Effects of thematic structure on syntactic comprehension in aphasia

This study assessed (1) aphasic subjects' sensitivity to the given-new structure within simple paragraphs and (2) the extent to which narrative discourse is facilitative of syntactic processing in the absence of semantic constraints. Subjects were divided into four groups along the dimensions o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brain and language 1986, Vol.27 (1), p.38-49
Hauptverfasser: Cannito, Michael P., Jarecki, Janis M., Pierce, Robert S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 49
container_issue 1
container_start_page 38
container_title Brain and language
container_volume 27
creator Cannito, Michael P.
Jarecki, Janis M.
Pierce, Robert S.
description This study assessed (1) aphasic subjects' sensitivity to the given-new structure within simple paragraphs and (2) the extent to which narrative discourse is facilitative of syntactic processing in the absence of semantic constraints. Subjects were divided into four groups along the dimensions of comprehension level and fluency. Stimulus items consisted of reversible active and passive sentences that were presented in the following three conditions: (1) isolation, (2) at the end of paragraphs such that the given-new structure was respected, and (3) at the end of paragraphs such that the given-new structure was violated. Fluency did not significantly influence performance but comprehension level did. The high-comprehension group presented no significant differences between contextual conditions. The low-comprehension group, however, favored both paragraph contexts over isolation with no difference occurring between contextual conditions. These results suggest that lower level aphasic subjects are able to utilize thematic, antecedent verbal information for comprehending sentences in connected discourse even when the discourse is not semantically predictive of the underlying meaning of these sentences. Whether the narrative respects or violates the given-new relationship may not be an important factor. The reasons for these findings are explored.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0093-934X(86)90003-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76705622</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0093934X86900039</els_id><sourcerecordid>1295105866</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-cf22bdf0c4a07fbcaa753ea5d1a990c59619c3293eb9c2f6767bab85a3cd1cdf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhUVpSTdp_0ELhoaQHtyOJEu2LoGwJGkh0EsDuYnxWGIV1vZWsgv595Wzyx56aE_DzHzzkN5j7AOHLxy4_gpgZGlk9XjZ6M8GAHL3iq04GCgFV-o1Wx2Rt-w0pScAzquGn7ATUfHGgFmx9Y33jqZUjL6YNq7HKVCRpjjTNEdXjEORnocJaRnT2O-i27ghhTwPQ4G7DaaA79gbj9vk3h_qGXu4vfm5_lbe_7j7vr6-L7HS9VSSF6LtPFCFUPuWEGslHaqOozFAymhuSAojXWtIeF3rusW2USip49R5ecYu9rq7OP6aXZpsHxK57RYHN87J5gNQWoj_gqrhUgppMvjpL_BpnOOQP2G5MIqDarTOVLWnKI4pReftLoYe47PlYJco7OKzXXy2jbYvUdhF_ONBfG571x2PDt7n_flhj4lw6yMOFNIRa7SpawUZu9pjLlv7O7hoEwU3kOtCzMnZbgz_fscfKY-lIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1295105866</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of thematic structure on syntactic comprehension in aphasia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Cannito, Michael P. ; Jarecki, Janis M. ; Pierce, Robert S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cannito, Michael P. ; Jarecki, Janis M. ; Pierce, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><description>This study assessed (1) aphasic subjects' sensitivity to the given-new structure within simple paragraphs and (2) the extent to which narrative discourse is facilitative of syntactic processing in the absence of semantic constraints. Subjects were divided into four groups along the dimensions of comprehension level and fluency. Stimulus items consisted of reversible active and passive sentences that were presented in the following three conditions: (1) isolation, (2) at the end of paragraphs such that the given-new structure was respected, and (3) at the end of paragraphs such that the given-new structure was violated. Fluency did not significantly influence performance but comprehension level did. The high-comprehension group presented no significant differences between contextual conditions. The low-comprehension group, however, favored both paragraph contexts over isolation with no difference occurring between contextual conditions. These results suggest that lower level aphasic subjects are able to utilize thematic, antecedent verbal information for comprehending sentences in connected discourse even when the discourse is not semantically predictive of the underlying meaning of these sentences. Whether the narrative respects or violates the given-new relationship may not be an important factor. The reasons for these findings are explored.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-934X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2155</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0093-934X(86)90003-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2418909</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRLGAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aphasia - psychology ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Language ; Middle Aged ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Semantics ; Speech Perception</subject><ispartof>Brain and language, 1986, Vol.27 (1), p.38-49</ispartof><rights>1986</rights><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-cf22bdf0c4a07fbcaa753ea5d1a990c59619c3293eb9c2f6767bab85a3cd1cdf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-cf22bdf0c4a07fbcaa753ea5d1a990c59619c3293eb9c2f6767bab85a3cd1cdf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0093934X86900039$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27846,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=8697750$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2418909$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cannito, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarecki, Janis M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of thematic structure on syntactic comprehension in aphasia</title><title>Brain and language</title><addtitle>Brain Lang</addtitle><description>This study assessed (1) aphasic subjects' sensitivity to the given-new structure within simple paragraphs and (2) the extent to which narrative discourse is facilitative of syntactic processing in the absence of semantic constraints. Subjects were divided into four groups along the dimensions of comprehension level and fluency. Stimulus items consisted of reversible active and passive sentences that were presented in the following three conditions: (1) isolation, (2) at the end of paragraphs such that the given-new structure was respected, and (3) at the end of paragraphs such that the given-new structure was violated. Fluency did not significantly influence performance but comprehension level did. The high-comprehension group presented no significant differences between contextual conditions. The low-comprehension group, however, favored both paragraph contexts over isolation with no difference occurring between contextual conditions. These results suggest that lower level aphasic subjects are able to utilize thematic, antecedent verbal information for comprehending sentences in connected discourse even when the discourse is not semantically predictive of the underlying meaning of these sentences. Whether the narrative respects or violates the given-new relationship may not be an important factor. The reasons for these findings are explored.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aphasia - psychology</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><issn>0093-934X</issn><issn>1090-2155</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhUVpSTdp_0ELhoaQHtyOJEu2LoGwJGkh0EsDuYnxWGIV1vZWsgv595Wzyx56aE_DzHzzkN5j7AOHLxy4_gpgZGlk9XjZ6M8GAHL3iq04GCgFV-o1Wx2Rt-w0pScAzquGn7ATUfHGgFmx9Y33jqZUjL6YNq7HKVCRpjjTNEdXjEORnocJaRnT2O-i27ghhTwPQ4G7DaaA79gbj9vk3h_qGXu4vfm5_lbe_7j7vr6-L7HS9VSSF6LtPFCFUPuWEGslHaqOozFAymhuSAojXWtIeF3rusW2USip49R5ecYu9rq7OP6aXZpsHxK57RYHN87J5gNQWoj_gqrhUgppMvjpL_BpnOOQP2G5MIqDarTOVLWnKI4pReftLoYe47PlYJco7OKzXXy2jbYvUdhF_ONBfG571x2PDt7n_flhj4lw6yMOFNIRa7SpawUZu9pjLlv7O7hoEwU3kOtCzMnZbgz_fscfKY-lIg</recordid><startdate>1986</startdate><enddate>1986</enddate><creator>Cannito, Michael P.</creator><creator>Jarecki, Janis M.</creator><creator>Pierce, Robert S.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JILTI</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1986</creationdate><title>Effects of thematic structure on syntactic comprehension in aphasia</title><author>Cannito, Michael P. ; Jarecki, Janis M. ; Pierce, Robert S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-cf22bdf0c4a07fbcaa753ea5d1a990c59619c3293eb9c2f6767bab85a3cd1cdf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aphasia - psychology</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cannito, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarecki, Janis M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 32</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Brain and language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cannito, Michael P.</au><au>Jarecki, Janis M.</au><au>Pierce, Robert S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of thematic structure on syntactic comprehension in aphasia</atitle><jtitle>Brain and language</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Lang</addtitle><date>1986</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>38</spage><epage>49</epage><pages>38-49</pages><issn>0093-934X</issn><eissn>1090-2155</eissn><coden>BRLGAZ</coden><abstract>This study assessed (1) aphasic subjects' sensitivity to the given-new structure within simple paragraphs and (2) the extent to which narrative discourse is facilitative of syntactic processing in the absence of semantic constraints. Subjects were divided into four groups along the dimensions of comprehension level and fluency. Stimulus items consisted of reversible active and passive sentences that were presented in the following three conditions: (1) isolation, (2) at the end of paragraphs such that the given-new structure was respected, and (3) at the end of paragraphs such that the given-new structure was violated. Fluency did not significantly influence performance but comprehension level did. The high-comprehension group presented no significant differences between contextual conditions. The low-comprehension group, however, favored both paragraph contexts over isolation with no difference occurring between contextual conditions. These results suggest that lower level aphasic subjects are able to utilize thematic, antecedent verbal information for comprehending sentences in connected discourse even when the discourse is not semantically predictive of the underlying meaning of these sentences. Whether the narrative respects or violates the given-new relationship may not be an important factor. The reasons for these findings are explored.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>2418909</pmid><doi>10.1016/0093-934X(86)90003-9</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0093-934X
ispartof Brain and language, 1986, Vol.27 (1), p.38-49
issn 0093-934X
1090-2155
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76705622
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Adult
Aged
Aphasia - psychology
Behavioral psychophysiology
Biological and medical sciences
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Language
Middle Aged
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Semantics
Speech Perception
title Effects of thematic structure on syntactic comprehension in aphasia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T07%3A41%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20thematic%20structure%20on%20syntactic%20comprehension%20in%20aphasia&rft.jtitle=Brain%20and%20language&rft.au=Cannito,%20Michael%20P.&rft.date=1986&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=49&rft.pages=38-49&rft.issn=0093-934X&rft.eissn=1090-2155&rft.coden=BRLGAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0093-934X(86)90003-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1295105866%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1295105866&rft_id=info:pmid/2418909&rft_els_id=0093934X86900039&rfr_iscdi=true