Does PEEP reduce the incidence of aspiration around endotracheal tubes?
Despite improved endotracheal tube designs, aspiration remains a cause of pulmonary complications. This in vitro study evaluates the efficacy of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in reducing the incidence of seepage around endotracheal tubes during mechanical (MV) and spontaneous ventilation (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal 1986-03, Vol.33 (2), p.157-161 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 161 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 157 |
container_title | Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | JANSON, B. A POULTON, T. J |
description | Despite improved endotracheal tube designs, aspiration remains a cause of pulmonary complications. This in vitro study evaluates the efficacy of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in reducing the incidence of seepage around endotracheal tubes during mechanical (MV) and spontaneous ventilation (SV). Two transparent plastic "tracheas" with cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes simulated adult and paediatric airways respectively. Ten trials without PEEP and ten with PEEP at each of two different levels were completed for each model using both SV and MV. Simulated SV in both models was associated with seepage nearly 100 per cent of the time, regardless of PEEP level. During MV without PEEP, seepage occurred in 55 per cent of the adult trials and 100 per cent of the paediatric trials. In contrast, MV with 5 cmH2O PEEP produced seepage rates of 15 per cent in the adult model and 0 per cent in the paediatric model. Compared to trials without PEEP, seepage occurred less frequently, was reduced in amount and delayed in onset. MV with PEEP significantly (p less than 0.05) decreased the incidence of seepage around endotracheal tubes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF03010825 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76796895</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76796895</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-51a22e9ded34ec92c91209435d93f063e20d74ae551c13b0b0128b21699e80473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMFLwzAYxYMoc04v3oUcxINQ_ZI0bXISndsUBu6g55ImX1mla2bSHvzvrVjm6fF4P97hR8glgzsGkN8_LUEAA8XlEZmyVGeJ0rk8JlMAUAlXMjslZzF-AgiRp3JCJkKyTIh0SlbPHiPdLBYbGtD1Fmm3RVq3tnbYDs1X1MR9HUxX-5aa4PvWUWyd74KxWzQN7foS48M5OalME_FizBn5WC7e5y_J-m31On9cJ1akeZdIZjhH7dCJFK3mVjMOOhXSaVFBJpCDy1ODUjLLRAklMK5KzjKtUUGaixm5-fvdB__VY-yKXR0tNo1p0fexyLNcZ0rLAbz9A23wMQasin2odyZ8FwyKX2vFv7UBvhpf-3KH7oCOmob9etxNtKapghkExQOmMtBSgvgBW6FxfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76796895</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does PEEP reduce the incidence of aspiration around endotracheal tubes?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>JANSON, B. A ; POULTON, T. J</creator><creatorcontrib>JANSON, B. A ; POULTON, T. J</creatorcontrib><description>Despite improved endotracheal tube designs, aspiration remains a cause of pulmonary complications. This in vitro study evaluates the efficacy of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in reducing the incidence of seepage around endotracheal tubes during mechanical (MV) and spontaneous ventilation (SV). Two transparent plastic "tracheas" with cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes simulated adult and paediatric airways respectively. Ten trials without PEEP and ten with PEEP at each of two different levels were completed for each model using both SV and MV. Simulated SV in both models was associated with seepage nearly 100 per cent of the time, regardless of PEEP level. During MV without PEEP, seepage occurred in 55 per cent of the adult trials and 100 per cent of the paediatric trials. In contrast, MV with 5 cmH2O PEEP produced seepage rates of 15 per cent in the adult model and 0 per cent in the paediatric model. Compared to trials without PEEP, seepage occurred less frequently, was reduced in amount and delayed in onset. MV with PEEP significantly (p less than 0.05) decreased the incidence of seepage around endotracheal tubes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-2856</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1496-8975</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF03010825</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3516334</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Toronto, ON: Canadian Anaesthetists' Society</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation ; Humans ; Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation ; Medical sciences ; Models, Structural ; Pneumonia, Aspiration - prevention & control ; Positive-Pressure Respiration ; Respiration, Artificial</subject><ispartof>Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal, 1986-03, Vol.33 (2), p.157-161</ispartof><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-51a22e9ded34ec92c91209435d93f063e20d74ae551c13b0b0128b21699e80473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-51a22e9ded34ec92c91209435d93f063e20d74ae551c13b0b0128b21699e80473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8609550$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3516334$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>JANSON, B. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POULTON, T. J</creatorcontrib><title>Does PEEP reduce the incidence of aspiration around endotracheal tubes?</title><title>Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal</title><addtitle>Can Anaesth Soc J</addtitle><description>Despite improved endotracheal tube designs, aspiration remains a cause of pulmonary complications. This in vitro study evaluates the efficacy of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in reducing the incidence of seepage around endotracheal tubes during mechanical (MV) and spontaneous ventilation (SV). Two transparent plastic "tracheas" with cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes simulated adult and paediatric airways respectively. Ten trials without PEEP and ten with PEEP at each of two different levels were completed for each model using both SV and MV. Simulated SV in both models was associated with seepage nearly 100 per cent of the time, regardless of PEEP level. During MV without PEEP, seepage occurred in 55 per cent of the adult trials and 100 per cent of the paediatric trials. In contrast, MV with 5 cmH2O PEEP produced seepage rates of 15 per cent in the adult model and 0 per cent in the paediatric model. Compared to trials without PEEP, seepage occurred less frequently, was reduced in amount and delayed in onset. MV with PEEP significantly (p less than 0.05) decreased the incidence of seepage around endotracheal tubes.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Structural</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Aspiration - prevention & control</subject><subject>Positive-Pressure Respiration</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial</subject><issn>0008-2856</issn><issn>1496-8975</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMFLwzAYxYMoc04v3oUcxINQ_ZI0bXISndsUBu6g55ImX1mla2bSHvzvrVjm6fF4P97hR8glgzsGkN8_LUEAA8XlEZmyVGeJ0rk8JlMAUAlXMjslZzF-AgiRp3JCJkKyTIh0SlbPHiPdLBYbGtD1Fmm3RVq3tnbYDs1X1MR9HUxX-5aa4PvWUWyd74KxWzQN7foS48M5OalME_FizBn5WC7e5y_J-m31On9cJ1akeZdIZjhH7dCJFK3mVjMOOhXSaVFBJpCDy1ODUjLLRAklMK5KzjKtUUGaixm5-fvdB__VY-yKXR0tNo1p0fexyLNcZ0rLAbz9A23wMQasin2odyZ8FwyKX2vFv7UBvhpf-3KH7oCOmob9etxNtKapghkExQOmMtBSgvgBW6FxfA</recordid><startdate>19860301</startdate><enddate>19860301</enddate><creator>JANSON, B. A</creator><creator>POULTON, T. J</creator><general>Canadian Anaesthetists' Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19860301</creationdate><title>Does PEEP reduce the incidence of aspiration around endotracheal tubes?</title><author>JANSON, B. A ; POULTON, T. J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-51a22e9ded34ec92c91209435d93f063e20d74ae551c13b0b0128b21699e80473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Structural</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Aspiration - prevention & control</topic><topic>Positive-Pressure Respiration</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>JANSON, B. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POULTON, T. J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>JANSON, B. A</au><au>POULTON, T. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does PEEP reduce the incidence of aspiration around endotracheal tubes?</atitle><jtitle>Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal</jtitle><addtitle>Can Anaesth Soc J</addtitle><date>1986-03-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>161</epage><pages>157-161</pages><issn>0008-2856</issn><eissn>1496-8975</eissn><abstract>Despite improved endotracheal tube designs, aspiration remains a cause of pulmonary complications. This in vitro study evaluates the efficacy of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in reducing the incidence of seepage around endotracheal tubes during mechanical (MV) and spontaneous ventilation (SV). Two transparent plastic "tracheas" with cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes simulated adult and paediatric airways respectively. Ten trials without PEEP and ten with PEEP at each of two different levels were completed for each model using both SV and MV. Simulated SV in both models was associated with seepage nearly 100 per cent of the time, regardless of PEEP level. During MV without PEEP, seepage occurred in 55 per cent of the adult trials and 100 per cent of the paediatric trials. In contrast, MV with 5 cmH2O PEEP produced seepage rates of 15 per cent in the adult model and 0 per cent in the paediatric model. Compared to trials without PEEP, seepage occurred less frequently, was reduced in amount and delayed in onset. MV with PEEP significantly (p less than 0.05) decreased the incidence of seepage around endotracheal tubes.</abstract><cop>Toronto, ON</cop><pub>Canadian Anaesthetists' Society</pub><pmid>3516334</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF03010825</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-2856 |
ispartof | Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal, 1986-03, Vol.33 (2), p.157-161 |
issn | 0008-2856 1496-8975 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76796895 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Adult Anesthesia Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Biological and medical sciences Child General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation Humans Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation Medical sciences Models, Structural Pneumonia, Aspiration - prevention & control Positive-Pressure Respiration Respiration, Artificial |
title | Does PEEP reduce the incidence of aspiration around endotracheal tubes? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T17%3A39%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20PEEP%20reduce%20the%20incidence%20of%20aspiration%20around%20endotracheal%20tubes?&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20Anaesthetists'%20Society%20journal&rft.au=JANSON,%20B.%20A&rft.date=1986-03-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=161&rft.pages=157-161&rft.issn=0008-2856&rft.eissn=1496-8975&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF03010825&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76796895%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76796895&rft_id=info:pmid/3516334&rfr_iscdi=true |