Effect of IRM root end fillings on healing after replantation
The effect of IRM as a root end filling placed in teeth prior to replantation was examined in 21 molar teeth in monkeys. After extraction, root ends were resected, the canals contaminated with oral bacteria, root end cavities prepared, and fillings of IRM or amalgam placed prior to replantation. Aft...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of endodontics 1994-08, Vol.20 (8), p.381-385 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 385 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 381 |
container_title | Journal of endodontics |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Pitt Ford, T.R. Andreasen, J.O. Dorn, S.O. Kariyawasam, S.P. |
description | The effect of IRM as a root end filling placed in teeth prior to replantation was examined in 21 molar teeth in monkeys. After extraction, root ends were resected, the canals contaminated with oral bacteria, root end cavities prepared, and fillings of IRM or amalgam placed prior to replantation. After 8 wk the jaws were removed and prepared for histological examination.
Bacteria were demonstrated in only 9 of 15 teeth filled with IRM; 18 of the roots (60%) were associated with inflammation, which was only moderate or severe around 5 (17%), and extended >0.1 mm around only 2 roots. In contrast, of the 6 teeth filled with amalgam, all contained bacteria in the root canals and 11 roots were associated with moderate or severe inflammation, which around 8 roots extended >0.5 mm. The difference in severity of inflammation for the two materials was statistically significant (p < 0.001).
The tissue response to root end fillings of IRM in replanted teeth was less severe and less extensive than that to amalgam. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80295-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76894631</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0099239906802955</els_id><sourcerecordid>76894631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-dd40f9035d51a783ccf44c815a9b51919b415a79d9fd80586d5fa82ada1055933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFtLAzEQhYMotVZ_QiFPog-rk2aTTR5EpFQtVAQvzyHNRSPbTU22gv_e7YW--jQD58ycmQ-hIYErAoRfvwJIWYyolBfALwWMJCvYAeoTUYmCMlYeov7ecoxOcv4CIBWlVQ_1Kik5gbKPbibeO9Pi6PH05QmnGFvsGot9qOvQfGQcG_zp9LrH2rcu4eSWtW5a3YbYnKIjr-vsznZ1gN7vJ2_jx2L2_DAd380KQzm0hbUleAmUWUZ0JagxviyNIEzLOSOSyHnZ9ZW00lsBTHDLvBYjbTUBxiSlA3S-3btM8XvlcqsWIRtXd4e4uMqq4kKWnJLOyLZGk2LOyXm1TGGh068ioNbY1AabWjNRwNUGm2Ld3HAXsJovnN1P7Th1-u1Wd92XP8EllU1wjXE2pA6fsjH8k_AHi717Rw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76894631</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of IRM root end fillings on healing after replantation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Pitt Ford, T.R. ; Andreasen, J.O. ; Dorn, S.O. ; Kariyawasam, S.P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pitt Ford, T.R. ; Andreasen, J.O. ; Dorn, S.O. ; Kariyawasam, S.P.</creatorcontrib><description>The effect of IRM as a root end filling placed in teeth prior to replantation was examined in 21 molar teeth in monkeys. After extraction, root ends were resected, the canals contaminated with oral bacteria, root end cavities prepared, and fillings of IRM or amalgam placed prior to replantation. After 8 wk the jaws were removed and prepared for histological examination.
Bacteria were demonstrated in only 9 of 15 teeth filled with IRM; 18 of the roots (60%) were associated with inflammation, which was only moderate or severe around 5 (17%), and extended >0.1 mm around only 2 roots. In contrast, of the 6 teeth filled with amalgam, all contained bacteria in the root canals and 11 roots were associated with moderate or severe inflammation, which around 8 roots extended >0.5 mm. The difference in severity of inflammation for the two materials was statistically significant (p < 0.001).
The tissue response to root end fillings of IRM in replanted teeth was less severe and less extensive than that to amalgam.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0099-2399</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3554</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80295-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7996104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bacteria - drug effects ; Cercopithecus aethiops ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Dental Amalgam ; Dental Pulp Cavity - microbiology ; Dentistry ; Methylmethacrylates - pharmacology ; Periapical Periodontitis - etiology ; Periapical Periodontitis - prevention & control ; Retrograde Obturation - adverse effects ; Root Canal Filling Materials - pharmacology ; Tooth Replantation ; Wound Healing - drug effects ; Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>Journal of endodontics, 1994-08, Vol.20 (8), p.381-385</ispartof><rights>1994 The American Association of Endodontists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-dd40f9035d51a783ccf44c815a9b51919b415a79d9fd80586d5fa82ada1055933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-dd40f9035d51a783ccf44c815a9b51919b415a79d9fd80586d5fa82ada1055933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80295-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7996104$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pitt Ford, T.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreasen, J.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorn, S.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kariyawasam, S.P.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of IRM root end fillings on healing after replantation</title><title>Journal of endodontics</title><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><description>The effect of IRM as a root end filling placed in teeth prior to replantation was examined in 21 molar teeth in monkeys. After extraction, root ends were resected, the canals contaminated with oral bacteria, root end cavities prepared, and fillings of IRM or amalgam placed prior to replantation. After 8 wk the jaws were removed and prepared for histological examination.
Bacteria were demonstrated in only 9 of 15 teeth filled with IRM; 18 of the roots (60%) were associated with inflammation, which was only moderate or severe around 5 (17%), and extended >0.1 mm around only 2 roots. In contrast, of the 6 teeth filled with amalgam, all contained bacteria in the root canals and 11 roots were associated with moderate or severe inflammation, which around 8 roots extended >0.5 mm. The difference in severity of inflammation for the two materials was statistically significant (p < 0.001).
The tissue response to root end fillings of IRM in replanted teeth was less severe and less extensive than that to amalgam.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria - drug effects</subject><subject>Cercopithecus aethiops</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Dental Amalgam</subject><subject>Dental Pulp Cavity - microbiology</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Methylmethacrylates - pharmacology</subject><subject>Periapical Periodontitis - etiology</subject><subject>Periapical Periodontitis - prevention & control</subject><subject>Retrograde Obturation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Root Canal Filling Materials - pharmacology</subject><subject>Tooth Replantation</subject><subject>Wound Healing - drug effects</subject><subject>Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement - pharmacology</subject><issn>0099-2399</issn><issn>1878-3554</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkFtLAzEQhYMotVZ_QiFPog-rk2aTTR5EpFQtVAQvzyHNRSPbTU22gv_e7YW--jQD58ycmQ-hIYErAoRfvwJIWYyolBfALwWMJCvYAeoTUYmCMlYeov7ecoxOcv4CIBWlVQ_1Kik5gbKPbibeO9Pi6PH05QmnGFvsGot9qOvQfGQcG_zp9LrH2rcu4eSWtW5a3YbYnKIjr-vsznZ1gN7vJ2_jx2L2_DAd380KQzm0hbUleAmUWUZ0JagxviyNIEzLOSOSyHnZ9ZW00lsBTHDLvBYjbTUBxiSlA3S-3btM8XvlcqsWIRtXd4e4uMqq4kKWnJLOyLZGk2LOyXm1TGGh068ioNbY1AabWjNRwNUGm2Ld3HAXsJovnN1P7Th1-u1Wd92XP8EllU1wjXE2pA6fsjH8k_AHi717Rw</recordid><startdate>19940801</startdate><enddate>19940801</enddate><creator>Pitt Ford, T.R.</creator><creator>Andreasen, J.O.</creator><creator>Dorn, S.O.</creator><creator>Kariyawasam, S.P.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940801</creationdate><title>Effect of IRM root end fillings on healing after replantation</title><author>Pitt Ford, T.R. ; Andreasen, J.O. ; Dorn, S.O. ; Kariyawasam, S.P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-dd40f9035d51a783ccf44c815a9b51919b415a79d9fd80586d5fa82ada1055933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria - drug effects</topic><topic>Cercopithecus aethiops</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Dental Amalgam</topic><topic>Dental Pulp Cavity - microbiology</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Methylmethacrylates - pharmacology</topic><topic>Periapical Periodontitis - etiology</topic><topic>Periapical Periodontitis - prevention & control</topic><topic>Retrograde Obturation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Root Canal Filling Materials - pharmacology</topic><topic>Tooth Replantation</topic><topic>Wound Healing - drug effects</topic><topic>Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pitt Ford, T.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreasen, J.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorn, S.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kariyawasam, S.P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pitt Ford, T.R.</au><au>Andreasen, J.O.</au><au>Dorn, S.O.</au><au>Kariyawasam, S.P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of IRM root end fillings on healing after replantation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><date>1994-08-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>381</spage><epage>385</epage><pages>381-385</pages><issn>0099-2399</issn><eissn>1878-3554</eissn><abstract>The effect of IRM as a root end filling placed in teeth prior to replantation was examined in 21 molar teeth in monkeys. After extraction, root ends were resected, the canals contaminated with oral bacteria, root end cavities prepared, and fillings of IRM or amalgam placed prior to replantation. After 8 wk the jaws were removed and prepared for histological examination.
Bacteria were demonstrated in only 9 of 15 teeth filled with IRM; 18 of the roots (60%) were associated with inflammation, which was only moderate or severe around 5 (17%), and extended >0.1 mm around only 2 roots. In contrast, of the 6 teeth filled with amalgam, all contained bacteria in the root canals and 11 roots were associated with moderate or severe inflammation, which around 8 roots extended >0.5 mm. The difference in severity of inflammation for the two materials was statistically significant (p < 0.001).
The tissue response to root end fillings of IRM in replanted teeth was less severe and less extensive than that to amalgam.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>7996104</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80295-5</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0099-2399 |
ispartof | Journal of endodontics, 1994-08, Vol.20 (8), p.381-385 |
issn | 0099-2399 1878-3554 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76894631 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Animals Bacteria - drug effects Cercopithecus aethiops Chi-Square Distribution Colony Count, Microbial Dental Amalgam Dental Pulp Cavity - microbiology Dentistry Methylmethacrylates - pharmacology Periapical Periodontitis - etiology Periapical Periodontitis - prevention & control Retrograde Obturation - adverse effects Root Canal Filling Materials - pharmacology Tooth Replantation Wound Healing - drug effects Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement - pharmacology |
title | Effect of IRM root end fillings on healing after replantation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A12%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20IRM%20root%20end%20fillings%20on%20healing%20after%20replantation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endodontics&rft.au=Pitt%20Ford,%20T.R.&rft.date=1994-08-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=381&rft.epage=385&rft.pages=381-385&rft.issn=0099-2399&rft.eissn=1878-3554&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80295-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76894631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76894631&rft_id=info:pmid/7996104&rft_els_id=S0099239906802955&rfr_iscdi=true |