Inefficacy of diltiazem in restenosis prevention after coronary angioplasty
To evaluate the efficacy of diltiazem in preventing restenosis after balloon angioplasty (PTCA). Eighty-nine patients who were undergone to successful PTCA, were divided them in 2 groups (G): A) 44 patients (50%) who received diltiazem (180 mg tid) immediately after PTCA and were kept on it for 6 mo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia 1994-02, Vol.62 (2), p.99-102 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | por |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 102 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 99 |
container_title | Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Tanajura, L F Sousa, A G Feres, F Atallah, T Pinto, I M Centemero, M P Chaves, A J Mattos, L A Martins, H C Abud, R L |
description | To evaluate the efficacy of diltiazem in preventing restenosis after balloon angioplasty (PTCA).
Eighty-nine patients who were undergone to successful PTCA, were divided them in 2 groups (G): A) 44 patients (50%) who received diltiazem (180 mg tid) immediately after PTCA and were kept on it for 6 months); B) 45 patients (50%) who received placebo. Fifty two lesions were dilated in GA and 54 in GB. Patients were excluded from analysis for several reasons, including: necessity of diltiazem or others calcium channel blockers use; heart failure, bradicardia, AV block of any degree, PTCA to chronic total occlusion, ostial lesions and AMI less than 30 days prior to PTCA. Patients were randomized to either the active drug or placebo in a double blind fashion. Restenosis was defined as a 50% lesion. Patients underwent late angiography either at 6 months or sooner if clinically indicated.
Both G were similar to age > 70 years (A = 7% vs B = 4%-p = NS), sex (A = 13% vs B = 11%-p = NS), stable angina (A = 43% vs B = 51%), unstable angina (A = 57% vs B = 49%-p = NS) and single vessel (A = 91% vs B = 87%-p = NS) or multivessel (A = 9% vs B = 13%-p = NS) PTCA. We studied 39/44 (89%) patients in GA and 43/45 (96%) in GB (p = NS). We observed restenosis in 17/39 (43%) in GA and 16/43 (37%) in GB (p = NS). The restenosis rate per lesion was 39% in GA and 31% in GB (p = NS).
Diltiazem was ineffective in the prevention of restenosis following PTCA. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76784751</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76784751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p537-b7944f196daa82e81fe5375c0d813e7589b12f469b0cd3fe6c20a0fcf0cd77a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotT0tLxDAYzEFZ19WfIOTkrZAmbb7kKIuPxQUve_BW0vSLRNqkJq2w_nor9jTMMMzjgmwZk7IAxd-vyHXOn4xxDqLekA3oqtIatuT1ENA5b4090-ho5_vJmx8cqA80YZ4wxOwzHRN-Y5h8DNS4CRO1McVg0pma8OHj2Js8nW_IpTN9xtsVd-T09HjavxTHt-fD_uFYjLWAov3rdqWWnTGKoyodLnJtWadKgVAr3ZbcVVK3zHbCobScGeasWyiAAbEj9_-xY4pf87KxGXy22PcmYJxzAxJUBXW5GO9W49wO2DVj8sMyuVnPi18EtlaP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76784751</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inefficacy of diltiazem in restenosis prevention after coronary angioplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Tanajura, L F ; Sousa, A G ; Feres, F ; Atallah, T ; Pinto, I M ; Centemero, M P ; Chaves, A J ; Mattos, L A ; Martins, H C ; Abud, R L</creator><creatorcontrib>Tanajura, L F ; Sousa, A G ; Feres, F ; Atallah, T ; Pinto, I M ; Centemero, M P ; Chaves, A J ; Mattos, L A ; Martins, H C ; Abud, R L</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the efficacy of diltiazem in preventing restenosis after balloon angioplasty (PTCA).
Eighty-nine patients who were undergone to successful PTCA, were divided them in 2 groups (G): A) 44 patients (50%) who received diltiazem (180 mg tid) immediately after PTCA and were kept on it for 6 months); B) 45 patients (50%) who received placebo. Fifty two lesions were dilated in GA and 54 in GB. Patients were excluded from analysis for several reasons, including: necessity of diltiazem or others calcium channel blockers use; heart failure, bradicardia, AV block of any degree, PTCA to chronic total occlusion, ostial lesions and AMI less than 30 days prior to PTCA. Patients were randomized to either the active drug or placebo in a double blind fashion. Restenosis was defined as a 50% lesion. Patients underwent late angiography either at 6 months or sooner if clinically indicated.
Both G were similar to age > 70 years (A = 7% vs B = 4%-p = NS), sex (A = 13% vs B = 11%-p = NS), stable angina (A = 43% vs B = 51%), unstable angina (A = 57% vs B = 49%-p = NS) and single vessel (A = 91% vs B = 87%-p = NS) or multivessel (A = 9% vs B = 13%-p = NS) PTCA. We studied 39/44 (89%) patients in GA and 43/45 (96%) in GB (p = NS). We observed restenosis in 17/39 (43%) in GA and 16/43 (37%) in GB (p = NS). The restenosis rate per lesion was 39% in GA and 31% in GB (p = NS).
Diltiazem was ineffective in the prevention of restenosis following PTCA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0066-782X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7944997</identifier><language>por</language><publisher>Brazil</publisher><subject>Aged ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary ; Coronary Disease - prevention & control ; Coronary Disease - therapy ; Diltiazem - therapeutic use ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Prospective Studies ; Recurrence</subject><ispartof>Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 1994-02, Vol.62 (2), p.99-102</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7944997$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tanajura, L F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, A G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feres, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atallah, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, I M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Centemero, M P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaves, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattos, L A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, H C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abud, R L</creatorcontrib><title>Inefficacy of diltiazem in restenosis prevention after coronary angioplasty</title><title>Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia</title><addtitle>Arq Bras Cardiol</addtitle><description>To evaluate the efficacy of diltiazem in preventing restenosis after balloon angioplasty (PTCA).
Eighty-nine patients who were undergone to successful PTCA, were divided them in 2 groups (G): A) 44 patients (50%) who received diltiazem (180 mg tid) immediately after PTCA and were kept on it for 6 months); B) 45 patients (50%) who received placebo. Fifty two lesions were dilated in GA and 54 in GB. Patients were excluded from analysis for several reasons, including: necessity of diltiazem or others calcium channel blockers use; heart failure, bradicardia, AV block of any degree, PTCA to chronic total occlusion, ostial lesions and AMI less than 30 days prior to PTCA. Patients were randomized to either the active drug or placebo in a double blind fashion. Restenosis was defined as a 50% lesion. Patients underwent late angiography either at 6 months or sooner if clinically indicated.
Both G were similar to age > 70 years (A = 7% vs B = 4%-p = NS), sex (A = 13% vs B = 11%-p = NS), stable angina (A = 43% vs B = 51%), unstable angina (A = 57% vs B = 49%-p = NS) and single vessel (A = 91% vs B = 87%-p = NS) or multivessel (A = 9% vs B = 13%-p = NS) PTCA. We studied 39/44 (89%) patients in GA and 43/45 (96%) in GB (p = NS). We observed restenosis in 17/39 (43%) in GA and 16/43 (37%) in GB (p = NS). The restenosis rate per lesion was 39% in GA and 31% in GB (p = NS).
Diltiazem was ineffective in the prevention of restenosis following PTCA.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary</subject><subject>Coronary Disease - prevention & control</subject><subject>Coronary Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Diltiazem - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><issn>0066-782X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNotT0tLxDAYzEFZ19WfIOTkrZAmbb7kKIuPxQUve_BW0vSLRNqkJq2w_nor9jTMMMzjgmwZk7IAxd-vyHXOn4xxDqLekA3oqtIatuT1ENA5b4090-ho5_vJmx8cqA80YZ4wxOwzHRN-Y5h8DNS4CRO1McVg0pma8OHj2Js8nW_IpTN9xtsVd-T09HjavxTHt-fD_uFYjLWAov3rdqWWnTGKoyodLnJtWadKgVAr3ZbcVVK3zHbCobScGeasWyiAAbEj9_-xY4pf87KxGXy22PcmYJxzAxJUBXW5GO9W49wO2DVj8sMyuVnPi18EtlaP</recordid><startdate>199402</startdate><enddate>199402</enddate><creator>Tanajura, L F</creator><creator>Sousa, A G</creator><creator>Feres, F</creator><creator>Atallah, T</creator><creator>Pinto, I M</creator><creator>Centemero, M P</creator><creator>Chaves, A J</creator><creator>Mattos, L A</creator><creator>Martins, H C</creator><creator>Abud, R L</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199402</creationdate><title>Inefficacy of diltiazem in restenosis prevention after coronary angioplasty</title><author>Tanajura, L F ; Sousa, A G ; Feres, F ; Atallah, T ; Pinto, I M ; Centemero, M P ; Chaves, A J ; Mattos, L A ; Martins, H C ; Abud, R L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p537-b7944f196daa82e81fe5375c0d813e7589b12f469b0cd3fe6c20a0fcf0cd77a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>por</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary</topic><topic>Coronary Disease - prevention & control</topic><topic>Coronary Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Diltiazem - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tanajura, L F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, A G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feres, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atallah, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, I M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Centemero, M P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaves, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattos, L A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, H C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abud, R L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tanajura, L F</au><au>Sousa, A G</au><au>Feres, F</au><au>Atallah, T</au><au>Pinto, I M</au><au>Centemero, M P</au><au>Chaves, A J</au><au>Mattos, L A</au><au>Martins, H C</au><au>Abud, R L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inefficacy of diltiazem in restenosis prevention after coronary angioplasty</atitle><jtitle>Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia</jtitle><addtitle>Arq Bras Cardiol</addtitle><date>1994-02</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>99-102</pages><issn>0066-782X</issn><abstract>To evaluate the efficacy of diltiazem in preventing restenosis after balloon angioplasty (PTCA).
Eighty-nine patients who were undergone to successful PTCA, were divided them in 2 groups (G): A) 44 patients (50%) who received diltiazem (180 mg tid) immediately after PTCA and were kept on it for 6 months); B) 45 patients (50%) who received placebo. Fifty two lesions were dilated in GA and 54 in GB. Patients were excluded from analysis for several reasons, including: necessity of diltiazem or others calcium channel blockers use; heart failure, bradicardia, AV block of any degree, PTCA to chronic total occlusion, ostial lesions and AMI less than 30 days prior to PTCA. Patients were randomized to either the active drug or placebo in a double blind fashion. Restenosis was defined as a 50% lesion. Patients underwent late angiography either at 6 months or sooner if clinically indicated.
Both G were similar to age > 70 years (A = 7% vs B = 4%-p = NS), sex (A = 13% vs B = 11%-p = NS), stable angina (A = 43% vs B = 51%), unstable angina (A = 57% vs B = 49%-p = NS) and single vessel (A = 91% vs B = 87%-p = NS) or multivessel (A = 9% vs B = 13%-p = NS) PTCA. We studied 39/44 (89%) patients in GA and 43/45 (96%) in GB (p = NS). We observed restenosis in 17/39 (43%) in GA and 16/43 (37%) in GB (p = NS). The restenosis rate per lesion was 39% in GA and 31% in GB (p = NS).
Diltiazem was ineffective in the prevention of restenosis following PTCA.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pmid>7944997</pmid><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0066-782X |
ispartof | Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 1994-02, Vol.62 (2), p.99-102 |
issn | 0066-782X |
language | por |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76784751 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Aged Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary Coronary Disease - prevention & control Coronary Disease - therapy Diltiazem - therapeutic use Double-Blind Method Female Humans Male Prospective Studies Recurrence |
title | Inefficacy of diltiazem in restenosis prevention after coronary angioplasty |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T04%3A16%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inefficacy%20of%20diltiazem%20in%20restenosis%20prevention%20after%20coronary%20angioplasty&rft.jtitle=Arquivos%20brasileiros%20de%20cardiologia&rft.au=Tanajura,%20L%20F&rft.date=1994-02&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=99-102&rft.issn=0066-782X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E76784751%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76784751&rft_id=info:pmid/7944997&rfr_iscdi=true |