Bacteriologic contamination of intravenous infusion delivery systems in an intensive care unit

Seventy intensive care unit patients were admitted to a double-blind prospective study to determine the level of contamination associated with the admixture and administration of intravenous solutions and whether intravenous filtersets prevented bacteremia. Patients were randomly assigned a 0.22 mic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of medicine 1986-03, Vol.80 (3), p.364-368
Hauptverfasser: Quercia, Robert A., Hills, Sally W., Klimek, Joseph J., Mclaughlin, James C., Nightingale, Charles H., David Drezner, A., Sigman, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 368
container_issue 3
container_start_page 364
container_title The American journal of medicine
container_volume 80
creator Quercia, Robert A.
Hills, Sally W.
Klimek, Joseph J.
Mclaughlin, James C.
Nightingale, Charles H.
David Drezner, A.
Sigman, Robert
description Seventy intensive care unit patients were admitted to a double-blind prospective study to determine the level of contamination associated with the admixture and administration of intravenous solutions and whether intravenous filtersets prevented bacteremia. Patients were randomly assigned a 0.22 micron filterset (real filter) or a filter cartridge without a 0.22 micron membrane (blank filter) on all possible intravenous lines. Forty-six (14.1 percent) real filtersets and 38 (11.3 percent) blank filtersets were found to be contaminated, and overall 30 patients (42.4 percent) were found to have extrinsically contaminated intravenous administration systems at least once during the study. Bacterial adherence to the plastic cartridge was demonstrated to be responsible for culture-positive blank filtersets. Staphylococcus epidermidis was the organism most frequently isolated from real and blank filtersets. Epidemiologic surveillance identified 10 patients with blank filtersets and three patients with real filtersets with clinically significant hospital-acquired bacteremias during the study period. It is concluded that (1) a significant level of extrinsic contamination of intravenous infusion delivery systems occurred on the intensive care unit; (2) documented clinically significant nosocomial bacteremias occurred less often in those patients who had a 0.22 micron bacterial retention filter on all possible intravenous lines.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90707-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76744240</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0002934386907072</els_id><sourcerecordid>14462798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-e2683bdf0bde1ed57851ceb4dcff967a1d406ac4483059199bf66368070d9f7f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE2LFDEQhoMo67j6DxT6IKKHXvPdyUXQRdeFBS96NaSTikS602uSHph_b9oZ5uiektT7VFF5EHpJ8BXBRL7HGNNeM87eKvlO4wEPPX2EdkQI0Q9E0sdod0aeomel_G5PrIW8QBdMECaE2qGfn6yrkOMyLb-i69ySqp1jsjUuqVtCF1PNdg9pWUu7h7VsdQ9T3EM-dOVQKsxb0tm0sZBKSzpnM3RrivU5ehLsVODF6bxEP758_n79tb_7dnN7_fGud4zR2gOVio0-4NEDAS8GJYiDkXsXgpaDJZ5jaR3nimGhidZjkJJJ1T7tdRgCu0RvjnPv8_JnhVLNHIuDabIJ2upmkAPnlOMHQcK5pINWDeRH0OWllAzB3Oc423wwBJvNv9nkmk2uUdL8829oa3t1mr-OM_hz00l4y1-fclucnUK2ycVyxpSkkgrWsA9HDJq0fYRsiouQHPiYwVXjl_j_Pf4CU9-iiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14462798</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bacteriologic contamination of intravenous infusion delivery systems in an intensive care unit</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Quercia, Robert A. ; Hills, Sally W. ; Klimek, Joseph J. ; Mclaughlin, James C. ; Nightingale, Charles H. ; David Drezner, A. ; Sigman, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Quercia, Robert A. ; Hills, Sally W. ; Klimek, Joseph J. ; Mclaughlin, James C. ; Nightingale, Charles H. ; David Drezner, A. ; Sigman, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Seventy intensive care unit patients were admitted to a double-blind prospective study to determine the level of contamination associated with the admixture and administration of intravenous solutions and whether intravenous filtersets prevented bacteremia. Patients were randomly assigned a 0.22 micron filterset (real filter) or a filter cartridge without a 0.22 micron membrane (blank filter) on all possible intravenous lines. Forty-six (14.1 percent) real filtersets and 38 (11.3 percent) blank filtersets were found to be contaminated, and overall 30 patients (42.4 percent) were found to have extrinsically contaminated intravenous administration systems at least once during the study. Bacterial adherence to the plastic cartridge was demonstrated to be responsible for culture-positive blank filtersets. Staphylococcus epidermidis was the organism most frequently isolated from real and blank filtersets. Epidemiologic surveillance identified 10 patients with blank filtersets and three patients with real filtersets with clinically significant hospital-acquired bacteremias during the study period. It is concluded that (1) a significant level of extrinsic contamination of intravenous infusion delivery systems occurred on the intensive care unit; (2) documented clinically significant nosocomial bacteremias occurred less often in those patients who had a 0.22 micron bacterial retention filter on all possible intravenous lines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9343</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-7162</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90707-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3513558</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJMEAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Bacteriological Techniques ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cross Infection - prevention &amp; control ; Double-Blind Method ; Emergency and intensive care: techniques, logistics ; Equipment Contamination ; Filtration - instrumentation ; Humans ; Infusions, Parenteral - instrumentation ; Infusions, Parenteral - standards ; Intensive care medicine ; Medical sciences ; Perfusions. Catheterizations. Hyperbaric oxygenotherapy ; Prospective Studies ; Random Allocation ; Sepsis - etiology ; Sepsis - prevention &amp; control ; Solutions - standards</subject><ispartof>The American journal of medicine, 1986-03, Vol.80 (3), p.364-368</ispartof><rights>1986</rights><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-e2683bdf0bde1ed57851ceb4dcff967a1d406ac4483059199bf66368070d9f7f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-e2683bdf0bde1ed57851ceb4dcff967a1d406ac4483059199bf66368070d9f7f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0002934386907072$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=8626253$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3513558$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quercia, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hills, Sally W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klimek, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mclaughlin, James C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nightingale, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David Drezner, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigman, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Bacteriologic contamination of intravenous infusion delivery systems in an intensive care unit</title><title>The American journal of medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Med</addtitle><description>Seventy intensive care unit patients were admitted to a double-blind prospective study to determine the level of contamination associated with the admixture and administration of intravenous solutions and whether intravenous filtersets prevented bacteremia. Patients were randomly assigned a 0.22 micron filterset (real filter) or a filter cartridge without a 0.22 micron membrane (blank filter) on all possible intravenous lines. Forty-six (14.1 percent) real filtersets and 38 (11.3 percent) blank filtersets were found to be contaminated, and overall 30 patients (42.4 percent) were found to have extrinsically contaminated intravenous administration systems at least once during the study. Bacterial adherence to the plastic cartridge was demonstrated to be responsible for culture-positive blank filtersets. Staphylococcus epidermidis was the organism most frequently isolated from real and blank filtersets. Epidemiologic surveillance identified 10 patients with blank filtersets and three patients with real filtersets with clinically significant hospital-acquired bacteremias during the study period. It is concluded that (1) a significant level of extrinsic contamination of intravenous infusion delivery systems occurred on the intensive care unit; (2) documented clinically significant nosocomial bacteremias occurred less often in those patients who had a 0.22 micron bacterial retention filter on all possible intravenous lines.</description><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Bacteriological Techniques</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cross Infection - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive care: techniques, logistics</subject><subject>Equipment Contamination</subject><subject>Filtration - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infusions, Parenteral - instrumentation</subject><subject>Infusions, Parenteral - standards</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Perfusions. Catheterizations. Hyperbaric oxygenotherapy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Sepsis - etiology</subject><subject>Sepsis - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Solutions - standards</subject><issn>0002-9343</issn><issn>1555-7162</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE2LFDEQhoMo67j6DxT6IKKHXvPdyUXQRdeFBS96NaSTikS602uSHph_b9oZ5uiektT7VFF5EHpJ8BXBRL7HGNNeM87eKvlO4wEPPX2EdkQI0Q9E0sdod0aeomel_G5PrIW8QBdMECaE2qGfn6yrkOMyLb-i69ySqp1jsjUuqVtCF1PNdg9pWUu7h7VsdQ9T3EM-dOVQKsxb0tm0sZBKSzpnM3RrivU5ehLsVODF6bxEP758_n79tb_7dnN7_fGud4zR2gOVio0-4NEDAS8GJYiDkXsXgpaDJZ5jaR3nimGhidZjkJJJ1T7tdRgCu0RvjnPv8_JnhVLNHIuDabIJ2upmkAPnlOMHQcK5pINWDeRH0OWllAzB3Oc423wwBJvNv9nkmk2uUdL8829oa3t1mr-OM_hz00l4y1-fclucnUK2ycVyxpSkkgrWsA9HDJq0fYRsiouQHPiYwVXjl_j_Pf4CU9-iiQ</recordid><startdate>198603</startdate><enddate>198603</enddate><creator>Quercia, Robert A.</creator><creator>Hills, Sally W.</creator><creator>Klimek, Joseph J.</creator><creator>Mclaughlin, James C.</creator><creator>Nightingale, Charles H.</creator><creator>David Drezner, A.</creator><creator>Sigman, Robert</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198603</creationdate><title>Bacteriologic contamination of intravenous infusion delivery systems in an intensive care unit</title><author>Quercia, Robert A. ; Hills, Sally W. ; Klimek, Joseph J. ; Mclaughlin, James C. ; Nightingale, Charles H. ; David Drezner, A. ; Sigman, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-e2683bdf0bde1ed57851ceb4dcff967a1d406ac4483059199bf66368070d9f7f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Bacteriological Techniques</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cross Infection - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive care: techniques, logistics</topic><topic>Equipment Contamination</topic><topic>Filtration - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infusions, Parenteral - instrumentation</topic><topic>Infusions, Parenteral - standards</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Perfusions. Catheterizations. Hyperbaric oxygenotherapy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Sepsis - etiology</topic><topic>Sepsis - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Solutions - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quercia, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hills, Sally W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klimek, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mclaughlin, James C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nightingale, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David Drezner, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigman, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quercia, Robert A.</au><au>Hills, Sally W.</au><au>Klimek, Joseph J.</au><au>Mclaughlin, James C.</au><au>Nightingale, Charles H.</au><au>David Drezner, A.</au><au>Sigman, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bacteriologic contamination of intravenous infusion delivery systems in an intensive care unit</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Med</addtitle><date>1986-03</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>364</spage><epage>368</epage><pages>364-368</pages><issn>0002-9343</issn><eissn>1555-7162</eissn><coden>AJMEAZ</coden><abstract>Seventy intensive care unit patients were admitted to a double-blind prospective study to determine the level of contamination associated with the admixture and administration of intravenous solutions and whether intravenous filtersets prevented bacteremia. Patients were randomly assigned a 0.22 micron filterset (real filter) or a filter cartridge without a 0.22 micron membrane (blank filter) on all possible intravenous lines. Forty-six (14.1 percent) real filtersets and 38 (11.3 percent) blank filtersets were found to be contaminated, and overall 30 patients (42.4 percent) were found to have extrinsically contaminated intravenous administration systems at least once during the study. Bacterial adherence to the plastic cartridge was demonstrated to be responsible for culture-positive blank filtersets. Staphylococcus epidermidis was the organism most frequently isolated from real and blank filtersets. Epidemiologic surveillance identified 10 patients with blank filtersets and three patients with real filtersets with clinically significant hospital-acquired bacteremias during the study period. It is concluded that (1) a significant level of extrinsic contamination of intravenous infusion delivery systems occurred on the intensive care unit; (2) documented clinically significant nosocomial bacteremias occurred less often in those patients who had a 0.22 micron bacterial retention filter on all possible intravenous lines.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>3513558</pmid><doi>10.1016/0002-9343(86)90707-2</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9343
ispartof The American journal of medicine, 1986-03, Vol.80 (3), p.364-368
issn 0002-9343
1555-7162
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76744240
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Bacteriological Techniques
Biological and medical sciences
Cross Infection - prevention & control
Double-Blind Method
Emergency and intensive care: techniques, logistics
Equipment Contamination
Filtration - instrumentation
Humans
Infusions, Parenteral - instrumentation
Infusions, Parenteral - standards
Intensive care medicine
Medical sciences
Perfusions. Catheterizations. Hyperbaric oxygenotherapy
Prospective Studies
Random Allocation
Sepsis - etiology
Sepsis - prevention & control
Solutions - standards
title Bacteriologic contamination of intravenous infusion delivery systems in an intensive care unit
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T14%3A53%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bacteriologic%20contamination%20of%20intravenous%20infusion%20delivery%20systems%20in%20an%20intensive%20care%20unit&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=Quercia,%20Robert%20A.&rft.date=1986-03&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=364&rft.epage=368&rft.pages=364-368&rft.issn=0002-9343&rft.eissn=1555-7162&rft.coden=AJMEAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0002-9343(86)90707-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14462798%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14462798&rft_id=info:pmid/3513558&rft_els_id=0002934386907072&rfr_iscdi=true