Radionuclide evaluation of bile leakage and the use of subhepatic drains after cholecystectomy

Our study addresses the question of efficacy of drainage after cholecystectomy by evaluation of the leakage of radiolabeled bile. Based on our data, drains placed at the time of surgery do not appear to reliably remove bile or to decrease morbidity. Our study reveals that bile leakage after cholecys...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of surgery 1986-02, Vol.151 (2), p.259-262
Hauptverfasser: Gilsdorf, James R., Phillips, Monir, McLeod, Michael K., Harness, Jay K., Hoversten, Glenn H., Woodbury, David, Daley, Kenneth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 262
container_issue 2
container_start_page 259
container_title The American journal of surgery
container_volume 151
creator Gilsdorf, James R.
Phillips, Monir
McLeod, Michael K.
Harness, Jay K.
Hoversten, Glenn H.
Woodbury, David
Daley, Kenneth
description Our study addresses the question of efficacy of drainage after cholecystectomy by evaluation of the leakage of radiolabeled bile. Based on our data, drains placed at the time of surgery do not appear to reliably remove bile or to decrease morbidity. Our study reveals that bile leakage after cholecystectomy is frequent, cannot be accurately predicted at operation, is not related to the experience of the operating surgeons, and does not necessarily correlate with morbidity. The shorter postoperative hospital stay in the group of patients with subhepatic bile leakage compared with the group without evidence of leakage after cholecystectomy is not statistically significant. However, this trend does suggest that there is no increase in morbidity associated with bile leakage per se. A large, clinically significant bile leak can easily be treated by modern interventional radiologic techniques if drainage is indicated. A larger, double-blind study is necessary to further evaluate the issues surrounding bile leakage and drainage after cholecystectomy.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90082-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76705174</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0002961086900826</els_id><sourcerecordid>76705174</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-d044a56ad1fb93829ca882db09f4f391bb62a1ebdb8d59d597b5bf185961c7bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE2LFDEQhoO4rOOs_0AhBxE99Jr0Rzq5CLKou7CwsOjVUEkqTjTTPSbdA_PvN-0McxQCRfI-VaQeQl5zds0ZFx8ZY3WlBGfvpfigGJN1JZ6RFZe9qriUzXOyOiMvyMucf5cr521zSS4b1Ype8BX5-QgujMNsY3BIcQ9xhqk80NFTEyLSiPAHfiGFwdFpg3TOuGR5NhvcFdRSlyAMmYKfMFG7GSPaQ57QTuP2cEUuPMSMr051TX58_fL95ra6f_h2d_P5vrKNFFPlWNtCJ8Bxb1Qja2VBytoZpnzrG8WNETVwNM5I16lyetMZz2VXdrO9Mc2avDvO3aXx74x50tuQLcYIA45z1r3oWcf7toDtEbRpzDmh17sUtpAOmjO9aNWLM70401Lof1q1KG1vTvNns0V3bjp5LPnbUw7ZQvQJBhvyGZN9wwpYsE9HDIuLfcCksw04WHQhFWHajeH__3gCdYSUrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76705174</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radionuclide evaluation of bile leakage and the use of subhepatic drains after cholecystectomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gilsdorf, James R. ; Phillips, Monir ; McLeod, Michael K. ; Harness, Jay K. ; Hoversten, Glenn H. ; Woodbury, David ; Daley, Kenneth</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilsdorf, James R. ; Phillips, Monir ; McLeod, Michael K. ; Harness, Jay K. ; Hoversten, Glenn H. ; Woodbury, David ; Daley, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><description>Our study addresses the question of efficacy of drainage after cholecystectomy by evaluation of the leakage of radiolabeled bile. Based on our data, drains placed at the time of surgery do not appear to reliably remove bile or to decrease morbidity. Our study reveals that bile leakage after cholecystectomy is frequent, cannot be accurately predicted at operation, is not related to the experience of the operating surgeons, and does not necessarily correlate with morbidity. The shorter postoperative hospital stay in the group of patients with subhepatic bile leakage compared with the group without evidence of leakage after cholecystectomy is not statistically significant. However, this trend does suggest that there is no increase in morbidity associated with bile leakage per se. A large, clinically significant bile leak can easily be treated by modern interventional radiologic techniques if drainage is indicated. A larger, double-blind study is necessary to further evaluate the issues surrounding bile leakage and drainage after cholecystectomy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90082-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3946761</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJSUAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bile ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cholecystectomy - adverse effects ; Drainage - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Liver - diagnostic imaging ; Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; Postoperative Period ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the digestive system</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 1986-02, Vol.151 (2), p.259-262</ispartof><rights>1986</rights><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-d044a56ad1fb93829ca882db09f4f391bb62a1ebdb8d59d597b5bf185961c7bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-d044a56ad1fb93829ca882db09f4f391bb62a1ebdb8d59d597b5bf185961c7bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0002961086900826$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=8730467$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3946761$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilsdorf, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Monir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLeod, Michael K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harness, Jay K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoversten, Glenn H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodbury, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daley, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><title>Radionuclide evaluation of bile leakage and the use of subhepatic drains after cholecystectomy</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Our study addresses the question of efficacy of drainage after cholecystectomy by evaluation of the leakage of radiolabeled bile. Based on our data, drains placed at the time of surgery do not appear to reliably remove bile or to decrease morbidity. Our study reveals that bile leakage after cholecystectomy is frequent, cannot be accurately predicted at operation, is not related to the experience of the operating surgeons, and does not necessarily correlate with morbidity. The shorter postoperative hospital stay in the group of patients with subhepatic bile leakage compared with the group without evidence of leakage after cholecystectomy is not statistically significant. However, this trend does suggest that there is no increase in morbidity associated with bile leakage per se. A large, clinically significant bile leak can easily be treated by modern interventional radiologic techniques if drainage is indicated. A larger, double-blind study is necessary to further evaluate the issues surrounding bile leakage and drainage after cholecystectomy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bile</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Drainage - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Liver - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the digestive system</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE2LFDEQhoO4rOOs_0AhBxE99Jr0Rzq5CLKou7CwsOjVUEkqTjTTPSbdA_PvN-0McxQCRfI-VaQeQl5zds0ZFx8ZY3WlBGfvpfigGJN1JZ6RFZe9qriUzXOyOiMvyMucf5cr521zSS4b1Ype8BX5-QgujMNsY3BIcQ9xhqk80NFTEyLSiPAHfiGFwdFpg3TOuGR5NhvcFdRSlyAMmYKfMFG7GSPaQ57QTuP2cEUuPMSMr051TX58_fL95ra6f_h2d_P5vrKNFFPlWNtCJ8Bxb1Qja2VBytoZpnzrG8WNETVwNM5I16lyetMZz2VXdrO9Mc2avDvO3aXx74x50tuQLcYIA45z1r3oWcf7toDtEbRpzDmh17sUtpAOmjO9aNWLM70401Lof1q1KG1vTvNns0V3bjp5LPnbUw7ZQvQJBhvyGZN9wwpYsE9HDIuLfcCksw04WHQhFWHajeH__3gCdYSUrg</recordid><startdate>19860201</startdate><enddate>19860201</enddate><creator>Gilsdorf, James R.</creator><creator>Phillips, Monir</creator><creator>McLeod, Michael K.</creator><creator>Harness, Jay K.</creator><creator>Hoversten, Glenn H.</creator><creator>Woodbury, David</creator><creator>Daley, Kenneth</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19860201</creationdate><title>Radionuclide evaluation of bile leakage and the use of subhepatic drains after cholecystectomy</title><author>Gilsdorf, James R. ; Phillips, Monir ; McLeod, Michael K. ; Harness, Jay K. ; Hoversten, Glenn H. ; Woodbury, David ; Daley, Kenneth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-d044a56ad1fb93829ca882db09f4f391bb62a1ebdb8d59d597b5bf185961c7bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bile</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Drainage - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Liver - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the digestive system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilsdorf, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Monir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLeod, Michael K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harness, Jay K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoversten, Glenn H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodbury, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daley, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilsdorf, James R.</au><au>Phillips, Monir</au><au>McLeod, Michael K.</au><au>Harness, Jay K.</au><au>Hoversten, Glenn H.</au><au>Woodbury, David</au><au>Daley, Kenneth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radionuclide evaluation of bile leakage and the use of subhepatic drains after cholecystectomy</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>1986-02-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>151</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>259</spage><epage>262</epage><pages>259-262</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><coden>AJSUAB</coden><abstract>Our study addresses the question of efficacy of drainage after cholecystectomy by evaluation of the leakage of radiolabeled bile. Based on our data, drains placed at the time of surgery do not appear to reliably remove bile or to decrease morbidity. Our study reveals that bile leakage after cholecystectomy is frequent, cannot be accurately predicted at operation, is not related to the experience of the operating surgeons, and does not necessarily correlate with morbidity. The shorter postoperative hospital stay in the group of patients with subhepatic bile leakage compared with the group without evidence of leakage after cholecystectomy is not statistically significant. However, this trend does suggest that there is no increase in morbidity associated with bile leakage per se. A large, clinically significant bile leak can easily be treated by modern interventional radiologic techniques if drainage is indicated. A larger, double-blind study is necessary to further evaluate the issues surrounding bile leakage and drainage after cholecystectomy.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>3946761</pmid><doi>10.1016/0002-9610(86)90082-6</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9610
ispartof The American journal of surgery, 1986-02, Vol.151 (2), p.259-262
issn 0002-9610
1879-1883
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76705174
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Bile
Biological and medical sciences
Cholecystectomy - adverse effects
Drainage - methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Length of Stay
Liver - diagnostic imaging
Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications
Postoperative Period
Radionuclide Imaging
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the digestive system
title Radionuclide evaluation of bile leakage and the use of subhepatic drains after cholecystectomy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T03%3A43%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radionuclide%20evaluation%20of%20bile%20leakage%20and%20the%20use%20of%20subhepatic%20drains%20after%20cholecystectomy&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Gilsdorf,%20James%20R.&rft.date=1986-02-01&rft.volume=151&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=259&rft.epage=262&rft.pages=259-262&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft.coden=AJSUAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0002-9610(86)90082-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76705174%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76705174&rft_id=info:pmid/3946761&rft_els_id=0002961086900826&rfr_iscdi=true