Reliability of haemodialysis urea kinetic modelling in children

The reliability of urea kinetic modelling (UKM) in paediatric haemodialysis was tested by comparing results of the classic variable volume model (UKM3), a recently introduced two-sample modification of this (UKM2) and direct quantification by a partial dialysate collection method (PDC). Urea generat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, West) West), 1994-10, Vol.8 (5), p.574-578
Hauptverfasser: BUUR, T, BRADBURY, M. G, SMYE, S. W, BROCKLEBANK, J. T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 578
container_issue 5
container_start_page 574
container_title Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, West)
container_volume 8
creator BUUR, T
BRADBURY, M. G
SMYE, S. W
BROCKLEBANK, J. T
description The reliability of urea kinetic modelling (UKM) in paediatric haemodialysis was tested by comparing results of the classic variable volume model (UKM3), a recently introduced two-sample modification of this (UKM2) and direct quantification by a partial dialysate collection method (PDC). Urea generation rate (G) was also found from a 1-week collection of dialysate and urine (OWC). Nine children aged 2-18 years and weighing 10.6-39.9 kg were examined over 1 week (25 treatments). UKM3 and UKM2 gave almost identical results, but deviated from PDC and OWC. The two indirect methods overestimated G by 24% and 18%. However, the correlations between the results were very high for all variables and all methods (r > or = 0.96). Repeating UKM3 and UKM2 mid-week for 5 consecutive weeks, the following coefficients of variation were found: for the normalised whole body urea clearance (Kt/V) 10% and 11%, respectively; for normalised protein catabolic rate 17% and 14%. It is concluded that all tested methods can be used, but each method requires its own reference interval. Results of UKM seem to vary somewhat more than in adults. This should be considered when assessing children by such methods.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF00858131
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76934376</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76934376</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-af656a879d9a815a87f2b330b244061e1b604d54c4aeea0a8d752d539ebf0c333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEFLxDAQRoMo67p68S70IB6E6qRJk-YkurgqLAiisLcyTVM3mraatIf991a3rKcZ5nt8DI-QUwpXFEBe3y0AsjSjjO6RKeUsianKVvtkCorRGDhdHZKjED7gDxMTMpEZVQB8Sm5ejLNYWGe7TdRW0RpN3ZYW3SbYEPXeYPRpG9NZHQ1345xt3iPbRHptXelNc0wOKnTBnIxzRt4W96_zx3j5_PA0v13GOklEF2MlUoGZVKXCjKbDViUFY1AknIOghhYCeJlyzdEYBMxKmSZlypQpKtCMsRm52PZ--fa7N6HLaxv08A82pu1DLoVinEkxgJdbUPs2BG-q_MvbGv0mp5D_2sr_bQ3w2djaF7Upd-ioZ8jPxxyDRld5bLQNO4wnXFEh2Q9B3nCY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76934376</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability of haemodialysis urea kinetic modelling in children</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>BUUR, T ; BRADBURY, M. G ; SMYE, S. W ; BROCKLEBANK, J. T</creator><creatorcontrib>BUUR, T ; BRADBURY, M. G ; SMYE, S. W ; BROCKLEBANK, J. T</creatorcontrib><description>The reliability of urea kinetic modelling (UKM) in paediatric haemodialysis was tested by comparing results of the classic variable volume model (UKM3), a recently introduced two-sample modification of this (UKM2) and direct quantification by a partial dialysate collection method (PDC). Urea generation rate (G) was also found from a 1-week collection of dialysate and urine (OWC). Nine children aged 2-18 years and weighing 10.6-39.9 kg were examined over 1 week (25 treatments). UKM3 and UKM2 gave almost identical results, but deviated from PDC and OWC. The two indirect methods overestimated G by 24% and 18%. However, the correlations between the results were very high for all variables and all methods (r &gt; or = 0.96). Repeating UKM3 and UKM2 mid-week for 5 consecutive weeks, the following coefficients of variation were found: for the normalised whole body urea clearance (Kt/V) 10% and 11%, respectively; for normalised protein catabolic rate 17% and 14%. It is concluded that all tested methods can be used, but each method requires its own reference interval. Results of UKM seem to vary somewhat more than in adults. This should be considered when assessing children by such methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-041X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-198X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00858131</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7819004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PENED3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management ; Female ; Humans ; Intensive care medicine ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy ; Male ; Mathematical Computing ; Medical sciences ; Models, Biological ; Renal Dialysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Urea - pharmacokinetics</subject><ispartof>Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, West), 1994-10, Vol.8 (5), p.574-578</ispartof><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-af656a879d9a815a87f2b330b244061e1b604d54c4aeea0a8d752d539ebf0c333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-af656a879d9a815a87f2b330b244061e1b604d54c4aeea0a8d752d539ebf0c333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,777,781,786,787,23911,23912,25121,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4249167$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7819004$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BUUR, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRADBURY, M. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMYE, S. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BROCKLEBANK, J. T</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability of haemodialysis urea kinetic modelling in children</title><title>Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, West)</title><addtitle>Pediatr Nephrol</addtitle><description>The reliability of urea kinetic modelling (UKM) in paediatric haemodialysis was tested by comparing results of the classic variable volume model (UKM3), a recently introduced two-sample modification of this (UKM2) and direct quantification by a partial dialysate collection method (PDC). Urea generation rate (G) was also found from a 1-week collection of dialysate and urine (OWC). Nine children aged 2-18 years and weighing 10.6-39.9 kg were examined over 1 week (25 treatments). UKM3 and UKM2 gave almost identical results, but deviated from PDC and OWC. The two indirect methods overestimated G by 24% and 18%. However, the correlations between the results were very high for all variables and all methods (r &gt; or = 0.96). Repeating UKM3 and UKM2 mid-week for 5 consecutive weeks, the following coefficients of variation were found: for the normalised whole body urea clearance (Kt/V) 10% and 11%, respectively; for normalised protein catabolic rate 17% and 14%. It is concluded that all tested methods can be used, but each method requires its own reference interval. Results of UKM seem to vary somewhat more than in adults. This should be considered when assessing children by such methods.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mathematical Computing</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Urea - pharmacokinetics</subject><issn>0931-041X</issn><issn>1432-198X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEFLxDAQRoMo67p68S70IB6E6qRJk-YkurgqLAiisLcyTVM3mraatIf991a3rKcZ5nt8DI-QUwpXFEBe3y0AsjSjjO6RKeUsianKVvtkCorRGDhdHZKjED7gDxMTMpEZVQB8Sm5ejLNYWGe7TdRW0RpN3ZYW3SbYEPXeYPRpG9NZHQ1345xt3iPbRHptXelNc0wOKnTBnIxzRt4W96_zx3j5_PA0v13GOklEF2MlUoGZVKXCjKbDViUFY1AknIOghhYCeJlyzdEYBMxKmSZlypQpKtCMsRm52PZ--fa7N6HLaxv08A82pu1DLoVinEkxgJdbUPs2BG-q_MvbGv0mp5D_2sr_bQ3w2djaF7Upd-ioZ8jPxxyDRld5bLQNO4wnXFEh2Q9B3nCY</recordid><startdate>199410</startdate><enddate>199410</enddate><creator>BUUR, T</creator><creator>BRADBURY, M. G</creator><creator>SMYE, S. W</creator><creator>BROCKLEBANK, J. T</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199410</creationdate><title>Reliability of haemodialysis urea kinetic modelling in children</title><author>BUUR, T ; BRADBURY, M. G ; SMYE, S. W ; BROCKLEBANK, J. T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-af656a879d9a815a87f2b330b244061e1b604d54c4aeea0a8d752d539ebf0c333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mathematical Computing</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Urea - pharmacokinetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BUUR, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRADBURY, M. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMYE, S. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BROCKLEBANK, J. T</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, West)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BUUR, T</au><au>BRADBURY, M. G</au><au>SMYE, S. W</au><au>BROCKLEBANK, J. T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability of haemodialysis urea kinetic modelling in children</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, West)</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatr Nephrol</addtitle><date>1994-10</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>574</spage><epage>578</epage><pages>574-578</pages><issn>0931-041X</issn><eissn>1432-198X</eissn><coden>PENED3</coden><abstract>The reliability of urea kinetic modelling (UKM) in paediatric haemodialysis was tested by comparing results of the classic variable volume model (UKM3), a recently introduced two-sample modification of this (UKM2) and direct quantification by a partial dialysate collection method (PDC). Urea generation rate (G) was also found from a 1-week collection of dialysate and urine (OWC). Nine children aged 2-18 years and weighing 10.6-39.9 kg were examined over 1 week (25 treatments). UKM3 and UKM2 gave almost identical results, but deviated from PDC and OWC. The two indirect methods overestimated G by 24% and 18%. However, the correlations between the results were very high for all variables and all methods (r &gt; or = 0.96). Repeating UKM3 and UKM2 mid-week for 5 consecutive weeks, the following coefficients of variation were found: for the normalised whole body urea clearance (Kt/V) 10% and 11%, respectively; for normalised protein catabolic rate 17% and 14%. It is concluded that all tested methods can be used, but each method requires its own reference interval. Results of UKM seem to vary somewhat more than in adults. This should be considered when assessing children by such methods.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>7819004</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF00858131</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0931-041X
ispartof Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, West), 1994-10, Vol.8 (5), p.574-578
issn 0931-041X
1432-198X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76934376
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Adolescent
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Child
Child, Preschool
Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management
Female
Humans
Intensive care medicine
Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy
Male
Mathematical Computing
Medical sciences
Models, Biological
Renal Dialysis
Reproducibility of Results
Urea - pharmacokinetics
title Reliability of haemodialysis urea kinetic modelling in children
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A05%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20of%20haemodialysis%20urea%20kinetic%20modelling%20in%20children&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20nephrology%20(Berlin,%20West)&rft.au=BUUR,%20T&rft.date=1994-10&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=574&rft.epage=578&rft.pages=574-578&rft.issn=0931-041X&rft.eissn=1432-198X&rft.coden=PENED3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00858131&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76934376%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76934376&rft_id=info:pmid/7819004&rfr_iscdi=true