Antenatal diagnosis of isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia is not an indicator of outcome

It has been reported previously that infants diagnosed with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) antenatally have a much poorer prognosis than those diagnosed postnatally. The authors identified 173 high-risk (symptomatic within the first 6 hours of life) infants with CDH treated in the past decade...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pediatric surgery 1994-06, Vol.29 (6), p.815-819
Hauptverfasser: Wilson, Jay M., Fauza, Dario O., Lund, Dennis P., Benacerraf, Beryl R., Hardy Hendren, W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 819
container_issue 6
container_start_page 815
container_title Journal of pediatric surgery
container_volume 29
creator Wilson, Jay M.
Fauza, Dario O.
Lund, Dennis P.
Benacerraf, Beryl R.
Hardy Hendren, W.
description It has been reported previously that infants diagnosed with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) antenatally have a much poorer prognosis than those diagnosed postnatally. The authors identified 173 high-risk (symptomatic within the first 6 hours of life) infants with CDH treated in the past decade. Seventy-seven cases were diagnosed antenatally and 96 were diagnosed postnatally. The survival rate was slightly worse for the antenatal group (34% v 48% for the postnatal group; P = .04). However, 59 of the 173 patients (34%) had other life-threatening congenital anomalies. Among the 114 patients with isolated CDH, the survival rate increased to 59% in the antenatal group and 63% in the postnatal group—a difference that was not significant. The timing of antenatal diagnosis (> or 25 weeks), is of no value in predicting outcome; (2) survival for patients with antenatally diagnosed isolated CDH is much higher than previously reported, a fact that should be considered when antenatal manipulations such as in utero CDH repair or termination of pregnancy are contemplated; (3) awareness of CDH by antenatal diagnosis leads to more effective resuscitation after birth; and (4) CDH associated with another significant anomaly, especially cardiac, currently has a dismal prognosis, irrespective of timing of diagnosis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0022-3468(94)90378-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76701667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0022346894903786</els_id><sourcerecordid>76701667</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-1d01f2de0a2235adb4781f25066a3fe93ac72775ede6b8138fa80a1992c641593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1rGzEQhkVpcB2n_6CFPZSQHDaRVrta7aVgTL7AkEt7rRhLs7bKruRKcqD_PnK9-NiT0MzzDjMPIV8YvWOUiXtKq6rktZA3XX3bUd7KUnwgc9ZwVjb5-5HMz8gnchnjb0pzmbIZmUnaSlrJOfm1dAkdJBgKY2HrfLSx8H1hox8goSm0d1t0dgL2uwDbEZLVxQ6Ds5DBwvlUgCusM1ZD8uGY94ek_YhX5KKHIeLn6V2Qn48PP1bP5fr16WW1XJeaS5FKZijrK4MUqoo3YDZ1K3OhoUIA77HjoNuqbRs0KDaScdmDpMC6rtKiZk3HF-T6NHcf_J8DxqRGGzUOAzj0h6hake8Wos1gfQJ18DEG7NU-2BHCX8WoOmpVR2fq6Ex1tfqnVYkc-zrNP2xGNOfQ5DH3v019iBqGPoDTNp6xvGM-jGbs-wnD7OLNYlBRW3QajQ2okzLe_n-Pd5aRk7Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76701667</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antenatal diagnosis of isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia is not an indicator of outcome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Wilson, Jay M. ; Fauza, Dario O. ; Lund, Dennis P. ; Benacerraf, Beryl R. ; Hardy Hendren, W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Jay M. ; Fauza, Dario O. ; Lund, Dennis P. ; Benacerraf, Beryl R. ; Hardy Hendren, W.</creatorcontrib><description>It has been reported previously that infants diagnosed with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) antenatally have a much poorer prognosis than those diagnosed postnatally. The authors identified 173 high-risk (symptomatic within the first 6 hours of life) infants with CDH treated in the past decade. Seventy-seven cases were diagnosed antenatally and 96 were diagnosed postnatally. The survival rate was slightly worse for the antenatal group (34% v 48% for the postnatal group; P = .04). However, 59 of the 173 patients (34%) had other life-threatening congenital anomalies. Among the 114 patients with isolated CDH, the survival rate increased to 59% in the antenatal group and 63% in the postnatal group—a difference that was not significant. The timing of antenatal diagnosis (&gt; or &lt;25 weeks) had no impact on the statistics ( P = .08). The only parameter consistently different between all groups and subgroups was the Apgar score at 5 minutes, which was always better in the antenatal group ( P &lt; .02), possibly reflecting more efficient resuscitation. Of the 59 patients with other life-threatening anomalies (42 cardiac), there was one survivor among the 34 in the antenatal group and only two among the 25 in the postnatal group, despite the fact that 39 patients had undergone resuscitation, which included ECMO in 25. From these data the authors conclude that (1) antenatal diagnosis of an isolated CDH, regardless of its timing (&lt; or &gt; 25 weeks), is of no value in predicting outcome; (2) survival for patients with antenatally diagnosed isolated CDH is much higher than previously reported, a fact that should be considered when antenatal manipulations such as in utero CDH repair or termination of pregnancy are contemplated; (3) awareness of CDH by antenatal diagnosis leads to more effective resuscitation after birth; and (4) CDH associated with another significant anomaly, especially cardiac, currently has a dismal prognosis, irrespective of timing of diagnosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3468</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0022-3468(94)90378-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8078028</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPDSA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Abnormalities, Multiple ; Apgar Score ; Biological and medical sciences ; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Hernia, Diaphragmatic - diagnosis ; Hernia, Diaphragmatic - mortality ; Hernia, Diaphragmatic - therapy ; Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Management. Prenatal diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta ; Prenatal Diagnosis ; Risk Factors ; Survival Rate ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of pediatric surgery, 1994-06, Vol.29 (6), p.815-819</ispartof><rights>1994</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-1d01f2de0a2235adb4781f25066a3fe93ac72775ede6b8138fa80a1992c641593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-1d01f2de0a2235adb4781f25066a3fe93ac72775ede6b8138fa80a1992c641593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3468(94)90378-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4152230$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8078028$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Jay M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fauza, Dario O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lund, Dennis P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benacerraf, Beryl R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy Hendren, W.</creatorcontrib><title>Antenatal diagnosis of isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia is not an indicator of outcome</title><title>Journal of pediatric surgery</title><addtitle>J Pediatr Surg</addtitle><description>It has been reported previously that infants diagnosed with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) antenatally have a much poorer prognosis than those diagnosed postnatally. The authors identified 173 high-risk (symptomatic within the first 6 hours of life) infants with CDH treated in the past decade. Seventy-seven cases were diagnosed antenatally and 96 were diagnosed postnatally. The survival rate was slightly worse for the antenatal group (34% v 48% for the postnatal group; P = .04). However, 59 of the 173 patients (34%) had other life-threatening congenital anomalies. Among the 114 patients with isolated CDH, the survival rate increased to 59% in the antenatal group and 63% in the postnatal group—a difference that was not significant. The timing of antenatal diagnosis (&gt; or &lt;25 weeks) had no impact on the statistics ( P = .08). The only parameter consistently different between all groups and subgroups was the Apgar score at 5 minutes, which was always better in the antenatal group ( P &lt; .02), possibly reflecting more efficient resuscitation. Of the 59 patients with other life-threatening anomalies (42 cardiac), there was one survivor among the 34 in the antenatal group and only two among the 25 in the postnatal group, despite the fact that 39 patients had undergone resuscitation, which included ECMO in 25. From these data the authors conclude that (1) antenatal diagnosis of an isolated CDH, regardless of its timing (&lt; or &gt; 25 weeks), is of no value in predicting outcome; (2) survival for patients with antenatally diagnosed isolated CDH is much higher than previously reported, a fact that should be considered when antenatal manipulations such as in utero CDH repair or termination of pregnancy are contemplated; (3) awareness of CDH by antenatal diagnosis leads to more effective resuscitation after birth; and (4) CDH associated with another significant anomaly, especially cardiac, currently has a dismal prognosis, irrespective of timing of diagnosis.</description><subject>Abnormalities, Multiple</subject><subject>Apgar Score</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Hernia, Diaphragmatic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hernia, Diaphragmatic - mortality</subject><subject>Hernia, Diaphragmatic - therapy</subject><subject>Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0022-3468</issn><issn>1531-5037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1rGzEQhkVpcB2n_6CFPZSQHDaRVrta7aVgTL7AkEt7rRhLs7bKruRKcqD_PnK9-NiT0MzzDjMPIV8YvWOUiXtKq6rktZA3XX3bUd7KUnwgc9ZwVjb5-5HMz8gnchnjb0pzmbIZmUnaSlrJOfm1dAkdJBgKY2HrfLSx8H1hox8goSm0d1t0dgL2uwDbEZLVxQ6Ds5DBwvlUgCusM1ZD8uGY94ek_YhX5KKHIeLn6V2Qn48PP1bP5fr16WW1XJeaS5FKZijrK4MUqoo3YDZ1K3OhoUIA77HjoNuqbRs0KDaScdmDpMC6rtKiZk3HF-T6NHcf_J8DxqRGGzUOAzj0h6hake8Wos1gfQJ18DEG7NU-2BHCX8WoOmpVR2fq6Ex1tfqnVYkc-zrNP2xGNOfQ5DH3v019iBqGPoDTNp6xvGM-jGbs-wnD7OLNYlBRW3QajQ2okzLe_n-Pd5aRk7Y</recordid><startdate>19940601</startdate><enddate>19940601</enddate><creator>Wilson, Jay M.</creator><creator>Fauza, Dario O.</creator><creator>Lund, Dennis P.</creator><creator>Benacerraf, Beryl R.</creator><creator>Hardy Hendren, W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940601</creationdate><title>Antenatal diagnosis of isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia is not an indicator of outcome</title><author>Wilson, Jay M. ; Fauza, Dario O. ; Lund, Dennis P. ; Benacerraf, Beryl R. ; Hardy Hendren, W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-1d01f2de0a2235adb4781f25066a3fe93ac72775ede6b8138fa80a1992c641593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Abnormalities, Multiple</topic><topic>Apgar Score</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Hernia, Diaphragmatic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hernia, Diaphragmatic - mortality</topic><topic>Hernia, Diaphragmatic - therapy</topic><topic>Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Jay M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fauza, Dario O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lund, Dennis P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benacerraf, Beryl R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy Hendren, W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pediatric surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilson, Jay M.</au><au>Fauza, Dario O.</au><au>Lund, Dennis P.</au><au>Benacerraf, Beryl R.</au><au>Hardy Hendren, W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antenatal diagnosis of isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia is not an indicator of outcome</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pediatric surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Pediatr Surg</addtitle><date>1994-06-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>815</spage><epage>819</epage><pages>815-819</pages><issn>0022-3468</issn><eissn>1531-5037</eissn><coden>JPDSA3</coden><abstract>It has been reported previously that infants diagnosed with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) antenatally have a much poorer prognosis than those diagnosed postnatally. The authors identified 173 high-risk (symptomatic within the first 6 hours of life) infants with CDH treated in the past decade. Seventy-seven cases were diagnosed antenatally and 96 were diagnosed postnatally. The survival rate was slightly worse for the antenatal group (34% v 48% for the postnatal group; P = .04). However, 59 of the 173 patients (34%) had other life-threatening congenital anomalies. Among the 114 patients with isolated CDH, the survival rate increased to 59% in the antenatal group and 63% in the postnatal group—a difference that was not significant. The timing of antenatal diagnosis (&gt; or &lt;25 weeks) had no impact on the statistics ( P = .08). The only parameter consistently different between all groups and subgroups was the Apgar score at 5 minutes, which was always better in the antenatal group ( P &lt; .02), possibly reflecting more efficient resuscitation. Of the 59 patients with other life-threatening anomalies (42 cardiac), there was one survivor among the 34 in the antenatal group and only two among the 25 in the postnatal group, despite the fact that 39 patients had undergone resuscitation, which included ECMO in 25. From these data the authors conclude that (1) antenatal diagnosis of an isolated CDH, regardless of its timing (&lt; or &gt; 25 weeks), is of no value in predicting outcome; (2) survival for patients with antenatally diagnosed isolated CDH is much higher than previously reported, a fact that should be considered when antenatal manipulations such as in utero CDH repair or termination of pregnancy are contemplated; (3) awareness of CDH by antenatal diagnosis leads to more effective resuscitation after birth; and (4) CDH associated with another significant anomaly, especially cardiac, currently has a dismal prognosis, irrespective of timing of diagnosis.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>8078028</pmid><doi>10.1016/0022-3468(94)90378-6</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3468
ispartof Journal of pediatric surgery, 1994-06, Vol.29 (6), p.815-819
issn 0022-3468
1531-5037
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76701667
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Abnormalities, Multiple
Apgar Score
Biological and medical sciences
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Hernia, Diaphragmatic - diagnosis
Hernia, Diaphragmatic - mortality
Hernia, Diaphragmatic - therapy
Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Management. Prenatal diagnosis
Medical sciences
Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta
Prenatal Diagnosis
Risk Factors
Survival Rate
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Antenatal diagnosis of isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia is not an indicator of outcome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T18%3A19%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antenatal%20diagnosis%20of%20isolated%20congenital%20diaphragmatic%20hernia%20is%20not%20an%20indicator%20of%20outcome&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pediatric%20surgery&rft.au=Wilson,%20Jay%20M.&rft.date=1994-06-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=815&rft.epage=819&rft.pages=815-819&rft.issn=0022-3468&rft.eissn=1531-5037&rft.coden=JPDSA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0022-3468(94)90378-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76701667%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76701667&rft_id=info:pmid/8078028&rft_els_id=0022346894903786&rfr_iscdi=true