Effects of Ethanol, MK-801, and Chlordiazepoxide on Locomotor Activity in Different Rat Lines: Dissociation of Locomotor Stimulation from Ethanol Preference

Several lines of research have suggested a link between the reward value of a drug and its ability to stimulate locomotion. One goal of the present study was to determine whether ethanol preferentially stimulates locomotor activity in lines of rat that show a preference for ethanol. A secondary goal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research clinical and experimental research, 1994-08, Vol.18 (4), p.917-923
Hauptverfasser: Criswell, Hugh E., Overstreet, David H., Rezvani, Amir H., Johnson, Kevin B., Simson, Peter E., Knapp, Darin J., Moy, Sheryl S., Breese, George R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 923
container_issue 4
container_start_page 917
container_title Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research
container_volume 18
creator Criswell, Hugh E.
Overstreet, David H.
Rezvani, Amir H.
Johnson, Kevin B.
Simson, Peter E.
Knapp, Darin J.
Moy, Sheryl S.
Breese, George R.
description Several lines of research have suggested a link between the reward value of a drug and its ability to stimulate locomotion. One goal of the present study was to determine whether ethanol preferentially stimulates locomotor activity in lines of rat that show a preference for ethanol. A secondary goal was to determine the extent to which the benzodiazepine‐like and NMDA antagonistic action of ethanol accounted for its effect on locomotor activity. To meet these goals, the effects of varying doses of ethanol (0.125‐1.0 g/kg), MK‐801 (0.1‐0.3 mg/kg), and chlordiazepoxide (0.3‐3 mg/kg) on locomotor activity were studied in several lines of rats that had been habituated to the testing procedure. The effect of low doses of ethanol on motor activity in the Alcohol‐Preferring (P) and Fawn‐Hooded rats, which show a strong ethanol preference, were similar to those of the alcohol‐nonpreferring (NP), Flinders Sensitive Line, and Flinders Resistant Line rats. Only the Flinder Resistant Line rats showed a small, but significant increase in locomotor activity after the administration of ethanol. The highest dose of ethanol (1.0 g/kg) produced locomotor depression in all lines except the P and NP lines, which were not tested at this dose. These findings do not support a link between locomotor stimulation by ethanol and ethanol preference. In contrast, all lines exhibited locomotor stimulation after moderate (0.1‐0.3 mg/kg) doses of MK‐801, but did not exhibit increases in activity following any dose of chlordiazepoxide. These data indicate that the profiles of activity after MK‐801 and chlordiazepoxide were distinct from that of ethanol in the various rat lines. Therefore, the effects of ethanol on locomotor activity cannot be accounted for by reference solely to its antagonist‐like action at NMDA receptors and/or its agonist‐like action at GABA/benzodiazepine receptors.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1994.tb00060.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76849356</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76849356</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4377-2d1fed8f2fda7f5e88e8b6a4f30d6dda812f4d4a570b1bb425361978338b0dac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVUctuEzEUHSFQCYVPQLIQYtUZ7LHHdrqpohAKIpQqgGBnefxQHWbGwXbahG_hY3GaENZ4cyWf19U9RfECwQrl93pZoQbDEtaMVWg8JlVqIYQUVpsHxegIPSxGEJGmpBDyx8WTGJeZRDilJ8UJGzOOIBkVv2fWGpUi8BbM0o0cfHcGPn4oOURnQA4aTG86H7STv8zKb5w2wA9g7pXvffIBTFRyty5tgRvAG5etghkSWMgE5m4w8Tx_xuiVk8llXc74J_2cXL_u9oANvv8bD66DufdR5mnxyMoummeHeVp8fTv7Mn1Xzj9dvp9O5qUimLGy1sgazW1ttWS2MZwb3lJJLIaaai05qi3RRDYMtqhtSd1givIBMOYt1FLh0-LV3ncV_M-1iUn0LirTdXIwfh0Fo5yMcUMz8XxPVMHHmPcUq-B6GbYCQbGrRizF7v5id3-xq0YcqhGbLH5-SFm3vdFH6aGLjL884DIq2dkgB-XikUYQpwixTLvY0-5cZ7b_sYCYTGeL8b1DuXdwMZnN0UGGH4IyzBrx7epSkO9kQdD1lcD4D7OnvGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76849356</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Ethanol, MK-801, and Chlordiazepoxide on Locomotor Activity in Different Rat Lines: Dissociation of Locomotor Stimulation from Ethanol Preference</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Criswell, Hugh E. ; Overstreet, David H. ; Rezvani, Amir H. ; Johnson, Kevin B. ; Simson, Peter E. ; Knapp, Darin J. ; Moy, Sheryl S. ; Breese, George R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Criswell, Hugh E. ; Overstreet, David H. ; Rezvani, Amir H. ; Johnson, Kevin B. ; Simson, Peter E. ; Knapp, Darin J. ; Moy, Sheryl S. ; Breese, George R.</creatorcontrib><description>Several lines of research have suggested a link between the reward value of a drug and its ability to stimulate locomotion. One goal of the present study was to determine whether ethanol preferentially stimulates locomotor activity in lines of rat that show a preference for ethanol. A secondary goal was to determine the extent to which the benzodiazepine‐like and NMDA antagonistic action of ethanol accounted for its effect on locomotor activity. To meet these goals, the effects of varying doses of ethanol (0.125‐1.0 g/kg), MK‐801 (0.1‐0.3 mg/kg), and chlordiazepoxide (0.3‐3 mg/kg) on locomotor activity were studied in several lines of rats that had been habituated to the testing procedure. The effect of low doses of ethanol on motor activity in the Alcohol‐Preferring (P) and Fawn‐Hooded rats, which show a strong ethanol preference, were similar to those of the alcohol‐nonpreferring (NP), Flinders Sensitive Line, and Flinders Resistant Line rats. Only the Flinder Resistant Line rats showed a small, but significant increase in locomotor activity after the administration of ethanol. The highest dose of ethanol (1.0 g/kg) produced locomotor depression in all lines except the P and NP lines, which were not tested at this dose. These findings do not support a link between locomotor stimulation by ethanol and ethanol preference. In contrast, all lines exhibited locomotor stimulation after moderate (0.1‐0.3 mg/kg) doses of MK‐801, but did not exhibit increases in activity following any dose of chlordiazepoxide. These data indicate that the profiles of activity after MK‐801 and chlordiazepoxide were distinct from that of ethanol in the various rat lines. Therefore, the effects of ethanol on locomotor activity cannot be accounted for by reference solely to its antagonist‐like action at NMDA receptors and/or its agonist‐like action at GABA/benzodiazepine receptors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-6008</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1994.tb00060.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7978104</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ACRSDM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Alcohol Drinking - genetics ; Alcoholism and acute alcohol poisoning ; Animals ; Arousal - drug effects ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chlordiazepoxide ; Chlordiazepoxide - pharmacology ; Dizocilpine Maleate - pharmacology ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Ethanol ; Ethanol - pharmacology ; Ethanol-Nonpreferring Rats (NP ; Ethanol-Preferring Rats (P ; Ethanol‐Nonpreferring Rats (NP,FSL,FRL) ; Ethanol‐Preferring Rats (P,FH) ; FH ; FRL ; FSL ; Male ; Medical sciences ; MK-801 ; Motor Activity - drug effects ; Rats ; Rats, Inbred Strains ; Receptors, GABA-A - drug effects ; Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate - drug effects ; Species Specificity ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 1994-08, Vol.18 (4), p.917-923</ispartof><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4377-2d1fed8f2fda7f5e88e8b6a4f30d6dda812f4d4a570b1bb425361978338b0dac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4377-2d1fed8f2fda7f5e88e8b6a4f30d6dda812f4d4a570b1bb425361978338b0dac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4186117$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7978104$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Criswell, Hugh E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Overstreet, David H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezvani, Amir H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kevin B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simson, Peter E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knapp, Darin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moy, Sheryl S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breese, George R.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Ethanol, MK-801, and Chlordiazepoxide on Locomotor Activity in Different Rat Lines: Dissociation of Locomotor Stimulation from Ethanol Preference</title><title>Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research</title><addtitle>Alcohol Clin Exp Res</addtitle><description>Several lines of research have suggested a link between the reward value of a drug and its ability to stimulate locomotion. One goal of the present study was to determine whether ethanol preferentially stimulates locomotor activity in lines of rat that show a preference for ethanol. A secondary goal was to determine the extent to which the benzodiazepine‐like and NMDA antagonistic action of ethanol accounted for its effect on locomotor activity. To meet these goals, the effects of varying doses of ethanol (0.125‐1.0 g/kg), MK‐801 (0.1‐0.3 mg/kg), and chlordiazepoxide (0.3‐3 mg/kg) on locomotor activity were studied in several lines of rats that had been habituated to the testing procedure. The effect of low doses of ethanol on motor activity in the Alcohol‐Preferring (P) and Fawn‐Hooded rats, which show a strong ethanol preference, were similar to those of the alcohol‐nonpreferring (NP), Flinders Sensitive Line, and Flinders Resistant Line rats. Only the Flinder Resistant Line rats showed a small, but significant increase in locomotor activity after the administration of ethanol. The highest dose of ethanol (1.0 g/kg) produced locomotor depression in all lines except the P and NP lines, which were not tested at this dose. These findings do not support a link between locomotor stimulation by ethanol and ethanol preference. In contrast, all lines exhibited locomotor stimulation after moderate (0.1‐0.3 mg/kg) doses of MK‐801, but did not exhibit increases in activity following any dose of chlordiazepoxide. These data indicate that the profiles of activity after MK‐801 and chlordiazepoxide were distinct from that of ethanol in the various rat lines. Therefore, the effects of ethanol on locomotor activity cannot be accounted for by reference solely to its antagonist‐like action at NMDA receptors and/or its agonist‐like action at GABA/benzodiazepine receptors.</description><subject>Alcohol Drinking - genetics</subject><subject>Alcoholism and acute alcohol poisoning</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Arousal - drug effects</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chlordiazepoxide</subject><subject>Chlordiazepoxide - pharmacology</subject><subject>Dizocilpine Maleate - pharmacology</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Ethanol - pharmacology</subject><subject>Ethanol-Nonpreferring Rats (NP</subject><subject>Ethanol-Preferring Rats (P</subject><subject>Ethanol‐Nonpreferring Rats (NP,FSL,FRL)</subject><subject>Ethanol‐Preferring Rats (P,FH)</subject><subject>FH</subject><subject>FRL</subject><subject>FSL</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>MK-801</subject><subject>Motor Activity - drug effects</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Inbred Strains</subject><subject>Receptors, GABA-A - drug effects</subject><subject>Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate - drug effects</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>0145-6008</issn><issn>1530-0277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVUctuEzEUHSFQCYVPQLIQYtUZ7LHHdrqpohAKIpQqgGBnefxQHWbGwXbahG_hY3GaENZ4cyWf19U9RfECwQrl93pZoQbDEtaMVWg8JlVqIYQUVpsHxegIPSxGEJGmpBDyx8WTGJeZRDilJ8UJGzOOIBkVv2fWGpUi8BbM0o0cfHcGPn4oOURnQA4aTG86H7STv8zKb5w2wA9g7pXvffIBTFRyty5tgRvAG5etghkSWMgE5m4w8Tx_xuiVk8llXc74J_2cXL_u9oANvv8bD66DufdR5mnxyMoummeHeVp8fTv7Mn1Xzj9dvp9O5qUimLGy1sgazW1ttWS2MZwb3lJJLIaaai05qi3RRDYMtqhtSd1givIBMOYt1FLh0-LV3ncV_M-1iUn0LirTdXIwfh0Fo5yMcUMz8XxPVMHHmPcUq-B6GbYCQbGrRizF7v5id3-xq0YcqhGbLH5-SFm3vdFH6aGLjL884DIq2dkgB-XikUYQpwixTLvY0-5cZ7b_sYCYTGeL8b1DuXdwMZnN0UGGH4IyzBrx7epSkO9kQdD1lcD4D7OnvGg</recordid><startdate>199408</startdate><enddate>199408</enddate><creator>Criswell, Hugh E.</creator><creator>Overstreet, David H.</creator><creator>Rezvani, Amir H.</creator><creator>Johnson, Kevin B.</creator><creator>Simson, Peter E.</creator><creator>Knapp, Darin J.</creator><creator>Moy, Sheryl S.</creator><creator>Breese, George R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199408</creationdate><title>Effects of Ethanol, MK-801, and Chlordiazepoxide on Locomotor Activity in Different Rat Lines: Dissociation of Locomotor Stimulation from Ethanol Preference</title><author>Criswell, Hugh E. ; Overstreet, David H. ; Rezvani, Amir H. ; Johnson, Kevin B. ; Simson, Peter E. ; Knapp, Darin J. ; Moy, Sheryl S. ; Breese, George R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4377-2d1fed8f2fda7f5e88e8b6a4f30d6dda812f4d4a570b1bb425361978338b0dac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Alcohol Drinking - genetics</topic><topic>Alcoholism and acute alcohol poisoning</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Arousal - drug effects</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chlordiazepoxide</topic><topic>Chlordiazepoxide - pharmacology</topic><topic>Dizocilpine Maleate - pharmacology</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Ethanol - pharmacology</topic><topic>Ethanol-Nonpreferring Rats (NP</topic><topic>Ethanol-Preferring Rats (P</topic><topic>Ethanol‐Nonpreferring Rats (NP,FSL,FRL)</topic><topic>Ethanol‐Preferring Rats (P,FH)</topic><topic>FH</topic><topic>FRL</topic><topic>FSL</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>MK-801</topic><topic>Motor Activity - drug effects</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Inbred Strains</topic><topic>Receptors, GABA-A - drug effects</topic><topic>Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate - drug effects</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Criswell, Hugh E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Overstreet, David H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezvani, Amir H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kevin B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simson, Peter E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knapp, Darin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moy, Sheryl S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breese, George R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Criswell, Hugh E.</au><au>Overstreet, David H.</au><au>Rezvani, Amir H.</au><au>Johnson, Kevin B.</au><au>Simson, Peter E.</au><au>Knapp, Darin J.</au><au>Moy, Sheryl S.</au><au>Breese, George R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Ethanol, MK-801, and Chlordiazepoxide on Locomotor Activity in Different Rat Lines: Dissociation of Locomotor Stimulation from Ethanol Preference</atitle><jtitle>Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research</jtitle><addtitle>Alcohol Clin Exp Res</addtitle><date>1994-08</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>917</spage><epage>923</epage><pages>917-923</pages><issn>0145-6008</issn><eissn>1530-0277</eissn><coden>ACRSDM</coden><abstract>Several lines of research have suggested a link between the reward value of a drug and its ability to stimulate locomotion. One goal of the present study was to determine whether ethanol preferentially stimulates locomotor activity in lines of rat that show a preference for ethanol. A secondary goal was to determine the extent to which the benzodiazepine‐like and NMDA antagonistic action of ethanol accounted for its effect on locomotor activity. To meet these goals, the effects of varying doses of ethanol (0.125‐1.0 g/kg), MK‐801 (0.1‐0.3 mg/kg), and chlordiazepoxide (0.3‐3 mg/kg) on locomotor activity were studied in several lines of rats that had been habituated to the testing procedure. The effect of low doses of ethanol on motor activity in the Alcohol‐Preferring (P) and Fawn‐Hooded rats, which show a strong ethanol preference, were similar to those of the alcohol‐nonpreferring (NP), Flinders Sensitive Line, and Flinders Resistant Line rats. Only the Flinder Resistant Line rats showed a small, but significant increase in locomotor activity after the administration of ethanol. The highest dose of ethanol (1.0 g/kg) produced locomotor depression in all lines except the P and NP lines, which were not tested at this dose. These findings do not support a link between locomotor stimulation by ethanol and ethanol preference. In contrast, all lines exhibited locomotor stimulation after moderate (0.1‐0.3 mg/kg) doses of MK‐801, but did not exhibit increases in activity following any dose of chlordiazepoxide. These data indicate that the profiles of activity after MK‐801 and chlordiazepoxide were distinct from that of ethanol in the various rat lines. Therefore, the effects of ethanol on locomotor activity cannot be accounted for by reference solely to its antagonist‐like action at NMDA receptors and/or its agonist‐like action at GABA/benzodiazepine receptors.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>7978104</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1530-0277.1994.tb00060.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0145-6008
ispartof Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 1994-08, Vol.18 (4), p.917-923
issn 0145-6008
1530-0277
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76849356
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Alcohol Drinking - genetics
Alcoholism and acute alcohol poisoning
Animals
Arousal - drug effects
Biological and medical sciences
Chlordiazepoxide
Chlordiazepoxide - pharmacology
Dizocilpine Maleate - pharmacology
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Ethanol
Ethanol - pharmacology
Ethanol-Nonpreferring Rats (NP
Ethanol-Preferring Rats (P
Ethanol‐Nonpreferring Rats (NP,FSL,FRL)
Ethanol‐Preferring Rats (P,FH)
FH
FRL
FSL
Male
Medical sciences
MK-801
Motor Activity - drug effects
Rats
Rats, Inbred Strains
Receptors, GABA-A - drug effects
Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate - drug effects
Species Specificity
Toxicology
title Effects of Ethanol, MK-801, and Chlordiazepoxide on Locomotor Activity in Different Rat Lines: Dissociation of Locomotor Stimulation from Ethanol Preference
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T10%3A35%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Ethanol,%20MK-801,%20and%20Chlordiazepoxide%20on%20Locomotor%20Activity%20in%20Different%20Rat%20Lines:%20Dissociation%20of%20Locomotor%20Stimulation%20from%20Ethanol%20Preference&rft.jtitle=Alcoholism,%20clinical%20and%20experimental%20research&rft.au=Criswell,%20Hugh%20E.&rft.date=1994-08&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=917&rft.epage=923&rft.pages=917-923&rft.issn=0145-6008&rft.eissn=1530-0277&rft.coden=ACRSDM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1530-0277.1994.tb00060.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76849356%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76849356&rft_id=info:pmid/7978104&rfr_iscdi=true