Treatment of Delayed and Nonunions of the Humeral Shaft Using the Seidel Locking Nail: A Preliminary Report of Five Cases
We report the treatment of five cases of delayed/or nonunions of the humerus using the Seidel locking nail. Union occurred in all cases despite two distal unscrewings. Shoulder motion was pain free, with slightly restricted abduction. No subacromial impingement occurred. Elbow motion was slightly li...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of orthopaedic trauma 1994, Vol.8 (3), p.240-244 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 244 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 240 |
container_title | Journal of orthopaedic trauma |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Pietu, G Raynaud, G Letenneur, J |
description | We report the treatment of five cases of delayed/or nonunions of the humerus using the Seidel locking nail. Union occurred in all cases despite two distal unscrewings. Shoulder motion was pain free, with slightly restricted abduction. No subacromial impingement occurred. Elbow motion was slightly limited in extension in two elderly patients, most likely because of previous immobilization. This method of treatment therefore seems to be of value because it avoids iatrogenic risk to the radial nerve and the possible need for bone grafting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00005131-199406000-00010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76597474</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76597474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3390-846f2ba7e4581826b56741db4dcaf4a7a058a92d4e01e71c2395b19eb5ef9ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi0EKkvhJyD5gLiF2okdx9yqhdJKq4LocrYmzoQ1deLFTqj23-P9YG9Yskae95kPvSaEcvaBM62uWD6SV7zgWgtW51eRL2fPyILLnC5LzZ-TBWs0K2RV6ZfkVUq_MtKwsrwgFzmoRosF2a0jwjTgONHQ00_oYYcdhbGj92GcRxfGtBemDdLbecAInj5soJ_oj-TGn4f8A7oOPV0F-7hP3YPzH-k1_RbRu8GNEHf0O25DPEy4cX-QLiFhek1e9OATvjnFS7K--bxe3harr1_ulterwua9WdGIui9bUChkw5uybmWtBO9a0VnoBShgsgFddgIZR8VtWWnZco2txF6DrS7J-2PbbQy_Z0yTGVyy6D2MGOZkVC21EkpksDmCNoaUIvZmG92Qtzecmb3p5p_p5my6OZieS9-eZsztgN258ORy1t-ddEgWfB9htC6dMcGZ0rXMmDhiT8FPGNOjn58wmg2Cnzbmf19e_QVOaJih</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76597474</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment of Delayed and Nonunions of the Humeral Shaft Using the Seidel Locking Nail: A Preliminary Report of Five Cases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Pietu, G ; Raynaud, G ; Letenneur, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Pietu, G ; Raynaud, G ; Letenneur, J</creatorcontrib><description>We report the treatment of five cases of delayed/or nonunions of the humerus using the Seidel locking nail. Union occurred in all cases despite two distal unscrewings. Shoulder motion was pain free, with slightly restricted abduction. No subacromial impingement occurred. Elbow motion was slightly limited in extension in two elderly patients, most likely because of previous immobilization. This method of treatment therefore seems to be of value because it avoids iatrogenic risk to the radial nerve and the possible need for bone grafting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-5339</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-2291</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199406000-00010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8027894</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott-Raven Publishers</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Nails ; Elbow ; Equipment Failure ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods ; Fractures, Ununited - surgery ; Humans ; Humeral Fractures - surgery ; Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Shoulder ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 1994, Vol.8 (3), p.240-244</ispartof><rights>Lippincott-Raven Publishers.</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4107965$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8027894$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pietu, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raynaud, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Letenneur, J</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment of Delayed and Nonunions of the Humeral Shaft Using the Seidel Locking Nail: A Preliminary Report of Five Cases</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic trauma</title><addtitle>J Orthop Trauma</addtitle><description>We report the treatment of five cases of delayed/or nonunions of the humerus using the Seidel locking nail. Union occurred in all cases despite two distal unscrewings. Shoulder motion was pain free, with slightly restricted abduction. No subacromial impingement occurred. Elbow motion was slightly limited in extension in two elderly patients, most likely because of previous immobilization. This method of treatment therefore seems to be of value because it avoids iatrogenic risk to the radial nerve and the possible need for bone grafting.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Nails</subject><subject>Elbow</subject><subject>Equipment Failure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods</subject><subject>Fractures, Ununited - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Humeral Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Shoulder</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><issn>0890-5339</issn><issn>1531-2291</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi0EKkvhJyD5gLiF2okdx9yqhdJKq4LocrYmzoQ1deLFTqj23-P9YG9Yskae95kPvSaEcvaBM62uWD6SV7zgWgtW51eRL2fPyILLnC5LzZ-TBWs0K2RV6ZfkVUq_MtKwsrwgFzmoRosF2a0jwjTgONHQ00_oYYcdhbGj92GcRxfGtBemDdLbecAInj5soJ_oj-TGn4f8A7oOPV0F-7hP3YPzH-k1_RbRu8GNEHf0O25DPEy4cX-QLiFhek1e9OATvjnFS7K--bxe3harr1_ulterwua9WdGIui9bUChkw5uybmWtBO9a0VnoBShgsgFddgIZR8VtWWnZco2txF6DrS7J-2PbbQy_Z0yTGVyy6D2MGOZkVC21EkpksDmCNoaUIvZmG92Qtzecmb3p5p_p5my6OZieS9-eZsztgN258ORy1t-ddEgWfB9htC6dMcGZ0rXMmDhiT8FPGNOjn58wmg2Cnzbmf19e_QVOaJih</recordid><startdate>1994</startdate><enddate>1994</enddate><creator>Pietu, G</creator><creator>Raynaud, G</creator><creator>Letenneur, J</creator><general>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1994</creationdate><title>Treatment of Delayed and Nonunions of the Humeral Shaft Using the Seidel Locking Nail: A Preliminary Report of Five Cases</title><author>Pietu, G ; Raynaud, G ; Letenneur, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3390-846f2ba7e4581826b56741db4dcaf4a7a058a92d4e01e71c2395b19eb5ef9ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Nails</topic><topic>Elbow</topic><topic>Equipment Failure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods</topic><topic>Fractures, Ununited - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Humeral Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Shoulder</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pietu, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raynaud, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Letenneur, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic trauma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pietu, G</au><au>Raynaud, G</au><au>Letenneur, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment of Delayed and Nonunions of the Humeral Shaft Using the Seidel Locking Nail: A Preliminary Report of Five Cases</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic trauma</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Trauma</addtitle><date>1994</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>240</spage><epage>244</epage><pages>240-244</pages><issn>0890-5339</issn><eissn>1531-2291</eissn><abstract>We report the treatment of five cases of delayed/or nonunions of the humerus using the Seidel locking nail. Union occurred in all cases despite two distal unscrewings. Shoulder motion was pain free, with slightly restricted abduction. No subacromial impingement occurred. Elbow motion was slightly limited in extension in two elderly patients, most likely because of previous immobilization. This method of treatment therefore seems to be of value because it avoids iatrogenic risk to the radial nerve and the possible need for bone grafting.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</pub><pmid>8027894</pmid><doi>10.1097/00005131-199406000-00010</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-5339 |
ispartof | Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 1994, Vol.8 (3), p.240-244 |
issn | 0890-5339 1531-2291 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76597474 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Aged Biological and medical sciences Bone Nails Elbow Equipment Failure Female Follow-Up Studies Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods Fractures, Ununited - surgery Humans Humeral Fractures - surgery Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Range of Motion, Articular Shoulder Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents |
title | Treatment of Delayed and Nonunions of the Humeral Shaft Using the Seidel Locking Nail: A Preliminary Report of Five Cases |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T19%3A34%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20of%20Delayed%20and%20Nonunions%20of%20the%20Humeral%20Shaft%20Using%20the%20Seidel%20Locking%20Nail:%20A%20Preliminary%20Report%20of%20Five%20Cases&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20trauma&rft.au=Pietu,%20G&rft.date=1994&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=240&rft.epage=244&rft.pages=240-244&rft.issn=0890-5339&rft.eissn=1531-2291&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00005131-199406000-00010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76597474%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76597474&rft_id=info:pmid/8027894&rfr_iscdi=true |