Radionuclide evaluation of bile leakage and the use of subhepatic drains after cholecystectomy
Our study addresses the question of efficacy of drainage after cholecystectomy by evaluation of the leakage of radiolabeled bile. Based on our data, drains placed at the time of surgery do not appear to reliably remove bile or to decrease morbidity. Our study reveals that bile leakage after cholecys...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of surgery 1986-02, Vol.151 (2), p.259-262 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 262 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 259 |
container_title | The American journal of surgery |
container_volume | 151 |
creator | Gilsdorf, James R. Phillips, Monir McLeod, Michael K. Harness, Jay K. Hoversten, Glenn H. Woodbury, David Daley, Kenneth |
description | Our study addresses the question of efficacy of drainage after cholecystectomy by evaluation of the leakage of radiolabeled bile. Based on our data, drains placed at the time of surgery do not appear to reliably remove bile or to decrease morbidity. Our study reveals that bile leakage after cholecystectomy is frequent, cannot be accurately predicted at operation, is not related to the experience of the operating surgeons, and does not necessarily correlate with morbidity. The shorter postoperative hospital stay in the group of patients with subhepatic bile leakage compared with the group without evidence of leakage after cholecystectomy is not statistically significant. However, this trend does suggest that there is no increase in morbidity associated with bile leakage per se. A large, clinically significant bile leak can easily be treated by modern interventional radiologic techniques if drainage is indicated.
A larger, double-blind study is necessary to further evaluate the issues surrounding bile leakage and drainage after cholecystectomy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90082-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76705174</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0002961086900826</els_id><sourcerecordid>76705174</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-d044a56ad1fb93829ca882db09f4f391bb62a1ebdb8d59d597b5bf185961c7bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE2LFDEQhoO4rOOs_0AhBxE99Jr0Rzq5CLKou7CwsOjVUEkqTjTTPSbdA_PvN-0McxQCRfI-VaQeQl5zds0ZFx8ZY3WlBGfvpfigGJN1JZ6RFZe9qriUzXOyOiMvyMucf5cr521zSS4b1Ype8BX5-QgujMNsY3BIcQ9xhqk80NFTEyLSiPAHfiGFwdFpg3TOuGR5NhvcFdRSlyAMmYKfMFG7GSPaQ57QTuP2cEUuPMSMr051TX58_fL95ra6f_h2d_P5vrKNFFPlWNtCJ8Bxb1Qja2VBytoZpnzrG8WNETVwNM5I16lyetMZz2VXdrO9Mc2avDvO3aXx74x50tuQLcYIA45z1r3oWcf7toDtEbRpzDmh17sUtpAOmjO9aNWLM70401Lof1q1KG1vTvNns0V3bjp5LPnbUw7ZQvQJBhvyGZN9wwpYsE9HDIuLfcCksw04WHQhFWHajeH__3gCdYSUrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76705174</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radionuclide evaluation of bile leakage and the use of subhepatic drains after cholecystectomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gilsdorf, James R. ; Phillips, Monir ; McLeod, Michael K. ; Harness, Jay K. ; Hoversten, Glenn H. ; Woodbury, David ; Daley, Kenneth</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilsdorf, James R. ; Phillips, Monir ; McLeod, Michael K. ; Harness, Jay K. ; Hoversten, Glenn H. ; Woodbury, David ; Daley, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><description>Our study addresses the question of efficacy of drainage after cholecystectomy by evaluation of the leakage of radiolabeled bile. Based on our data, drains placed at the time of surgery do not appear to reliably remove bile or to decrease morbidity. Our study reveals that bile leakage after cholecystectomy is frequent, cannot be accurately predicted at operation, is not related to the experience of the operating surgeons, and does not necessarily correlate with morbidity. The shorter postoperative hospital stay in the group of patients with subhepatic bile leakage compared with the group without evidence of leakage after cholecystectomy is not statistically significant. However, this trend does suggest that there is no increase in morbidity associated with bile leakage per se. A large, clinically significant bile leak can easily be treated by modern interventional radiologic techniques if drainage is indicated.
A larger, double-blind study is necessary to further evaluate the issues surrounding bile leakage and drainage after cholecystectomy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90082-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3946761</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJSUAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bile ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cholecystectomy - adverse effects ; Drainage - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Liver - diagnostic imaging ; Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; Postoperative Period ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the digestive system</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 1986-02, Vol.151 (2), p.259-262</ispartof><rights>1986</rights><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-d044a56ad1fb93829ca882db09f4f391bb62a1ebdb8d59d597b5bf185961c7bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-d044a56ad1fb93829ca882db09f4f391bb62a1ebdb8d59d597b5bf185961c7bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0002961086900826$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8730467$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3946761$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilsdorf, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Monir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLeod, Michael K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harness, Jay K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoversten, Glenn H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodbury, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daley, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><title>Radionuclide evaluation of bile leakage and the use of subhepatic drains after cholecystectomy</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Our study addresses the question of efficacy of drainage after cholecystectomy by evaluation of the leakage of radiolabeled bile. Based on our data, drains placed at the time of surgery do not appear to reliably remove bile or to decrease morbidity. Our study reveals that bile leakage after cholecystectomy is frequent, cannot be accurately predicted at operation, is not related to the experience of the operating surgeons, and does not necessarily correlate with morbidity. The shorter postoperative hospital stay in the group of patients with subhepatic bile leakage compared with the group without evidence of leakage after cholecystectomy is not statistically significant. However, this trend does suggest that there is no increase in morbidity associated with bile leakage per se. A large, clinically significant bile leak can easily be treated by modern interventional radiologic techniques if drainage is indicated.
A larger, double-blind study is necessary to further evaluate the issues surrounding bile leakage and drainage after cholecystectomy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bile</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Drainage - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Liver - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the digestive system</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE2LFDEQhoO4rOOs_0AhBxE99Jr0Rzq5CLKou7CwsOjVUEkqTjTTPSbdA_PvN-0McxQCRfI-VaQeQl5zds0ZFx8ZY3WlBGfvpfigGJN1JZ6RFZe9qriUzXOyOiMvyMucf5cr521zSS4b1Ype8BX5-QgujMNsY3BIcQ9xhqk80NFTEyLSiPAHfiGFwdFpg3TOuGR5NhvcFdRSlyAMmYKfMFG7GSPaQ57QTuP2cEUuPMSMr051TX58_fL95ra6f_h2d_P5vrKNFFPlWNtCJ8Bxb1Qja2VBytoZpnzrG8WNETVwNM5I16lyetMZz2VXdrO9Mc2avDvO3aXx74x50tuQLcYIA45z1r3oWcf7toDtEbRpzDmh17sUtpAOmjO9aNWLM70401Lof1q1KG1vTvNns0V3bjp5LPnbUw7ZQvQJBhvyGZN9wwpYsE9HDIuLfcCksw04WHQhFWHajeH__3gCdYSUrg</recordid><startdate>19860201</startdate><enddate>19860201</enddate><creator>Gilsdorf, James R.</creator><creator>Phillips, Monir</creator><creator>McLeod, Michael K.</creator><creator>Harness, Jay K.</creator><creator>Hoversten, Glenn H.</creator><creator>Woodbury, David</creator><creator>Daley, Kenneth</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19860201</creationdate><title>Radionuclide evaluation of bile leakage and the use of subhepatic drains after cholecystectomy</title><author>Gilsdorf, James R. ; Phillips, Monir ; McLeod, Michael K. ; Harness, Jay K. ; Hoversten, Glenn H. ; Woodbury, David ; Daley, Kenneth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-d044a56ad1fb93829ca882db09f4f391bb62a1ebdb8d59d597b5bf185961c7bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bile</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Drainage - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Liver - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the digestive system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilsdorf, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Monir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLeod, Michael K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harness, Jay K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoversten, Glenn H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodbury, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daley, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilsdorf, James R.</au><au>Phillips, Monir</au><au>McLeod, Michael K.</au><au>Harness, Jay K.</au><au>Hoversten, Glenn H.</au><au>Woodbury, David</au><au>Daley, Kenneth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radionuclide evaluation of bile leakage and the use of subhepatic drains after cholecystectomy</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>1986-02-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>151</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>259</spage><epage>262</epage><pages>259-262</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><coden>AJSUAB</coden><abstract>Our study addresses the question of efficacy of drainage after cholecystectomy by evaluation of the leakage of radiolabeled bile. Based on our data, drains placed at the time of surgery do not appear to reliably remove bile or to decrease morbidity. Our study reveals that bile leakage after cholecystectomy is frequent, cannot be accurately predicted at operation, is not related to the experience of the operating surgeons, and does not necessarily correlate with morbidity. The shorter postoperative hospital stay in the group of patients with subhepatic bile leakage compared with the group without evidence of leakage after cholecystectomy is not statistically significant. However, this trend does suggest that there is no increase in morbidity associated with bile leakage per se. A large, clinically significant bile leak can easily be treated by modern interventional radiologic techniques if drainage is indicated.
A larger, double-blind study is necessary to further evaluate the issues surrounding bile leakage and drainage after cholecystectomy.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>3946761</pmid><doi>10.1016/0002-9610(86)90082-6</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9610 |
ispartof | The American journal of surgery, 1986-02, Vol.151 (2), p.259-262 |
issn | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76705174 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Bile Biological and medical sciences Cholecystectomy - adverse effects Drainage - methods Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Length of Stay Liver - diagnostic imaging Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Postoperative Complications Postoperative Period Radionuclide Imaging Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the digestive system |
title | Radionuclide evaluation of bile leakage and the use of subhepatic drains after cholecystectomy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T03%3A43%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radionuclide%20evaluation%20of%20bile%20leakage%20and%20the%20use%20of%20subhepatic%20drains%20after%20cholecystectomy&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Gilsdorf,%20James%20R.&rft.date=1986-02-01&rft.volume=151&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=259&rft.epage=262&rft.pages=259-262&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft.coden=AJSUAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0002-9610(86)90082-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76705174%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76705174&rft_id=info:pmid/3946761&rft_els_id=0002961086900826&rfr_iscdi=true |