Detection of expiratory flow limitation during mechanical ventilation

Two new methods, application of negative pressure at the airway opening during expiration (NEP) and reduction of flow resistance by bypassing the expiratory line of the ventilator by exhaling into the atmosphere (ATM), were used to detect expiratory flow limitation in 12 semirecumbent (45 degree) me...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 1994-11, Vol.150 (5), p.1311-1317
Hauptverfasser: VALTA, P, CORBEIL, C, LAVOIE, A, CAMPODONICO, R, KOULOURIS, N, CHASSE, M, BRAIDY, J, MILIC-EMILI, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1317
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1311
container_title American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
container_volume 150
creator VALTA, P
CORBEIL, C
LAVOIE, A
CAMPODONICO, R
KOULOURIS, N
CHASSE, M
BRAIDY, J
MILIC-EMILI, J
description Two new methods, application of negative pressure at the airway opening during expiration (NEP) and reduction of flow resistance by bypassing the expiratory line of the ventilator by exhaling into the atmosphere (ATM), were used to detect expiratory flow limitation in 12 semirecumbent (45 degree) mechanically ventilated patients, seven with chronic airway obstruction (CAO). An increase of expiratory flow with NEP or ATM, relative to the preceding control breath, was taken as indicating absence of expiratory flow limitation. By contrast, the portion of the tidal expiration over which there was no change in flow with NEP or ATM was considered as flow-limited. With NEP, nine patients exhibited flow limitation, six (all with CAO) were flow-limited over most of the tidal expiration (> 70% VT), and three at < 60% VT. Although the results with NEP and ATM were in general in good agreement, in the three non-flow-limited patients the ATM method gave erroneous results. Six patients were also studied supine, including two who were not flow-limited when semirecumbent: both became flow-limited when supine. We conclude that NEP provides a simple method to detect flow limitation in mechanically ventilated patients. The supine position enhances flow limitation.
doi_str_mv 10.1164/ajrccm.150.5.7952558
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76795864</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76795864</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-bcee87c194f748ac2478411e0b9912cfd1d94e7da2d575d4e3ca99ca6b758fa93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gcIexNuuySbZJEfR-gEFLwreQjY70ZT9qMlW7b93bZd6moH3eQfmQeic4IyQgl2bZbC2yQjHGc-E4jnn8gBNCac8ZUrgw2HHgqaMqbdjdBLjEmOSS4InaDLiUzS_gx5s77s26VwCPysfTN-FTeLq7jupfeN7s02rdfDte9KA_TCtt6ZOvqDtfb1NT9GRM3WEs3HO0Ov9_OX2MV08Pzzd3ixSSynp09ICSGGJYk4waWzOhGSEAC6VIrl1FakUA1GZvOKCVwyoNUpZU5SCS2cUnaGr3d1V6D7XEHvd-Gihrk0L3TpqUQyPyYININuBNnQxBnB6FXxjwkYTrP_s6Z09PdjTXI86htrFeH9dNlDtS__55ZibOChwwbTWxz1GaV5QIekvaVJ6_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76795864</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection of expiratory flow limitation during mechanical ventilation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>VALTA, P ; CORBEIL, C ; LAVOIE, A ; CAMPODONICO, R ; KOULOURIS, N ; CHASSE, M ; BRAIDY, J ; MILIC-EMILI, J</creator><creatorcontrib>VALTA, P ; CORBEIL, C ; LAVOIE, A ; CAMPODONICO, R ; KOULOURIS, N ; CHASSE, M ; BRAIDY, J ; MILIC-EMILI, J</creatorcontrib><description>Two new methods, application of negative pressure at the airway opening during expiration (NEP) and reduction of flow resistance by bypassing the expiratory line of the ventilator by exhaling into the atmosphere (ATM), were used to detect expiratory flow limitation in 12 semirecumbent (45 degree) mechanically ventilated patients, seven with chronic airway obstruction (CAO). An increase of expiratory flow with NEP or ATM, relative to the preceding control breath, was taken as indicating absence of expiratory flow limitation. By contrast, the portion of the tidal expiration over which there was no change in flow with NEP or ATM was considered as flow-limited. With NEP, nine patients exhibited flow limitation, six (all with CAO) were flow-limited over most of the tidal expiration (&gt; 70% VT), and three at &lt; 60% VT. Although the results with NEP and ATM were in general in good agreement, in the three non-flow-limited patients the ATM method gave erroneous results. Six patients were also studied supine, including two who were not flow-limited when semirecumbent: both became flow-limited when supine. We conclude that NEP provides a simple method to detect flow limitation in mechanically ventilated patients. The supine position enhances flow limitation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1073-449X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-4970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.5.7952558</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7952558</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: American Lung Association</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Emergency and intensive respiratory care ; Female ; Humans ; Intensive care medicine ; Lung Diseases, Obstructive - complications ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pulmonary Ventilation ; Respiration, Artificial ; Respiratory Insufficiency - etiology ; Respiratory Insufficiency - physiopathology ; Respiratory Insufficiency - therapy ; Supine Position</subject><ispartof>American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 1994-11, Vol.150 (5), p.1311-1317</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-bcee87c194f748ac2478411e0b9912cfd1d94e7da2d575d4e3ca99ca6b758fa93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3326378$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7952558$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>VALTA, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CORBEIL, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAVOIE, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAMPODONICO, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KOULOURIS, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHASSE, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRAIDY, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MILIC-EMILI, J</creatorcontrib><title>Detection of expiratory flow limitation during mechanical ventilation</title><title>American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Respir Crit Care Med</addtitle><description>Two new methods, application of negative pressure at the airway opening during expiration (NEP) and reduction of flow resistance by bypassing the expiratory line of the ventilator by exhaling into the atmosphere (ATM), were used to detect expiratory flow limitation in 12 semirecumbent (45 degree) mechanically ventilated patients, seven with chronic airway obstruction (CAO). An increase of expiratory flow with NEP or ATM, relative to the preceding control breath, was taken as indicating absence of expiratory flow limitation. By contrast, the portion of the tidal expiration over which there was no change in flow with NEP or ATM was considered as flow-limited. With NEP, nine patients exhibited flow limitation, six (all with CAO) were flow-limited over most of the tidal expiration (&gt; 70% VT), and three at &lt; 60% VT. Although the results with NEP and ATM were in general in good agreement, in the three non-flow-limited patients the ATM method gave erroneous results. Six patients were also studied supine, including two who were not flow-limited when semirecumbent: both became flow-limited when supine. We conclude that NEP provides a simple method to detect flow limitation in mechanically ventilated patients. The supine position enhances flow limitation.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive respiratory care</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Lung Diseases, Obstructive - complications</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pulmonary Ventilation</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial</subject><subject>Respiratory Insufficiency - etiology</subject><subject>Respiratory Insufficiency - physiopathology</subject><subject>Respiratory Insufficiency - therapy</subject><subject>Supine Position</subject><issn>1073-449X</issn><issn>1535-4970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gcIexNuuySbZJEfR-gEFLwreQjY70ZT9qMlW7b93bZd6moH3eQfmQeic4IyQgl2bZbC2yQjHGc-E4jnn8gBNCac8ZUrgw2HHgqaMqbdjdBLjEmOSS4InaDLiUzS_gx5s77s26VwCPysfTN-FTeLq7jupfeN7s02rdfDte9KA_TCtt6ZOvqDtfb1NT9GRM3WEs3HO0Ov9_OX2MV08Pzzd3ixSSynp09ICSGGJYk4waWzOhGSEAC6VIrl1FakUA1GZvOKCVwyoNUpZU5SCS2cUnaGr3d1V6D7XEHvd-Gihrk0L3TpqUQyPyYININuBNnQxBnB6FXxjwkYTrP_s6Z09PdjTXI86htrFeH9dNlDtS__55ZibOChwwbTWxz1GaV5QIekvaVJ6_w</recordid><startdate>19941101</startdate><enddate>19941101</enddate><creator>VALTA, P</creator><creator>CORBEIL, C</creator><creator>LAVOIE, A</creator><creator>CAMPODONICO, R</creator><creator>KOULOURIS, N</creator><creator>CHASSE, M</creator><creator>BRAIDY, J</creator><creator>MILIC-EMILI, J</creator><general>American Lung Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19941101</creationdate><title>Detection of expiratory flow limitation during mechanical ventilation</title><author>VALTA, P ; CORBEIL, C ; LAVOIE, A ; CAMPODONICO, R ; KOULOURIS, N ; CHASSE, M ; BRAIDY, J ; MILIC-EMILI, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-bcee87c194f748ac2478411e0b9912cfd1d94e7da2d575d4e3ca99ca6b758fa93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive respiratory care</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Lung Diseases, Obstructive - complications</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pulmonary Ventilation</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial</topic><topic>Respiratory Insufficiency - etiology</topic><topic>Respiratory Insufficiency - physiopathology</topic><topic>Respiratory Insufficiency - therapy</topic><topic>Supine Position</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>VALTA, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CORBEIL, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAVOIE, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAMPODONICO, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KOULOURIS, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHASSE, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRAIDY, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MILIC-EMILI, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>VALTA, P</au><au>CORBEIL, C</au><au>LAVOIE, A</au><au>CAMPODONICO, R</au><au>KOULOURIS, N</au><au>CHASSE, M</au><au>BRAIDY, J</au><au>MILIC-EMILI, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection of expiratory flow limitation during mechanical ventilation</atitle><jtitle>American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Respir Crit Care Med</addtitle><date>1994-11-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>150</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1311</spage><epage>1317</epage><pages>1311-1317</pages><issn>1073-449X</issn><eissn>1535-4970</eissn><abstract>Two new methods, application of negative pressure at the airway opening during expiration (NEP) and reduction of flow resistance by bypassing the expiratory line of the ventilator by exhaling into the atmosphere (ATM), were used to detect expiratory flow limitation in 12 semirecumbent (45 degree) mechanically ventilated patients, seven with chronic airway obstruction (CAO). An increase of expiratory flow with NEP or ATM, relative to the preceding control breath, was taken as indicating absence of expiratory flow limitation. By contrast, the portion of the tidal expiration over which there was no change in flow with NEP or ATM was considered as flow-limited. With NEP, nine patients exhibited flow limitation, six (all with CAO) were flow-limited over most of the tidal expiration (&gt; 70% VT), and three at &lt; 60% VT. Although the results with NEP and ATM were in general in good agreement, in the three non-flow-limited patients the ATM method gave erroneous results. Six patients were also studied supine, including two who were not flow-limited when semirecumbent: both became flow-limited when supine. We conclude that NEP provides a simple method to detect flow limitation in mechanically ventilated patients. The supine position enhances flow limitation.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>American Lung Association</pub><pmid>7952558</pmid><doi>10.1164/ajrccm.150.5.7952558</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1073-449X
ispartof American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 1994-11, Vol.150 (5), p.1311-1317
issn 1073-449X
1535-4970
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76795864
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Emergency and intensive respiratory care
Female
Humans
Intensive care medicine
Lung Diseases, Obstructive - complications
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Pulmonary Ventilation
Respiration, Artificial
Respiratory Insufficiency - etiology
Respiratory Insufficiency - physiopathology
Respiratory Insufficiency - therapy
Supine Position
title Detection of expiratory flow limitation during mechanical ventilation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T01%3A05%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20of%20expiratory%20flow%20limitation%20during%20mechanical%20ventilation&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20respiratory%20and%20critical%20care%20medicine&rft.au=VALTA,%20P&rft.date=1994-11-01&rft.volume=150&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1311&rft.epage=1317&rft.pages=1311-1317&rft.issn=1073-449X&rft.eissn=1535-4970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1164/ajrccm.150.5.7952558&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76795864%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76795864&rft_id=info:pmid/7952558&rfr_iscdi=true