Treatment of Delayed and Nonunions of the Humeral Shaft Using the Seidel Locking Nail: A Preliminary Report of Five Cases

We report the treatment of five cases of delayed/or nonunions of the humerus using the Seidel locking nail. Union occurred in all cases despite two distal unscrewings. Shoulder motion was pain free, with slightly restricted abduction. No subacromial impingement occurred. Elbow motion was slightly li...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedic trauma 1994, Vol.8 (3), p.240-244
Hauptverfasser: Pietu, G, Raynaud, G, Letenneur, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 244
container_issue 3
container_start_page 240
container_title Journal of orthopaedic trauma
container_volume 8
creator Pietu, G
Raynaud, G
Letenneur, J
description We report the treatment of five cases of delayed/or nonunions of the humerus using the Seidel locking nail. Union occurred in all cases despite two distal unscrewings. Shoulder motion was pain free, with slightly restricted abduction. No subacromial impingement occurred. Elbow motion was slightly limited in extension in two elderly patients, most likely because of previous immobilization. This method of treatment therefore seems to be of value because it avoids iatrogenic risk to the radial nerve and the possible need for bone grafting.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00005131-199406000-00010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76597474</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76597474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3390-846f2ba7e4581826b56741db4dcaf4a7a058a92d4e01e71c2395b19eb5ef9ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi0EKkvhJyD5gLiF2okdx9yqhdJKq4LocrYmzoQ1deLFTqj23-P9YG9Yskae95kPvSaEcvaBM62uWD6SV7zgWgtW51eRL2fPyILLnC5LzZ-TBWs0K2RV6ZfkVUq_MtKwsrwgFzmoRosF2a0jwjTgONHQ00_oYYcdhbGj92GcRxfGtBemDdLbecAInj5soJ_oj-TGn4f8A7oOPV0F-7hP3YPzH-k1_RbRu8GNEHf0O25DPEy4cX-QLiFhek1e9OATvjnFS7K--bxe3harr1_ulterwua9WdGIui9bUChkw5uybmWtBO9a0VnoBShgsgFddgIZR8VtWWnZco2txF6DrS7J-2PbbQy_Z0yTGVyy6D2MGOZkVC21EkpksDmCNoaUIvZmG92Qtzecmb3p5p_p5my6OZieS9-eZsztgN258ORy1t-ddEgWfB9htC6dMcGZ0rXMmDhiT8FPGNOjn58wmg2Cnzbmf19e_QVOaJih</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76597474</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment of Delayed and Nonunions of the Humeral Shaft Using the Seidel Locking Nail: A Preliminary Report of Five Cases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Pietu, G ; Raynaud, G ; Letenneur, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Pietu, G ; Raynaud, G ; Letenneur, J</creatorcontrib><description>We report the treatment of five cases of delayed/or nonunions of the humerus using the Seidel locking nail. Union occurred in all cases despite two distal unscrewings. Shoulder motion was pain free, with slightly restricted abduction. No subacromial impingement occurred. Elbow motion was slightly limited in extension in two elderly patients, most likely because of previous immobilization. This method of treatment therefore seems to be of value because it avoids iatrogenic risk to the radial nerve and the possible need for bone grafting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-5339</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-2291</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199406000-00010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8027894</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott-Raven Publishers</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Nails ; Elbow ; Equipment Failure ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods ; Fractures, Ununited - surgery ; Humans ; Humeral Fractures - surgery ; Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Shoulder ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 1994, Vol.8 (3), p.240-244</ispartof><rights>Lippincott-Raven Publishers.</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4107965$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8027894$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pietu, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raynaud, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Letenneur, J</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment of Delayed and Nonunions of the Humeral Shaft Using the Seidel Locking Nail: A Preliminary Report of Five Cases</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic trauma</title><addtitle>J Orthop Trauma</addtitle><description>We report the treatment of five cases of delayed/or nonunions of the humerus using the Seidel locking nail. Union occurred in all cases despite two distal unscrewings. Shoulder motion was pain free, with slightly restricted abduction. No subacromial impingement occurred. Elbow motion was slightly limited in extension in two elderly patients, most likely because of previous immobilization. This method of treatment therefore seems to be of value because it avoids iatrogenic risk to the radial nerve and the possible need for bone grafting.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Nails</subject><subject>Elbow</subject><subject>Equipment Failure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods</subject><subject>Fractures, Ununited - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Humeral Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Shoulder</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><issn>0890-5339</issn><issn>1531-2291</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi0EKkvhJyD5gLiF2okdx9yqhdJKq4LocrYmzoQ1deLFTqj23-P9YG9Yskae95kPvSaEcvaBM62uWD6SV7zgWgtW51eRL2fPyILLnC5LzZ-TBWs0K2RV6ZfkVUq_MtKwsrwgFzmoRosF2a0jwjTgONHQ00_oYYcdhbGj92GcRxfGtBemDdLbecAInj5soJ_oj-TGn4f8A7oOPV0F-7hP3YPzH-k1_RbRu8GNEHf0O25DPEy4cX-QLiFhek1e9OATvjnFS7K--bxe3harr1_ulterwua9WdGIui9bUChkw5uybmWtBO9a0VnoBShgsgFddgIZR8VtWWnZco2txF6DrS7J-2PbbQy_Z0yTGVyy6D2MGOZkVC21EkpksDmCNoaUIvZmG92Qtzecmb3p5p_p5my6OZieS9-eZsztgN258ORy1t-ddEgWfB9htC6dMcGZ0rXMmDhiT8FPGNOjn58wmg2Cnzbmf19e_QVOaJih</recordid><startdate>1994</startdate><enddate>1994</enddate><creator>Pietu, G</creator><creator>Raynaud, G</creator><creator>Letenneur, J</creator><general>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1994</creationdate><title>Treatment of Delayed and Nonunions of the Humeral Shaft Using the Seidel Locking Nail: A Preliminary Report of Five Cases</title><author>Pietu, G ; Raynaud, G ; Letenneur, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3390-846f2ba7e4581826b56741db4dcaf4a7a058a92d4e01e71c2395b19eb5ef9ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Nails</topic><topic>Elbow</topic><topic>Equipment Failure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods</topic><topic>Fractures, Ununited - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Humeral Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Shoulder</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pietu, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raynaud, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Letenneur, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic trauma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pietu, G</au><au>Raynaud, G</au><au>Letenneur, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment of Delayed and Nonunions of the Humeral Shaft Using the Seidel Locking Nail: A Preliminary Report of Five Cases</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic trauma</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Trauma</addtitle><date>1994</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>240</spage><epage>244</epage><pages>240-244</pages><issn>0890-5339</issn><eissn>1531-2291</eissn><abstract>We report the treatment of five cases of delayed/or nonunions of the humerus using the Seidel locking nail. Union occurred in all cases despite two distal unscrewings. Shoulder motion was pain free, with slightly restricted abduction. No subacromial impingement occurred. Elbow motion was slightly limited in extension in two elderly patients, most likely because of previous immobilization. This method of treatment therefore seems to be of value because it avoids iatrogenic risk to the radial nerve and the possible need for bone grafting.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</pub><pmid>8027894</pmid><doi>10.1097/00005131-199406000-00010</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-5339
ispartof Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 1994, Vol.8 (3), p.240-244
issn 0890-5339
1531-2291
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76597474
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Bone Nails
Elbow
Equipment Failure
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods
Fractures, Ununited - surgery
Humans
Humeral Fractures - surgery
Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Range of Motion, Articular
Shoulder
Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents
title Treatment of Delayed and Nonunions of the Humeral Shaft Using the Seidel Locking Nail: A Preliminary Report of Five Cases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T19%3A34%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20of%20Delayed%20and%20Nonunions%20of%20the%20Humeral%20Shaft%20Using%20the%20Seidel%20Locking%20Nail:%20A%20Preliminary%20Report%20of%20Five%20Cases&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20trauma&rft.au=Pietu,%20G&rft.date=1994&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=240&rft.epage=244&rft.pages=240-244&rft.issn=0890-5339&rft.eissn=1531-2291&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00005131-199406000-00010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76597474%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76597474&rft_id=info:pmid/8027894&rfr_iscdi=true