Detection of expiratory flow limitation during mechanical ventilation
Two new methods, application of negative pressure at the airway opening during expiration (NEP) and reduction of flow resistance by bypassing the expiratory line of the ventilator by exhaling into the atmosphere (ATM), were used to detect expiratory flow limitation in 12 semirecumbent (45 degree) me...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 1994-11, Vol.150 (5), p.1311-1317 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1317 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1311 |
container_title | American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine |
container_volume | 150 |
creator | VALTA, P CORBEIL, C LAVOIE, A CAMPODONICO, R KOULOURIS, N CHASSE, M BRAIDY, J MILIC-EMILI, J |
description | Two new methods, application of negative pressure at the airway opening during expiration (NEP) and reduction of flow resistance by bypassing the expiratory line of the ventilator by exhaling into the atmosphere (ATM), were used to detect expiratory flow limitation in 12 semirecumbent (45 degree) mechanically ventilated patients, seven with chronic airway obstruction (CAO). An increase of expiratory flow with NEP or ATM, relative to the preceding control breath, was taken as indicating absence of expiratory flow limitation. By contrast, the portion of the tidal expiration over which there was no change in flow with NEP or ATM was considered as flow-limited. With NEP, nine patients exhibited flow limitation, six (all with CAO) were flow-limited over most of the tidal expiration (> 70% VT), and three at < 60% VT. Although the results with NEP and ATM were in general in good agreement, in the three non-flow-limited patients the ATM method gave erroneous results. Six patients were also studied supine, including two who were not flow-limited when semirecumbent: both became flow-limited when supine. We conclude that NEP provides a simple method to detect flow limitation in mechanically ventilated patients. The supine position enhances flow limitation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1164/ajrccm.150.5.7952558 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76795864</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76795864</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-bcee87c194f748ac2478411e0b9912cfd1d94e7da2d575d4e3ca99ca6b758fa93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gcIexNuuySbZJEfR-gEFLwreQjY70ZT9qMlW7b93bZd6moH3eQfmQeic4IyQgl2bZbC2yQjHGc-E4jnn8gBNCac8ZUrgw2HHgqaMqbdjdBLjEmOSS4InaDLiUzS_gx5s77s26VwCPysfTN-FTeLq7jupfeN7s02rdfDte9KA_TCtt6ZOvqDtfb1NT9GRM3WEs3HO0Ov9_OX2MV08Pzzd3ixSSynp09ICSGGJYk4waWzOhGSEAC6VIrl1FakUA1GZvOKCVwyoNUpZU5SCS2cUnaGr3d1V6D7XEHvd-Gihrk0L3TpqUQyPyYININuBNnQxBnB6FXxjwkYTrP_s6Z09PdjTXI86htrFeH9dNlDtS__55ZibOChwwbTWxz1GaV5QIekvaVJ6_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76795864</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection of expiratory flow limitation during mechanical ventilation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>VALTA, P ; CORBEIL, C ; LAVOIE, A ; CAMPODONICO, R ; KOULOURIS, N ; CHASSE, M ; BRAIDY, J ; MILIC-EMILI, J</creator><creatorcontrib>VALTA, P ; CORBEIL, C ; LAVOIE, A ; CAMPODONICO, R ; KOULOURIS, N ; CHASSE, M ; BRAIDY, J ; MILIC-EMILI, J</creatorcontrib><description>Two new methods, application of negative pressure at the airway opening during expiration (NEP) and reduction of flow resistance by bypassing the expiratory line of the ventilator by exhaling into the atmosphere (ATM), were used to detect expiratory flow limitation in 12 semirecumbent (45 degree) mechanically ventilated patients, seven with chronic airway obstruction (CAO). An increase of expiratory flow with NEP or ATM, relative to the preceding control breath, was taken as indicating absence of expiratory flow limitation. By contrast, the portion of the tidal expiration over which there was no change in flow with NEP or ATM was considered as flow-limited. With NEP, nine patients exhibited flow limitation, six (all with CAO) were flow-limited over most of the tidal expiration (> 70% VT), and three at < 60% VT. Although the results with NEP and ATM were in general in good agreement, in the three non-flow-limited patients the ATM method gave erroneous results. Six patients were also studied supine, including two who were not flow-limited when semirecumbent: both became flow-limited when supine. We conclude that NEP provides a simple method to detect flow limitation in mechanically ventilated patients. The supine position enhances flow limitation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1073-449X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-4970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.5.7952558</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7952558</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: American Lung Association</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Emergency and intensive respiratory care ; Female ; Humans ; Intensive care medicine ; Lung Diseases, Obstructive - complications ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pulmonary Ventilation ; Respiration, Artificial ; Respiratory Insufficiency - etiology ; Respiratory Insufficiency - physiopathology ; Respiratory Insufficiency - therapy ; Supine Position</subject><ispartof>American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 1994-11, Vol.150 (5), p.1311-1317</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-bcee87c194f748ac2478411e0b9912cfd1d94e7da2d575d4e3ca99ca6b758fa93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3326378$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7952558$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>VALTA, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CORBEIL, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAVOIE, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAMPODONICO, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KOULOURIS, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHASSE, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRAIDY, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MILIC-EMILI, J</creatorcontrib><title>Detection of expiratory flow limitation during mechanical ventilation</title><title>American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Respir Crit Care Med</addtitle><description>Two new methods, application of negative pressure at the airway opening during expiration (NEP) and reduction of flow resistance by bypassing the expiratory line of the ventilator by exhaling into the atmosphere (ATM), were used to detect expiratory flow limitation in 12 semirecumbent (45 degree) mechanically ventilated patients, seven with chronic airway obstruction (CAO). An increase of expiratory flow with NEP or ATM, relative to the preceding control breath, was taken as indicating absence of expiratory flow limitation. By contrast, the portion of the tidal expiration over which there was no change in flow with NEP or ATM was considered as flow-limited. With NEP, nine patients exhibited flow limitation, six (all with CAO) were flow-limited over most of the tidal expiration (> 70% VT), and three at < 60% VT. Although the results with NEP and ATM were in general in good agreement, in the three non-flow-limited patients the ATM method gave erroneous results. Six patients were also studied supine, including two who were not flow-limited when semirecumbent: both became flow-limited when supine. We conclude that NEP provides a simple method to detect flow limitation in mechanically ventilated patients. The supine position enhances flow limitation.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive respiratory care</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Lung Diseases, Obstructive - complications</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pulmonary Ventilation</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial</subject><subject>Respiratory Insufficiency - etiology</subject><subject>Respiratory Insufficiency - physiopathology</subject><subject>Respiratory Insufficiency - therapy</subject><subject>Supine Position</subject><issn>1073-449X</issn><issn>1535-4970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gcIexNuuySbZJEfR-gEFLwreQjY70ZT9qMlW7b93bZd6moH3eQfmQeic4IyQgl2bZbC2yQjHGc-E4jnn8gBNCac8ZUrgw2HHgqaMqbdjdBLjEmOSS4InaDLiUzS_gx5s77s26VwCPysfTN-FTeLq7jupfeN7s02rdfDte9KA_TCtt6ZOvqDtfb1NT9GRM3WEs3HO0Ov9_OX2MV08Pzzd3ixSSynp09ICSGGJYk4waWzOhGSEAC6VIrl1FakUA1GZvOKCVwyoNUpZU5SCS2cUnaGr3d1V6D7XEHvd-Gihrk0L3TpqUQyPyYININuBNnQxBnB6FXxjwkYTrP_s6Z09PdjTXI86htrFeH9dNlDtS__55ZibOChwwbTWxz1GaV5QIekvaVJ6_w</recordid><startdate>19941101</startdate><enddate>19941101</enddate><creator>VALTA, P</creator><creator>CORBEIL, C</creator><creator>LAVOIE, A</creator><creator>CAMPODONICO, R</creator><creator>KOULOURIS, N</creator><creator>CHASSE, M</creator><creator>BRAIDY, J</creator><creator>MILIC-EMILI, J</creator><general>American Lung Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19941101</creationdate><title>Detection of expiratory flow limitation during mechanical ventilation</title><author>VALTA, P ; CORBEIL, C ; LAVOIE, A ; CAMPODONICO, R ; KOULOURIS, N ; CHASSE, M ; BRAIDY, J ; MILIC-EMILI, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-bcee87c194f748ac2478411e0b9912cfd1d94e7da2d575d4e3ca99ca6b758fa93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive respiratory care</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Lung Diseases, Obstructive - complications</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pulmonary Ventilation</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial</topic><topic>Respiratory Insufficiency - etiology</topic><topic>Respiratory Insufficiency - physiopathology</topic><topic>Respiratory Insufficiency - therapy</topic><topic>Supine Position</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>VALTA, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CORBEIL, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAVOIE, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAMPODONICO, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KOULOURIS, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHASSE, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRAIDY, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MILIC-EMILI, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>VALTA, P</au><au>CORBEIL, C</au><au>LAVOIE, A</au><au>CAMPODONICO, R</au><au>KOULOURIS, N</au><au>CHASSE, M</au><au>BRAIDY, J</au><au>MILIC-EMILI, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection of expiratory flow limitation during mechanical ventilation</atitle><jtitle>American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Respir Crit Care Med</addtitle><date>1994-11-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>150</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1311</spage><epage>1317</epage><pages>1311-1317</pages><issn>1073-449X</issn><eissn>1535-4970</eissn><abstract>Two new methods, application of negative pressure at the airway opening during expiration (NEP) and reduction of flow resistance by bypassing the expiratory line of the ventilator by exhaling into the atmosphere (ATM), were used to detect expiratory flow limitation in 12 semirecumbent (45 degree) mechanically ventilated patients, seven with chronic airway obstruction (CAO). An increase of expiratory flow with NEP or ATM, relative to the preceding control breath, was taken as indicating absence of expiratory flow limitation. By contrast, the portion of the tidal expiration over which there was no change in flow with NEP or ATM was considered as flow-limited. With NEP, nine patients exhibited flow limitation, six (all with CAO) were flow-limited over most of the tidal expiration (> 70% VT), and three at < 60% VT. Although the results with NEP and ATM were in general in good agreement, in the three non-flow-limited patients the ATM method gave erroneous results. Six patients were also studied supine, including two who were not flow-limited when semirecumbent: both became flow-limited when supine. We conclude that NEP provides a simple method to detect flow limitation in mechanically ventilated patients. The supine position enhances flow limitation.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>American Lung Association</pub><pmid>7952558</pmid><doi>10.1164/ajrccm.150.5.7952558</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1073-449X |
ispartof | American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 1994-11, Vol.150 (5), p.1311-1317 |
issn | 1073-449X 1535-4970 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76795864 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Biological and medical sciences Emergency and intensive respiratory care Female Humans Intensive care medicine Lung Diseases, Obstructive - complications Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Pulmonary Ventilation Respiration, Artificial Respiratory Insufficiency - etiology Respiratory Insufficiency - physiopathology Respiratory Insufficiency - therapy Supine Position |
title | Detection of expiratory flow limitation during mechanical ventilation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T01%3A05%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20of%20expiratory%20flow%20limitation%20during%20mechanical%20ventilation&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20respiratory%20and%20critical%20care%20medicine&rft.au=VALTA,%20P&rft.date=1994-11-01&rft.volume=150&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1311&rft.epage=1317&rft.pages=1311-1317&rft.issn=1073-449X&rft.eissn=1535-4970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1164/ajrccm.150.5.7952558&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76795864%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76795864&rft_id=info:pmid/7952558&rfr_iscdi=true |