Decision making during a Phase III randomized controlled trial
Experiments such as clinical trials should be carried out with specific objectives. For example, in a trial designed to prevent disease, specific considerations should be made concerning the impact of the trial on the health of the target population, including the participants in the trial. These ob...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Controlled clinical trials 1994-10, Vol.15 (5), p.360-378 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 378 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 360 |
container_title | Controlled clinical trials |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Berry, Donald A. Wolff, Mark C. Sack, David |
description | Experiments such as clinical trials should be carried out with specific objectives. For example, in a trial designed to prevent disease, specific considerations should be made concerning the impact of the trial on the health of the target population, including the participants in the trial. These objectives should be assessed continually in light of data accumulating from the trial. Accumulating evidence should be judged in the context of changing circumstances external to the trial, and the trial's design possibly modified. An important type of modification is stopping the trial. This is a sequential decision problem that can be addressed using a Bayesian approach and the methods of dynamic programming. As an example we consider a vaccine trial for the prevention of
haemophilus influenzae type b. The objective we consider is minimizing the number of cases of this disease in a Native American population over a specified horizon. We assess the prior probability distribution of vaccine efficacy. We also assess the probability of regulatory approval for widespread use of the vaccine, depending on the data presented to the regulatory officials. In deciding whether to continue the trial we weigh the impact of the possible future results by their (predictive) probabilities. We address the sensitivity of the optimal stopping policy to the priorprobability distribution, to the assessed probability of regulatory approval, and to the horizon. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0197-2456(94)90033-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76894222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0197245694900337</els_id><sourcerecordid>76894222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-22788788ebc85b0b6ba47fd41e80d1c4eea8e4c121a2c92084c11f4275976ad73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMo67r6DRR6Ej1UkzRt0suCrP8KC3pQ8BbSZKrRtlmTVtBPb-suexQGZmDevMf8EDom-IJgkl1ikvOYsjQ7y9l5jnGSxHwHTYngeYxT_LKLplvJPjoI4R1jnJKMTdBEYEySlE_R_Bq0Dda1UaM-bPsamd6PTUWPbypAVBRF5FVrXGN_wETatZ13dT2MnbeqPkR7laoDHG36DD3f3jwt7uPlw12xuFrGekjpYkq5EENBqUVa4jIrFeOVYQQENkQzACWAaUKJojqnWAwzqRjlac4zZXgyQ6dr35V3nz2ETjY2aKhr1YLrg-SZyBmldBCytVB7F4KHSq68bZT_lgTLEZscmciRicyZ_MMmR_-TjX9fNmC2RxtOw36-3sPw5JcFL4O20Gow1oPupHH2_4Bf9dN63w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76894222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Decision making during a Phase III randomized controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Berry, Donald A. ; Wolff, Mark C. ; Sack, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Berry, Donald A. ; Wolff, Mark C. ; Sack, David</creatorcontrib><description>Experiments such as clinical trials should be carried out with specific objectives. For example, in a trial designed to prevent disease, specific considerations should be made concerning the impact of the trial on the health of the target population, including the participants in the trial. These objectives should be assessed continually in light of data accumulating from the trial. Accumulating evidence should be judged in the context of changing circumstances external to the trial, and the trial's design possibly modified. An important type of modification is stopping the trial. This is a sequential decision problem that can be addressed using a Bayesian approach and the methods of dynamic programming. As an example we consider a vaccine trial for the prevention of
haemophilus influenzae type b. The objective we consider is minimizing the number of cases of this disease in a Native American population over a specified horizon. We assess the prior probability distribution of vaccine efficacy. We also assess the probability of regulatory approval for widespread use of the vaccine, depending on the data presented to the regulatory officials. In deciding whether to continue the trial we weigh the impact of the possible future results by their (predictive) probabilities. We address the sensitivity of the optimal stopping policy to the priorprobability distribution, to the assessed probability of regulatory approval, and to the horizon.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-2456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-050X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(94)90033-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8001357</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>assessing prior information ; Bayes Theorem ; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic - methods ; decision analysis ; Decision Support Techniques ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Evaluation ; dynamic programming ; Haemophilus Infections - prevention & control ; Haemophilus influenzae ; Haemophilus Vaccines - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Indians, North American ; Infant ; Monitoring randomized clinical trials ; optimal stopping ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods ; sequential design ; Southwestern United States ; Treatment Outcome ; weighing information gain with effective therapy</subject><ispartof>Controlled clinical trials, 1994-10, Vol.15 (5), p.360-378</ispartof><rights>1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-22788788ebc85b0b6ba47fd41e80d1c4eea8e4c121a2c92084c11f4275976ad73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8001357$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berry, Donald A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolff, Mark C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sack, David</creatorcontrib><title>Decision making during a Phase III randomized controlled trial</title><title>Controlled clinical trials</title><addtitle>Control Clin Trials</addtitle><description>Experiments such as clinical trials should be carried out with specific objectives. For example, in a trial designed to prevent disease, specific considerations should be made concerning the impact of the trial on the health of the target population, including the participants in the trial. These objectives should be assessed continually in light of data accumulating from the trial. Accumulating evidence should be judged in the context of changing circumstances external to the trial, and the trial's design possibly modified. An important type of modification is stopping the trial. This is a sequential decision problem that can be addressed using a Bayesian approach and the methods of dynamic programming. As an example we consider a vaccine trial for the prevention of
haemophilus influenzae type b. The objective we consider is minimizing the number of cases of this disease in a Native American population over a specified horizon. We assess the prior probability distribution of vaccine efficacy. We also assess the probability of regulatory approval for widespread use of the vaccine, depending on the data presented to the regulatory officials. In deciding whether to continue the trial we weigh the impact of the possible future results by their (predictive) probabilities. We address the sensitivity of the optimal stopping policy to the priorprobability distribution, to the assessed probability of regulatory approval, and to the horizon.</description><subject>assessing prior information</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic - methods</subject><subject>decision analysis</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug Evaluation</subject><subject>dynamic programming</subject><subject>Haemophilus Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Haemophilus influenzae</subject><subject>Haemophilus Vaccines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indians, North American</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Monitoring randomized clinical trials</subject><subject>optimal stopping</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods</subject><subject>sequential design</subject><subject>Southwestern United States</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>weighing information gain with effective therapy</subject><issn>0197-2456</issn><issn>1879-050X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMo67r6DRR6Ej1UkzRt0suCrP8KC3pQ8BbSZKrRtlmTVtBPb-suexQGZmDevMf8EDom-IJgkl1ikvOYsjQ7y9l5jnGSxHwHTYngeYxT_LKLplvJPjoI4R1jnJKMTdBEYEySlE_R_Bq0Dda1UaM-bPsamd6PTUWPbypAVBRF5FVrXGN_wETatZ13dT2MnbeqPkR7laoDHG36DD3f3jwt7uPlw12xuFrGekjpYkq5EENBqUVa4jIrFeOVYQQENkQzACWAaUKJojqnWAwzqRjlac4zZXgyQ6dr35V3nz2ETjY2aKhr1YLrg-SZyBmldBCytVB7F4KHSq68bZT_lgTLEZscmciRicyZ_MMmR_-TjX9fNmC2RxtOw36-3sPw5JcFL4O20Gow1oPupHH2_4Bf9dN63w</recordid><startdate>19941001</startdate><enddate>19941001</enddate><creator>Berry, Donald A.</creator><creator>Wolff, Mark C.</creator><creator>Sack, David</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19941001</creationdate><title>Decision making during a Phase III randomized controlled trial</title><author>Berry, Donald A. ; Wolff, Mark C. ; Sack, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-22788788ebc85b0b6ba47fd41e80d1c4eea8e4c121a2c92084c11f4275976ad73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>assessing prior information</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic - methods</topic><topic>decision analysis</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug Evaluation</topic><topic>dynamic programming</topic><topic>Haemophilus Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Haemophilus influenzae</topic><topic>Haemophilus Vaccines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indians, North American</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Monitoring randomized clinical trials</topic><topic>optimal stopping</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods</topic><topic>sequential design</topic><topic>Southwestern United States</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>weighing information gain with effective therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berry, Donald A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolff, Mark C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sack, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Controlled clinical trials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berry, Donald A.</au><au>Wolff, Mark C.</au><au>Sack, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Decision making during a Phase III randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Controlled clinical trials</jtitle><addtitle>Control Clin Trials</addtitle><date>1994-10-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>360</spage><epage>378</epage><pages>360-378</pages><issn>0197-2456</issn><eissn>1879-050X</eissn><abstract>Experiments such as clinical trials should be carried out with specific objectives. For example, in a trial designed to prevent disease, specific considerations should be made concerning the impact of the trial on the health of the target population, including the participants in the trial. These objectives should be assessed continually in light of data accumulating from the trial. Accumulating evidence should be judged in the context of changing circumstances external to the trial, and the trial's design possibly modified. An important type of modification is stopping the trial. This is a sequential decision problem that can be addressed using a Bayesian approach and the methods of dynamic programming. As an example we consider a vaccine trial for the prevention of
haemophilus influenzae type b. The objective we consider is minimizing the number of cases of this disease in a Native American population over a specified horizon. We assess the prior probability distribution of vaccine efficacy. We also assess the probability of regulatory approval for widespread use of the vaccine, depending on the data presented to the regulatory officials. In deciding whether to continue the trial we weigh the impact of the possible future results by their (predictive) probabilities. We address the sensitivity of the optimal stopping policy to the priorprobability distribution, to the assessed probability of regulatory approval, and to the horizon.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>8001357</pmid><doi>10.1016/0197-2456(94)90033-7</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0197-2456 |
ispartof | Controlled clinical trials, 1994-10, Vol.15 (5), p.360-378 |
issn | 0197-2456 1879-050X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76894222 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | assessing prior information Bayes Theorem Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic - methods decision analysis Decision Support Techniques Double-Blind Method Drug Evaluation dynamic programming Haemophilus Infections - prevention & control Haemophilus influenzae Haemophilus Vaccines - therapeutic use Humans Indians, North American Infant Monitoring randomized clinical trials optimal stopping Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods sequential design Southwestern United States Treatment Outcome weighing information gain with effective therapy |
title | Decision making during a Phase III randomized controlled trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T20%3A11%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Decision%20making%20during%20a%20Phase%20III%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Controlled%20clinical%20trials&rft.au=Berry,%20Donald%20A.&rft.date=1994-10-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=360&rft.epage=378&rft.pages=360-378&rft.issn=0197-2456&rft.eissn=1879-050X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0197-2456(94)90033-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76894222%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76894222&rft_id=info:pmid/8001357&rft_els_id=0197245694900337&rfr_iscdi=true |