Effects of thematic structure on syntactic comprehension in aphasia
This study assessed (1) aphasic subjects' sensitivity to the given-new structure within simple paragraphs and (2) the extent to which narrative discourse is facilitative of syntactic processing in the absence of semantic constraints. Subjects were divided into four groups along the dimensions o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Brain and language 1986, Vol.27 (1), p.38-49 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 49 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 38 |
container_title | Brain and language |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Cannito, Michael P. Jarecki, Janis M. Pierce, Robert S. |
description | This study assessed (1) aphasic subjects' sensitivity to the given-new structure within simple paragraphs and (2) the extent to which narrative discourse is facilitative of syntactic processing in the absence of semantic constraints. Subjects were divided into four groups along the dimensions of comprehension level and fluency. Stimulus items consisted of reversible active and passive sentences that were presented in the following three conditions: (1) isolation, (2) at the end of paragraphs such that the given-new structure was respected, and (3) at the end of paragraphs such that the given-new structure was violated. Fluency did not significantly influence performance but comprehension level did. The high-comprehension group presented no significant differences between contextual conditions. The low-comprehension group, however, favored both paragraph contexts over isolation with no difference occurring between contextual conditions. These results suggest that lower level aphasic subjects are able to utilize thematic, antecedent verbal information for comprehending sentences in connected discourse even when the discourse is not semantically predictive of the underlying meaning of these sentences. Whether the narrative respects or violates the given-new relationship may not be an important factor. The reasons for these findings are explored. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0093-934X(86)90003-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76705622</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0093934X86900039</els_id><sourcerecordid>1295105866</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-cf22bdf0c4a07fbcaa753ea5d1a990c59619c3293eb9c2f6767bab85a3cd1cdf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhUVpSTdp_0ELhoaQHtyOJEu2LoGwJGkh0EsDuYnxWGIV1vZWsgv595Wzyx56aE_DzHzzkN5j7AOHLxy4_gpgZGlk9XjZ6M8GAHL3iq04GCgFV-o1Wx2Rt-w0pScAzquGn7ATUfHGgFmx9Y33jqZUjL6YNq7HKVCRpjjTNEdXjEORnocJaRnT2O-i27ghhTwPQ4G7DaaA79gbj9vk3h_qGXu4vfm5_lbe_7j7vr6-L7HS9VSSF6LtPFCFUPuWEGslHaqOozFAymhuSAojXWtIeF3rusW2USip49R5ecYu9rq7OP6aXZpsHxK57RYHN87J5gNQWoj_gqrhUgppMvjpL_BpnOOQP2G5MIqDarTOVLWnKI4pReftLoYe47PlYJco7OKzXXy2jbYvUdhF_ONBfG571x2PDt7n_flhj4lw6yMOFNIRa7SpawUZu9pjLlv7O7hoEwU3kOtCzMnZbgz_fscfKY-lIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1295105866</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of thematic structure on syntactic comprehension in aphasia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Cannito, Michael P. ; Jarecki, Janis M. ; Pierce, Robert S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cannito, Michael P. ; Jarecki, Janis M. ; Pierce, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><description>This study assessed (1) aphasic subjects' sensitivity to the given-new structure within simple paragraphs and (2) the extent to which narrative discourse is facilitative of syntactic processing in the absence of semantic constraints. Subjects were divided into four groups along the dimensions of comprehension level and fluency. Stimulus items consisted of reversible active and passive sentences that were presented in the following three conditions: (1) isolation, (2) at the end of paragraphs such that the given-new structure was respected, and (3) at the end of paragraphs such that the given-new structure was violated. Fluency did not significantly influence performance but comprehension level did. The high-comprehension group presented no significant differences between contextual conditions. The low-comprehension group, however, favored both paragraph contexts over isolation with no difference occurring between contextual conditions. These results suggest that lower level aphasic subjects are able to utilize thematic, antecedent verbal information for comprehending sentences in connected discourse even when the discourse is not semantically predictive of the underlying meaning of these sentences. Whether the narrative respects or violates the given-new relationship may not be an important factor. The reasons for these findings are explored.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-934X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2155</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0093-934X(86)90003-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2418909</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRLGAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aphasia - psychology ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Language ; Middle Aged ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Semantics ; Speech Perception</subject><ispartof>Brain and language, 1986, Vol.27 (1), p.38-49</ispartof><rights>1986</rights><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-cf22bdf0c4a07fbcaa753ea5d1a990c59619c3293eb9c2f6767bab85a3cd1cdf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-cf22bdf0c4a07fbcaa753ea5d1a990c59619c3293eb9c2f6767bab85a3cd1cdf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0093934X86900039$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27846,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8697750$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2418909$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cannito, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarecki, Janis M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of thematic structure on syntactic comprehension in aphasia</title><title>Brain and language</title><addtitle>Brain Lang</addtitle><description>This study assessed (1) aphasic subjects' sensitivity to the given-new structure within simple paragraphs and (2) the extent to which narrative discourse is facilitative of syntactic processing in the absence of semantic constraints. Subjects were divided into four groups along the dimensions of comprehension level and fluency. Stimulus items consisted of reversible active and passive sentences that were presented in the following three conditions: (1) isolation, (2) at the end of paragraphs such that the given-new structure was respected, and (3) at the end of paragraphs such that the given-new structure was violated. Fluency did not significantly influence performance but comprehension level did. The high-comprehension group presented no significant differences between contextual conditions. The low-comprehension group, however, favored both paragraph contexts over isolation with no difference occurring between contextual conditions. These results suggest that lower level aphasic subjects are able to utilize thematic, antecedent verbal information for comprehending sentences in connected discourse even when the discourse is not semantically predictive of the underlying meaning of these sentences. Whether the narrative respects or violates the given-new relationship may not be an important factor. The reasons for these findings are explored.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aphasia - psychology</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><issn>0093-934X</issn><issn>1090-2155</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhUVpSTdp_0ELhoaQHtyOJEu2LoGwJGkh0EsDuYnxWGIV1vZWsgv595Wzyx56aE_DzHzzkN5j7AOHLxy4_gpgZGlk9XjZ6M8GAHL3iq04GCgFV-o1Wx2Rt-w0pScAzquGn7ATUfHGgFmx9Y33jqZUjL6YNq7HKVCRpjjTNEdXjEORnocJaRnT2O-i27ghhTwPQ4G7DaaA79gbj9vk3h_qGXu4vfm5_lbe_7j7vr6-L7HS9VSSF6LtPFCFUPuWEGslHaqOozFAymhuSAojXWtIeF3rusW2USip49R5ecYu9rq7OP6aXZpsHxK57RYHN87J5gNQWoj_gqrhUgppMvjpL_BpnOOQP2G5MIqDarTOVLWnKI4pReftLoYe47PlYJco7OKzXXy2jbYvUdhF_ONBfG571x2PDt7n_flhj4lw6yMOFNIRa7SpawUZu9pjLlv7O7hoEwU3kOtCzMnZbgz_fscfKY-lIg</recordid><startdate>1986</startdate><enddate>1986</enddate><creator>Cannito, Michael P.</creator><creator>Jarecki, Janis M.</creator><creator>Pierce, Robert S.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JILTI</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1986</creationdate><title>Effects of thematic structure on syntactic comprehension in aphasia</title><author>Cannito, Michael P. ; Jarecki, Janis M. ; Pierce, Robert S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-cf22bdf0c4a07fbcaa753ea5d1a990c59619c3293eb9c2f6767bab85a3cd1cdf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aphasia - psychology</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cannito, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarecki, Janis M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 32</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Brain and language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cannito, Michael P.</au><au>Jarecki, Janis M.</au><au>Pierce, Robert S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of thematic structure on syntactic comprehension in aphasia</atitle><jtitle>Brain and language</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Lang</addtitle><date>1986</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>38</spage><epage>49</epage><pages>38-49</pages><issn>0093-934X</issn><eissn>1090-2155</eissn><coden>BRLGAZ</coden><abstract>This study assessed (1) aphasic subjects' sensitivity to the given-new structure within simple paragraphs and (2) the extent to which narrative discourse is facilitative of syntactic processing in the absence of semantic constraints. Subjects were divided into four groups along the dimensions of comprehension level and fluency. Stimulus items consisted of reversible active and passive sentences that were presented in the following three conditions: (1) isolation, (2) at the end of paragraphs such that the given-new structure was respected, and (3) at the end of paragraphs such that the given-new structure was violated. Fluency did not significantly influence performance but comprehension level did. The high-comprehension group presented no significant differences between contextual conditions. The low-comprehension group, however, favored both paragraph contexts over isolation with no difference occurring between contextual conditions. These results suggest that lower level aphasic subjects are able to utilize thematic, antecedent verbal information for comprehending sentences in connected discourse even when the discourse is not semantically predictive of the underlying meaning of these sentences. Whether the narrative respects or violates the given-new relationship may not be an important factor. The reasons for these findings are explored.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>2418909</pmid><doi>10.1016/0093-934X(86)90003-9</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0093-934X |
ispartof | Brain and language, 1986, Vol.27 (1), p.38-49 |
issn | 0093-934X 1090-2155 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76705622 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | Adult Aged Aphasia - psychology Behavioral psychophysiology Biological and medical sciences Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Language Middle Aged Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Semantics Speech Perception |
title | Effects of thematic structure on syntactic comprehension in aphasia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T07%3A41%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20thematic%20structure%20on%20syntactic%20comprehension%20in%20aphasia&rft.jtitle=Brain%20and%20language&rft.au=Cannito,%20Michael%20P.&rft.date=1986&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=49&rft.pages=38-49&rft.issn=0093-934X&rft.eissn=1090-2155&rft.coden=BRLGAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0093-934X(86)90003-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1295105866%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1295105866&rft_id=info:pmid/2418909&rft_els_id=0093934X86900039&rfr_iscdi=true |