Rater agreement for the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test
This report assesses the intrarater and interrater reliability of quantitatively scoring the Rey‐Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (RCF). The intrarater correlation coefficients were .96, .99, and .96, and the interrater correlation coefficients were .88, .97, and .96 for the Copy, Immediate Recall, an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical psychology 1994-07, Vol.50 (4), p.615-624 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 624 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 615 |
container_title | Journal of clinical psychology |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Liberman, Joshua Stewart, Walter Seines, Ola Gordon, Barry |
description | This report assesses the intrarater and interrater reliability of quantitatively scoring the Rey‐Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (RCF). The intrarater correlation coefficients were .96, .99, and .96, and the interrater correlation coefficients were .88, .97, and .96 for the Copy, Immediate Recall, and Delayed Recall, respectively. However, statistically significant mean differences in score were found between raters on the Copy, Immediate, and Delayed Recall. Though the majority of structural units within the RCF are reliably scored, several units had a greater magnitude of observed scoring differences compared to the other units after adjusting for expected differences. Overall, reliability estimates demonstrate high intrarater reliability and acceptable interrater reliability except for the potential for systematic scoring differences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/1097-4679(199407)50:4<615::AID-JCLP2270500419>3.0.CO;2-R |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76870907</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57628248</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5049-7b034508624444753daa8f6c12c1fcdcffe4eb2b241bac76ad760c622639fe803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkl1v0zAYhSMEGmXwE5AihBBcpLz-jrtpYsvYB6ooqgbj7pXjOltG0hS7Feu_x1WqSuwChG98cR6fY7_HSfKBwJAA0PcEtMq4VPot0ZqDeidgxA8lEaPR8eVp9qkYf6FUgQDgRB-xIQyLyQHNpo-Swe7o42QQrUimlaRPk2ch3EHEgYi9ZE_pnFFCB8loapbOp-bGO9e6-TKtOp8ub106detsEqLma7e8TYuuXTTuPj2rb1bepVcuLJ8nTyrTBPdiu-8nX88-XhUX2XhyflkcjzMrgOtMlcC4gFxSHpcSbGZMXklLqCWVndmqctyVtKSclMYqaWZKgpWUSqYrlwPbT970vgvf_VzFYGzrYF3TmLnrVgGVzBVoUP8ERRxETnkewVcPwLtu5efxEUiZ1IxwTiP0vYes70LwrsKFr1vj10gANyXhZtK4mTT2JaEA5BhLQowl4Z8lIUPAYoIUp9H65TZ_VbZutjPethL111vdBGuaypu5rcMO41QwJknEbI_9qhu3_o_r_fV2D5SYkvUpdfwN97sU43-gVEwJvP58jicXJzn7dnqNiv0GpXvHnA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>236931442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rater agreement for the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Liberman, Joshua ; Stewart, Walter ; Seines, Ola ; Gordon, Barry</creator><creatorcontrib>Liberman, Joshua ; Stewart, Walter ; Seines, Ola ; Gordon, Barry</creatorcontrib><description>This report assesses the intrarater and interrater reliability of quantitatively scoring the Rey‐Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (RCF). The intrarater correlation coefficients were .96, .99, and .96, and the interrater correlation coefficients were .88, .97, and .96 for the Copy, Immediate Recall, and Delayed Recall, respectively. However, statistically significant mean differences in score were found between raters on the Copy, Immediate, and Delayed Recall. Though the majority of structural units within the RCF are reliably scored, several units had a greater magnitude of observed scoring differences compared to the other units after adjusting for expected differences. Overall, reliability estimates demonstrate high intrarater reliability and acceptable interrater reliability except for the potential for systematic scoring differences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9762</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4679</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(199407)50:4<615::AID-JCLP2270500419>3.0.CO;2-R</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7983212</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCPYAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brandon: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Boxing - injuries ; Brain Damage, Chronic - diagnosis ; Brain Damage, Chronic - psychology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Head Injuries, Closed - diagnosis ; Head Injuries, Closed - psychology ; Humans ; Individuality ; Interrater reliability ; Learning. Memory ; Male ; Memory tests ; Mental Recall ; Neuropsychological Tests - statistics & numerical data ; Observer Variation ; Psychological tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychometrics ; Psychomotor Performance ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retention (Psychology) ; Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test ; Social research</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical psychology, 1994-07, Vol.50 (4), p.615-624</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1994 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Clinical Psychology Publishing Company, Incorporated Jul 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5049-7b034508624444753daa8f6c12c1fcdcffe4eb2b241bac76ad760c622639fe803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F1097-4679%28199407%2950%3A4%3C615%3A%3AAID-JCLP2270500419%3E3.0.CO%3B2-R$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F1097-4679%28199407%2950%3A4%3C615%3A%3AAID-JCLP2270500419%3E3.0.CO%3B2-R$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,30983,45557,45558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4253361$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7983212$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liberman, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seines, Ola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Barry</creatorcontrib><title>Rater agreement for the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test</title><title>Journal of clinical psychology</title><addtitle>J. Clin. Psychol</addtitle><description>This report assesses the intrarater and interrater reliability of quantitatively scoring the Rey‐Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (RCF). The intrarater correlation coefficients were .96, .99, and .96, and the interrater correlation coefficients were .88, .97, and .96 for the Copy, Immediate Recall, and Delayed Recall, respectively. However, statistically significant mean differences in score were found between raters on the Copy, Immediate, and Delayed Recall. Though the majority of structural units within the RCF are reliably scored, several units had a greater magnitude of observed scoring differences compared to the other units after adjusting for expected differences. Overall, reliability estimates demonstrate high intrarater reliability and acceptable interrater reliability except for the potential for systematic scoring differences.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Boxing - injuries</subject><subject>Brain Damage, Chronic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Brain Damage, Chronic - psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Head Injuries, Closed - diagnosis</subject><subject>Head Injuries, Closed - psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Interrater reliability</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory tests</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retention (Psychology)</subject><subject>Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test</subject><subject>Social research</subject><issn>0021-9762</issn><issn>1097-4679</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkl1v0zAYhSMEGmXwE5AihBBcpLz-jrtpYsvYB6ooqgbj7pXjOltG0hS7Feu_x1WqSuwChG98cR6fY7_HSfKBwJAA0PcEtMq4VPot0ZqDeidgxA8lEaPR8eVp9qkYf6FUgQDgRB-xIQyLyQHNpo-Swe7o42QQrUimlaRPk2ch3EHEgYi9ZE_pnFFCB8loapbOp-bGO9e6-TKtOp8ub106detsEqLma7e8TYuuXTTuPj2rb1bepVcuLJ8nTyrTBPdiu-8nX88-XhUX2XhyflkcjzMrgOtMlcC4gFxSHpcSbGZMXklLqCWVndmqctyVtKSclMYqaWZKgpWUSqYrlwPbT970vgvf_VzFYGzrYF3TmLnrVgGVzBVoUP8ERRxETnkewVcPwLtu5efxEUiZ1IxwTiP0vYes70LwrsKFr1vj10gANyXhZtK4mTT2JaEA5BhLQowl4Z8lIUPAYoIUp9H65TZ_VbZutjPethL111vdBGuaypu5rcMO41QwJknEbI_9qhu3_o_r_fV2D5SYkvUpdfwN97sU43-gVEwJvP58jicXJzn7dnqNiv0GpXvHnA</recordid><startdate>199407</startdate><enddate>199407</enddate><creator>Liberman, Joshua</creator><creator>Stewart, Walter</creator><creator>Seines, Ola</creator><creator>Gordon, Barry</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199407</creationdate><title>Rater agreement for the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test</title><author>Liberman, Joshua ; Stewart, Walter ; Seines, Ola ; Gordon, Barry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5049-7b034508624444753daa8f6c12c1fcdcffe4eb2b241bac76ad760c622639fe803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Boxing - injuries</topic><topic>Brain Damage, Chronic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Brain Damage, Chronic - psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Head Injuries, Closed - diagnosis</topic><topic>Head Injuries, Closed - psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Interrater reliability</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory tests</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retention (Psychology)</topic><topic>Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test</topic><topic>Social research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liberman, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seines, Ola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Barry</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liberman, Joshua</au><au>Stewart, Walter</au><au>Seines, Ola</au><au>Gordon, Barry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rater agreement for the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Clin. Psychol</addtitle><date>1994-07</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>615</spage><epage>624</epage><pages>615-624</pages><issn>0021-9762</issn><eissn>1097-4679</eissn><coden>JCPYAO</coden><abstract>This report assesses the intrarater and interrater reliability of quantitatively scoring the Rey‐Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (RCF). The intrarater correlation coefficients were .96, .99, and .96, and the interrater correlation coefficients were .88, .97, and .96 for the Copy, Immediate Recall, and Delayed Recall, respectively. However, statistically significant mean differences in score were found between raters on the Copy, Immediate, and Delayed Recall. Though the majority of structural units within the RCF are reliably scored, several units had a greater magnitude of observed scoring differences compared to the other units after adjusting for expected differences. Overall, reliability estimates demonstrate high intrarater reliability and acceptable interrater reliability except for the potential for systematic scoring differences.</abstract><cop>Brandon</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>7983212</pmid><doi>10.1002/1097-4679(199407)50:4<615::AID-JCLP2270500419>3.0.CO;2-R</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9762 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical psychology, 1994-07, Vol.50 (4), p.615-624 |
issn | 0021-9762 1097-4679 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76870907 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Biological and medical sciences Boxing - injuries Brain Damage, Chronic - diagnosis Brain Damage, Chronic - psychology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Head Injuries, Closed - diagnosis Head Injuries, Closed - psychology Humans Individuality Interrater reliability Learning. Memory Male Memory tests Mental Recall Neuropsychological Tests - statistics & numerical data Observer Variation Psychological tests Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychometrics Psychomotor Performance Reproducibility of Results Retention (Psychology) Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test Social research |
title | Rater agreement for the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T18%3A25%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rater%20agreement%20for%20the%20Rey-Osterrieth%20Complex%20Figure%20Test&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20psychology&rft.au=Liberman,%20Joshua&rft.date=1994-07&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=615&rft.epage=624&rft.pages=615-624&rft.issn=0021-9762&rft.eissn=1097-4679&rft.coden=JCPYAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1097-4679(199407)50:4%3C615::AID-JCLP2270500419%3E3.0.CO;2-R&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57628248%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=236931442&rft_id=info:pmid/7983212&rfr_iscdi=true |