Does PEEP reduce the incidence of aspiration around endotracheal tubes?

Despite improved endotracheal tube designs, aspiration remains a cause of pulmonary complications. This in vitro study evaluates the efficacy of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in reducing the incidence of seepage around endotracheal tubes during mechanical (MV) and spontaneous ventilation (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal 1986-03, Vol.33 (2), p.157-161
Hauptverfasser: JANSON, B. A, POULTON, T. J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 161
container_issue 2
container_start_page 157
container_title Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal
container_volume 33
creator JANSON, B. A
POULTON, T. J
description Despite improved endotracheal tube designs, aspiration remains a cause of pulmonary complications. This in vitro study evaluates the efficacy of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in reducing the incidence of seepage around endotracheal tubes during mechanical (MV) and spontaneous ventilation (SV). Two transparent plastic "tracheas" with cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes simulated adult and paediatric airways respectively. Ten trials without PEEP and ten with PEEP at each of two different levels were completed for each model using both SV and MV. Simulated SV in both models was associated with seepage nearly 100 per cent of the time, regardless of PEEP level. During MV without PEEP, seepage occurred in 55 per cent of the adult trials and 100 per cent of the paediatric trials. In contrast, MV with 5 cmH2O PEEP produced seepage rates of 15 per cent in the adult model and 0 per cent in the paediatric model. Compared to trials without PEEP, seepage occurred less frequently, was reduced in amount and delayed in onset. MV with PEEP significantly (p less than 0.05) decreased the incidence of seepage around endotracheal tubes.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF03010825
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76796895</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76796895</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-51a22e9ded34ec92c91209435d93f063e20d74ae551c13b0b0128b21699e80473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMFLwzAYxYMoc04v3oUcxINQ_ZI0bXISndsUBu6g55ImX1mla2bSHvzvrVjm6fF4P97hR8glgzsGkN8_LUEAA8XlEZmyVGeJ0rk8JlMAUAlXMjslZzF-AgiRp3JCJkKyTIh0SlbPHiPdLBYbGtD1Fmm3RVq3tnbYDs1X1MR9HUxX-5aa4PvWUWyd74KxWzQN7foS48M5OalME_FizBn5WC7e5y_J-m31On9cJ1akeZdIZjhH7dCJFK3mVjMOOhXSaVFBJpCDy1ODUjLLRAklMK5KzjKtUUGaixm5-fvdB__VY-yKXR0tNo1p0fexyLNcZ0rLAbz9A23wMQasin2odyZ8FwyKX2vFv7UBvhpf-3KH7oCOmob9etxNtKapghkExQOmMtBSgvgBW6FxfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76796895</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does PEEP reduce the incidence of aspiration around endotracheal tubes?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>JANSON, B. A ; POULTON, T. J</creator><creatorcontrib>JANSON, B. A ; POULTON, T. J</creatorcontrib><description>Despite improved endotracheal tube designs, aspiration remains a cause of pulmonary complications. This in vitro study evaluates the efficacy of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in reducing the incidence of seepage around endotracheal tubes during mechanical (MV) and spontaneous ventilation (SV). Two transparent plastic "tracheas" with cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes simulated adult and paediatric airways respectively. Ten trials without PEEP and ten with PEEP at each of two different levels were completed for each model using both SV and MV. Simulated SV in both models was associated with seepage nearly 100 per cent of the time, regardless of PEEP level. During MV without PEEP, seepage occurred in 55 per cent of the adult trials and 100 per cent of the paediatric trials. In contrast, MV with 5 cmH2O PEEP produced seepage rates of 15 per cent in the adult model and 0 per cent in the paediatric model. Compared to trials without PEEP, seepage occurred less frequently, was reduced in amount and delayed in onset. MV with PEEP significantly (p less than 0.05) decreased the incidence of seepage around endotracheal tubes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-2856</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1496-8975</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF03010825</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3516334</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Toronto, ON: Canadian Anaesthetists' Society</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation ; Humans ; Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation ; Medical sciences ; Models, Structural ; Pneumonia, Aspiration - prevention &amp; control ; Positive-Pressure Respiration ; Respiration, Artificial</subject><ispartof>Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal, 1986-03, Vol.33 (2), p.157-161</ispartof><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-51a22e9ded34ec92c91209435d93f063e20d74ae551c13b0b0128b21699e80473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-51a22e9ded34ec92c91209435d93f063e20d74ae551c13b0b0128b21699e80473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=8609550$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3516334$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>JANSON, B. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POULTON, T. J</creatorcontrib><title>Does PEEP reduce the incidence of aspiration around endotracheal tubes?</title><title>Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal</title><addtitle>Can Anaesth Soc J</addtitle><description>Despite improved endotracheal tube designs, aspiration remains a cause of pulmonary complications. This in vitro study evaluates the efficacy of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in reducing the incidence of seepage around endotracheal tubes during mechanical (MV) and spontaneous ventilation (SV). Two transparent plastic "tracheas" with cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes simulated adult and paediatric airways respectively. Ten trials without PEEP and ten with PEEP at each of two different levels were completed for each model using both SV and MV. Simulated SV in both models was associated with seepage nearly 100 per cent of the time, regardless of PEEP level. During MV without PEEP, seepage occurred in 55 per cent of the adult trials and 100 per cent of the paediatric trials. In contrast, MV with 5 cmH2O PEEP produced seepage rates of 15 per cent in the adult model and 0 per cent in the paediatric model. Compared to trials without PEEP, seepage occurred less frequently, was reduced in amount and delayed in onset. MV with PEEP significantly (p less than 0.05) decreased the incidence of seepage around endotracheal tubes.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Structural</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Aspiration - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Positive-Pressure Respiration</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial</subject><issn>0008-2856</issn><issn>1496-8975</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMFLwzAYxYMoc04v3oUcxINQ_ZI0bXISndsUBu6g55ImX1mla2bSHvzvrVjm6fF4P97hR8glgzsGkN8_LUEAA8XlEZmyVGeJ0rk8JlMAUAlXMjslZzF-AgiRp3JCJkKyTIh0SlbPHiPdLBYbGtD1Fmm3RVq3tnbYDs1X1MR9HUxX-5aa4PvWUWyd74KxWzQN7foS48M5OalME_FizBn5WC7e5y_J-m31On9cJ1akeZdIZjhH7dCJFK3mVjMOOhXSaVFBJpCDy1ODUjLLRAklMK5KzjKtUUGaixm5-fvdB__VY-yKXR0tNo1p0fexyLNcZ0rLAbz9A23wMQasin2odyZ8FwyKX2vFv7UBvhpf-3KH7oCOmob9etxNtKapghkExQOmMtBSgvgBW6FxfA</recordid><startdate>19860301</startdate><enddate>19860301</enddate><creator>JANSON, B. A</creator><creator>POULTON, T. J</creator><general>Canadian Anaesthetists' Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19860301</creationdate><title>Does PEEP reduce the incidence of aspiration around endotracheal tubes?</title><author>JANSON, B. A ; POULTON, T. J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-51a22e9ded34ec92c91209435d93f063e20d74ae551c13b0b0128b21699e80473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Structural</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Aspiration - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Positive-Pressure Respiration</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>JANSON, B. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POULTON, T. J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>JANSON, B. A</au><au>POULTON, T. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does PEEP reduce the incidence of aspiration around endotracheal tubes?</atitle><jtitle>Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal</jtitle><addtitle>Can Anaesth Soc J</addtitle><date>1986-03-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>161</epage><pages>157-161</pages><issn>0008-2856</issn><eissn>1496-8975</eissn><abstract>Despite improved endotracheal tube designs, aspiration remains a cause of pulmonary complications. This in vitro study evaluates the efficacy of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in reducing the incidence of seepage around endotracheal tubes during mechanical (MV) and spontaneous ventilation (SV). Two transparent plastic "tracheas" with cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes simulated adult and paediatric airways respectively. Ten trials without PEEP and ten with PEEP at each of two different levels were completed for each model using both SV and MV. Simulated SV in both models was associated with seepage nearly 100 per cent of the time, regardless of PEEP level. During MV without PEEP, seepage occurred in 55 per cent of the adult trials and 100 per cent of the paediatric trials. In contrast, MV with 5 cmH2O PEEP produced seepage rates of 15 per cent in the adult model and 0 per cent in the paediatric model. Compared to trials without PEEP, seepage occurred less frequently, was reduced in amount and delayed in onset. MV with PEEP significantly (p less than 0.05) decreased the incidence of seepage around endotracheal tubes.</abstract><cop>Toronto, ON</cop><pub>Canadian Anaesthetists' Society</pub><pmid>3516334</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF03010825</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-2856
ispartof Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal, 1986-03, Vol.33 (2), p.157-161
issn 0008-2856
1496-8975
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76796895
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adult
Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Child
General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation
Humans
Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation
Medical sciences
Models, Structural
Pneumonia, Aspiration - prevention & control
Positive-Pressure Respiration
Respiration, Artificial
title Does PEEP reduce the incidence of aspiration around endotracheal tubes?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T17%3A39%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20PEEP%20reduce%20the%20incidence%20of%20aspiration%20around%20endotracheal%20tubes?&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20Anaesthetists'%20Society%20journal&rft.au=JANSON,%20B.%20A&rft.date=1986-03-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=161&rft.pages=157-161&rft.issn=0008-2856&rft.eissn=1496-8975&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF03010825&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76796895%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76796895&rft_id=info:pmid/3516334&rfr_iscdi=true