Computerized Clinical Psychological Test Interpretations: Unvalidated Plus All Mean and No Sigma

The author believes that computerized clinical psychological test interpretations offer considerable potential for improving the work of health service providers. In the not-too-distant future, it may be possible to use in isolation such products of our new technology in validly describing a unique...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American psychologist 1986-01, Vol.41 (1), p.14-24
1. Verfasser: Matarazzo, Joseph D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 24
container_issue 1
container_start_page 14
container_title The American psychologist
container_volume 41
creator Matarazzo, Joseph D
description The author believes that computerized clinical psychological test interpretations offer considerable potential for improving the work of health service providers. In the not-too-distant future, it may be possible to use in isolation such products of our new technology in validly describing a unique human. However, until future research establishes that such descriptions meet even the most primitive scientific tests of validation, let alone more adequate ones, it is essential that they be used only as tools by the clinician trained in their use and not as equivalents of, and thus substitutes for, professional education and training. It therefore is imperative that the necessary additional research be initiated and that the profession of psychology accelerate the process of educating our members and use every means possible to communicate to the consumer, the undertrained provider, the psychologist consultants, and the businesspersons and companies selling the software the risks involved in the misuse of such computerized clinical psychological narratives. Society has demonstrated forcefully during the past 20 years its capacity to regulate the use of the tools of psychology when our discipline fails to regulate itself or other users of the knowledge of our discipline. Putting aside the more important human costs, the author believes that the increases that this new technology is adding to the cost of health care have increased the probabilities that legislative, judicial, and administrative restrictions and sanctions will be imposed unless the profession of psychology itself takes the required steps to educate our members and to vigorously pursue the necessary research. Evidence has accumulated during the past two years that psychologists have begun to address vigorously and responsibly some of the scientific, ethical, and professional aspects of the threat this new technology will pose to society and to our profession, if it is left unbridled.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0003-066X.41.1.14
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76747327</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1289862924</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-84e1080593265bd48dc85c11dfbbce612cc6c0d4762fbb8519b521ed16f959203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotVZ_gAehWPAgbM1kk2xylOJHoaCHCr2FbDbVLftlsnuov97UlqKizGGYeZ95GV6EzgGPAcfJDcY4jjDnizGFcSh6gPogYxZJiReHqL_Xj9GJ96swMiGhh3pxwihg0kdiUpdN11qXf9hsOCnyKje6GD77tXmri_r1a5pb3w6nVaAaZ1vd5nXlT9HRUhfenu36AL3c380nj9Hs6WE6uZ1FmgJtI0EtYIGZjAlnaUZFZgQzANkyTY3lQIzhBmc04SRsBAOZMgI2A76UTBIcD9DV1rdx9XsXHlFl7o0tCl3ZuvMq4QlNYpIE8PIXuKo7V4XfFAcaJ5RxCNDoPwiIkIITSWigYEsZV3vv7FI1Li-1WyvAahO82gSrNsEqCirU5uZi59ylpc32F7ukg3691XWjVRPi1a7NTWG96ZyzVat02XwzG_0N_6A-AdRrl-0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614374561</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computerized Clinical Psychological Test Interpretations: Unvalidated Plus All Mean and No Sigma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Matarazzo, Joseph D</creator><contributor>Goodstein, Leonard D</contributor><creatorcontrib>Matarazzo, Joseph D ; Goodstein, Leonard D</creatorcontrib><description>The author believes that computerized clinical psychological test interpretations offer considerable potential for improving the work of health service providers. In the not-too-distant future, it may be possible to use in isolation such products of our new technology in validly describing a unique human. However, until future research establishes that such descriptions meet even the most primitive scientific tests of validation, let alone more adequate ones, it is essential that they be used only as tools by the clinician trained in their use and not as equivalents of, and thus substitutes for, professional education and training. It therefore is imperative that the necessary additional research be initiated and that the profession of psychology accelerate the process of educating our members and use every means possible to communicate to the consumer, the undertrained provider, the psychologist consultants, and the businesspersons and companies selling the software the risks involved in the misuse of such computerized clinical psychological narratives. Society has demonstrated forcefully during the past 20 years its capacity to regulate the use of the tools of psychology when our discipline fails to regulate itself or other users of the knowledge of our discipline. Putting aside the more important human costs, the author believes that the increases that this new technology is adding to the cost of health care have increased the probabilities that legislative, judicial, and administrative restrictions and sanctions will be imposed unless the profession of psychology itself takes the required steps to educate our members and to vigorously pursue the necessary research. Evidence has accumulated during the past two years that psychologists have begun to address vigorously and responsibly some of the scientific, ethical, and professional aspects of the threat this new technology will pose to society and to our profession, if it is left unbridled.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-066X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-990X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.41.1.14</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3754102</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Computer Applications ; Human ; Humans ; Microcomputers ; Psychodiagnosis ; Psychological Tests - instrumentation ; Software ; Test Interpretation</subject><ispartof>The American psychologist, 1986-01, Vol.41 (1), p.14-24</ispartof><rights>1986 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1986, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-84e1080593265bd48dc85c11dfbbce612cc6c0d4762fbb8519b521ed16f959203</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3754102$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Goodstein, Leonard D</contributor><creatorcontrib>Matarazzo, Joseph D</creatorcontrib><title>Computerized Clinical Psychological Test Interpretations: Unvalidated Plus All Mean and No Sigma</title><title>The American psychologist</title><addtitle>Am Psychol</addtitle><description>The author believes that computerized clinical psychological test interpretations offer considerable potential for improving the work of health service providers. In the not-too-distant future, it may be possible to use in isolation such products of our new technology in validly describing a unique human. However, until future research establishes that such descriptions meet even the most primitive scientific tests of validation, let alone more adequate ones, it is essential that they be used only as tools by the clinician trained in their use and not as equivalents of, and thus substitutes for, professional education and training. It therefore is imperative that the necessary additional research be initiated and that the profession of psychology accelerate the process of educating our members and use every means possible to communicate to the consumer, the undertrained provider, the psychologist consultants, and the businesspersons and companies selling the software the risks involved in the misuse of such computerized clinical psychological narratives. Society has demonstrated forcefully during the past 20 years its capacity to regulate the use of the tools of psychology when our discipline fails to regulate itself or other users of the knowledge of our discipline. Putting aside the more important human costs, the author believes that the increases that this new technology is adding to the cost of health care have increased the probabilities that legislative, judicial, and administrative restrictions and sanctions will be imposed unless the profession of psychology itself takes the required steps to educate our members and to vigorously pursue the necessary research. Evidence has accumulated during the past two years that psychologists have begun to address vigorously and responsibly some of the scientific, ethical, and professional aspects of the threat this new technology will pose to society and to our profession, if it is left unbridled.</description><subject>Computer Applications</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Microcomputers</subject><subject>Psychodiagnosis</subject><subject>Psychological Tests - instrumentation</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Test Interpretation</subject><issn>0003-066X</issn><issn>1935-990X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotVZ_gAehWPAgbM1kk2xylOJHoaCHCr2FbDbVLftlsnuov97UlqKizGGYeZ95GV6EzgGPAcfJDcY4jjDnizGFcSh6gPogYxZJiReHqL_Xj9GJ96swMiGhh3pxwihg0kdiUpdN11qXf9hsOCnyKje6GD77tXmri_r1a5pb3w6nVaAaZ1vd5nXlT9HRUhfenu36AL3c380nj9Hs6WE6uZ1FmgJtI0EtYIGZjAlnaUZFZgQzANkyTY3lQIzhBmc04SRsBAOZMgI2A76UTBIcD9DV1rdx9XsXHlFl7o0tCl3ZuvMq4QlNYpIE8PIXuKo7V4XfFAcaJ5RxCNDoPwiIkIITSWigYEsZV3vv7FI1Li-1WyvAahO82gSrNsEqCirU5uZi59ylpc32F7ukg3691XWjVRPi1a7NTWG96ZyzVat02XwzG_0N_6A-AdRrl-0</recordid><startdate>198601</startdate><enddate>198601</enddate><creator>Matarazzo, Joseph D</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198601</creationdate><title>Computerized Clinical Psychological Test Interpretations</title><author>Matarazzo, Joseph D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-84e1080593265bd48dc85c11dfbbce612cc6c0d4762fbb8519b521ed16f959203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Computer Applications</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Microcomputers</topic><topic>Psychodiagnosis</topic><topic>Psychological Tests - instrumentation</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Test Interpretation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matarazzo, Joseph D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American psychologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matarazzo, Joseph D</au><au>Goodstein, Leonard D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computerized Clinical Psychological Test Interpretations: Unvalidated Plus All Mean and No Sigma</atitle><jtitle>The American psychologist</jtitle><addtitle>Am Psychol</addtitle><date>1986-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>14</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>14-24</pages><issn>0003-066X</issn><eissn>1935-990X</eissn><abstract>The author believes that computerized clinical psychological test interpretations offer considerable potential for improving the work of health service providers. In the not-too-distant future, it may be possible to use in isolation such products of our new technology in validly describing a unique human. However, until future research establishes that such descriptions meet even the most primitive scientific tests of validation, let alone more adequate ones, it is essential that they be used only as tools by the clinician trained in their use and not as equivalents of, and thus substitutes for, professional education and training. It therefore is imperative that the necessary additional research be initiated and that the profession of psychology accelerate the process of educating our members and use every means possible to communicate to the consumer, the undertrained provider, the psychologist consultants, and the businesspersons and companies selling the software the risks involved in the misuse of such computerized clinical psychological narratives. Society has demonstrated forcefully during the past 20 years its capacity to regulate the use of the tools of psychology when our discipline fails to regulate itself or other users of the knowledge of our discipline. Putting aside the more important human costs, the author believes that the increases that this new technology is adding to the cost of health care have increased the probabilities that legislative, judicial, and administrative restrictions and sanctions will be imposed unless the profession of psychology itself takes the required steps to educate our members and to vigorously pursue the necessary research. Evidence has accumulated during the past two years that psychologists have begun to address vigorously and responsibly some of the scientific, ethical, and professional aspects of the threat this new technology will pose to society and to our profession, if it is left unbridled.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>3754102</pmid><doi>10.1037/0003-066X.41.1.14</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-066X
ispartof The American psychologist, 1986-01, Vol.41 (1), p.14-24
issn 0003-066X
1935-990X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76747327
source MEDLINE; Periodicals Index Online; APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Computer Applications
Human
Humans
Microcomputers
Psychodiagnosis
Psychological Tests - instrumentation
Software
Test Interpretation
title Computerized Clinical Psychological Test Interpretations: Unvalidated Plus All Mean and No Sigma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T18%3A25%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computerized%20Clinical%20Psychological%20Test%20Interpretations:%20Unvalidated%20Plus%20All%20Mean%20and%20No%20Sigma&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20psychologist&rft.au=Matarazzo,%20Joseph%20D&rft.date=1986-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=14&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=14-24&rft.issn=0003-066X&rft.eissn=1935-990X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0003-066X.41.1.14&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1289862924%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614374561&rft_id=info:pmid/3754102&rfr_iscdi=true