Comparative in-vitro activity of antibiotics incorporated in acrylic bone cement
We compared the persistence of antibacterial activity around antibiotic-impregnated acrylic bone cement discs which were serially transferred on seeded agar plates. On plates inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, CMW1 discs containing 2.5% by dry weight of cephalothin, coumermycin or fus...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 1986-02, Vol.17 (2), p.173-184 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 184 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 173 |
container_title | Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Beeching, N. J. Thomas, M. G. Roberts, S. Lang, S. D. R. |
description | We compared the persistence of antibacterial activity around antibiotic-impregnated acrylic bone cement discs which were serially transferred on seeded agar plates. On plates inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, CMW1 discs containing 2.5% by dry weight of cephalothin, coumermycin or fusidic acid (as diethanolamine fusidate) produced zones of inhibition for four to eight weeks when transferred daily. In contrast, ceftriaxone, cotrimoxazole, rifampicin and vancomycin ceased to be inhibitory within a week. Discs made of ‘Palacos-R with Garamycin,’ which contains gentamicin 1.25%, had an intermediate duration of activity. When Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as the test organism, ceftriaxone and ‘Palacos-R with Garamycin’ showed activity for almost three weeks, cephalothin and cotrimoxazole were briefly inhibitory and the remainder not at all. When discs were transferred each week instead of daily, the ranking of antibiotics was similar but antibacterial activity persisted for longer. A combination of gentamicin plus fusidic acid in CMWI was active for a much shorter time than either fusidic acid alone or ‘Palacos-R with Garamycin’. We conclude that coumermycin is a promising new agent for incorporation in acrylic cement. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jac/17.2.173 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76803689</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76803689</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-a2c7e1e3cf6eb055dd2b185ac8fad2255a65043944ae23c839002667976eb5b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1r3DAQBmBRGtJN2luvBR9KT_FmJFkfPrZLmwQCKbQNIRcxlmVQaltbSRu6_z5adtlrLhqG92EQLyEfKSwptPzyCe0lVUu2pIq_IQvaSKgZtPQtWQAHUatG8HfkLKUnAJBC6lNyyhUA02JBfq7CtMaI2T-7ys_1s88xVGjL7vO2CkOFc_adD9nbVIANcR0Kd31Ziovb0duqC7OrrJvcnN-TkwHH5D4c5jn58-P779V1fXt3dbP6eltbziDXyKxy1HE7SNeBEH3POqoFWj1gz5gQKAU0vG0adIxbzdvyYSlVq4oXHefn5Mv-7jqGfxuXspl8sm4ccXZhk4ySGrjU7auQNg0Viu0uXuyhjSGl6Aazjn7CuDUUzK5pU5o2VBlWnh3_dLi76SbXH_Gh2pJ_PuSYLI5DxNn6dGRatNBoXVi9Zz5l9_8YY_xrpOJKmOuHR3OvVt_olRTmF38BBgOVNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14415723</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative in-vitro activity of antibiotics incorporated in acrylic bone cement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy</source><creator>Beeching, N. J. ; Thomas, M. G. ; Roberts, S. ; Lang, S. D. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Beeching, N. J. ; Thomas, M. G. ; Roberts, S. ; Lang, S. D. R.</creatorcontrib><description>We compared the persistence of antibacterial activity around antibiotic-impregnated acrylic bone cement discs which were serially transferred on seeded agar plates. On plates inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, CMW1 discs containing 2.5% by dry weight of cephalothin, coumermycin or fusidic acid (as diethanolamine fusidate) produced zones of inhibition for four to eight weeks when transferred daily. In contrast, ceftriaxone, cotrimoxazole, rifampicin and vancomycin ceased to be inhibitory within a week. Discs made of ‘Palacos-R with Garamycin,’ which contains gentamicin 1.25%, had an intermediate duration of activity. When Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as the test organism, ceftriaxone and ‘Palacos-R with Garamycin’ showed activity for almost three weeks, cephalothin and cotrimoxazole were briefly inhibitory and the remainder not at all. When discs were transferred each week instead of daily, the ranking of antibiotics was similar but antibacterial activity persisted for longer. A combination of gentamicin plus fusidic acid in CMWI was active for a much shorter time than either fusidic acid alone or ‘Palacos-R with Garamycin’. We conclude that coumermycin is a promising new agent for incorporation in acrylic cement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7453</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2091</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jac/17.2.173</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3700285</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACHDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Acrylates - pharmacology ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; Antibacterial agents ; Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents ; Bacteria - drug effects ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Cements - pharmacology ; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical ; Drug Stability ; Medical sciences ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 1986-02, Vol.17 (2), p.173-184</ispartof><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-a2c7e1e3cf6eb055dd2b185ac8fad2255a65043944ae23c839002667976eb5b33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8590488$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3700285$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beeching, N. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, M. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, S. D. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative in-vitro activity of antibiotics incorporated in acrylic bone cement</title><title>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</title><addtitle>J Antimicrob Chemother</addtitle><description>We compared the persistence of antibacterial activity around antibiotic-impregnated acrylic bone cement discs which were serially transferred on seeded agar plates. On plates inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, CMW1 discs containing 2.5% by dry weight of cephalothin, coumermycin or fusidic acid (as diethanolamine fusidate) produced zones of inhibition for four to eight weeks when transferred daily. In contrast, ceftriaxone, cotrimoxazole, rifampicin and vancomycin ceased to be inhibitory within a week. Discs made of ‘Palacos-R with Garamycin,’ which contains gentamicin 1.25%, had an intermediate duration of activity. When Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as the test organism, ceftriaxone and ‘Palacos-R with Garamycin’ showed activity for almost three weeks, cephalothin and cotrimoxazole were briefly inhibitory and the remainder not at all. When discs were transferred each week instead of daily, the ranking of antibiotics was similar but antibacterial activity persisted for longer. A combination of gentamicin plus fusidic acid in CMWI was active for a much shorter time than either fusidic acid alone or ‘Palacos-R with Garamycin’. We conclude that coumermycin is a promising new agent for incorporation in acrylic cement.</description><subject>Acrylates - pharmacology</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Antibacterial agents</subject><subject>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Bacteria - drug effects</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Cements - pharmacology</subject><subject>Chemistry, Pharmaceutical</subject><subject>Drug Stability</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0305-7453</issn><issn>1460-2091</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E1r3DAQBmBRGtJN2luvBR9KT_FmJFkfPrZLmwQCKbQNIRcxlmVQaltbSRu6_z5adtlrLhqG92EQLyEfKSwptPzyCe0lVUu2pIq_IQvaSKgZtPQtWQAHUatG8HfkLKUnAJBC6lNyyhUA02JBfq7CtMaI2T-7ys_1s88xVGjL7vO2CkOFc_adD9nbVIANcR0Kd31Ziovb0duqC7OrrJvcnN-TkwHH5D4c5jn58-P779V1fXt3dbP6eltbziDXyKxy1HE7SNeBEH3POqoFWj1gz5gQKAU0vG0adIxbzdvyYSlVq4oXHefn5Mv-7jqGfxuXspl8sm4ccXZhk4ySGrjU7auQNg0Viu0uXuyhjSGl6Aazjn7CuDUUzK5pU5o2VBlWnh3_dLi76SbXH_Gh2pJ_PuSYLI5DxNn6dGRatNBoXVi9Zz5l9_8YY_xrpOJKmOuHR3OvVt_olRTmF38BBgOVNQ</recordid><startdate>198602</startdate><enddate>198602</enddate><creator>Beeching, N. J.</creator><creator>Thomas, M. G.</creator><creator>Roberts, S.</creator><creator>Lang, S. D. R.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198602</creationdate><title>Comparative in-vitro activity of antibiotics incorporated in acrylic bone cement</title><author>Beeching, N. J. ; Thomas, M. G. ; Roberts, S. ; Lang, S. D. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-a2c7e1e3cf6eb055dd2b185ac8fad2255a65043944ae23c839002667976eb5b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Acrylates - pharmacology</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Antibacterial agents</topic><topic>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Bacteria - drug effects</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Cements - pharmacology</topic><topic>Chemistry, Pharmaceutical</topic><topic>Drug Stability</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beeching, N. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, M. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, S. D. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beeching, N. J.</au><au>Thomas, M. G.</au><au>Roberts, S.</au><au>Lang, S. D. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative in-vitro activity of antibiotics incorporated in acrylic bone cement</atitle><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Antimicrob Chemother</addtitle><date>1986-02</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>173</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>173-184</pages><issn>0305-7453</issn><eissn>1460-2091</eissn><coden>JACHDX</coden><abstract>We compared the persistence of antibacterial activity around antibiotic-impregnated acrylic bone cement discs which were serially transferred on seeded agar plates. On plates inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, CMW1 discs containing 2.5% by dry weight of cephalothin, coumermycin or fusidic acid (as diethanolamine fusidate) produced zones of inhibition for four to eight weeks when transferred daily. In contrast, ceftriaxone, cotrimoxazole, rifampicin and vancomycin ceased to be inhibitory within a week. Discs made of ‘Palacos-R with Garamycin,’ which contains gentamicin 1.25%, had an intermediate duration of activity. When Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as the test organism, ceftriaxone and ‘Palacos-R with Garamycin’ showed activity for almost three weeks, cephalothin and cotrimoxazole were briefly inhibitory and the remainder not at all. When discs were transferred each week instead of daily, the ranking of antibiotics was similar but antibacterial activity persisted for longer. A combination of gentamicin plus fusidic acid in CMWI was active for a much shorter time than either fusidic acid alone or ‘Palacos-R with Garamycin’. We conclude that coumermycin is a promising new agent for incorporation in acrylic cement.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>3700285</pmid><doi>10.1093/jac/17.2.173</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-7453 |
ispartof | Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 1986-02, Vol.17 (2), p.173-184 |
issn | 0305-7453 1460-2091 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76803689 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy |
subjects | Acrylates - pharmacology Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology Antibacterial agents Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents Bacteria - drug effects Biological and medical sciences Bone Cements - pharmacology Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Drug Stability Medical sciences Microbial Sensitivity Tests Pharmacology. Drug treatments Time Factors |
title | Comparative in-vitro activity of antibiotics incorporated in acrylic bone cement |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T06%3A12%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20in-vitro%20activity%20of%20antibiotics%20incorporated%20in%20acrylic%20bone%20cement&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20antimicrobial%20chemotherapy&rft.au=Beeching,%20N.%20J.&rft.date=1986-02&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=173&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=173-184&rft.issn=0305-7453&rft.eissn=1460-2091&rft.coden=JACHDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jac/17.2.173&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76803689%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14415723&rft_id=info:pmid/3700285&rfr_iscdi=true |