Reliability of haemodialysis urea kinetic modelling in children
The reliability of urea kinetic modelling (UKM) in paediatric haemodialysis was tested by comparing results of the classic variable volume model (UKM3), a recently introduced two-sample modification of this (UKM2) and direct quantification by a partial dialysate collection method (PDC). Urea generat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, West) West), 1994-10, Vol.8 (5), p.574-578 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 578 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 574 |
container_title | Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, West) |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | BUUR, T BRADBURY, M. G SMYE, S. W BROCKLEBANK, J. T |
description | The reliability of urea kinetic modelling (UKM) in paediatric haemodialysis was tested by comparing results of the classic variable volume model (UKM3), a recently introduced two-sample modification of this (UKM2) and direct quantification by a partial dialysate collection method (PDC). Urea generation rate (G) was also found from a 1-week collection of dialysate and urine (OWC). Nine children aged 2-18 years and weighing 10.6-39.9 kg were examined over 1 week (25 treatments). UKM3 and UKM2 gave almost identical results, but deviated from PDC and OWC. The two indirect methods overestimated G by 24% and 18%. However, the correlations between the results were very high for all variables and all methods (r > or = 0.96). Repeating UKM3 and UKM2 mid-week for 5 consecutive weeks, the following coefficients of variation were found: for the normalised whole body urea clearance (Kt/V) 10% and 11%, respectively; for normalised protein catabolic rate 17% and 14%. It is concluded that all tested methods can be used, but each method requires its own reference interval. Results of UKM seem to vary somewhat more than in adults. This should be considered when assessing children by such methods. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF00858131 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76934376</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76934376</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-af656a879d9a815a87f2b330b244061e1b604d54c4aeea0a8d752d539ebf0c333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEFLxDAQRoMo67p68S70IB6E6qRJk-YkurgqLAiisLcyTVM3mraatIf991a3rKcZ5nt8DI-QUwpXFEBe3y0AsjSjjO6RKeUsianKVvtkCorRGDhdHZKjED7gDxMTMpEZVQB8Sm5ejLNYWGe7TdRW0RpN3ZYW3SbYEPXeYPRpG9NZHQ1345xt3iPbRHptXelNc0wOKnTBnIxzRt4W96_zx3j5_PA0v13GOklEF2MlUoGZVKXCjKbDViUFY1AknIOghhYCeJlyzdEYBMxKmSZlypQpKtCMsRm52PZ--fa7N6HLaxv08A82pu1DLoVinEkxgJdbUPs2BG-q_MvbGv0mp5D_2sr_bQ3w2djaF7Upd-ioZ8jPxxyDRld5bLQNO4wnXFEh2Q9B3nCY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76934376</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability of haemodialysis urea kinetic modelling in children</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>BUUR, T ; BRADBURY, M. G ; SMYE, S. W ; BROCKLEBANK, J. T</creator><creatorcontrib>BUUR, T ; BRADBURY, M. G ; SMYE, S. W ; BROCKLEBANK, J. T</creatorcontrib><description>The reliability of urea kinetic modelling (UKM) in paediatric haemodialysis was tested by comparing results of the classic variable volume model (UKM3), a recently introduced two-sample modification of this (UKM2) and direct quantification by a partial dialysate collection method (PDC). Urea generation rate (G) was also found from a 1-week collection of dialysate and urine (OWC). Nine children aged 2-18 years and weighing 10.6-39.9 kg were examined over 1 week (25 treatments). UKM3 and UKM2 gave almost identical results, but deviated from PDC and OWC. The two indirect methods overestimated G by 24% and 18%. However, the correlations between the results were very high for all variables and all methods (r > or = 0.96). Repeating UKM3 and UKM2 mid-week for 5 consecutive weeks, the following coefficients of variation were found: for the normalised whole body urea clearance (Kt/V) 10% and 11%, respectively; for normalised protein catabolic rate 17% and 14%. It is concluded that all tested methods can be used, but each method requires its own reference interval. Results of UKM seem to vary somewhat more than in adults. This should be considered when assessing children by such methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-041X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-198X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00858131</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7819004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PENED3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management ; Female ; Humans ; Intensive care medicine ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy ; Male ; Mathematical Computing ; Medical sciences ; Models, Biological ; Renal Dialysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Urea - pharmacokinetics</subject><ispartof>Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, West), 1994-10, Vol.8 (5), p.574-578</ispartof><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-af656a879d9a815a87f2b330b244061e1b604d54c4aeea0a8d752d539ebf0c333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-af656a879d9a815a87f2b330b244061e1b604d54c4aeea0a8d752d539ebf0c333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,777,781,786,787,23911,23912,25121,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4249167$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7819004$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BUUR, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRADBURY, M. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMYE, S. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BROCKLEBANK, J. T</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability of haemodialysis urea kinetic modelling in children</title><title>Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, West)</title><addtitle>Pediatr Nephrol</addtitle><description>The reliability of urea kinetic modelling (UKM) in paediatric haemodialysis was tested by comparing results of the classic variable volume model (UKM3), a recently introduced two-sample modification of this (UKM2) and direct quantification by a partial dialysate collection method (PDC). Urea generation rate (G) was also found from a 1-week collection of dialysate and urine (OWC). Nine children aged 2-18 years and weighing 10.6-39.9 kg were examined over 1 week (25 treatments). UKM3 and UKM2 gave almost identical results, but deviated from PDC and OWC. The two indirect methods overestimated G by 24% and 18%. However, the correlations between the results were very high for all variables and all methods (r > or = 0.96). Repeating UKM3 and UKM2 mid-week for 5 consecutive weeks, the following coefficients of variation were found: for the normalised whole body urea clearance (Kt/V) 10% and 11%, respectively; for normalised protein catabolic rate 17% and 14%. It is concluded that all tested methods can be used, but each method requires its own reference interval. Results of UKM seem to vary somewhat more than in adults. This should be considered when assessing children by such methods.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mathematical Computing</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Urea - pharmacokinetics</subject><issn>0931-041X</issn><issn>1432-198X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEFLxDAQRoMo67p68S70IB6E6qRJk-YkurgqLAiisLcyTVM3mraatIf991a3rKcZ5nt8DI-QUwpXFEBe3y0AsjSjjO6RKeUsianKVvtkCorRGDhdHZKjED7gDxMTMpEZVQB8Sm5ejLNYWGe7TdRW0RpN3ZYW3SbYEPXeYPRpG9NZHQ1345xt3iPbRHptXelNc0wOKnTBnIxzRt4W96_zx3j5_PA0v13GOklEF2MlUoGZVKXCjKbDViUFY1AknIOghhYCeJlyzdEYBMxKmSZlypQpKtCMsRm52PZ--fa7N6HLaxv08A82pu1DLoVinEkxgJdbUPs2BG-q_MvbGv0mp5D_2sr_bQ3w2djaF7Upd-ioZ8jPxxyDRld5bLQNO4wnXFEh2Q9B3nCY</recordid><startdate>199410</startdate><enddate>199410</enddate><creator>BUUR, T</creator><creator>BRADBURY, M. G</creator><creator>SMYE, S. W</creator><creator>BROCKLEBANK, J. T</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199410</creationdate><title>Reliability of haemodialysis urea kinetic modelling in children</title><author>BUUR, T ; BRADBURY, M. G ; SMYE, S. W ; BROCKLEBANK, J. T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-af656a879d9a815a87f2b330b244061e1b604d54c4aeea0a8d752d539ebf0c333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mathematical Computing</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Urea - pharmacokinetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BUUR, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRADBURY, M. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMYE, S. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BROCKLEBANK, J. T</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, West)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BUUR, T</au><au>BRADBURY, M. G</au><au>SMYE, S. W</au><au>BROCKLEBANK, J. T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability of haemodialysis urea kinetic modelling in children</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, West)</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatr Nephrol</addtitle><date>1994-10</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>574</spage><epage>578</epage><pages>574-578</pages><issn>0931-041X</issn><eissn>1432-198X</eissn><coden>PENED3</coden><abstract>The reliability of urea kinetic modelling (UKM) in paediatric haemodialysis was tested by comparing results of the classic variable volume model (UKM3), a recently introduced two-sample modification of this (UKM2) and direct quantification by a partial dialysate collection method (PDC). Urea generation rate (G) was also found from a 1-week collection of dialysate and urine (OWC). Nine children aged 2-18 years and weighing 10.6-39.9 kg were examined over 1 week (25 treatments). UKM3 and UKM2 gave almost identical results, but deviated from PDC and OWC. The two indirect methods overestimated G by 24% and 18%. However, the correlations between the results were very high for all variables and all methods (r > or = 0.96). Repeating UKM3 and UKM2 mid-week for 5 consecutive weeks, the following coefficients of variation were found: for the normalised whole body urea clearance (Kt/V) 10% and 11%, respectively; for normalised protein catabolic rate 17% and 14%. It is concluded that all tested methods can be used, but each method requires its own reference interval. Results of UKM seem to vary somewhat more than in adults. This should be considered when assessing children by such methods.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>7819004</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF00858131</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0931-041X |
ispartof | Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, West), 1994-10, Vol.8 (5), p.574-578 |
issn | 0931-041X 1432-198X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76934376 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Biological and medical sciences Child Child, Preschool Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management Female Humans Intensive care medicine Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy Male Mathematical Computing Medical sciences Models, Biological Renal Dialysis Reproducibility of Results Urea - pharmacokinetics |
title | Reliability of haemodialysis urea kinetic modelling in children |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A05%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20of%20haemodialysis%20urea%20kinetic%20modelling%20in%20children&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20nephrology%20(Berlin,%20West)&rft.au=BUUR,%20T&rft.date=1994-10&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=574&rft.epage=578&rft.pages=574-578&rft.issn=0931-041X&rft.eissn=1432-198X&rft.coden=PENED3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00858131&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76934376%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76934376&rft_id=info:pmid/7819004&rfr_iscdi=true |