Evaluation of Contraceptive History Data in the Republic of Korea
The consistency of retrospective and current status data on contraceptive use from a series of national fertility surveys carried out during the 1970s in Korea is investigated. Aggregate consistency is examined among random samples from the same cohort or cohorts of women interviewed in each survey....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Studies in family planning 1986-01, Vol.17 (1), p.22-35 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 35 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 22 |
| container_title | Studies in family planning |
| container_volume | 17 |
| creator | Pebley, Anne R. Goldman, Noreen Choe, Minja Kim |
| description | The consistency of retrospective and current status data on contraceptive use from a series of national fertility surveys carried out during the 1970s in Korea is investigated. Aggregate consistency is examined among random samples from the same cohort or cohorts of women interviewed in each survey. The results indicate that estimates of trends in contraceptive use from a retrospective history in one survey, or from cross-sectional estimates in a series of surveys, can each yield misleading findings. Data from the 1974 Korean National Fertility Survey (KNFS) appear to be more reliable than those from other surveys, possibly because an interval-by-interval contraceptive history was used, explicit definitions of contraceptive methods were given prior to taking the contraceptive history, and the KNFS involved longer interviewer training and, perhaps, less time pressure during interviews. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/1966952 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76767760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1966952</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1966952</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-9ee7a2f6b3b75046f299d30ccf0e2b45720a5e29b2c4f6204e509f495bc3b3fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1LAzEQBuAgSq1V_AXCgqKn1cnnNsdS6wcWBNHzkqQJbtlu1iRb6L93S4sHQWQOc5iHF-ZF6BzDLaFQ3GEphOTkAA1xQcY5Y4IfoiEAlTkVgh-jkxiXACAFwAANqBR4zPgQTWZrVXcqVb7JvMumvklBGdumam2zpyomHzbZvUoqq5osfdrszbadriuz1S8-WHWKjpyqoz3b7xH6eJi9T5_y-evj83Qyzw0VLOXS2kIRJzTVBQcmHJFyQcEYB5ZoxgsCilsiNTHMCQLMcpCOSa4N1dQt6Ahd73Lb4L86G1O5qqKxda0a67tYFqKfQsC_EDMCnGDew8tfcOm70PRPlJgCYDkGTnt1s1Mm-BiDdWUbqpUKmxJDue2-3Hffy4t9XqdXdvHj9mX396vdfbmt9c-Yb3Pjhtg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1300198053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Contraceptive History Data in the Republic of Korea</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Pebley, Anne R. ; Goldman, Noreen ; Choe, Minja Kim</creator><creatorcontrib>Pebley, Anne R. ; Goldman, Noreen ; Choe, Minja Kim</creatorcontrib><description>The consistency of retrospective and current status data on contraceptive use from a series of national fertility surveys carried out during the 1970s in Korea is investigated. Aggregate consistency is examined among random samples from the same cohort or cohorts of women interviewed in each survey. The results indicate that estimates of trends in contraceptive use from a retrospective history in one survey, or from cross-sectional estimates in a series of surveys, can each yield misleading findings. Data from the 1974 Korean National Fertility Survey (KNFS) appear to be more reliable than those from other surveys, possibly because an interval-by-interval contraceptive history was used, explicit definitions of contraceptive methods were given prior to taking the contraceptive history, and the KNFS involved longer interviewer training and, perhaps, less time pressure during interviews.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-3665</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1728-4465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1966952</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3961845</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Population Council</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age groups ; Birth control ; Birth Intervals ; Birth Rate ; Condoms ; Contraception ; Contraception Behavior ; Developing Countries ; Family planning ; Family Planning Services - trends ; Female ; Fertility ; Gender equality ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Intrauterine devices ; Korea ; Oral contraceptives ; Population ; Pregnancy ; Questionnaires ; Reproductive history</subject><ispartof>Studies in family planning, 1986-01, Vol.17 (1), p.22-35</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1986 The Population Council, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-9ee7a2f6b3b75046f299d30ccf0e2b45720a5e29b2c4f6204e509f495bc3b3fd3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1966952$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1966952$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27850,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3961845$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pebley, Anne R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Noreen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choe, Minja Kim</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Contraceptive History Data in the Republic of Korea</title><title>Studies in family planning</title><addtitle>Stud Fam Plann</addtitle><description>The consistency of retrospective and current status data on contraceptive use from a series of national fertility surveys carried out during the 1970s in Korea is investigated. Aggregate consistency is examined among random samples from the same cohort or cohorts of women interviewed in each survey. The results indicate that estimates of trends in contraceptive use from a retrospective history in one survey, or from cross-sectional estimates in a series of surveys, can each yield misleading findings. Data from the 1974 Korean National Fertility Survey (KNFS) appear to be more reliable than those from other surveys, possibly because an interval-by-interval contraceptive history was used, explicit definitions of contraceptive methods were given prior to taking the contraceptive history, and the KNFS involved longer interviewer training and, perhaps, less time pressure during interviews.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age groups</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Birth Intervals</subject><subject>Birth Rate</subject><subject>Condoms</subject><subject>Contraception</subject><subject>Contraception Behavior</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Family planning</subject><subject>Family Planning Services - trends</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Gender equality</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Intrauterine devices</subject><subject>Korea</subject><subject>Oral contraceptives</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reproductive history</subject><issn>0039-3665</issn><issn>1728-4465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E1LAzEQBuAgSq1V_AXCgqKn1cnnNsdS6wcWBNHzkqQJbtlu1iRb6L93S4sHQWQOc5iHF-ZF6BzDLaFQ3GEphOTkAA1xQcY5Y4IfoiEAlTkVgh-jkxiXACAFwAANqBR4zPgQTWZrVXcqVb7JvMumvklBGdumam2zpyomHzbZvUoqq5osfdrszbadriuz1S8-WHWKjpyqoz3b7xH6eJi9T5_y-evj83Qyzw0VLOXS2kIRJzTVBQcmHJFyQcEYB5ZoxgsCilsiNTHMCQLMcpCOSa4N1dQt6Ahd73Lb4L86G1O5qqKxda0a67tYFqKfQsC_EDMCnGDew8tfcOm70PRPlJgCYDkGTnt1s1Mm-BiDdWUbqpUKmxJDue2-3Hffy4t9XqdXdvHj9mX396vdfbmt9c-Yb3Pjhtg</recordid><startdate>19860101</startdate><enddate>19860101</enddate><creator>Pebley, Anne R.</creator><creator>Goldman, Noreen</creator><creator>Choe, Minja Kim</creator><general>The Population Council</general><general>Population Council</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HFIND</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19860101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Contraceptive History Data in the Republic of Korea</title><author>Pebley, Anne R. ; Goldman, Noreen ; Choe, Minja Kim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-9ee7a2f6b3b75046f299d30ccf0e2b45720a5e29b2c4f6204e509f495bc3b3fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age groups</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Birth Intervals</topic><topic>Birth Rate</topic><topic>Condoms</topic><topic>Contraception</topic><topic>Contraception Behavior</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Family planning</topic><topic>Family Planning Services - trends</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Gender equality</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Intrauterine devices</topic><topic>Korea</topic><topic>Oral contraceptives</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reproductive history</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pebley, Anne R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Noreen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choe, Minja Kim</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 16</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Studies in family planning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pebley, Anne R.</au><au>Goldman, Noreen</au><au>Choe, Minja Kim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Contraceptive History Data in the Republic of Korea</atitle><jtitle>Studies in family planning</jtitle><addtitle>Stud Fam Plann</addtitle><date>1986-01-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>22</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>22-35</pages><issn>0039-3665</issn><eissn>1728-4465</eissn><abstract>The consistency of retrospective and current status data on contraceptive use from a series of national fertility surveys carried out during the 1970s in Korea is investigated. Aggregate consistency is examined among random samples from the same cohort or cohorts of women interviewed in each survey. The results indicate that estimates of trends in contraceptive use from a retrospective history in one survey, or from cross-sectional estimates in a series of surveys, can each yield misleading findings. Data from the 1974 Korean National Fertility Survey (KNFS) appear to be more reliable than those from other surveys, possibly because an interval-by-interval contraceptive history was used, explicit definitions of contraceptive methods were given prior to taking the contraceptive history, and the KNFS involved longer interviewer training and, perhaps, less time pressure during interviews.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Population Council</pub><pmid>3961845</pmid><doi>10.2307/1966952</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0039-3665 |
| ispartof | Studies in family planning, 1986-01, Vol.17 (1), p.22-35 |
| issn | 0039-3665 1728-4465 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76767760 |
| source | MEDLINE; Periodicals Index Online; Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Age groups Birth control Birth Intervals Birth Rate Condoms Contraception Contraception Behavior Developing Countries Family planning Family Planning Services - trends Female Fertility Gender equality Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Humans Infant, Newborn Intrauterine devices Korea Oral contraceptives Population Pregnancy Questionnaires Reproductive history |
| title | Evaluation of Contraceptive History Data in the Republic of Korea |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T12%3A39%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Contraceptive%20History%20Data%20in%20the%20Republic%20of%20Korea&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20family%20planning&rft.au=Pebley,%20Anne%20R.&rft.date=1986-01-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=22&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=22-35&rft.issn=0039-3665&rft.eissn=1728-4465&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1966952&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1966952%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1300198053&rft_id=info:pmid/3961845&rft_jstor_id=1966952&rfr_iscdi=true |