Rater agreement for the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test

This report assesses the intrarater and interrater reliability of quantitatively scoring the Rey‐Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (RCF). The intrarater correlation coefficients were .96, .99, and .96, and the interrater correlation coefficients were .88, .97, and .96 for the Copy, Immediate Recall, an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical psychology 1994-07, Vol.50 (4), p.615-624
Hauptverfasser: Liberman, Joshua, Stewart, Walter, Seines, Ola, Gordon, Barry
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 624
container_issue 4
container_start_page 615
container_title Journal of clinical psychology
container_volume 50
creator Liberman, Joshua
Stewart, Walter
Seines, Ola
Gordon, Barry
description This report assesses the intrarater and interrater reliability of quantitatively scoring the Rey‐Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (RCF). The intrarater correlation coefficients were .96, .99, and .96, and the interrater correlation coefficients were .88, .97, and .96 for the Copy, Immediate Recall, and Delayed Recall, respectively. However, statistically significant mean differences in score were found between raters on the Copy, Immediate, and Delayed Recall. Though the majority of structural units within the RCF are reliably scored, several units had a greater magnitude of observed scoring differences compared to the other units after adjusting for expected differences. Overall, reliability estimates demonstrate high intrarater reliability and acceptable interrater reliability except for the potential for systematic scoring differences.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/1097-4679(199407)50:4<615::AID-JCLP2270500419>3.0.CO;2-R
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76870907</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57628248</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5049-7b034508624444753daa8f6c12c1fcdcffe4eb2b241bac76ad760c622639fe803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkl1v0zAYhSMEGmXwE5AihBBcpLz-jrtpYsvYB6ooqgbj7pXjOltG0hS7Feu_x1WqSuwChG98cR6fY7_HSfKBwJAA0PcEtMq4VPot0ZqDeidgxA8lEaPR8eVp9qkYf6FUgQDgRB-xIQyLyQHNpo-Swe7o42QQrUimlaRPk2ch3EHEgYi9ZE_pnFFCB8loapbOp-bGO9e6-TKtOp8ub106detsEqLma7e8TYuuXTTuPj2rb1bepVcuLJ8nTyrTBPdiu-8nX88-XhUX2XhyflkcjzMrgOtMlcC4gFxSHpcSbGZMXklLqCWVndmqctyVtKSclMYqaWZKgpWUSqYrlwPbT970vgvf_VzFYGzrYF3TmLnrVgGVzBVoUP8ERRxETnkewVcPwLtu5efxEUiZ1IxwTiP0vYes70LwrsKFr1vj10gANyXhZtK4mTT2JaEA5BhLQowl4Z8lIUPAYoIUp9H65TZ_VbZutjPethL111vdBGuaypu5rcMO41QwJknEbI_9qhu3_o_r_fV2D5SYkvUpdfwN97sU43-gVEwJvP58jicXJzn7dnqNiv0GpXvHnA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>236931442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rater agreement for the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Liberman, Joshua ; Stewart, Walter ; Seines, Ola ; Gordon, Barry</creator><creatorcontrib>Liberman, Joshua ; Stewart, Walter ; Seines, Ola ; Gordon, Barry</creatorcontrib><description>This report assesses the intrarater and interrater reliability of quantitatively scoring the Rey‐Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (RCF). The intrarater correlation coefficients were .96, .99, and .96, and the interrater correlation coefficients were .88, .97, and .96 for the Copy, Immediate Recall, and Delayed Recall, respectively. However, statistically significant mean differences in score were found between raters on the Copy, Immediate, and Delayed Recall. Though the majority of structural units within the RCF are reliably scored, several units had a greater magnitude of observed scoring differences compared to the other units after adjusting for expected differences. Overall, reliability estimates demonstrate high intrarater reliability and acceptable interrater reliability except for the potential for systematic scoring differences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9762</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4679</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(199407)50:4&lt;615::AID-JCLP2270500419&gt;3.0.CO;2-R</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7983212</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCPYAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brandon: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Boxing - injuries ; Brain Damage, Chronic - diagnosis ; Brain Damage, Chronic - psychology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Head Injuries, Closed - diagnosis ; Head Injuries, Closed - psychology ; Humans ; Individuality ; Interrater reliability ; Learning. Memory ; Male ; Memory tests ; Mental Recall ; Neuropsychological Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Observer Variation ; Psychological tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychometrics ; Psychomotor Performance ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retention (Psychology) ; Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test ; Social research</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical psychology, 1994-07, Vol.50 (4), p.615-624</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1994 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Clinical Psychology Publishing Company, Incorporated Jul 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5049-7b034508624444753daa8f6c12c1fcdcffe4eb2b241bac76ad760c622639fe803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F1097-4679%28199407%2950%3A4%3C615%3A%3AAID-JCLP2270500419%3E3.0.CO%3B2-R$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F1097-4679%28199407%2950%3A4%3C615%3A%3AAID-JCLP2270500419%3E3.0.CO%3B2-R$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,30983,45557,45558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4253361$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7983212$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liberman, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seines, Ola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Barry</creatorcontrib><title>Rater agreement for the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test</title><title>Journal of clinical psychology</title><addtitle>J. Clin. Psychol</addtitle><description>This report assesses the intrarater and interrater reliability of quantitatively scoring the Rey‐Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (RCF). The intrarater correlation coefficients were .96, .99, and .96, and the interrater correlation coefficients were .88, .97, and .96 for the Copy, Immediate Recall, and Delayed Recall, respectively. However, statistically significant mean differences in score were found between raters on the Copy, Immediate, and Delayed Recall. Though the majority of structural units within the RCF are reliably scored, several units had a greater magnitude of observed scoring differences compared to the other units after adjusting for expected differences. Overall, reliability estimates demonstrate high intrarater reliability and acceptable interrater reliability except for the potential for systematic scoring differences.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Boxing - injuries</subject><subject>Brain Damage, Chronic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Brain Damage, Chronic - psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Head Injuries, Closed - diagnosis</subject><subject>Head Injuries, Closed - psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Interrater reliability</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory tests</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retention (Psychology)</subject><subject>Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test</subject><subject>Social research</subject><issn>0021-9762</issn><issn>1097-4679</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkl1v0zAYhSMEGmXwE5AihBBcpLz-jrtpYsvYB6ooqgbj7pXjOltG0hS7Feu_x1WqSuwChG98cR6fY7_HSfKBwJAA0PcEtMq4VPot0ZqDeidgxA8lEaPR8eVp9qkYf6FUgQDgRB-xIQyLyQHNpo-Swe7o42QQrUimlaRPk2ch3EHEgYi9ZE_pnFFCB8loapbOp-bGO9e6-TKtOp8ub106detsEqLma7e8TYuuXTTuPj2rb1bepVcuLJ8nTyrTBPdiu-8nX88-XhUX2XhyflkcjzMrgOtMlcC4gFxSHpcSbGZMXklLqCWVndmqctyVtKSclMYqaWZKgpWUSqYrlwPbT970vgvf_VzFYGzrYF3TmLnrVgGVzBVoUP8ERRxETnkewVcPwLtu5efxEUiZ1IxwTiP0vYes70LwrsKFr1vj10gANyXhZtK4mTT2JaEA5BhLQowl4Z8lIUPAYoIUp9H65TZ_VbZutjPethL111vdBGuaypu5rcMO41QwJknEbI_9qhu3_o_r_fV2D5SYkvUpdfwN97sU43-gVEwJvP58jicXJzn7dnqNiv0GpXvHnA</recordid><startdate>199407</startdate><enddate>199407</enddate><creator>Liberman, Joshua</creator><creator>Stewart, Walter</creator><creator>Seines, Ola</creator><creator>Gordon, Barry</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199407</creationdate><title>Rater agreement for the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test</title><author>Liberman, Joshua ; Stewart, Walter ; Seines, Ola ; Gordon, Barry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5049-7b034508624444753daa8f6c12c1fcdcffe4eb2b241bac76ad760c622639fe803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Boxing - injuries</topic><topic>Brain Damage, Chronic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Brain Damage, Chronic - psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Head Injuries, Closed - diagnosis</topic><topic>Head Injuries, Closed - psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Interrater reliability</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory tests</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retention (Psychology)</topic><topic>Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test</topic><topic>Social research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liberman, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seines, Ola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Barry</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liberman, Joshua</au><au>Stewart, Walter</au><au>Seines, Ola</au><au>Gordon, Barry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rater agreement for the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Clin. Psychol</addtitle><date>1994-07</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>615</spage><epage>624</epage><pages>615-624</pages><issn>0021-9762</issn><eissn>1097-4679</eissn><coden>JCPYAO</coden><abstract>This report assesses the intrarater and interrater reliability of quantitatively scoring the Rey‐Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (RCF). The intrarater correlation coefficients were .96, .99, and .96, and the interrater correlation coefficients were .88, .97, and .96 for the Copy, Immediate Recall, and Delayed Recall, respectively. However, statistically significant mean differences in score were found between raters on the Copy, Immediate, and Delayed Recall. Though the majority of structural units within the RCF are reliably scored, several units had a greater magnitude of observed scoring differences compared to the other units after adjusting for expected differences. Overall, reliability estimates demonstrate high intrarater reliability and acceptable interrater reliability except for the potential for systematic scoring differences.</abstract><cop>Brandon</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>7983212</pmid><doi>10.1002/1097-4679(199407)50:4&lt;615::AID-JCLP2270500419&gt;3.0.CO;2-R</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9762
ispartof Journal of clinical psychology, 1994-07, Vol.50 (4), p.615-624
issn 0021-9762
1097-4679
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76870907
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Boxing - injuries
Brain Damage, Chronic - diagnosis
Brain Damage, Chronic - psychology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Head Injuries, Closed - diagnosis
Head Injuries, Closed - psychology
Humans
Individuality
Interrater reliability
Learning. Memory
Male
Memory tests
Mental Recall
Neuropsychological Tests - statistics & numerical data
Observer Variation
Psychological tests
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychometrics
Psychomotor Performance
Reproducibility of Results
Retention (Psychology)
Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test
Social research
title Rater agreement for the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T18%3A25%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rater%20agreement%20for%20the%20Rey-Osterrieth%20Complex%20Figure%20Test&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20psychology&rft.au=Liberman,%20Joshua&rft.date=1994-07&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=615&rft.epage=624&rft.pages=615-624&rft.issn=0021-9762&rft.eissn=1097-4679&rft.coden=JCPYAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1097-4679(199407)50:4%3C615::AID-JCLP2270500419%3E3.0.CO;2-R&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57628248%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=236931442&rft_id=info:pmid/7983212&rfr_iscdi=true