Category 1, 2, 3 and 4: A Procedure-Oriented Isolation System
A procedure-oriented isolation system, Category 1, 2, 3, and 4, was introduced at a 547-bed, acute and rehabilitative medical center. The system consisted of four categories of isolation which followed a numerical sequence that represented the necessary attire needed to complete the procedure. After...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Infection control : IC 1986-05, Vol.7 (5), p.263-267 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 267 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 263 |
| container_title | Infection control : IC |
| container_volume | 7 |
| creator | Gilmore, Donna S. Montgomerie, John Z. Graham, Irene E. |
| description | A procedure-oriented isolation system, Category 1, 2, 3, and 4, was introduced at a 547-bed, acute and rehabilitative medical center. The system consisted of four categories of isolation which followed a numerical sequence that represented the necessary attire needed to complete the procedure. After 1 year of use, personnel compared the procedure-oriented system with the previously-used system (Strict, Respiratory, Wound and Skin, Enteric, and Limited Barrier). Personnel found the procedure-oriented system easier to understand (84%) and follow (83%). Seventy-six percent felt their isolation techniques had improved with the new system. A reduction in the cross-infection rate with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus did coincide with the use of the new isolation system, however, no causal relationship was established. The Category 1, 2, 3, and 4 isolation system was well received by personnel and was found to be an effective alternative to the previous, more complicated system used in this setting. Further evaluation of this system in other settings would seem warranted. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0195941700064183 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76850789</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>30148512</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>30148512</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-563666ec8a4bc7738d0901cd114ba3a0590480dd3594be941989c83d3e3641bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkEtLAzEUhYMotVZ_gAshK1cdzZ28BRel-CgUKlTXQyZJZcpMU5OZRf-9U1rswtVdfOcc7jkI3QJ5AALycUlAc81AEkIEA0XP0DCnucw043COhnuc7fklukppTQgTMucDNKCCcqZhiJ6npvXfIe4wjHE-xhSbjcPsCU_wRwzWuy76bBErv2m9w7MUatNWYYOXu9T65hpdrEyd_M3xjtDX68vn9D2bL95m08k8sxRUm3FBhRDeKsNKKyVVjmgC1gGw0lBDuCZMEedo36X0_b9aaauoo572rcqSjtD9IXcbw0_nU1s0VbK-rs3Ghy4VUihOpNK9EA5CG0NK0a-KbawaE3cFkGI_WfFvst5zdwzvysa7P8dxoxNfpzbEEybAFIec_gIBNmv9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76850789</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Category 1, 2, 3 and 4: A Procedure-Oriented Isolation System</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gilmore, Donna S. ; Montgomerie, John Z. ; Graham, Irene E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilmore, Donna S. ; Montgomerie, John Z. ; Graham, Irene E.</creatorcontrib><description>A procedure-oriented isolation system, Category 1, 2, 3, and 4, was introduced at a 547-bed, acute and rehabilitative medical center. The system consisted of four categories of isolation which followed a numerical sequence that represented the necessary attire needed to complete the procedure. After 1 year of use, personnel compared the procedure-oriented system with the previously-used system (Strict, Respiratory, Wound and Skin, Enteric, and Limited Barrier). Personnel found the procedure-oriented system easier to understand (84%) and follow (83%). Seventy-six percent felt their isolation techniques had improved with the new system. A reduction in the cross-infection rate with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus did coincide with the use of the new isolation system, however, no causal relationship was established. The Category 1, 2, 3, and 4 isolation system was well received by personnel and was found to be an effective alternative to the previous, more complicated system used in this setting. Further evaluation of this system in other settings would seem warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-9417</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-9451</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0195941700064183</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3635491</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: SLACK Incorporated</publisher><subject>Blood ; Body fluids ; California ; Cross Infection - prevention & control ; Dresses ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Evening gloves ; Hospital Bed Capacity, 300 to 499 ; Humans ; Lesions ; Nursing ; Patient Isolation - methods ; Postural drainage ; Retrospective Studies ; Secretion ; Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Suppuration ; Surgical suction ; Urine</subject><ispartof>Infection control : IC, 1986-05, Vol.7 (5), p.263-267</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-563666ec8a4bc7738d0901cd114ba3a0590480dd3594be941989c83d3e3641bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-563666ec8a4bc7738d0901cd114ba3a0590480dd3594be941989c83d3e3641bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3635491$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilmore, Donna S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomerie, John Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Irene E.</creatorcontrib><title>Category 1, 2, 3 and 4: A Procedure-Oriented Isolation System</title><title>Infection control : IC</title><addtitle>Infect Control</addtitle><description>A procedure-oriented isolation system, Category 1, 2, 3, and 4, was introduced at a 547-bed, acute and rehabilitative medical center. The system consisted of four categories of isolation which followed a numerical sequence that represented the necessary attire needed to complete the procedure. After 1 year of use, personnel compared the procedure-oriented system with the previously-used system (Strict, Respiratory, Wound and Skin, Enteric, and Limited Barrier). Personnel found the procedure-oriented system easier to understand (84%) and follow (83%). Seventy-six percent felt their isolation techniques had improved with the new system. A reduction in the cross-infection rate with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus did coincide with the use of the new isolation system, however, no causal relationship was established. The Category 1, 2, 3, and 4 isolation system was well received by personnel and was found to be an effective alternative to the previous, more complicated system used in this setting. Further evaluation of this system in other settings would seem warranted.</description><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Body fluids</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Cross Infection - prevention & control</subject><subject>Dresses</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Evening gloves</subject><subject>Hospital Bed Capacity, 300 to 499</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Patient Isolation - methods</subject><subject>Postural drainage</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Secretion</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Suppuration</subject><subject>Surgical suction</subject><subject>Urine</subject><issn>0195-9417</issn><issn>2327-9451</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNplkEtLAzEUhYMotVZ_gAshK1cdzZ28BRel-CgUKlTXQyZJZcpMU5OZRf-9U1rswtVdfOcc7jkI3QJ5AALycUlAc81AEkIEA0XP0DCnucw043COhnuc7fklukppTQgTMucDNKCCcqZhiJ6npvXfIe4wjHE-xhSbjcPsCU_wRwzWuy76bBErv2m9w7MUatNWYYOXu9T65hpdrEyd_M3xjtDX68vn9D2bL95m08k8sxRUm3FBhRDeKsNKKyVVjmgC1gGw0lBDuCZMEedo36X0_b9aaauoo572rcqSjtD9IXcbw0_nU1s0VbK-rs3Ghy4VUihOpNK9EA5CG0NK0a-KbawaE3cFkGI_WfFvst5zdwzvysa7P8dxoxNfpzbEEybAFIec_gIBNmv9</recordid><startdate>19860501</startdate><enddate>19860501</enddate><creator>Gilmore, Donna S.</creator><creator>Montgomerie, John Z.</creator><creator>Graham, Irene E.</creator><general>SLACK Incorporated</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19860501</creationdate><title>Category 1, 2, 3 and 4: A Procedure-Oriented Isolation System</title><author>Gilmore, Donna S. ; Montgomerie, John Z. ; Graham, Irene E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-563666ec8a4bc7738d0901cd114ba3a0590480dd3594be941989c83d3e3641bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Body fluids</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Cross Infection - prevention & control</topic><topic>Dresses</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Evening gloves</topic><topic>Hospital Bed Capacity, 300 to 499</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Patient Isolation - methods</topic><topic>Postural drainage</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Secretion</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Suppuration</topic><topic>Surgical suction</topic><topic>Urine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilmore, Donna S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomerie, John Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Irene E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Infection control : IC</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilmore, Donna S.</au><au>Montgomerie, John Z.</au><au>Graham, Irene E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Category 1, 2, 3 and 4: A Procedure-Oriented Isolation System</atitle><jtitle>Infection control : IC</jtitle><addtitle>Infect Control</addtitle><date>1986-05-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>263</spage><epage>267</epage><pages>263-267</pages><issn>0195-9417</issn><eissn>2327-9451</eissn><abstract>A procedure-oriented isolation system, Category 1, 2, 3, and 4, was introduced at a 547-bed, acute and rehabilitative medical center. The system consisted of four categories of isolation which followed a numerical sequence that represented the necessary attire needed to complete the procedure. After 1 year of use, personnel compared the procedure-oriented system with the previously-used system (Strict, Respiratory, Wound and Skin, Enteric, and Limited Barrier). Personnel found the procedure-oriented system easier to understand (84%) and follow (83%). Seventy-six percent felt their isolation techniques had improved with the new system. A reduction in the cross-infection rate with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus did coincide with the use of the new isolation system, however, no causal relationship was established. The Category 1, 2, 3, and 4 isolation system was well received by personnel and was found to be an effective alternative to the previous, more complicated system used in this setting. Further evaluation of this system in other settings would seem warranted.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>SLACK Incorporated</pub><pmid>3635491</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0195941700064183</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0195-9417 |
| ispartof | Infection control : IC, 1986-05, Vol.7 (5), p.263-267 |
| issn | 0195-9417 2327-9451 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76850789 |
| source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Blood Body fluids California Cross Infection - prevention & control Dresses Evaluation Studies as Topic Evening gloves Hospital Bed Capacity, 300 to 499 Humans Lesions Nursing Patient Isolation - methods Postural drainage Retrospective Studies Secretion Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control Staphylococcus aureus Suppuration Surgical suction Urine |
| title | Category 1, 2, 3 and 4: A Procedure-Oriented Isolation System |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T13%3A14%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Category%201,%202,%203%20and%204:%20A%20Procedure-Oriented%20Isolation%20System&rft.jtitle=Infection%20control%20:%20IC&rft.au=Gilmore,%20Donna%20S.&rft.date=1986-05-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=263&rft.epage=267&rft.pages=263-267&rft.issn=0195-9417&rft.eissn=2327-9451&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0195941700064183&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E30148512%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76850789&rft_id=info:pmid/3635491&rft_jstor_id=30148512&rfr_iscdi=true |