu3cMMV3xadf2sWsaqnkfAza88zyhp37Fsa05eR8cutUR2_PYJDre9jF7vb15md5nj893D9Prx8zlatJnUAokKBxUBqmQgmThjdYFyNpVZVVpWQEOZ4MR0rtS6rwqZI5V7Z1WShg1Zueb3HnsPheUejsLyVHTYEvdItlJYSYiH_4cs8sN6GKXUiRv5zHMMK4sCLuWZ9fy7Fqe_ZE3bJxuoxfVjOo_fmtrAM62ACaHjY_YupB-OSMM5DBQZkPRoOErULTJBWod1SGS623dhX9P-AY32InK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76970465</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New wheelie aid for wheelchairs: Controlled trial of safety and efficacy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Kirby, R.Lee ; Lugar, Judy A. ; Breckenridge, Catharine</creator><creatorcontrib>Kirby, R.Lee ; Lugar, Judy A. ; Breckenridge, Catharine</creatorcontrib><description>Kirby RL, Lugar JA, Breckenridge C. New wheelie aid for wheelchairs: controlled trial of safety and efficacy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:380-90. Objective: To test hypotheses that people learning to perform aided wheelies (AW) with a new self-deploying wheelie aid (WA) (1) are safer than those who use the conventional wheelie (CW), (2) are more successful at learning the skills, (3) learn more quickly, and (4) find such skills less difficult. Design: Randomized, controlled study. Setting: Wheelchair obstacle course. Participants: Forty-two subjects (12 wheelchair users, 30 able-bodied) randomly assigned to the CW (n = 23) or AW (n = 19) groups. Interventions: We performed static tests on a WA-modified wheelchair occupied by a test dummy. We also attempted to teach each subject to perform a set of 14 wheelie-related skills. Main Outcome Measures: Visual analog scale (VAS) of safety, percentage of subjects able to learn the skills, the time required, and subjective difficulty scores (from 1 for “very easy” to 5 for “very difficult”). Results: Up to 11.2° of antitip-device stability was available without the WA extending beyond the rearmost aspect of the rear wheel in the resting position. For the CW and AW groups, the mean ± standard deviation VAS safety scores were 43% ± 27% and 98% ± 2% (p <.0001), respectively; the overall success rates were 93% and 96% (p =.079), respectively; the mean times required to learn a skill (in 5-min increments) were 1.56 ± 1.08 minutes and.72 ±.35 minutes (p =.002), respectively; and the mean difficulty scores were 2.94 ±.38 and 2.23 ±.34 (p <.0001), respectively. Conclusions: The new WA provides stability and wheelie-like function without interfering with maneuverability. Although both groups were equally successful, learning to perform AWs is safer, faster, and less difficult than learning CWs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-821X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2001.20830</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11245762</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APMHAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Equilibrium ; Equipment Design ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Protective Devices ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Rehabilitation ; Safety ; Self-help devices ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation ; Wheelchair ; Wheelchairs</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2001-03, Vol.82 (3), p.380-390</ispartof><rights>2001 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-180ae16c1b9ae620e26f955612dcb8bb52b1a0031902fc8254b624abdfc533093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-180ae16c1b9ae620e26f955612dcb8bb52b1a0031902fc8254b624abdfc533093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.20830$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=909141$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11245762$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kirby, R.Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lugar, Judy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breckenridge, Catharine</creatorcontrib><title>New wheelie aid for wheelchairs: Controlled trial of safety and efficacy</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>Kirby RL, Lugar JA, Breckenridge C. New wheelie aid for wheelchairs: controlled trial of safety and efficacy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:380-90. Objective: To test hypotheses that people learning to perform aided wheelies (AW) with a new self-deploying wheelie aid (WA) (1) are safer than those who use the conventional wheelie (CW), (2) are more successful at learning the skills, (3) learn more quickly, and (4) find such skills less difficult. Design: Randomized, controlled study. Setting: Wheelchair obstacle course. Participants: Forty-two subjects (12 wheelchair users, 30 able-bodied) randomly assigned to the CW (n = 23) or AW (n = 19) groups. Interventions: We performed static tests on a WA-modified wheelchair occupied by a test dummy. We also attempted to teach each subject to perform a set of 14 wheelie-related skills. Main Outcome Measures: Visual analog scale (VAS) of safety, percentage of subjects able to learn the skills, the time required, and subjective difficulty scores (from 1 for “very easy” to 5 for “very difficult”). Results: Up to 11.2° of antitip-device stability was available without the WA extending beyond the rearmost aspect of the rear wheel in the resting position. For the CW and AW groups, the mean ± standard deviation VAS safety scores were 43% ± 27% and 98% ± 2% (p <.0001), respectively; the overall success rates were 93% and 96% (p =.079), respectively; the mean times required to learn a skill (in 5-min increments) were 1.56 ± 1.08 minutes and.72 ±.35 minutes (p =.002), respectively; and the mean difficulty scores were 2.94 ±.38 and 2.23 ±.34 (p <.0001), respectively. Conclusions: The new WA provides stability and wheelie-like function without interfering with maneuverability. Although both groups were equally successful, learning to perform AWs is safer, faster, and less difficult than learning CWs.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Protective Devices</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Self-help devices</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation</subject><subject>Wheelchair</subject><subject>Wheelchairs</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><issn>1532-821X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWqtnbxIQvK1mks12402KXyB6UfAWZrMTjGx3a7K19N-7tUVPXmYYeOZl5mHsBMQFCK0ucT6LF1IIGEqpxA4bgVYyKyW87bKREEJlxhh1wA5T-hjGQivYZwcAMteTQo7Y_RMt-fKdqAnEMdTcd3Ezu3cMMV3xadf2sWsaqnkfAza88zyhp37Fsa05eR8cutUR2_PYJDre9jF7vb15md5nj893D9Prx8zlatJnUAokKBxUBqmQgmThjdYFyNpVZVVpWQEOZ4MR0rtS6rwqZI5V7Z1WShg1Zueb3HnsPheUejsLyVHTYEvdItlJYSYiH_4cs8sN6GKXUiRv5zHMMK4sCLuWZ9fy7Fqe_ZE3bJxuoxfVjOo_fmtrAM62ACaHjY_YupB-OSMM5DBQZkPRoOErULTJBWod1SGS623dhX9P-AY32InK</recordid><startdate>20010301</startdate><enddate>20010301</enddate><creator>Kirby, R.Lee</creator><creator>Lugar, Judy A.</creator><creator>Breckenridge, Catharine</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010301</creationdate><title>New wheelie aid for wheelchairs: Controlled trial of safety and efficacy</title><author>Kirby, R.Lee ; Lugar, Judy A. ; Breckenridge, Catharine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-180ae16c1b9ae620e26f955612dcb8bb52b1a0031902fc8254b624abdfc533093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Protective Devices</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Self-help devices</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation</topic><topic>Wheelchair</topic><topic>Wheelchairs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kirby, R.Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lugar, Judy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breckenridge, Catharine</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kirby, R.Lee</au><au>Lugar, Judy A.</au><au>Breckenridge, Catharine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New wheelie aid for wheelchairs: Controlled trial of safety and efficacy</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>2001-03-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>380</spage><epage>390</epage><pages>380-390</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><eissn>1532-821X</eissn><coden>APMHAI</coden><abstract>Kirby RL, Lugar JA, Breckenridge C. New wheelie aid for wheelchairs: controlled trial of safety and efficacy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:380-90. Objective: To test hypotheses that people learning to perform aided wheelies (AW) with a new self-deploying wheelie aid (WA) (1) are safer than those who use the conventional wheelie (CW), (2) are more successful at learning the skills, (3) learn more quickly, and (4) find such skills less difficult. Design: Randomized, controlled study. Setting: Wheelchair obstacle course. Participants: Forty-two subjects (12 wheelchair users, 30 able-bodied) randomly assigned to the CW (n = 23) or AW (n = 19) groups. Interventions: We performed static tests on a WA-modified wheelchair occupied by a test dummy. We also attempted to teach each subject to perform a set of 14 wheelie-related skills. Main Outcome Measures: Visual analog scale (VAS) of safety, percentage of subjects able to learn the skills, the time required, and subjective difficulty scores (from 1 for “very easy” to 5 for “very difficult”). Results: Up to 11.2° of antitip-device stability was available without the WA extending beyond the rearmost aspect of the rear wheel in the resting position. For the CW and AW groups, the mean ± standard deviation VAS safety scores were 43% ± 27% and 98% ± 2% (p <.0001), respectively; the overall success rates were 93% and 96% (p =.079), respectively; the mean times required to learn a skill (in 5-min increments) were 1.56 ± 1.08 minutes and.72 ±.35 minutes (p =.002), respectively; and the mean difficulty scores were 2.94 ±.38 and 2.23 ±.34 (p <.0001), respectively. Conclusions: The new WA provides stability and wheelie-like function without interfering with maneuverability. Although both groups were equally successful, learning to perform AWs is safer, faster, and less difficult than learning CWs.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11245762</pmid><doi>10.1053/apmr.2001.20830</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-9993 |
ispartof | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2001-03, Vol.82 (3), p.380-390 |
issn | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76970465 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Equilibrium Equipment Design Humans Medical sciences Protective Devices Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) Rehabilitation Safety Self-help devices Statistics, Nonparametric Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation Wheelchair Wheelchairs |
title | New wheelie aid for wheelchairs: Controlled trial of safety and efficacy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T09%3A14%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20wheelie%20aid%20for%20wheelchairs:%20Controlled%20trial%20of%20safety%20and%20efficacy&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Kirby,%20R.Lee&rft.date=2001-03-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=380&rft.epage=390&rft.pages=380-390&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft.coden=APMHAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/apmr.2001.20830&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76970465%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76970465&rft_id=info:pmid/11245762&rft_els_id=S0003999301150884&rfr_iscdi=true |